Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,822)

Showing posts 156,421 - 156,440 of199,070
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Raggers

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179351
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Non will be needed from now on, the record is just fine as is.

Since: Jan 12

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179352
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
It seems same sex marriage advocates think there is only so much marriage equality to go around. And they want all of it! Which of course is not equality at all.
Funny because bigoted people like you used to say the same thing about "interracial marriage advocates".

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179353
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Wat the Tyler wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny because bigoted people like you used to say the same thing about "interracial marriage advocates".
And now some bigoted gay marriage advocates can say the same thing about plural marriage.

“CAPS LOCK CAUSE CLIMATE CHANGE”

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179355
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Racial differences are tiny and unimportant but gender differences are great and essential to the survival of the human race. Loving v Virginia is US Supreme Court precedent for marriage as one man and one woman.

If you reject segregation, reject gender apartheid marriage; keep marriage integrated and gender diverse as male/female.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179357
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Wat the Tyler wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny because bigoted people like you used to say the same thing about "interracial marriage advocates".
Funny, I am not a bigot, but you are. I support marriage equality. Do you? Not just for people you approve of but for everyone?

Funny, I supported civil rights for interracial marriage in those days. Did you?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179358
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Wonder if that hypocrite "Big D" is going to rant against equal rights for groups he doesn't approve of again today.

Better that than those religion jags he goes on and bores us all with!

He goes on and on like some quacked out fundie on Modesto meth!

YUK!YUK!YUK! Big D(ope)!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179359
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
And now some bigoted gay marriage advocates can say the same thing about plural marriage.
Some of them, like the jackass "Big D" aren't even shy about it. He says polygamists are child molesters, welfare cheats and all around scumbags!

And he thinks it's perfectly fine to believe that and still be a champion of equal rights (but only for people he likes).
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179360
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179361
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
I find it difficult to see the logic of defending monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?
From a legal perspective, your soaking wet

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179362
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>From a legal perspective, your soaking wet
How so?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179363
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>From a legal perspective, your soaking wet
".....monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.

If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?"

What in that statement is "soaking wet"?

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179364
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
How so?
Gawdd you people really are clueless. Do single couples have the same rights and privileges of marries couples?

How about married couples VRS Civil Unions???

Lets see if YOU can find out.

How about this. A gay couple, been together for 25 years. One is involved in a horrific auto crash, leaves him brain dead, can the other ask to have the plug pulled?????( If he is even allowed in the room)

Income tax, wills, probate, the list is quite extensive
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179365
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it arrogance or naiveté? What you think don't anyone else is going to apply language, "marriage equality", from the SSM movement for their own cause? Every victory for SSM, is a victory for plural marriage. We both know it. Why fight it? Deny it all you want, but we both know its true. Just as Kody Brown and the Missuses Brown. You must cringe every time they give an interview expressing support for SSM.
who?
Neil Andblowme

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179366
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Pietro Armando wrote:
If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?"
When did heterosexuals stop getting married?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179367
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>From a legal perspective, your soaking wet
From any perspective, "your" a jackass! Learn English.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179368
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Gawdd you people really are clueless. Do single couples have the same rights and privileges of marries couples?
How about married couples VRS Civil Unions???
Lets see if YOU can find out.
How about this. A gay couple, been together for 25 years. One is involved in a horrific auto crash, leaves him brain dead, can the other ask to have the plug pulled?????( If he is even allowed in the room)
Income tax, wills, probate, the list is quite extensive
Why are you whining to Pietro? He's not a hypocrite like you who supports marriage equality for only people you approve of and denies it to everyone else.

He's consistent. You're not because you are a bigot, and very stupid.

Hope that helps!

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179369
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
From any perspective, "your" a jackass! Learn English.
Learn to be a human
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179370
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Neil Andblowme wrote:
<quoted text>
When did heterosexuals stop getting married?
They didn't. Who said they did? Boy are you dumb.
DorN

Ridgecrest, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179371
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Straight parents do produce gay offspring.
They want their sons or daughts to be able to marry the person of their choice.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179372
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
".....monogamous marriage as the historic norm when the laws of many states have already departed from the principle that it is heterosexual, monogamous marriage that is essential to social stability.
If heterosexuality is no longer legally, morally or socially relevant to marriage, why should monogamy continue to be so important?"
What in that statement is "soaking wet"?
Nothing. JizzyBirdy is an idiot.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 156,421 - 156,440 of199,070
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

The Mission News Video

•••
•••

The Mission Jobs

•••
•••
•••

The Mission People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••