what is your impression of Pollster

what is your impression of Pollster

Created by OICUR12 on Feb 21, 2013

56 votes

Click on an option to vote

false hypocrite preacher-man

insane and dangerous

he represents my republican party

he represents my Christian beliefs

I'm proud to have him on my side

he's a self-loathing gay

he's looking for a man date

his favoite hobby-gay porn

gives me the creeps

God don't like what he's doing

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Since: Nov 10

Lima, Ohio

#1 Feb 21, 2013
I can't really choose one because he's a really troubled person who always accuses others as being gay whenever they disagree with him. Those who accuse others of something usually do it because they are that themselves. He's obsessed with gay people! Spooky and not natural!

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#2 Feb 21, 2013
Next I would like to consider a verse in Romans concerning the homosexual. I want to go into some of the Greek.

But before I do that I would like to explain something, not that I haven't been explaining a lot about the homosexual.

Here is what I want you to consider!

Although some accuse others of being bigoted. Greek language is unbiased and UN-bigoted as is all language.

You can never pull anyone's leg with language.

Because all language dictates its own definitions. And is governed by its own laws. And especially the Greek.

Greek is very precise, very accurate.

Now, Once again individuals may or may not be biased. But remember that all language is UN-biased. And that is the reason we can trust language and the information provided by such.

Now, With these truths in mind lets consider the homosexual here in the book of Romans.

I will keep it simple and only cover one verse at this time to help you learn. I also will not be covering every word in the verse at this time.

We will only consider one word.

Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men,{Homosexuals} leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly,{Unnatural} and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.{Appropriate}

The word I would like to look at is the word:{RECOMPENSE}

The Greek word used for the word {RECOMPENSE} is the word {ANTIMISTHIA}

This word is made of two words: Anti, "In return" and misthos, "wages"

This word literally means, a giving back in return. Yes, its a wage, a reward.

But its not a wage or reward in a good sense.

To help you further understand this word {RECOMPENSE} it more accurately means a consequence.

But a consequence for what?

It is a wage, a reward, a consequence for homosexual behavour.

Judged:

12

12

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
animal control

Mount Vernon, OH

#4 Feb 21, 2013
http://www.bing.com/images/search... +(&qpvt=Bernard+Hartman+( &FORM=IGRE#view=detail &id=149403F1601B9693882A26 7ADE523AF5A3349450&selecte dIndex=9

Since: May 11

Reality, USA

#5 Feb 21, 2013
Pollster wrote:
Next I would like to consider a verse in Romans concerning the homosexual. I want to go into some of the Greek.
LOL...I bet you do want to go "Greek". No surprise there what with all of your self acknowledged trips to Columbus "for research purposes only".
OICUR12

Bellefontaine, OH

#7 Feb 21, 2013
I see that Don and Polster are voting more than once wanting people to believe Pollster is being backed up by supporters . I ask anyone who claims he represents their Christian beliefs to back it up with their topix name. Lets see how many claim bubba's b^tch represents what they believe. Come on, be brave and put you John doe down! No name.>>>>> then we know it's just Don and bubba sayng pollster represents their religion.
OICUR12

Bellefontaine, OH

#8 Feb 21, 2013
aww, bubba's b^tch doesn't like what missippy said so is voting multiple times to x her remark out because he knows what she said is the truth. Too bad bubba's b^tch. we know what you are up to.

“Marriage=Love+Co mmitment.....”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#9 Feb 21, 2013
Pollster wrote:
Romans 1:27 And likewise also the men,{Homosexuals} leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly,{Unnatural} and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.{Appropriate}
Romans 1 may seem daunting when first approached because it is written in a rhetorical style most modern readers are not used to. Paul, the writer of Romans, was trained as a scholar of Greek classics and Hebrew literature, and his style may seem obscure to those of us (like Tyler) who enjoy reading Dear Abby and USA Today.

Though it may come as a surprise, we consider this to be the easiest of the clobber passages to interpret. This is because Paul, in his classically trained style, thoroughly explains the factual assumptions and rationale behind his condemnation of the behavior described here. This makes it easy for us to answer our question: Does this passage apply to inherently same-gender-attracted people who are living in loving, committed relationships?

If we follow the passage, step-by-step, we find Paul is moving through a logical progression. He is talking about people who:

Refused to acknowledge and glorify God.(v. 21)
Began worshipping idols (images of created things, rather than the Creator).(v. 23)
Were more interested in earthly pursuits than spiritual pursuits.(v. 25)
Gave up their natural, i.e., innate, passion for the opposite sex in an unbounded search for pleasure.(v. 26-27)
Lived lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, strife, slander, disrespect for parents, pride, and hatred of God.(v. 29-31)

The model of homosexual behavior Paul was addressing here is explicitly associated with idol worship (probably temple prostitution (See note 2.)), and with people who, in an unbridled search for pleasure (or because of religious rituals associated with their idolatry), broke away from their natural sexual orientation, participating in promiscuous sex with anyone available.

http://www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org/biblica...
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#10 Feb 21, 2013
OICUR12 wrote:
I see that Don and Polster are voting more than once wanting people to believe Pollster is being backed up by supporters . I ask anyone who claims he represents their Christian beliefs to back it up with their topix name. Lets see how many claim bubba's b^tch represents what they believe. Come on, be brave and put you John doe down! No name.>>>>> then we know it's just Don and bubba sayng pollster represents their religion.
Its not respectable for one to beg.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#11 Feb 21, 2013
LindaS wrote:
<quoted text>
Romans 1 may seem daunting when first approached because it is written in a rhetorical style most modern readers are not used to. Paul, the writer of Romans, was trained as a scholar of Greek classics and Hebrew literature, and his style may seem obscure to those of us (like Tyler) who enjoy reading Dear Abby and USA Today.
Though it may come as a surprise, we consider this to be the easiest of the clobber passages to interpret. This is because Paul, in his classically trained style, thoroughly explains the factual assumptions and rationale behind his condemnation of the behavior described here. This makes it easy for us to answer our question: Does this passage apply to inherently same-gender-attracted people who are living in loving, committed relationships?
If we follow the passage, step-by-step, we find Paul is moving through a logical progression. He is talking about people who:
Refused to acknowledge and glorify God.(v. 21)
Began worshipping idols (images of created things, rather than the Creator).(v. 23)
Were more interested in earthly pursuits than spiritual pursuits.(v. 25)
Gave up their natural, i.e., innate, passion for the opposite sex in an unbounded search for pleasure.(v. 26-27)
Lived lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, strife, slander, disrespect for parents, pride, and hatred of God.(v. 29-31)
The model of homosexual behavior Paul was addressing here is explicitly associated with idol worship (probably temple prostitution (See note 2.)), and with people who, in an unbridled search for pleasure (or because of religious rituals associated with their idolatry), broke away from their natural sexual orientation, participating in promiscuous sex with anyone available.
http://www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org/biblica...
{Romans 1 may seem daunting when first approached because it is written in a rhetorical style most modern readers are not used to}

Oh I see, now individuals need your homosexual web-site to tell them how to read?

Laughable!
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#12 Feb 21, 2013
Given the most recent conviction of the homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky. Is there really much difference between what he did and what homosexuals are teaching school children?

Should male on male sodomy really be introduced to school children?

Should not school children be left to grow and flourish as God intended?

Can homosexuality really be normal if it has to be taught and forced upon school children?

It seems that heterosexual children have done quite well without being indoctrinated as children as to what is proper. If homosexuality is normal, then wouldn't it stand to reason that natural selection would balance it all out without someone being required to be educated about the lifestyle?

Will Sandusky and the homosexual become the new societal norms of our culture?

Sure there is age and consent involved.

But from what we have seen so far is that really a bridge to far?

After all it does seem as though they are lowering the age of consent every day.

Have you ever asked yourself the question, why are the homosexuals in the schools?

Why is it so important for them to be in the schools?

And why grade schools?

If their going to be in the schools, should it not at the very least be in the high schools?

Should children in grade school have to deal with the sex lives of the adults?

Children no doubt have been exposed to the atrocities of the homosexual pedophile Jerry Sandusky via TV, news paper etc. Would it be unreasonable for them to not make the connection between Sandusky and what their being taught in school concerning homosexual sodomy?

And you must remember that children are not easily fooled.

I realize these are very troubling questions for any parent.

But you will be required to expose and teach your children about them at some point. Is the acceptance of these things as there taught to your children really love?

Should not the interest of the children be put first?

Should the tender minds of the children be so twisted and contorted for something as inessential to our culture as the Sandusky's and other homosexual pedophiles?

Should we teach school children that polygamy would also be an acceptable lifestyle for them to consider.

After all polygamist make the same claim that the homosexual and the homosexual pedophile make. And that is that their lifestyle and desires are based upon love.

But what is love?

Are there any boundaries to love?

And what or who sets those boundaries?

Is there a right and proper sexual and moral conduct? And who or what determines what that right, proper and moral conduct is?

And since homosexuals and homosexual pedophiles in the truest sense produce no children. Should children be taught that marriage and family are unimportant?

That marriage and family are inessential to our culture norms?

Is that love?

And we know that all civilizations thru out antiquity have been based upon the family and not the individual. Should that societal norm now be changed to accommodate the corrupt inessential desires of the individual within a society?

Is that love?
OICUR12

Bellefontaine, OH

#13 Feb 21, 2013
Still ranting about homo sex I see. Just proving you cant forget it one second of the day or night,

Does anyone really read all the way down through your insane preaching? Anyone, and if so, do you really agree with this bubba's b^tch?

I don't see anyone adding their John Doe as testiony how you represent their Christian views, BB!

“If you trash the earth, ”

Since: May 09

you have no place else to go.

#14 Feb 21, 2013
He's good at voting multiple times for himself, and then giving everyone else who don't agree with him multiple Xs. I'm with you.... I want to see people use their topix names to say he represents their views on Christianity. I know of two who might. lol.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#15 Feb 21, 2013
OICUR12 wrote:
Still ranting about homo sex I see. Just proving you cant forget it one second of the day or night,
Does anyone really read all the way down through your insane preaching? Anyone, and if so, do you really agree with this bubba's b^tch?
I don't see anyone adding their John Doe as testiony how you represent their Christian views, BB!
Its not respectable for one to beg.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#16 Feb 21, 2013
Hummingbird 4 Real wrote:
He's good at voting multiple times for himself, and then giving everyone else who don't agree with him multiple Xs. I'm with you.... I want to see people use their topix names to say he represents their views on Christianity. I know of two who might. lol.
Its not respectable for one to beg.

“If you trash the earth, ”

Since: May 09

you have no place else to go.

#17 Feb 21, 2013
Pollster wrote:
<quoted text>Its not respectable for one to beg.
It not respectable to vote for yourself and try to pass the allusion you are greatly supported on Topix, either. We know better than that. All one has to do is read their comments on your countless anti-gay threads to see how people feel about you and what you are doing, including Christians! Your fan club consists of 2 people. Voting over and over for yourself is a form of lying.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#18 Feb 21, 2013
I chose insane and dangerous....there is no way 9 people agree with his Christian views...and that's just in the past two hours.

He has to realize that every other poster and reader here can see that it's painfully obvious that he is manipulating the poll and the post judging. He has been called out on that very thing many times. Yet he continues to do it.

Yes, to me that is insane.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#19 Feb 21, 2013
OICUR12 wrote:
Still ranting about homo sex I see. Just proving you cant forget it one second of the day or night,
Does anyone really read all the way down through your insane preaching? Anyone, and if so, do you really agree with this bubba's b^tch?
I don't see anyone adding their John Doe as testiony how you represent their Christian views, BB!
Just a little teaser.

antiatheist wrote:
pollster I can tell you from experience that trying to reason with these people is a complete waste of time. They won't shut up until we have gay marriage, legalized drugs, abortion on demand, etc etc. They are going to be the downfall of America eventually.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#20 Feb 21, 2013
magictrix wrote:
I chose insane and dangerous....there is no way 9 people agree with his Christian views...and that's just in the past two hours.
He has to realize that every other poster and reader here can see that it's painfully obvious that he is manipulating the poll and the post judging. He has been called out on that very thing many times. Yet he continues to do it.
Yes, to me that is insane.
Just a little teaser.

THE BOXER

Hurricane, WV

Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#39
Yesterday


Pollster, people like you reaffirms my faith in God! Your a blessing. I wish i had your patience with these people but i dont. My disgust sometimes overwhelms me. I could definitely learn from you.
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#21 Feb 21, 2013
Hummingbird 4 Real wrote:
He's good at voting multiple times for himself, and then giving everyone else who don't agree with him multiple Xs. I'm with you.... I want to see people use their topix names to say he represents their views on Christianity. I know of two who might. lol.
Just another little teaser.

king james version

United States

thank you someone that knows the word of god and knows what all this filth is contributing in altering the younger generations after us stand up and speak out we do not want this lifestyle for our children grandchildren and great grandchildren to come thank u pollster ur one of the few left
Pollster

Bristolville, OH

#22 Feb 21, 2013
OICUR12 wrote:
I see that Don and Polster are voting more than once wanting people to believe Pollster is being backed up by supporters . I ask anyone who claims he represents their Christian beliefs to back it up with their topix name. Lets see how many claim bubba's b^tch represents what they believe. Come on, be brave and put you John doe down! No name.>>>>> then we know it's just Don and bubba sayng pollster represents their religion.
Just another little teaser.

THE BOXER

Hurricane, WV

Reply »
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Yesterday

Amen KJV.Thanks to you as well.God speed

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rushsylvania Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
This forum is so lame! 52 min Bellefontaine Forum 6
Can Anyone Explain The Difference Between a Dem... 1 hr Hummingbird 4 Real 35
Can You Go 24 Hrs Without Posting? 1 hr USN Atheist 3
DECADES of LIBERAL DENYING of a PROBLEM THAT CO... 3 hr Big Bertha 7
Would Republicans vote for Hitler as President 4 hr Flip Flopper 11
Donald Trump Admits To Trolling Republicans – D... 14 hr Flip Flopper 6
Would Liberals Vote Jesus For President? 15 hr DON W SOUTH 14
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rushsylvania Mortgages