RMSD board to hold off on legal payments

RMSD board to hold off on legal payments

There are 3 comments on the Ruidoso News story from Jul 12, 2012, titled RMSD board to hold off on legal payments. In it, Ruidoso News reports that:

Any legal costs surrounding the defense of two Ruidoso Municipal School District education board members targeted by a group for recall will not be paid by the district, at least for the time being.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Ruidoso News.

nmle2180

Ruidoso, NM

#1 Jul 12, 2012
No wonder our kids are stupid. The political gesturing and egotisical posturing on the part of certain board members, and the public alike, based solely on the fact that they didn't like the suspension of Dr. Harris is a prime example of idiocy at its best. We can't expect excellence from a school district that is run by a board divided by a few petulant foot-stompers and an administrator that can't keep track $800K without an improvement one to show for it.

I appreciate Ms. Marshall for acting like a School Board president and sticking to her guns. The rest of the whiny, petulant, back-biting bunch need to knock it off and act like adults.
What

Ruidoso, NM

#2 Jul 12, 2012
The board also should follow state law open meeting policies. A judge has ruled there is enough evidence to warrant a recall......... something else to consider. And I'm sure the Judge Ritter didn't stomp his feet when handing down his decision.
nmle2180

Ruidoso, NM

#3 Jul 17, 2012
What wrote:
The board also should follow state law open meeting policies. A judge has ruled there is enough evidence to warrant a recall......... something else to consider. And I'm sure the Judge Ritter didn't stomp his feet when handing down his decision.
Following open meeting policies is one thing, but closed door sessions are allowed for personnel issues. The suspension of Dr. Harris is a personnel issue and not subject to the open meeting act.

Nobody said Judge Ritter stomped his feet. The entire mess was started by petulant foot-stompers. That's the only reason it made it to Judge Ritter's courtroom when it did.

I say let the investigation into Dr. Harris conclude. Let the results be presented and THEN determine if there is a need or justification for recall.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Ruidoso Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
All 50 state Medicaid directors oppose Obamacar... 33 min Dittoe 1
GOPís Latest Anti-Obamacare Bill Could Leave 21... 43 min Dittoe 1
Trump Blasts John McCain In The Wake Of His Emb... 1 hr Dittoe 4
I Listened... 1 hr Dittoe 415
Ralph and the Houston Topix Fart King are equal 7 hr Laughing 4
Biden says Enough 8 hr Laughing 25
Things you didn't know 11 hr he should 55

Ruidoso Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Ruidoso Mortgages