Iranian President Wants to Debate Bush

Iranian President Wants to Debate Bush

There are 317 comments on the The Associated Press story from Aug 29, 2006, titled Iranian President Wants to Debate Bush . In it, The Associated Press reports that:

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Tuesday challenged the authority of the U.N. Security Council as Iran faces a deadline to halt its uranium enrichment and he called for a televised debate with President Bush on ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Associated Press.

First Prev
of 16
Next Last
coolmind

North East, MD

#319 Sep 16, 2006
The debate would be unfair. A battle of whits with an unarmed man. But, then Bush doesn't deserve fair does he? He wants to re-write the Geneve convention so he can torture... so let the Iranian pres torture him in a debate. Bush would be so pitiful, all tongue tied and at a lost of anything smart to say....

Did he do anything at Yale other than cocaine and booze? And a raft of chicks?
ppildog2

AOL

#320 Sep 16, 2006
coolmind wrote:
The debate would be unfair. A battle of whits with an unarmed man. But, then Bush doesn't deserve fair does he? He wants to re-write the Geneve convention so he can torture... so let the Iranian pres torture him in a debate. Bush would be so pitiful, all tongue tied and at a lost of anything smart to say....
Did he do anything at Yale other than cocaine and booze? And a raft of chicks?
since you side with the terrorist governments of the world why dont you go live with them?
Crikey

Auckland, New Zealand

#321 Sep 16, 2006
coolmind wrote:
The debate would be unfair. A battle of whits with an unarmed man. But, then Bush doesn't deserve fair does he? He wants to re-write the Geneve convention so he can torture... so let the Iranian pres torture him in a debate. Bush would be so pitiful, all tongue tied and at a lost of anything smart to say....
Did he do anything at Yale other than cocaine and booze? And a raft of chicks?
Great post.Was't Bush a womanising,alcoholic?would't
he need mic's,device's,dictionary,thes aurus to help him out?George Bush debating with Mahmoud would be like rewatching vs Kerry.Kerry fluid and eloquent.
Dumya pause struggling to listen to the question and
repeat the answer given via his "help gadget's".
Can you believe this? because you are called the prez it mean's just like the emperor's invisible clothing.You become immune to criticism obviously some people would downtrow, bend over for any body
who was "voted".I post that loosely.Into a position of power.
Patriot

Austin, TX

#322 Sep 16, 2006
bush man would further embarrass all of us. Though, if their serving popcorn and beer, I will come watch.

IMPEACH the dictator Bush.
ppildog2

AOL

#323 Sep 16, 2006
Patriot wrote:
bush man would further embarrass all of us. Though, if their serving popcorn and beer, I will come watch.
IMPEACH the dictator Bush.
your name or call sign says patriot if that is the case and one looks at your post they can only assume you are a patriot of the democratic terrorist movement in america.
Tristan

Barnesville, OH

#324 Sep 16, 2006
Demiurg wrote:
<quoted text>
911 is quite a controversy, but my research on that subject is done, and my thoughts are clear… If you wish you can take a look at movie available here: http://911revisited.com/ ... The ppl putting forward the evidence and theories are professors, civil engineers and M.I.T. physics graduates with decades of theoretical and practical experience in the laws of thermodynamics and physics and also in reality… all that being a drop of tear in this sea of terror…
SSDD Total BS by Steven Jones, again no Construction engineer was used, here's those used except for an old interview DeMartini back during construction. The man died in the 9/11 calapse of the towers. And I think anyone can see from the morning of 9/11, that was no pencil hole in a screen netting. That was a massive hole over multiple floors.

Jeff King - MIT Engineer and Research Scientist???, He got a Bachelors degree in electrical engineer 1974 from MIT, he's been workign as a physician for the past 25 years, and has nothing to do with MIT past his graduation???

James H Fetzer - Professor of Philosophy???

Morgan Reynolds - Professor Emeritus of Economics???

YEP, they would be the top notch people I would want trying to explain a constructural calapse. My eyes are open now too.

If you want to check and not watch the entire thing, go to the credits where they thank those that contributed.

Check the film at the 4:50-4:55 film time, where the building begins calapsing, no explosion damage ahead of the calapse, wonder why? The so called demolition explosions would have been in enclosed areas, result, the DAMN windows would have come out, and not just 1 or 2 windows either.

Out and out lie in the film:
Steel doesn't melt at 3000 degrees, a man of science doesn't round numbers off, usually they are precise, except in this case he rounds it up to reinforce his theory. Hard Steel melts at around 2500 degrees. Big difference between 2500 and 3000.

http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01....

But there is no mention of tensil strength, or what high temperatures do to structural steel's tensil strength. No mention of the torque damage the building would have suffered when roughly 120 tons slammed into it doing 550 mph. These are simple things a Construction engineer would take into consideration.
Demiurg

Croatia

#325 Sep 16, 2006
Tristan wrote:
<quoted text>
SSDD Total BS by Steven Jones, again no Construction engineer was used, here's those used except for an old interview DeMartini back during construction. The man died in the 9/11 calapse of the towers. And I think anyone can see from the morning of 9/11, that was no pencil hole in a screen netting. That was a massive hole over multiple floors.
Jeff King - MIT Engineer and Research Scientist???, He got a Bachelors degree in electrical engineer 1974 from MIT, he's been workign as a physician for the past 25 years, and has nothing to do with MIT past his graduation???
James H Fetzer - Professor of Philosophy???
Morgan Reynolds - Professor Emeritus of Economics???
YEP, they would be the top notch people I would want trying to explain a constructural calapse. My eyes are open now too.
If you want to check and not watch the entire thing, go to the credits where they thank those that contributed.
Check the film at the 4:50-4:55 film time, where the building begins calapsing, no explosion damage ahead of the calapse, wonder why? The so called demolition explosions would have been in enclosed areas, result, the DAMN windows would have come out, and not just 1 or 2 windows either.
Out and out lie in the film:
Steel doesn't melt at 3000 degrees, a man of science doesn't round numbers off, usually they are precise, except in this case he rounds it up to reinforce his theory. Hard Steel melts at around 2500 degrees. Big difference between 2500 and 3000.
http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01....
But there is no mention of tensil strength, or what high temperatures do to structural steel's tensil strength. No mention of the torque damage the building would have suffered when roughly 120 tons slammed into it doing 550 mph. These are simple things a Construction engineer would take into consideration.
LOL, I find all this extremely amusing; honestly, the freefall is freefall the laws of physics are laws of physics… But being here, reading things, I'm not surprised at all that such laws don’t' work in US;). Say, that tremendous heat which melted steel, can you picture it? Have you noticed that there were people in those holes? Fireman reported small, isolated pockets of fire, they calling in, saying things are cool, they can take em out… minutes later buildings fell? Passports survived the carnage intact? Pentagon? WTC building 7? Mockery… If you type appropriate keywords in Google, you'll find zillions and zillions of articles, sites, sounds and videos which are very clear about it… http://911readingroom.org/bib/ .
Here is another interesting source: http://www.reopen911.org/Tarpley_ch_6.pdf#sea... , you can also pick any other video: http://video.google.com/videosearch... or http://video.google.com/videosearch... , or http://www.youtube.com/results... ... ;)
Tristan

Barnesville, OH

#326 Sep 16, 2006
Demiurg wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, I find all this extremely amusing; honestly, the freefall is freefall the laws of physics are laws of physics… But being here, reading things, I'm not surprised at all that such laws don’t' work in US;). Say, that tremendous heat which melted steel, can you picture it? Have you noticed that there were people in those holes? Fireman reported small, isolated pockets of fire, they calling in, saying things are cool, they can take em out… minutes later buildings fell? Passports survived the carnage intact? Pentagon? WTC building 7? Mockery… If you type appropriate keywords in Google, you'll find zillions and zillions of articles, sites, sounds and videos which are very clear about it… http://911readingroom.org/bib/ .
Here is another interesting source: http://www.reopen911.org/Tarpley_ch_6.pdf#sea... , you can also pick any other video: http://video.google.com/videosearch... or http://video.google.com/videosearch... , or http://www.youtube.com/results... ... ;)
Oh god, ok, fire absorbs oxygen, which causes suction pulling fresh oxygen to the fire, the only place those people could get away from the heat is at the holes. That is a really lame reasoning. Think of it this way, the flue on a fireplace, with out adequate ventilation, the fire goes out, to get that ventilation, air is drawn to the fire the heat goes up. Close the flue, the heat quits going up, the fire goes out.

There's not zillion, theres a handful at most, and most of those argue against each other, they make me laugh.

Everyone is filled with misstatements, 1/2 truths, statements taken out of context, and out and out lies.
Every supposed fact they make can be proved false by any half ass Construction Engineer and anyone else with a little common sense.
typical US citizen

Homestead, FL

#327 Sep 16, 2006
Demiurg wrote:
<quoted text>
911 is quite a controversy, but my research on that subject is done, and my thoughts are clear… If you wish you can take a look at movie available here: http://911revisited.com/ ... The ppl putting forward the evidence and theories are professors, civil engineers and M.I.T. physics graduates with decades of theoretical and practical experience in the laws of thermodynamics and physics and also in reality… all that being a drop of tear in this sea of terror…
Many people have already viewed this film on 9/11 -- but for those who may not have seen it, it's about 40 minutes of really interesting information. It is controversial.

http://video.google.com/videoplay...
Loose change documentary on 9/11
typical US citizen

Homestead, FL

#328 Sep 16, 2006
Tristan wrote:
<quoted text>
SSDD Total BS by Steven Jones, again no Construction engineer was used, here's those used except for an old interview DeMartini back during construction. The man died in the 9/11 calapse of the towers. And I think anyone can see from the morning of 9/11, that was no pencil hole in a screen netting. That was a massive hole over multiple floors.
Jeff King - MIT Engineer and Research Scientist???, He got a Bachelors degree in electrical engineer 1974 from MIT, he's been workign as a physician for the past 25 years, and has nothing to do with MIT past his graduation???
James H Fetzer - Professor of Philosophy???
Morgan Reynolds - Professor Emeritus of Economics???
YEP, they would be the top notch people I would want trying to explain a constructural calapse. My eyes are open now too.
If you want to check and not watch the entire thing, go to the credits where they thank those that contributed.
Check the film at the 4:50-4:55 film time, where the building begins calapsing, no explosion damage ahead of the calapse, wonder why? The so called demolition explosions would have been in enclosed areas, result, the DAMN windows would have come out, and not just 1 or 2 windows either.
Out and out lie in the film:
Steel doesn't melt at 3000 degrees, a man of science doesn't round numbers off, usually they are precise, except in this case he rounds it up to reinforce his theory. Hard Steel melts at around 2500 degrees. Big difference between 2500 and 3000.
http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01....
But there is no mention of tensil strength, or what high temperatures do to structural steel's tensil strength. No mention of the torque damage the building would have suffered when roughly 120 tons slammed into it doing 550 mph. These are simple things a Construction engineer would take into consideration.
Tristan,

According to reports, one of the highjackers was identified by his passport which was found in the rubble at the trade center. Does it make sense to you that a fire so hot that it would melt steel could not melt a paper passport? If we are to believe that that passport was inside the plane that had fuel so hot that it melted steel, how did the passport end up outside of the plane in perfect condition?
Tristan

Barnesville, OH

#329 Sep 17, 2006
typical US citizen wrote:
<quoted text>
Tristan,
According to reports, one of the highjackers was identified by his passport which was found in the rubble at the trade center. Does it make sense to you that a fire so hot that it would melt steel could not melt a paper passport? If we are to believe that that passport was inside the plane that had fuel so hot that it melted steel, how did the passport end up outside of the plane in perfect condition?
I've never heard that a passport was found. I read that remains had been identified as the terrorist. But if one was found, does it have to be in perfect condition?

Nothing in Loose Change, anything Jones has put out, or any other conspiracy theories has put out points to anything other than the WTC fell because the plane impacts.
typical US citizen

Homestead, FL

#330 Sep 17, 2006
Tristan wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never heard that a passport was found. I read that remains had been identified as the terrorist. But if one was found, does it have to be in perfect condition?
Nothing in Loose Change, anything Jones has put out, or any other conspiracy theories has put out points to anything other than the WTC fell because the plane impacts.
The passport was not found at the tower but at the wreckage of flight 93. I apologized for the inaccurate information. And you are correct; the passport was not in perfect condition. "A fragment of Jarrah's passport was found in the wreckage of the hijacked Flight 93." -- CNN
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/US/08/01/cia.hij...
Garry

South Lancaster, MA

#331 Sep 17, 2006
Tristan wrote:
<quoted text>
I've never heard that a passport was found. I read that remains had been identified as the terrorist. But if one was found, does it have to be in perfect condition?
Nothing in Loose Change, anything Jones has put out, or any other conspiracy theories has put out points to anything other than the WTC fell because the plane impacts.
For buildings 1 and 2 sure, but how do you figure for building 7?
Tristan

Barnesville, OH

#332 Sep 18, 2006
Garry wrote:
<quoted text>
For buildings 1 and 2 sure, but how do you figure for building 7?
Since there were not alot of good photos or videos of buidling 7 I've had to read for information. The best information I found came from :

www.firehouse.com/911/magazine

WTC Building 7 appears to have suffered significant damage at some point after the WTC Towers had collapsed, according to firefighters at the scene. Firefighter Butch Brandies tells other firefighters that nobody is to go into Building 7 because of creaking and noises coming out of there.[Firehouse Magazine, 8/02]

Heavy, thick smoke rises near 7 World Trade Center. Smoke is visible from the upper floors of the 47-story building. Firefighters using transits to determine whether there was any movement in the structure were surprised to discover that is was moving. The area was evacuated and the building collapsed later in the afternoon of Sept. 11.

Battalion Chief John Norman later recalls, "At the edge of the south face you could see that it is very heavily damaged." [Firehouse Magazine, 5/02]

A laymaon police officer spoke to fireman stating "that building doesn’t look straight."

Firemen reported seeing a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13".

Chief Cruthers said in an interview later ""Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area --(Q. A collapse zone?)-- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed."

Fire department Deputy Chief Peter Hayden stated that the firement were ordered away from WTC about 3:30 due to the threat of calapse from WTC7. He went on to say that he already knew that they had already lost 300 people that day, and didn't want to risk anymore.

From statements like this, and knowing the debris field from WTC 1, I can only assume it was bombarded with both burning debris and heavy pieces of material from WTC that both caused structural damage to WTC7 and increased the load on the building which it couldn't support in it's damaged condition.

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/mag......

http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/mag......

http://www.firehouse.com/911/magazine/towers....
DennyCrane

United States

#333 Sep 22, 2006
Curious wrote:
<quoted text>
Tristan the bush lackey how much to you get paid for your posts?
Curious, liberals are paid to lie but conservatives will volunteer their time to try and get the truth out to people like you
majid

Iran

#334 Dec 16, 2006
i am iranian and i want request that for american for job or your univercity
penelope jones

Golden, CO

#336 Apr 17, 2008
ronnie wrote:
my eyesight was ruined at the howerton lasik eye center in austin texas
this is paid spam aimed to sabbotage that should be deleted

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 16
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Salem Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News State child agency pulling wards from Durham sc... (May '07) Jun '15 Jermaine Shivers 42
News Rep. Ziobron organizes efforts for osprey platf... May '15 WERGHY3 2
lets get vote to tear down swing bridge May '15 KAREN V 1
Local Politics Do you approve of Joe Courtney as Representative? (Nov '11) May '15 ZANEY LEX 10
casino to west tisbury Feb '15 CASINO WEST TISB... 2
News Racism in Eastern Connecticut often hidden (Jan '07) Aug '14 furble 18
if yur car is repo'd call larry pittman jam rec... (Oct '10) Aug '14 ms doe 12
More from around the web

Salem People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Salem Mortgages