Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks ...

Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media

There are 66307 comments on the Wall Street Journal story from Mar 22, 2012, titled Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on Social Media. In it, Wall Street Journal reports that:

Social media has put the spotlight on the story Trayvon Martin , an unarmed African-American teenager who was shot to death last month by a neighborhood watch captain in Florida.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Wall Street Journal.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44995 Dec 25, 2012
hildebeast wrote:
<quoted text>
Concussions will do that to you. They will make you stupid. take me for example. I don't testify if I don't want to testify. how stupid is that?
The medical report details an overweight man who at 28 suffered from a variety of ailments including tonsil stones and irritable bowel syndrome. His mood was “appropriate,” and he showed “no acute distress.”

At 5 feet 7½ inches and 204 lbs, the physician assistant at Altamonte Family Practice described Zimmerman as “obese.” Zimmerman’s size compared to Trayvon’s has been a heated topic of discussion both in court and the blogosphere, as people on opposite sides of the controversial issue debate who had the upper hand during the altercation. Zimmerman was much shorter than the nearly six-foot Trayvon, but was 45 pounds heavier.

The report also said although Zimmerman did not have any blurry vision or dizziness, he said he got nauseous every time he thought of the night’s violence.

The report detailed two open wounds on the back of Zimmerman’s head, one two centimeters and one half a centimeter, which did not require stitches. She described his head as “normocephalic and atraumatic’’— normal and without injuries.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/03/2880246...

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44996 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
And it's legal to murder white children?
Sure size has a lot to do with a case like this. A taller, younger and more athletic person is (in many cases) more difficult if not impossible (as in this case) to defend yourself against. In this case, it seems the only way to stop the attack from Martin was to shoot him. Zimmerman had no idea at what point Martin would stop if he would at all. It could be serious injuries or it could be death. Nobody knows what was in the mind of a wild animal like this.
If Zim testifies that Martin tried to take his gun away from him, it's reasonable to assume his fate would have been death. That aside, it was reported by John the witness that Martin was using karate style punches on Zimmerman. I've studied karate for many years, and trust me, death is very possible when using martial arts. It's nothing to play with.
The state will prove that Zimmerthugman is a liar and is lying about the events of that night.

Trayvon did not try to take the gun away from Zimmerthugman.

Zimmerthugman disconnected from the police dispatcher so there would not be a recording of what he was about to do. He exited his vehicle, an angry man with a little man complex, armed and dangerous, drugged and intent on murder. He succeeded in murdering an unarmed child.

Now he's not man enough to take his punishment. Oh well, that is out of his hands.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44997 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know WTF you're even talking about. The only thing you know is the defendant wasn't black and the attacker was. That's all you feel you need to know. Black racist.
The attacker, who is now the defendant as a result of his actions, is multi-racial. His victim was a black, unarmed child.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#44998 Dec 25, 2012
Merry Christmas Truth, Rosie, Yeah, Barefoot, and Buffalo Bill, my favorite pervert.

I hope you all had a wonderful day filled with joy and lots of good food.
hildebeast

France

#44999 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
The medical report details an overweight man who at 28 suffered from a variety of ailments including tonsil stones and irritable bowel syndrome. His mood was “appropriate,” and he showed “no acute distress.”

At 5 feet 7½ inches and 204 lbs, the physician assistant at Altamonte Family Practice described Zimmerman as “obese.” Zimmerman’s size compared to Trayvon’s has been a heated topic of discussion both in court and the blogosphere, as people on opposite sides of the controversial issue debate who had the upper hand during the altercation. Zimmerman was much shorter than the nearly six-foot Trayvon, but was 45 pounds heavier.

The report also said although Zimmerman did not have any blurry vision or dizziness, he said he got nauseous every time he thought of the night’s violence.

The report detailed two open wounds on the back of Zimmerman’s head, one two centimeters and one half a centimeter, which did not require stitches. She described his head as “normocephalic and atraumatic’’— normal and without injuries.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/03/2880246...
I am an obese woman who at age 65 suffered from a concussion, gas, bloating, constipation, jet lag, and ringworm.

At 5'8" and 210 lbs. i am also been considered obese with excessive belly fat and mid rift bulge.

I also do not have any blurry vision bit i do get nauseous every time i think of Monica.

and i also have two open gashes, and my head has been described as "abnormophalic and traumatic",...(i'm a biter). I once bit billy and he stayed home for over three weeks and tended my gash.

but just like Zim i don't have to testify unless i want to.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#45000 Dec 25, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, no son. He's testifying under oath.
The jury can accept or discard any or all parts of the testimony. Nowhere is it written that what a defendant testifies to is a "fact."
No there isn't. But the instructions to the jury will be "beyond a reasonable doubt." That's the standard of most all juries.

We have more than a mountain of evidence that Martin was the aggressor in this case. But the prosecution will say that Zimmerman was. Who's telling the truth? Zimmerman, or a made-up story by the prosecutor.

Without a shred of evidence, the prosecution will say they "believe" Zim was the aggressor because he chased Martin a few minutes earlier. This is called circumstantial evidence. In other words, a theory, a supposition, a possibility, but certainly not rock hard evidence of any kind.

Both testimonies of the prosecution and Zimmerman have to be decided by the jury. But wait! The instructions to the jury is beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution presents circumstantial evidence, is that not reasonable doubt? And if they weigh in on the multiple injuries Zimmerman sustained, is that not reasonable doubt he was not the attacker, but the victim?

In spite of all the evidence against Simpson in the OJ case, he was let off the hook because the jury used beyond reasonable doubt when they made their decision. Their claim was that the evidence presented against OJ was beyond reasonable doubt.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#45001 Dec 25, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Then it's interesting how you're in favor of a rigged trial instead of a fair one!
I don't think there should be any trial at all. If you are going to charge somebody with second degree murder, then let's see the evidence that brought you to this conclusion besides the pressure of the media and various groups like the New Black Panthers and various black so-called leaders in our country.

I mean something specific and rock core. What non-circumstantial evidence did they use to charge Zimmerman with second degree murder? Nothing.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#45002 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
The medical report details an overweight man who at 28 suffered from a variety of ailments including tonsil stones and irritable bowel syndrome. His mood was “appropriate,” and he showed “no acute distress.”
At 5 feet 7½ inches and 204 lbs, the physician assistant at Altamonte Family Practice described Zimmerman as “obese.” Zimmerman’s size compared to Trayvon’s has been a heated topic of discussion both in court and the blogosphere, as people on opposite sides of the controversial issue debate who had the upper hand during the altercation. Zimmerman was much shorter than the nearly six-foot Trayvon, but was 45 pounds heavier.
Gee, all this, and you expect a judge or jury to believe that Zimmerman had any chance protecting himself from a much younger and more physically fit attacker without a firearm?

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45003 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
Merry Christmas Truth, Rosie, Yeah, Barefoot, and Buffalo Bill, my favorite pervert.

I hope you all had a wonderful day filled with joy and lots of good food.
TY.

Merry Christmas, Zazz
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#45004 Dec 25, 2012
zazz wrote:
<quoted text>
The state will prove that Zimmerthugman is a liar and is lying about the events of that night.
Trayvon did not try to take the gun away from Zimmerthugman.
Zimmerthugman disconnected from the police dispatcher so there would not be a recording of what he was about to do. He exited his vehicle, an angry man with a little man complex, armed and dangerous, drugged and intent on murder.
Okay, where is this evidence that the animal didn't try to disarm Zimmerman? I would like to see it. Zimmerman did not "disconnect" the conversation. The conversation was over and there was nothing more to say. They both hung up the phone satisfied with the conclusion. The only one drugged that night was Martin. Toxicology results are proof of that. Both parties were tested for conscious altering substances.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45005 Dec 25, 2012
hildebeast wrote:
<quoted text>I am an obese woman who at age 65 suffered from a concussion, gas, bloating, constipation, jet lag, and ringworm.

At 5'8" and 210 lbs. i am also been considered obese with excessive belly fat and mid rift bulge.

I also do not have any blurry vision bit i do get nauseous every time i think of Monica.

and i also have two open gashes, and my head has been described as "abnormophalic and traumatic",...(i'm a biter). I once bit billy and he stayed home for over three weeks and tended my gash.

but just like Zim i don't have to testify unless i want to.
And just like Thug Zim...

The state of Florida can tend to all of your medical needs.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45006 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>No there isn't. But the instructions to the jury will be "beyond a reasonable doubt." That's the standard of most all juries.

We have more than a mountain of evidence that Martin was the aggressor in this case. But the prosecution will say that Zimmerman was. Who's telling the truth? Zimmerman, or a made-up story by the prosecutor.

Without a shred of evidence, the prosecution will say they "believe" Zim was the aggressor because he chased Martin a few minutes earlier. This is called circumstantial evidence. In other words, a theory, a supposition, a possibility, but certainly not rock hard evidence of any kind.

Both testimonies of the prosecution and Zimmerman have to be decided by the jury. But wait! The instructions to the jury is beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution presents circumstantial evidence, is that not reasonable doubt? And if they weigh in on the multiple injuries Zimmerman sustained, is that not reasonable doubt he was not the attacker, but the victim?

In spite of all the evidence against Simpson in the OJ case, he was let off the hook because the jury used beyond reasonable doubt when they made their decision. Their claim was that the evidence presented against OJ was beyond reasonable doubt.
People get convicted on circumstantial evidence all the time.

The injuries sustained by the Thug is consistent with being defended against.

But there's always that nagging thought that many of Thug Zimmerman's injuries are self-inflicted. You know what I mean?

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45007 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think there should be any trial at all. If you are going to charge somebody with second degree murder, then let's see the evidence that brought you to this conclusion besides the pressure of the media and various groups like the New Black Panthers and various black so-called leaders in our country.

I mean something specific and rock core. What non-circumstantial evidence did they use to charge Zimmerman with second degree murder? Nothing.
HA!

This isn't trial by public.

It's trial by jury, you nincompoop!

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45008 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>Gee, all this, and you expect a judge or jury to believe that Zimmerman had any chance protecting himself from a much younger and more physically fit attacker without a firearm?
Yep, especially when it is Thug Zimmerman who initiated, stalked and killed the child.

Oh yes.
hildebeast

France

#45009 Dec 25, 2012
Be Truthful Be Free wrote:
<quoted text>
And just like Thug Zim...
The state of Florida can tend to all of your medical needs.
I have a cadillac health insurance policy bought and paid for by the American taxpayers.

The state of Florida will pay to have you to be cremated and put into a jar if you go down there...

just like thug Martin.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#45010 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
No there isn't. But the instructions to the jury will be "beyond a reasonable doubt." That's the standard of most all juries.
We have more than a mountain of evidence that Martin was the aggressor in this case. But the prosecution will say that Zimmerman was. Who's telling the truth? Zimmerman, or a made-up story by the prosecutor.
Without a shred of evidence, the prosecution will say they "believe" Zim was the aggressor because he chased Martin a few minutes earlier. This is called circumstantial evidence. In other words, a theory, a supposition, a possibility, but certainly not rock hard evidence of any kind.
Both testimonies of the prosecution and Zimmerman have to be decided by the jury. But wait! The instructions to the jury is beyond a reasonable doubt. If the prosecution presents circumstantial evidence, is that not reasonable doubt? And if they weigh in on the multiple injuries Zimmerman sustained, is that not reasonable doubt he was not the attacker, but the victim?
In spite of all the evidence against Simpson in the OJ case, he was let off the hook because the jury used beyond reasonable doubt when they made their decision. Their claim was that the evidence presented against OJ was beyond reasonable doubt.
Well, that certainly eliminates the FACT part of your argument!

You keep claiming that there's "evidence" of Martin's aggression, but everything is pointing to Zimmerman.

As the article I posted stated, the law doesn't give one the right to walk around in a protective bubble called syg.

Zimmerman saw Martin approach his vehicle. Zimmerman saw Martin flee his vehicle. Zimmerman then gave chase with a loaded weapon of Martin.

The aggressor is clear. If things were really as loaded against Martin as you claim, O'Mara would have done the syg hearing and/or demanded the speedy trial.

Instead, he stated he still needs to go through all the evidence and asks for continuances.

What you claim and what is happening in reality have a dichotomy. I'll take reality over your opinions anyday.

Since: Apr 12

Truth's Door

#45011 Dec 25, 2012
hildebeast wrote:
I have a cadillac health insurance policy bought and paid for by the American taxpayers.

The state of Florida will pay to have you to be cremated and put into a jar if you go down there...

just like thug Martin.
No, I will not be a burden on the taxpayers of Florida, as Thug Zimmerman is.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#45012 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think there should be any trial at all. If you are going to charge somebody with second degree murder, then let's see the evidence that brought you to this conclusion besides the pressure of the media and various groups like the New Black Panthers and various black so-called leaders in our country.
I mean something specific and rock core. What non-circumstantial evidence did they use to charge Zimmerman with second degree murder? Nothing.
What you think and what the prosecutor's allowed are clearly two different perspectives. Unlike the Duke case where Mike Nifong really had it in for the LaCrosse players, this one is completely different.

I don't need "...something specific and rock core..." Clearly son, you've already forgotten your previous entry of "beyond reasonable doubt." Clearly you hold a differing set of standards of cases based on your personal belief and not the facts.

There's a dead body that Zimmerman made. Seems 2nd degree murder charges are appropriate. Obviously you definition requires something other than a cadaver.

Of course, I'm willing to listen to what your minimum standard is for such a charge. I hope it at least involves a body.

“JUSTICE DENIED, AGAIN!!!”

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#45013 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think there should be any trial at all. If you are going to charge somebody with second degree murder, then let's see the evidence that brought you to this conclusion besides the pressure of the media and various groups like the New Black Panthers and various black so-called leaders in our country.
I mean something specific and rock core. What non-circumstantial evidence did they use to charge Zimmerman with second degree murder? Nothing.
Fortunately what you think will have no bearing on the wheels of justice, they will keep turning and Zimmerthugman will get his day in court.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#45014 Dec 25, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, where is this evidence that the animal didn't try to disarm Zimmerman? I would like to see it. Zimmerman did not "disconnect" the conversation. The conversation was over and there was nothing more to say. They both hung up the phone satisfied with the conclusion. The only one drugged that night was Martin. Toxicology results are proof of that. Both parties were tested for conscious altering substances.
Are you going beyond your "reasonable doubt" claim again son?

Funny how you've already drawn the conclusion without the forensics.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Sanford Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White people are devils! Mon Fitus T Bluster 5
What About Lake Sheriff Borders? (Nov '11) May 21 The Peoples Media 1,072
News Deltona residents talk crime, controversial tag... May 21 Fitus T Bluster 1
News Police: Man fatally shot during Pine Hills home... May 18 Runrun 2
1983 Wife Shoots Husband in "Self-Defense" May 16 JosephHusted 1
Buy your crack on Landsdown May 15 oink o hara 2
News Tavares H.S. Assistant Athletic Director Gavin ... (Dec '13) May 15 baylaker 14

Sanford Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Sanford Mortgages