I could have been -- or I could have been using a pen name, talking about a different name, or never posted my name at all.<quoted text>
YOU complained about people posting your real name. Were you lying?
The point here, is you published a claim someone else made -- based on no more than the fact the person said it.
And we know this because I never published any name here at all --your homosexual pals claimed I did, but I never did.
Of course it is when you see everything from the prism of homosexuality. But that's not normal ... or healthy --and underlines what's fundamentally wrong with you people -- you sexualize everything.I notice you didn't say anything about a woman getting married to a woman. Your fixation on gay men is interesting.
And you're appealing to marital law which is based on the English common law tradition.A non issue. You are appealing to tradition. A logical fallacy.
Now, deal with the issue.
Can you come up with a logical reason why a woman should marry a man?A man can marry a woman, so a woman should have that same right.
Can you come up with a logical reason she shouldn't?