Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Interesting

Medford, MA

#805 Aug 22, 2012
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
<quoted text>
I like this site, Stamos. They won a Pulitzer, and they tell the truth:
http://www.politifact.com/
You don't mind if I post this after your posts, do you?
Pants on fire!!
Politifact is notoriously biased for liberals. A quick google search pulls hundreds of examples.
Bright side

Leominster, MA

#806 Aug 22, 2012
Sla wrote:
<quoted text>
I said I was of this forum.
But to you Bright side. You never told me your age.
But I will be at DD on Bridge st at 8am.
Black pants, Black shirt. And How will I know you?
You will recognize me as the person who won't be there. I have work lined up for Monday. Although I'm impressed you wanted to get dressed up for it. Just a little tip, wearing all black on a hot summer day isn't a good idea.

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#808 Aug 23, 2012
Interesting wrote:
<quoted text>
Politifact is notoriously biased for liberals. A quick google search pulls hundreds of examples.
FactCheck is funded by Annenberg. Annenberg once employed Obama and Bill Ayers on the Chicago School Challenge (which after $ millions in funding was a complete failure - big surprise.) Hardly a credible source.
Civil Servant Supporter

Winchendon, MA

#809 Aug 23, 2012
I guess it's easy to say something is un-credible when someone or some thing speaks the truth, and the truth ends up being unseemly. Who's won the Pulitzer, or is that institution overwhelmingly liberal biased? I've already heard that about the Nobel Committee. I mean, Stamos, who's an undecided supposed to believe these days? You?

And how about that GOP candidate for Sheriff of HIllsborough County NH Frank Szabo? The scary part is the polls will probably show a positive result of his statements resorting to violence to prevent a WOMAN'S constitutional right to an abortion.

It's funny-iin the not-so-distant past when a Republican wanted to win, they would appeal to the moderate sensibilities. Today they appeal to the disenfranchised, disillusioned, and misinformed. Usually by first saying they have "business" experience. And they call it the "Grand Old Party."

Oh, yeah, Scott Brown will win because Gail Huff is tough, REAL tough, so he must be tough too. Some of that toughness must have rubbed off on him. Remember when WCVB used to stick her sorry-ass out in the middle of blizzards and hurricanes? Scott was home at the time, feeding the babies. What a smart basterd-sticking your wife out in a typhoon while you stay home and watch Sponge Bob Squarepants cartoons and eat Coco Puffs with the girls. I wonder what they thought when they saw Mom getting battered by the surf at the Lynn seawall during the no-name storm.

Dumb as a freaking fox that Junior senator from MA.

Civil Servant Supporter

Winchendon, MA

#810 Aug 23, 2012
And how about that Scott Brown ad showing him in formation with his National Guard basic training unit? How patriotic he is! Talk about waving the flag. And the disclaimer-'The National Guard does not endorse..."

Well, I'd rather be a dog in a whore's backyard then be in the freaking National Guard.
Civil Servant Supporter

Winchendon, MA

#811 Aug 23, 2012
Florida Retiree wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sorry to butt in but, what's your take on Gail Huff? Your wife is drooling over Scotty and you have the hots for the kids, don't tell me you are shipping Gail over to be with Just Facts?? LOL....
Gail would be much cuter if her face wasn't so weather-beaten. And it's Scott's fault. And I don't have "the hots" for those girls. I just said they were hot. I like Ann Coultier, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, and Sarah Palin. I like them dumb. But hot.

Why can't you Republicans get Sarah Palin to shed the glasses for a nice pair of contacts? I bet she has nice eyes. Oh! That's right-she looks smart with her glasses. Right until she opens her mouth.
Just Facts

Southborough, MA

#812 Aug 23, 2012
Florida Retiree wrote:
<quoted text>
Mr. Just Facts, You have no credibility at all, you didnít even know Pearl Harbor was attacked and it was the reason the US entered WWII. Yet you claimed President Bush was the first president to have an attack on American soil. Now, you are saying that Democratic candidates donít come to Mass to campaign because they know itís in the bag for them to win an election. Yet you say Romney was Governor of Mass and he was a Republican. How did that happen?? Naw, never mind, you donít know the answer to that question. And guess what party Sen. Scott Brown belongs to???? Was it in the bag for him too????
Letís face it; you just donít know what the hell you are posting about. At first I thought you were a person that could be informative in a debate, but I see you do not have the credibility to make your points based on any real facts, so I choose not discuss anything with you.
You publicly denounce the president of the United States in an insulting manner yet you state that you were taught respect, what did the president say to you to cause you to continue calling him insulting names?? Naw, donít answer that either, I think I know the answer; you don't know the meaning of the word respect.
You and that Stamass character should leave our country because you are both not worthy of living here by the way you both attack our elected leaders with insulting names that only show that you do not know the meaning of the word respect and honor the office of our elected leaders. Our leaders were put in office by the majority of American voters and there is a congress that is equally responsible towards creating and managing the laws of the land that you denounce.
I am quite tired of you people shooting off your uninformed mouths and calling the President of our United States insulting names and I say to you all; if you don't like our country or it's elected leaders then get the hell out of our country and let the informed Americans vote in the president of their choice and let the rest of us real Americans respect the choices made because we live in a Democracy. And by the way, this forum is on the Senate race and not the presidential race so go to a forum on that subject and spew your uninformed nonsense there for the weak of minds to read.
And do yourself a favor, change your name to "Just Guessing" it's a better fit for you.
You poor poor old man, I hope you do get help for your comprehension problems. If you read my post again, you will see that I stated that Presidential candidates do not campaign in Massachusetts because they know that Massachusetts is in the bag...got it? Alrighty then!!

As far as choosing not to discuss anything with me, you have said that a number of times, but then you respond to my posts in an effort at discussing things. I had already decided that you cannot offer anything of any value to a discussion because you are just looking to be a jerk.

As I stated in another post, my parents were smart enough to teach me that respect isn't an automatic thing based on title or age or anything else that guaratees respect...respect is earned, and our current President hasn't earned my respect...I don't really care if you like it or not because I don't owe you anything grampy...

Take your self-righteous attitude and shove it. Hows that for rude?
Florida Retiree

Bradenton, FL

#813 Aug 23, 2012
Just Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
You poor poor old man, I hope you do get help for your comprehension problems. If you read my post again, you will see that I stated that Presidential candidates do not campaign in Massachusetts because they know that Massachusetts is in the bag...got it? Alrighty then!!
As far as choosing not to discuss anything with me, you have said that a number of times, but then you respond to my posts in an effort at discussing things. I had already decided that you cannot offer anything of any value to a discussion because you are just looking to be a jerk.
As I stated in another post, my parents were smart enough to teach me that respect isn't an automatic thing based on title or age or anything else that guaratees respect...respect is earned, and our current President hasn't earned my respect...I don't really care if you like it or not because I don't owe you anything grampy...
Take your self-righteous attitude and shove it. Hows that for rude?


I respond to some of your posts in an attempt to help you see your weakness and the lack of facts in which you post but mainly to let others on here know that your posts are mainly off the wall and not to take stock in your uninformed inaccurate comments. I now believe I have succeeded in doing that and will no longer address any of your dribble postings.

Florida Retiree

Bradenton, FL

#814 Aug 23, 2012
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
<quoted text>
Gail would be much cuter if her face wasn't so weather-beaten. And it's Scott's fault. And I don't have "the hots" for those girls. I just said they were hot. I like Ann Coultier, Elisabeth Hasselbeck, and Sarah Palin. I like them dumb. But hot.
Why can't you Republicans get Sarah Palin to shed the glasses for a nice pair of contacts? I bet she has nice eyes. Oh! That's right-she looks smart with her glasses. Right until she opens her mouth.


CSS, to think we have Sen. McCain to thank for giving us Sarah, can you imagine where we would be now if he was elected.
Please let the past reflect on the future and re-elect Sen. Scott Brown and President Obama.
Emerald

Waldorf, MD

#815 Aug 23, 2012
Florida Retiree wrote:
<quoted text>
I respond to some of your posts in an attempt to help you see your weakness and the lack of facts in which you post but mainly to let others on here know that your posts are mainly off the wall and not to take stock in your uninformed inaccurate comments. I now believe I have succeeded in doing that and will no longer address any of your dribble postings.
I really don't think that you have proved anything with your posts either, just that you don't agree with that poster...whose comments have been fairly accurate IMO. Disagreeing with him does not necessarily mean you are right, or that he is wrong.
Sla

Dracut, MA

#816 Aug 23, 2012
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
And how about that Scott Brown ad showing him in formation with his National Guard basic training unit? How patriotic he is! Talk about waving the flag. And the disclaimer-'The National Guard does not endorse..."
Well, I'd rather be a dog in a whore's backyard then be in the freaking National Guard.
Whats wrong with the NATIONAL Guard?
Your wife is in Love with Scott. And you think his daughters are hot.

Maybe you should invest a Hundred bucks and find a hooker.
You sound frustraded.
Or you could buy a blow up doll.
Sla

Dracut, MA

#817 Aug 23, 2012
Emerald wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't think that you have proved anything with your posts either, just that you don't agree with that poster...whose comments have been fairly accurate IMO. Disagreeing with him does not necessarily mean you are right, or that he is wrong.
That's your opinion.
I think he has proved it. Maybe you should take a second look.
Sla

Dracut, MA

#818 Aug 23, 2012
Job report just came out.
372 thousand new job claims.
Highest in last 5 weeks.
Florida Retiree

Bradenton, FL

#819 Aug 23, 2012
Emerald wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't think that you have proved anything with your posts either, just that you don't agree with that poster...whose comments have been fairly accurate IMO. Disagreeing with him does not necessarily mean you are right, or that he is wrong.


When someone posts that the only attack on American soil was 911 and does not know that Pearl Harbor was bombed and was the cause of the US getting into WWII they need their comment addressed and in my book that's not disagreement, it's called CORRECTION!

Hope that helps you understand better whats going on here.

Have a good day!
Just Facts

Southborough, MA

#820 Aug 23, 2012
Florida Retiree wrote:
<quoted text>
I respond to some of your posts in an attempt to help you see your weakness and the lack of facts in which you post but mainly to let others on here know that your posts are mainly off the wall and not to take stock in your uninformed inaccurate comments. I now believe I have succeeded in doing that and will no longer address any of your dribble postings.
You obviously think you are someone special to be pointing out someone else's supposed weaknesses, while ignoring your own. I didn't ask for your help and certainly don't need your kind of help. You are like others that believe you are above others and even suggested here that other people reading this forum cannot determine for themselves what is correct and what is incorrect, and they somehow need you to point it out for them...how arrogant of you.

and for the last time, would you please do what you've said you would do and stop responding to my posts? I'm not interested in debates with an arrogant old man that feels he is above others and deserves respect when he disrespects others.

have a nice day...
Ya OK

Boston, MA

#821 Aug 23, 2012
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
I guess it's easy to say something is un-credible when someone or some thing speaks the truth, and the truth ends up being unseemly. Who's won the Pulitzer, or is that institution overwhelmingly liberal biased? I've already heard that about the Nobel Committee. I mean, Stamos, who's an undecided supposed to believe these days? You?
And how about that GOP candidate for Sheriff of HIllsborough County NH Frank Szabo? The scary part is the polls will probably show a positive result of his statements resorting to violence to prevent a WOMAN'S constitutional right to an abortion.
It's funny-iin the not-so-distant past when a Republican wanted to win, they would appeal to the moderate sensibilities. Today they appeal to the disenfranchised, disillusioned, and misinformed. Usually by first saying they have "business" experience. And they call it the "Grand Old Party."
Oh, yeah, Scott Brown will win because Gail Huff is tough, REAL tough, so he must be tough too. Some of that toughness must have rubbed off on him. Remember when WCVB used to stick her sorry-ass out in the middle of blizzards and hurricanes? Scott was home at the time, feeding the babies. What a smart basterd-sticking your wife out in a typhoon while you stay home and watch Sponge Bob Squarepants cartoons and eat Coco Puffs with the girls. I wonder what they thought when they saw Mom getting battered by the surf at the Lynn seawall during the no-name storm.
Dumb as a freaking fox that Junior senator from MA.
Obama won a Nobel Peace Prize and he hadn't even done ANYTHING. That really speaks for itself.
Florida Retiree

Bradenton, FL

#822 Aug 23, 2012
Emerald wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't think that you have proved anything with your posts either, just that you don't agree with that poster...whose comments have been fairly accurate IMO. Disagreeing with him does not necessarily mean you are right, or that he is wrong.


I responded to your post and now the misinformed young man seems to think I was responding to his post and replys with a nasty, how confusing is that??
disgusting

Boston, MA

#823 Aug 23, 2012
Civil Servant Supporter wrote:
And how about that Scott Brown ad showing him in formation with his National Guard basic training unit? How patriotic he is! Talk about waving the flag. And the disclaimer-'The National Guard does not endorse..."
Well, I'd rather be a dog in a whore's backyard then be in the freaking National Guard.
Your posts are disgusting, immature and meaningless. Of course you wouldn't join the National Guard. You are probably a sniveling little coward.
Sla

Dracut, MA

#824 Aug 23, 2012
Just Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
You obviously think you are someone special to be pointing out someone else's supposed weaknesses, while ignoring your own. I didn't ask for your help and certainly don't need your kind of help. You are like others that believe you are above others and even suggested here that other people reading this forum cannot determine for themselves what is correct and what is incorrect, and they somehow need you to point it out for them...how arrogant of you.
and for the last time, would you please do what you've said you would do and stop responding to my posts? I'm not interested in debates with an arrogant old man that feels he is above others and deserves respect when he disrespects others.
have a nice day...
I can see why you don;t want to debate.
It would be nice if he stopped debateing you.
He is makeing you look like a fool.
On the other hand I'm not a good speller.
And I'll debate anyone.
And your a rude person calling people old.
You show no respect yourself.
So take your own advice.
disgusting

Boston, MA

#825 Aug 23, 2012
Florida Retiree wrote:
<quoted text>
When someone posts that the only attack on American soil was 911 and does not know that Pearl Harbor was bombed and was the cause of the US getting into WWII they need their comment addressed and in my book that's not disagreement, it's called CORRECTION!
Hope that helps you understand better whats going on here.
Have a good day!
You're too much old man. You're commiserating now with "CSS" who completely disrespected the National Guard in one of his posts. Nice going!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rutland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Tavern on The common welcomes back..... 22 hr New England Music... 1
Dan Kirouac live in Holden in May Apr 25 New England Music... 1
News Restaurant consortium bringing owners together ... (Jan '08) Apr 20 Donna 19
News Patrick receives mixed grades from local politi... (Jan '08) Apr 19 Irvinator 358 4
Musician Dan Kirouac returns to Jefferson MA in... Apr 15 New England Music... 1
News What's Coming to Amazon Prime in March? Feb '16 Noreaster 1
News Veteran legislators offer advice to winner of T... Feb '16 Mingo 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rutland Mortgages