A child reported a crime (witness tampering, solicitation of perjury). There was every reason to believe the child including support from third party witnesses. The child was perfectly credible and never impeached. A child psychologist found him credible. The child made his statements repeatedly and his statements were consistent and record. At the time, the corruption started none of the corrupt actors had seen the statements. Later, the child confirmed his statements in front of a district judge. The corrupt James Ehler and the corrupt Marie Haspil aggressively attacked both the woman and her lawyer for believing the child. They lied about the law. They took upon themselves the lie being told by Judge William Adams, Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, etc. that it is frivolous to believe the child. That is a lie. That is corruption of justice. It is concealing evidence. There was no reason this witness should be ignored other than corruption to protect the people identified by the child as committing a crime. Some of these people had been identified by previous children of similar crime (solicitation of perjury). The crime is similar to the crime that Judge Ken Anderson is not charged with (ignoring a child). The child in connection with Judge Ken Anderson was much younger. It is criminal to ignore a child and start a systematic retaliation against a mother and her lawyer for trying to deal with what the child dealt reported. The corrupt criminal Marie Haspil not only engaged in retaliation with respect to the statements of the child but statements of the mother. The mother made a statement about the condition of a child care giver. Marie Haspil on behalf of the corrupt bar demanded to know in a disciplinary letter why the mother's lawyer believed her (2 days before trial). Marie Haspil was actively corrupting the trial process by threatening the mother's attorney. She is criminal who was obstructing the judicial process. This is hardcore corruption of the legal system. Nothing is to be gained by ignoring it. It is irresponsible to ignore it.
This series of corrupt events started around 2000 with the corrupt James Ehler who ignored and supported many corrupt events in connection with Stanley Rains. James Ehler is perfectly OK with fabrication of evidence, lying insinuations not based on any evidence whatsoever, ex parte hearings, etc. He did nothing when William Dudley and Lanette Joubert were caught red handed fabricating evidence, when they held multiple ex parte hearing, made false criminal allegations, etc. It was so bad that orders appeared out of nowhere (not even in the Court file). The school district would produce orders signed by the Judge that were not in the Court file and not the subject of any hearing (totally ex parte).
James Ehler clearly into corruption around 2000. The patterns of corruption can be traced through at least half a dozen cases known to me (similar things most false sexaul allegations not based on any evidence at all) victimizing a series of people. Presently, there is civil litigation in progress where a lawyer is suing Lanette Joubert for setting him up for a false allegation of sexual abuse of a child. That lawyer was actually indicted before exonerated. His child[ren] were physically violated as part of the scheme to set him up (Stanley Rains' child was repeatedly physically violated -- they'll violate the child with one SANE NURSE and then take the child to a different SANE nurse who of course will find evidence of violation). A while series of people have been severely harmed by James Ehler's lack of ethics. These lawyers know they can act this way.
These lawyers just free lie without limits. Recently, they were repeatedly lying with respect to the mother referenced above that she and her lawyer were sexually involved. There was no evidence at all of that. They were just lying.
The pattern is to lie and then complain when the victim necessary responds. Total corruption.