Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Kentucky in 2010?

[wtf]

Are You Kidding wrote:

<quoted text>
I most certainly can read since I am responding to your posts!!! Again, name calling. Why can't you discuss and debate an issue without lowering yourself to an immature level of name calling?

You do not even know about the Congressional Oversight Committe Hearings that revealed W's people ignored direct intel on what was going to happen.

So you must read comics.

[makes you think]

Antiparty wrote:

<quoted text>
Once again pantyparty, I made a general statement concerning the idiot logic of voting party rather than person. You chimed in and fine, it's your right but in the process you show you are stupid, can't read, and wrongly think you can identify a persons political stance by reading topix. I am not anti any party,, can I break that down further so a three year old can read it to you,,,, we have a basic need for party based preliminary selection, but beyond that the vote should based on who you really think will best serve the public interest,, You would not know right wing if it bit your well fed fat hairy pimpled pompus flabby lazy butt.

if that is really your opinion then I totally agree. but I would suggest that if you want people to take you seriously you have to take the maturity level of your posts up a notch. your defensive attitude and third grade tactics, fantasizing about the way I look and all the name calling, only makes you look ignorant and clueless. and would you please explain " I am not anti any party" is that some more of that third grade reading level stuff? You wart-nosed, slack jawwed,cross eyed, Lilly livered, backer chewing, bow legged,pigeon toed, nobby kneed, butt scratchin, hump backed, poopy breath varmit!

[Are You Kidding]

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>The Memo read "bin Laden determind to strike US targets with hi-jacked Aircrafts" you ignorant SOB. How stupid are you?
Bush had to protect bin Laden, his Daddy is in business with the bin Ladens.
You are severely stupid.

When you mature enough to debate an issue sensibly, maybe someone will listen.

[wtf]

Are You Kidding wrote:

<quoted text>
When you mature enough to debate an issue sensibly, maybe someone will listen.

When you learn to read and can keep up.

What memo?

Dumbass!

[lol]

Are You Kidding wrote:

<quoted text>
When you mature enough to debate an issue sensibly, maybe someone will listen.

says the guy who just had his rear handed to him ...lmao

[Are You Kidding]

lol wrote:

<quoted text>
says the guy who just had his rear handed to him ...lmao

Not at all! In complete control here sweetie!!!

[Are You Kidding]

wtf wrote:

<quoted text>When you learn to read and can keep up.
What memo?
Dumbass!

Oh more name calling. I am crushed!!!

[culture vulture]

Are You Kidding wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh more name calling. I am crushed!!!

I'm kinda getting into the middle on this, I hope you don't mind? I believe the memo that 'wtf' is referring to is one that was sent to most, if not all of the Bush Administration 6 weeks before 9/11. In it, the administration was warned that a 'big event was coming soon, probably with aircraft as the mode it would be delivered by, and this is not about if but when.' The warning was ignored from the President and Vice-President, Condileeza Rice, and everyone else in the administration except for Richard Clark, who was the national coordinator of security and counterterrorism at the time. He worked for Reagan, Bush I and II and Clinton as well, so people usually pay attention when he has something to say. Not this time. He was ignored time and again, and one of his agents, while delivering a warning to George W. Bush, was famously told,'You've covered your ass, now get out of my office'. Mr. Clark has two great books out on terrorism,'Against All Enemies' and 'Your Government Failed You'. He does not hesitate to call it as he see's it, which makes him less than partisan and a refreshing read on the topic of terrorism, if that's possible. Hope this gives a little better understanding than what 'wtf' was only hinting at. Sometimes I just don't know about that one! Thanks for your time.

[Bonnie]

Wiccan wrote:

Let's see Republicans reply hurt us under Bush. Obama isn't the best but because of what Bush did it will take SEVERAL presidents to get it fixed. Romney has came out and said he doesn't care for the poor only the rich. Now I for one can not trust him.

Wiccan,Bush hasn't hurt us as much as Obama, and Obama hasn't hurt us as much as he's going to if he gets 4 more years. You have no ideal whats in store for us.You are to busy "going green" "Mother earth, and all that" to know whats he's really up to.

[Art Freen]

Culture Vulture, you are correct. The President's Daily Briefing of August 6, 2001, gave direct warning of bin Laden's intent to strike inside the US. The text of the briefing is included in the 9/11 Commission Report.

Bush was on vacation at the time in Crawford, TX. I guess the pressures of being President for 6 months had gotten to him and he needed a break. And, as you suggest, Dubya ignored the warning and went back to choppin' wood and clearin' brush.

[Bonnie]

hollerrat wrote:

its a simple choice, obozotheassclown, or a decent american citizen

Right! Don't forget, they are two good decent God fearing men christian men. What we have now is a closet Muslim, that will come out this next four years if he's elected. He claims to be christian, but he made two may slips of the tongue about his "Muslim faith" and he bowed to much to them and prayed to much with them .Hell will be here on earth.
My bet is that if he's re elected, there will a mosque build as close to the 911 site as they can get it, with Obama's OK. He was afraid to give that ok last time because he wanted to get elected again. Hide and watch. Then Obama will come out of the closet and we will be under Islamic rule,and Muslim's will take over

[hollerrat]

Art Freen wrote:

Culture Vulture, you are correct. The President's Daily Briefing of August 6, 2001, gave direct warning of bin Laden's intent to strike inside the US. The text of the briefing is included in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Bush was on vacation at the time in Crawford, TX. I guess the pressures of being President for 6 months had gotten to him and he needed a break. And, as you suggest, Dubya ignored the warning and went back to choppin' wood and clearin' brush.

you lowlife backbiting scumsucking leftwingwhackadoos cant defend this president so all you can do is make shit up on george w bush well george w bush isnt running and blaming him for the mess thats been created by the surrendercraps and this mooslim wont work this tiome americans arent as stoopid as you obozoites

[hollerrat]

culture vulture wrote:

<quoted text>I'm kinda getting into the middle on this, I hope you don't mind? I believe the memo that 'wtf' is referring to is one that was sent to most, if not all of the Bush Administration 6 weeks before 9/11. In it, the administration was warned that a 'big event was coming soon, probably with aircraft as the mode it would be delivered by, and this is not about if but when.' The warning was ignored from the President and Vice-President, Condileeza Rice, and everyone else in the administration except for Richard Clark, who was the national coordinator of security and counterterrorism at the time. He worked for Reagan, Bush I and II and Clinton as well, so people usually pay attention when he has something to say. Not this time. He was ignored time and again, and one of his agents, while delivering a warning to George W. Bush, was famously told,'You've covered your ass, now get out of my office'. Mr. Clark has two great books out on terrorism,'Against All Enemies' and 'Your Government Failed You'. He does not hesitate to call it as he see's it, which makes him less than partisan and a refreshing read on the topic of terrorism, if that's possible. Hope this gives a little better understanding than what 'wtf' was only hinting at. Sometimes I just don't know about that one! Thanks for your time.

you are as full of shit as a christmas turkey is stuffing

[hollerrat]

richard clark was paid by saddam hussien to ignore the fact of his weapons program thats a fact jack

[Antiparty]

makes you think wrote:

<quoted text>
if that is really your opinion then I totally agree. but I would suggest that if you want people to take you seriously you have to take the maturity level of your posts up a notch. your defensive attitude and third grade tactics, fantasizing about the way I look and all the name calling, only makes you look ignorant and clueless. and would you please explain " I am not anti any party" is that some more of that third grade reading level stuff? You wart-nosed, slack jawwed,cross eyed, Lilly livered, backer chewing, bow legged,pigeon toed, nobby kneed, butt scratchin, hump backed, poopy breath varmit!

Sure numnuts, it's really simple, just beyond your capacity for logic. Here's where you will want that third grader to help you,, we are basically a two party system,, yes with exceptions, so when I say I am not Anti any Party,, could it be that simple,,, yes it is wanker, it means I am not against the any political party that wants to better America. In example, if I were say: republican and voted to have a party leader run for office,, >if< in the final election I thought a democrate candidate would do a better job for the country, I would vote against my party for what I think would be a greater good. So simple you buttpirate, vote the person, NOT the party. Now, captain obvious, do you get it or are you just a freaking full blown dipwad peckerheaded fool. Thanks for your input zipperhead, have a nice evening.

[Sasquatch man]

Bonnie wrote:

<quoted text>
Right! Don't forget, they are two good decent God fearing men christian men. What we have now is a closet Muslim, that will come out this next four years if he's elected. He claims to be christian, but he made two may slips of the tongue about his "Muslim faith" and he bowed to much to them and prayed to much with them .Hell will be here on earth.
My bet is that if he's re elected, there will a mosque build as close to the 911 site as they can get it, with Obama's OK. He was afraid to give that ok last time because he wanted to get elected again. Hide and watch. Then Obama will come out of the closet and we will be under Islamic rule,and Muslim's will take over

I have heard that Obama is an alien from another world come here to steal our women. My source is as trustworthy as yours and you can count on it.
I also hard that Kentucky sold its senate seat (Paul) to Texas which now has three senators.

[Are You Kidding]

culture vulture wrote:

<quoted text>I'm kinda getting into the middle on this, I hope you don't mind? I believe the memo that 'wtf' is referring to is one that was sent to most, if not all of the Bush Administration 6 weeks before 9/11. In it, the administration was warned that a 'big event was coming soon, probably with aircraft as the mode it would be delivered by, and this is not about if but when.' The warning was ignored from the President and Vice-President, Condileeza Rice, and everyone else in the administration except for Richard Clark, who was the national coordinator of security and counterterrorism at the time. He worked for Reagan, Bush I and II and Clinton as well, so people usually pay attention when he has something to say. Not this time. He was ignored time and again, and one of his agents, while delivering a warning to George W. Bush, was famously told,'You've covered your ass, now get out of my office'. Mr. Clark has two great books out on terrorism,'Against All Enemies' and 'Your Government Failed You'. He does not hesitate to call it as he see's it, which makes him less than partisan and a refreshing read on the topic of terrorism, if that's possible. Hope this gives a little better understanding than what 'wtf' was only hinting at. Sometimes I just don't know about that one! Thanks for your time.

Thank you for the information and for providing it in such a pleasant manner.

[culture vulture]

hollerrat wrote:

<quoted text>
you lowlife backbiting scumsucking leftwingwhackadoos cant defend this president so all you can do is make shit up on george w bush well george w bush isnt running and blaming him for the mess thats been created by the surrendercraps and this mooslim wont work this tiome americans arent as stoopid as you obozoites

No one is making anything up. Do your homework and you can make informed, conclusive posts like I try to, and that will enable you to stay away from foolish, mis-informed 3rd grade antics like, you know, wtf. Grow up.

[culture vulture]

hollerrat wrote:

<quoted text>
you are as full of shit as a christmas turkey is stuffing

I think folks on here know who the turkey is. O r perhaps you've had too much Wild Turkey, at which point I would commend you on that choice, not so much on your inability to debate.

[culture vulture]

hollerrat wrote:

richard clark was paid by saddam hussien to ignore the fact of his weapons program thats a fact jack

That is not a fact, jack, and you cannot prove it. How foolish can you get?