Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201880 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149420 Jul 8, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
I see you are using the term, asshat. dan also loves that word,
Yes, I know. I stole it from him because it fits with so many of you Topix Trolls.
RiccardoFire wrote:
Like i just said, my ass is exit only.
Thanks for telling us about your ass. You folks seem to love to do that. And while yours may be for exit only, for many its not. Whether that be for suppositories, doctor's scopes, or sexual activity.
RiccardoFire wrote:
Is that all u love to talk about, the ass?
I didn't bring up the ass, I brought up asshat. Two different things. YOU brought up ass.
RiccardoFire wrote:
You should hook up with dan.
Dan is straight, and I'm married. But thanks for your concern.
RiccardoFire wrote:
There are many harms starting with the fact that you keep denying about anal sex, then u say gays don't do anal sex....
What a crock of lying shit. I've never denied anything about anal sex, and I've never stated that gays don't do anal sex. I've been quite clear in the fact that both orientations engage in anal sex. Any other deceitfulness you'd like to try and shovel Ricky?

I've also stated, when practiced appropriately there is no harm in anal sex. None at all. I've also stated that there is nothing demeaning about it as silly bitch KiMare likes to pretend. I've also stated that who has anal sex is nobodies concern but the people who consent to engage in it.

As for harm, anal sex is an activity that is engaged in by both some heterosexuals and some homomsexuals. It is not a sexual orientation. Being homosexaul does not guarantee that one will engage in anal sex. And if anal sex can be harmful we teach THAT, not that homosexuality is harmful.

Feel free to try again. What harm does homosexuality cause? It's what you want to teach children after all. You were the one stating we didn't need to confuse children, yet you want to teach them that homosexuality is harmful. Step up to plate Ricky, we're all waiting.
RiccardoFire wrote:
I have heard your crap.[/QUOTe]
If you have, then why are you lying about what I've stated?

[QUOTE who="RiccardoFire"]
Tell the truth, then we can debate, otherwise this topix is meaningless, just like our votes.
I've never not told the truth. You, on the other hand have stated that homosexuality is harmful. But to date have yet to state how. Tell the truth Ricky Ritardo, how is homosexuality harmful?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#149421 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS said...
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival..."
Gay unions are not "fundamental to our very existence and survival". In fact, they are a societal dead end.
Smile.

People can reproduce without marriage.

And still no good argument against gay marriage...
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#149422 Jul 8, 2012
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Where are those "harms" you stated existed? Seriously, I want to know what harm I incurred simply being homosexual. They coming anytime soon?
I didn't say "harm" I said "truths". I said let's be honest to kids and explain the dangers of all sex and the extra dangers of anal sex. Let's explain medically to them why it's wrong and not natural. Let's explain that some gays don't do that.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149423 Jul 8, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>how bout the coverup in San Francisco with larry brinkin, never been charged yet.
Oh brother! The "coverup"?!! I see, so now the gay community not only wants a suspected trafficker of child pornography to remain free, but they also control the San Francisco Police Department? LOL!! Wow, you need to get some of that medicine that Prof. Marvelous is on.

He hasn't been charged yet because the investigation is still in progress you moron. Buy a newspaper. I suppose the gay community is responsible for the fact that charges haven't been placed on Larry Zimmerman too, right chump?
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#149424 Jul 8, 2012
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I know. I stole it from him because it fits with so many of you Topix Trolls.
<quoted text>
Thanks for telling us about your ass. You folks seem to love to do that. And while yours may be for exit only, for many its not. Whether that be for suppositories, doctor's scopes, or sexual activity.
<quoted text>
I didn't bring up the ass, I brought up asshat. Two different things. YOU brought up ass.
<quoted text>
Dan is straight, and I'm married. But thanks for your concern.
<quoted text>
What a crock of lying shit. I've never denied anything about anal sex, and I've never stated that gays don't do anal sex. I've been quite clear in the fact that both orientations engage in anal sex. Any other deceitfulness you'd like to try and shovel Ricky?
I've also stated, when practiced appropriately there is no harm in anal sex. None at all. I've also stated that there is nothing demeaning about it as silly bitch KiMare likes to pretend. I've also stated that who has anal sex is nobodies concern but the people who consent to engage in it.
As for harm, anal sex is an activity that is engaged in by both some heterosexuals and some homomsexuals. It is not a sexual orientation. Being homosexaul does not guarantee that one will engage in anal sex. And if anal sex can be harmful we teach THAT, not that homosexuality is harmful.
Feel free to try again. What harm does homosexuality cause? It's what you want to teach children after all. You were the one stating we didn't need to confuse children, yet you want to teach them that homosexuality is harmful. Step up to plate Ricky, we're all waiting.
<quoted text>
I've never not told the truth. You, on the other hand have stated that homosexuality is harmful. But to date have yet to state how. Tell the truth Ricky Ritardo, how is homosexuality harmful?
Sounds like u had a bad night again, did u just wake up? What is making u so angry these days? Did u realize that this topix changes nothing. But hope the venting helps.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149425 Jul 8, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>LOL...a police document shows the charges were related to possession of obscene matter depicting a minor, sexual exploitation of a child, and advertising obscene matter depicting a minor. San Francisco Superior Court records show that police seized two locked red plastic toolboxes containing videos, two laptops and a desktop computer, three thumb drives, and other items from Brinkinís Waller Street home. Did they set poor Larry up and put all those things in his possessions? http://www.edgesanfrancisco.com/news/crime/ne... In the email, Zack3737 wrote, "damn, what a sight seeing huge dick in tiny hole, tearing it open. That [n-word] must be in coon heaven stuffin it in the tiny white hole!"
The officer also examined emails that were sent from Brinkinís HRC email address to Zack3737 Brinkin was in San Francisco County jail overnight Friday but was released Saturday morning....that's quicker then a drunk would be released. Why is that ELH? Doesn't surprise me that you are backing up Larry.
Hey Ricky, if you were able to absorb all that, and take the time to cut and paste it, why weren't you able to continue on through the article and comprehend this part....

"Stephanie Ong Stillman, a spokeswoman for the district attorneyís office, said Tuesday that prosecutors are "taking this case very seriously.

"Weíre waiting for computer forensic evidence to be analyzed in order to make a proper charging decision," she said. "These types of cases are complex in nature, and we require more time to thoroughly evaluate the evidence."

From YOUR cited article. Yet, you needed to ask me why he hadn't been charged. Your deceitfulness is hilarious!!!
ELH

Portland, OR

#149426 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your mockery of the handicapped is callous and uncivilized.
I wasn't aware that being a malignant narcissist was a handicap
Professor KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Ask your wife and friends if they think you need a letter.
Smile.
Don't have a wife, I do have an UNAMBIGUOUS husband. I don't need to ask my friends, mainly because, unlike you, I actually have friend to ask.

PS: Your 'predecessor', MadAss Melba also has a "handicap" and also suffered delusions that she was being persecuted because of it... You really need to mix it up a little if your going to sell this new character.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149427 Jul 8, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>The LOL was at the beginning of my post after your remarks of poor gay larry being set up by a Christian group. Then after the LOL, I wrote the rest. Hope that clears it up for you. The big question is why u support a sick bastard like that? does he represent you?
In which post was this "support" given? Please supply the post number.

Waiting....

Waiting....

Waiting....

Liars for Jesus unite! Ricky Ritardo has taken up your cause!!!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149428 Jul 8, 2012
Prof Marvel wrote:
<quoted text>
Good point -- religion and homosexuality can't coexist.
Which brings up the question YOU should answer -- your support of homosexuality requires you to reject the teachings of every known religion.
Why do you think the LGBT is right and all known religions wrong?
Religion is irrelevant. This is the United States moron.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149429 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
I (the straight man) married my wife 36 years ago. The slut lesbian in me likes her too, so things work out somewhat okay, if you consider a straight man living with a wife AND a lesbian.
I hope I have made myself clear.
Smile.
Yep. You're a married straight man/slutty lesbian who believes that having ambiguous sex organs is the same as having two different personalities of two different genders. And apparently your wife who enjoys "three ways".
Perfectly clear.

PS: I suggest that you add a new character to this story line. How about having KiMares "wife" join TOPIX? I think it would be GREAT if she posted long winded rants against hermaphrodites while claimed that some of the "best friends" are sexually ambiguous.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149430 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Perfect example of gay twirling in the face of a blatant schooling...
-"Gays marry all over the world"
No, they 'marry' in a handful of nations.
Those handful of nations are "all over the world". They also include the second largest country on the planet. My statement stands. Next....
KiMare wrote:
"all over the world" gay 'marriage' is rejected. In fact, there are more countries that jail and kill gays than allow 'gay marriage'.
Doesn't change the fact that they are also accepted around the world.

Christians are also jailed and killed in some countries. What's your freakin' point with that nonsense?
KiMare wrote:
-"Not a damn thing you can do about it."
Sorry, but I can and am doing something about it. That is precisely why you are having a hissy rant. And there is not a damn thing you can do about it.
You can't do a damn thing but prolong the inevitable. Your delight in that says a lot about your lack of character.

You remind me of Anita Bryant. She to felt like you did in the 70's. She got all the churches riled up over laws that were enacted to ensure that gays were given equal protection under the law as it pertained to jobs and housing. She got all those religious folks to get ballots out to the public so that they could repeal the laws. She hooted and hollered over the success of your godly mission. A few decades later, NONE of those repeals stand, and all the places that you fundies got ballots out to vote on our civil rights now have equal protection laws. History does not support your cause. It never will.

Smile bitch.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149431 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Frantic gay twirl...
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302749...
"I am a Canadian economist who has worked on family issues in Canada and the U.S. for the past 26 years. Although Iíve mostly studied matters of divorce, custody, child support, and the general institution of marriage, for the past few years Iíve been working on series of empirical projects related to same-sex marriage. Iíve been using a special data set in Canada that is large (over 300,000 individuals) and random (with weights), that directly identifies sexual orientation, and that was designed by Statistics Canada. In the process of working on same-sex marriage I have read almost every study conducted on same-sex parenting. I say all of this because, unlike most people who have commented on the recent Regnerus study, Iím a qualified outsider to the U.S. debate and perhaps can provide some (relatively) neutral assessment.
The study published by Professor Mark Regnerus this week certainly has some flaws, and many of the comments made about it have some merit. However, as a matter of intellectual honesty, it needs to be recognized that virtually all the studies of same-sex parenting that have been conducted thus far fall far short of any standard of scientific testing."
The rest of the article explains why. Read it and flail...
And the "condemning" and "damage" and "harm" you cite can be found where? Please pinpoint it for us dearie.

You got nothin!
ELH

Portland, OR

#149432 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
I brought up the letter validating my sanity EXACTLY because you were questioning it.
Yes, and the fact you need a letter verify my diagnosis. So THANKS!

PS: Are you an FBI "Junior" agent with a direct line the the LA FBI office her (undercover) to "expose" this thread and "blow it wide open?

PSS: Do you know Bill Gates?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149433 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Another example of you wanting to talk about faith instead of reality...
Provide the exact sentence where I stated I wanted to talk about faith Ms. Deceitful.

Waiting....

Waiting....

Waiting....

Liars for Jesus unite!!!
KiMare wrote:
You need to ask yourself why the paranoidal focus on the unprovable (faith) and the absolute terror of reality.
Yeah, and you need a good f*ck.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149434 Jul 8, 2012
Jonah1 wrote:
Smile bitch.
(S)he can't stop smiling, I think it's the medication.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149435 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I live as straight and moral as we can by God' grace.
Since when is intentional deceitfulness moral?

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149436 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Addendum to previous post;
In fact, I much prefer to fix broken stuff.
Then you should start with yourself.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149437 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
The absence of a mothering instinct is clear evidence of a genetic defect.
Really? Then you won't mind presenting the peer reviewed research that concludes this "clear evidence" of "defect". Cause as of today, not one professional organization or association SPECIALIZING in such matters agrees with you.

Come on now, where is this "clear evidence of a genetic defect" concluded?
KiMare wrote:
Theologically, it is referred to as 'depravity'.
No one cares what you think it's theologically referred to. Your theology is irrelevant.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149438 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS said...
"Marriage is one of the "basic civil rights of man," fundamental to our very existence and survival..."
Gay unions are not "fundamental to our very existence and survival". In fact, they are a societal dead end.
Smile.
Where did SCOTUS mandate procreation ability as a requirement of marriage? Until you can answer that, the above is irrelevant.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#149439 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't forget that I also have a letter from a certified psychologist declaring I am normal and capable of living on my own.
I bet you don't have one...
Um, unlike you, we don't need one. Only the unbalanced need some type of legal proof that they can live on their own.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Ramon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
I didnt know it was a crime to sit in a parked car (Apr '09) 3 hr Noneya 61
Carl Caughell Sep 16 Kyle 1
Drop a Word ~ Add a Word (Nov '11) Sep 16 Princess Hey 5,006
What to do about noisy neighbor Sep 16 PVguy 4
News Roadshow: Parking in front of a neighbor's hous... (Aug '09) Sep 15 robert1971 341
News AIDS Experience Comes to Northern California (Feb '08) Sep 14 TBone 19
Low-frequency rumbling or humming sound day and... (Mar '11) Sep 13 Lisalisa 218

San Ramon Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

San Ramon Mortgages