Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Full story: www.cnn.com 201,187

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Full Story

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#169696 Dec 2, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>

Like I repeatedly stated but you being a dumbfuck failed to read - I could give a shit less if the incredibly few poloygamists want to pursue their format of marriage as long as it did not include underage brides, coercion or hiding spouses from each other.
Stereotype much?

That inner-bigot really shines through when you get angry.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169698 Dec 3, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Dan, we have all suffered through your posts. You are very good at dancing, but not very good at reality.
You are like Rose, trying to speak in all kinds of cryptic terms, trying to leave yourselves a way out of all of your nonsense by attempting to never really commit to anything. The problem is, neither of you are intelligent enough to do so, and not one person is falling for your nonsense.
You cannot claim that you are for equal rights on one hand, and then deny those right's on the other. You cannot claim that it is OK to deny right's from one group because of- A,B,C- and then claim you cannot deny those same right's from another group because A,B,C does not apply to them.
You don't get a pass on being a bigot because you are in favor of same sex marriage anymore than a black person gets a pass on being a racist because of the color of their skin.
Very well said. I couldn't have said it better. Just let me add that Dan is a jackass! And a big dope.

Funny stuff!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169699 Dec 3, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
The aspect of allowing gays to marry involves itself with the expansion of basic liberties to a grouping of American citizens whom have been previously denied those freedoms...specifically of being allowed to marry the adult of their choice.
Your post above is a sad lie in that you want to infer I would support the government as an entity to control relationships that "they" determine harmful.
First off understand our government is formatted by the people for the purpose of allowing us as U.S. citizens to govern ourselves as free peoples. The fact that the government determined polygamy a problematic and harmful insitution was based on their past occurances with that said insitution in that they found harmful elements such as cultist aspects which led to underage marriages and unwarranted control of subjects within those cults.
I never made the statement you claim nor did I deliver anything which led to that direction...I merely advised facts.
So I can safely point ot you as not only being the dumbass here but as a liar.
Next.
The "aspect of allowing gays to marry..." "..our government is formatted.." a "grouping of American citizens"

It's real funny when dopey Dan tries to sound intelligent! Love it.

What a dope!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169700 Dec 3, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Not really.
Marriage involves itself with the basic elements of mutual attraction, a shared love and a willingess to commit to a legal union amongst adults.
Gays can perform that circus trick as well as heterosexuals.
HJeterosexual marriages often times produce horribly abused children so your blanket claim inference that heterosexual marriages protect children more than gay families is incorrect.
There are studies 9several in fact) which displace this generalistic and unbased claim.
Here's one;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peggy-drexler/t...
As far as identifying a gay marriage with proper wording I think the most accurate would be "marriage" itself since it encompasses the fact you can have 2 same sex members get hitched.
I'm here to help friend....all you have to do is ask.
When it's two adults you say "between" adults. If there are three or more you say "among" or "amongst" adults.

Since you used "amongst adults" and not "between adults" you must mean polygamists.

Glad you're on board Dan! Who are you, Mormon Manny all of a sudden? What about all those "inherent harms" the "formatted" government has determined? The "cultish aspects" etc?

You're a real dope, Dan.

Having fun now!

Since: Mar 07

United States

#169701 Dec 3, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
.
You cannot claim that you are for equal rights on one hand, and then deny those right's on the other. You cannot claim that it is OK to deny right's from one group because of- A,B,C- and then claim you cannot deny those same right's from another group because A,B,C does not apply to them.
.......
Actually, yes you can. Straight people do it every day.

The key is the reasons you are denying those equal rights. Gay folks have already proven, categorically, that our marriages are good for our families, and good for society in general.

Gay folks want the SAME right to marry the adult single non-related person of their choice that straight folks ALREADY have. It's very simple.

And straight religious folks marrying many spouses at one time just doesn't enter into the marriage conversation for most Americans. Americans LOVE to marry multiples - just one at a time.

Do you demand that all of your straight friends, and every heterosexual married couple that you know, support marrying multiple spouses, simply because THEY can marry one at a time? Don't you think they would laugh at you for making such silly and illogical demands?

Of course you don't do that, do you, but you apply that leaky logic ONLY to gay folks.

Polygamy is a separate issue, with it's own arguments, detractors, and problems. If people wish to begin marrying many, then they will go through the appropriate channels, and prove that their marriages are good for their families, and for society, and the laws banning it will change.

If you support polygamy, then speak up. Demanding that other people who do not want to marry more than one spouse at a time support polygamy, simply because they want to marry just ONE person, is just plain silly.

But, I guess it really is all you have left, isn't it? You can't find a single logical or relevant reason to deny gay people the right to marry, so all you can do it to try to tie it to an unrelated divisive issue and hope for the best.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169702 Dec 3, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>It's about the only thing I agree with him on. And I noticed it wasn't very popular with the Liberals that love the big unions.
I'm waiting for Dan to start threatening to beat people up in the Home Depot parking lot again.

You know how he gets, he threatens to beat some tolerance and diversity into them!

He once threatened to beat me "into a greasy stain" because he felt I wasn't being tolerant and diverse enough. Meanwhile it's Dan who is the real bigot.

Priceless!

Since: Mar 07

United States

#169703 Dec 3, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Very well said. I couldn't have said it better. Just let me add that Dan is a jackass! And a big dope.
Funny stuff!
Why do folks like yourself and AK have such difficulty differentiating between ONE, and TWO, THREE or FOUR?

It hardly seems a mark of great intelligence, since most chdilren learn this in preschool, or even before.

Perhaps using counting sticks, or pennies would help.

One plus one + one = two. One + two (or three, or four) does not = two.

Does that make it a little more clear for you?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169704 Dec 3, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
As far as experimenting during sex all I can say is don't do the Lone Ranger bit.
I did. Rode the range on my stick horse naked sans a pair of boots, Stetson and toy gunbelt into my bedroom where a topless Pocahontas was waiting for me only to have my handy six shooter shift leaving a bruised notch on my love stick.
Yuck!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169705 Dec 3, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
No it doesn't any more than allowing differing races to marry opened the door to allow Farmer Brown to marry his favorite milking cow Bessie you moron.
And if polygamists want to make the fight to legalize their particular aspect of marriage it's within their right but polygamy is a completely separate entity which stands on it's own merits.
No. Equal rights are equal rights. Your bigotry against polygamists is not a "separate entity".

What a dope!
Sunny days

Covina, CA

#169706 Dec 3, 2012
I would still say it's the Republican and stupid Tea Party Nation members fault.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169707 Dec 3, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
The only double standard exists when heterosexuals want to ban homosexuals from marrying.
It's OK for heterosexuals to marry given it's a basic liberty all American adults should have but not homosexuals albeit they too are American citizens wishing to pursue a freedom which exhibits no harm.
You just got busted son.
Polygamists are "American citizens wishing to pursue a freedom which exhibits no harm" also.

You just got busted son.

What a dope!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169708 Dec 3, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Dan, we have all suffered through your posts.
Indeed, they are so dumb.

But that makes them real funny so it's OK.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169709 Dec 3, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do folks like yourself and AK have such difficulty differentiating between ONE, and TWO, THREE or FOUR?
It hardly seems a mark of great intelligence, since most chdilren learn this in preschool, or even before.
Perhaps using counting sticks, or pennies would help.
One plus one + one = two. One + two (or three, or four) does not = two.
Does that make it a little more clear for you?
Oh boy, now we're getting a smarmy arithmetic lesson! Priceless.

You think it's OK to eliminate the gender requirement in "one man one woman" but not the number requirement. Why? Please explain.

One man one woman. Why do folks like you have such trouble differentiating gender? Most children learn this in school bla bla bla.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#169710 Dec 3, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Polygamists are "American citizens wishing to pursue a freedom which exhibits no harm" also.
You just got busted son.
What a dope!
Polygamy is already on the books as ILLEGEAL. Utah couldn't b/c a state with it. Look it up. YOU just got busted son.....what a dope! ROTFL@U

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169711 Dec 3, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, yes you can. Straight people do it every day.
The key is the reasons you are denying those equal rights. Gay folks have already proven, categorically, that our marriages are good for our families, and good for society in general.
Gay folks want the SAME right to marry the adult single non-related person of their choice that straight folks ALREADY have. It's very simple.
And straight religious folks marrying many spouses at one time just doesn't enter into the marriage conversation for most Americans. Americans LOVE to marry multiples - just one at a time.
Do you demand that all of your straight friends, and every heterosexual married couple that you know, support marrying multiple spouses, simply because THEY can marry one at a time? Don't you think they would laugh at you for making such silly and illogical demands?
Of course you don't do that, do you, but you apply that leaky logic ONLY to gay folks.
Polygamy is a separate issue, with it's own arguments, detractors, and problems. If people wish to begin marrying many, then they will go through the appropriate channels, and prove that their marriages are good for their families, and for society, and the laws banning it will change.
If you support polygamy, then speak up. Demanding that other people who do not want to marry more than one spouse at a time support polygamy, simply because they want to marry just ONE person, is just plain silly.
But, I guess it really is all you have left, isn't it? You can't find a single logical or relevant reason to deny gay people the right to marry, so all you can do it to try to tie it to an unrelated divisive issue and hope for the best.
Straight people discriminate against gays so it's alright for you to discriminate against polygamists. Is that what you are saying jackass?

What harm would a loving marriage of three consenting adult men cause you or anyone else? We won't wait for an answer since you have don't have one.

What a dope!
Demon

Covina, CA

#169712 Dec 3, 2012
Just say NO, to Gover Norquist and his crazy ideas that come from the Middle East.

Republicans, Tea Party Nation members and GOP, break Grover Norquist's grip on you.

He even looks like a demon!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169713 Dec 3, 2012
Sunny days wrote:
I would still say it's the Republican and stupid Tea Party Nation members fault.
Definitely Bush's fault. It was almost Romney's fault, the popular vote was close. But Obama won so it's Bush's fault for 4 more years.

Funny!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#169714 Dec 3, 2012
Imprtnrd wrote:
<quoted text>Polygamy is already on the books as ILLEGEAL. Utah couldn't b/c a state with it. Look it up. YOU just got busted son.....what a dope! ROTFL@U
That's all the bigots really have to justify denying polygamy. "It's illegal".

Research the reasons it's illegal and then come back and justify them. We won't wait.

P.S. Same sex marriage is effectively illegal in most states. Will you accept that as a reason to deny it? We won't wait for an answer.

What a dope!
Rubbed

Covina, CA

#169715 Dec 3, 2012
It looks as if the 75% of voters who approved of President Obama's economic approach in exit polls to help America and the middle class, working poor are getting a voice in Congress.

People like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Paul Ryan, Ron Paul, Tim Donnelly, Willard Mitt Romney, John BoneHead himer, Grover Norquist and other Republican, GOP and Tea Party Meat-Heads need to get their act straightened up.

The GOP and Republican outlaws are being hunted down as you read this message, they haven't a chance since they have already been tried and convicted of treason against the citizens of The United States of America.

All the while those pesky Tea Party members are running like cockroaches from the limelight of the world.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#169716 Dec 3, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
That's all the bigots really have to justify denying polygamy. "It's illegal".
Research the reasons it's illegal and then come back and justify them. We won't wait.
P.S. Same sex marriage is effectively illegal in most states. Will you accept that as a reason to deny it? We won't wait for an answer.
What a dope!
post #169710

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

San Jacinto Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
How come all Hemet sex offenders addresses aren... (Dec '08) Thu lARRY mILLER9626 12
Review: R G Deck Coatings Inc Thu Annonymous 1
San Jacinto Woman Accused of Stabbing Boyfriend... Dec 24 lupita garcia 1
corruption with Riverside county CPS Dec 24 Chris 10
San JacintoUnlock parks, San Jacinto residents say Dec 22 SJskin 1
any Gay guys In San Jacinto Dec 22 Wyd700 4
Officials: Missing Dog Was Dyed to Deceive Dec 21 Parden Pard 3

San Jacinto News Video

San Jacinto Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

San Jacinto People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

San Jacinto News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in San Jacinto

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:38 pm PST