Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201880 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179769 Feb 15, 2013
Necessary repeat of disclaimer, for the dopes who forgot again-

You have to try and understand, when I talk of marriage equality, it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.

In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it? Got it? Good!
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179770 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>I am trying, its a shame you wont.
Perhaps you will direct me to one of those posts where you discussed marriage equality. All I see is dopey troll.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179771 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Aww , did you not like my answer? So what have you done to help your cause???? I know sit on your lazy azz and spam Topix
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Snappy

Covina, CA

#179772 Feb 15, 2013
Will the pencil lipped fool from out of town who keeps posting snap-poola, shut up
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179773 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>LOl, trees to follow
Remember when they used that against same sex marriage fruitcake? You are the civil rights champion of us all, you must remember that. It was stupid then, remember? It still is.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179774 Feb 15, 2013
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179775 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
Necessary repeat of disclaimer, for the dopes who forgot again-
You have to try and understand, when I talk of marriage equality, it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.
In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it? Got it? Good!
and the decline of the influence of religion in America that made it possible.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179776 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
And I don't want to marry her, I just want to discuss the right to marry her. Too bad you don't understand the difference.
I dont thinkg your dog does either
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179777 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What I understand is that you are ignorant.
You are trying to tell me that polygamy has a bad and that is justified. Ignorance and bigotry plain and simple.
No I have been trying to tell you that it has an image problem, you donít want to believe it.

so when you try to get your pet obsession on the ballot you will be facing a very unexpected surprise

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179778 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means to you that the other few million poly marriages around the world should be made illegal?
"Cool beans" fruitcake!
Go back and read your post dummy. Why are you now talking about what is allready legal in other countries? Still deflecting?
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179779 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
and the decline of the influence of religion in America that made it possible.
More people in traditional MARRIAGES are child molesters and welfare cheats than people in poly MARRIAGES by a factor of about 15,500,000 to 1.

Watch, you'll whine about the mention of poly, but not traditional marriage! Priceless.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179780 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So that means to you that the other few million poly marriages around the world should be made illegal?
"Cool beans" fruitcake!
"it is understood I am talking about COMMITTED CONSENSUAL ADULTS.
In every case of opposite sex, same sex, incest and poly marriage. Get it"

I posted you a link, thats not the case in EVERY poly marriage. Why do you support child molestation?
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179781 Feb 15, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Go back and read your post dummy. Why are you now talking about what is allready legal in other countries? Still deflecting?
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.

But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?

If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.

Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179782 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.
But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?
If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?
Look up the existing laws. One more time, I nor Big D care if you want five wives, hire a lawyer and go for it. Are we clear?
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179783 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
He said Dogs, I was expecting Goats as that is what the "arguments against same sex" pamphlet calls for
Remember when they used that against same sex marriage fruitcake? It was stupid then, remember? It still is.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179784 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
I dont thinkg your dog does either
Remember when they used that against same sex marriage fruitcake? It was stupid then, remember? It still is.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179785 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
More people in traditional MARRIAGES are child molesters and welfare cheats than people in poly MARRIAGES by a factor of about 15,500,000 to 1.
Watch, you'll whine about the mention of poly, but not traditional marriage! Priceless.
No one is arguing that fact dummy. I cant help pervert heterosexuals. Gawddd you are stoopid. We told you its the public's perception of Poly marriage. Just like the public's perception of same sex marriage. Its up to you and those who support poly marriage to change it.
Frankie RIzzo

Hayward, CA

#179786 Feb 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
No I have been trying to tell you that it has an image problem, you donít want to believe it.
so when you try to get your pet obsession on the ballot you will be facing a very unexpected surprise
Yes you are trying to tell me it has an image problem. It does. But what I object to is how much of an image problem you think it has and the fact that you insist this image problem is justified. That's ignorance and bigotry plain and simple.

Jazybird58

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#179787 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever since I began researching the topic of polygamy, I have been bothered by the idea that this practice is justifiably criminalized because it is associated with the ills of child exploitation, abuse of women and children, etc.
But, within the criminal code, we have clear and specific provisions to target these offences, which are clearly harmful, and which any reasonable person considers intolerable and deserving of criminal sanction. So why does the law banning polygamy remain, a provision which, by the way, is almost never invoked and when it has been used, has led to few convictions that carried relatively minimal sentences?
If someone commits a crime, prosecute the hell out of them NO MATTER THE TYPE OF MARRIAGE THEY CHOOSE.
Perhaps I need to explain this to you clowns in simpler terms. It means we have perfectly good laws against the crimes you fear are associated with polygamy. Therefore why is polygamy illegal?
Hey, why not keep posting the same post?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#179788 Feb 15, 2013
Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Remember when they used that against same sex marriage fruitcake? It was stupid then, remember? It still is.
You still are, by the playbook

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richmond Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hotel Drisco Announces Completion Of Stunning R... Sep 18 eugene 1
News Police: San Francisco mansion squatter stole $3... (Oct '15) Sep 14 Boo 4
News People dance against hate in San Francisco ahea... Aug 28 Ioe 7
News 'Patriot Prayer' organizer says he's willing to... Aug 27 Christsharian Dee... 1
News Presidio Terrace: A brief guide to San Francisc... Aug '17 SFJazzer 1
News Public nudity ban eyed in San Fran (Nov '12) Jul '17 C Kersey 80
News Televised Comey testimony billed as a Super Bow... Jun '17 Comey vs Comb Over 1

Richmond Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richmond Mortgages