I'll pretend for a moment that you talk intelligently without vile filthy comments so I can have what will be a one sided conversation as it usually is from me to you.<quoted text>
You don't care that there is a difference, creep. And you aren't making sense again.
I care more that there's a difference in age than you do. That's a fact. You have branded any teenager in the 1840's a "little girl" with the little girl immaturity of a 21st century teenager. You have repeatedly did that. Not I.
I do not agree with older guys marrying young girls. But I can't condone what was done in a past century as wrong or bad by our present standards. If I do that, I might as well use their past standards to judge homosexuals as wrong and bad as societies viewed them for thousands of years. Get it?
I won't judge what Smith did of marrying two 14 or 15 year olds or two 16 or 17 year olds as wrong and bad. I find it strange if anything. I find it strange that he supposedly married over 40 females in a short three year period aged 14 to 60+.
I have no facts that he illegally married them or took them to bed. All I have is what you have, rumors and claims and a few written statements. And unlike you and many others, I don't make a judgement on such weak non-established evidence that's all based on rumors and women proved liers of having made claims of sleeping with him and or having his baby(s).
And that's our defined difference.
You and dana lead verbal lynch mobs based on no actual facts to hang who you want to hang because you're factually a rage hater. Neither of you are about any actual evidence. You assume and suck the life out of rumors like it's your dying breath to live to have something rage hating to say.
I like evidence and you and dana don't. You two have long established that fact. Understand?