La Habra Heights Council votes to hide!
Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.whittierdailynews.com.
#1 Sep 18, 2013
The Whittier Daily News article was incorrect and reads like a City press release.
George Edwards did NOT refuse to waive the council conflict of interest, though he'd be smart to do so.
What he said,if you watch the video, was since he only was presented with the option moments earlier that he needed time to talk with counsel.
The city attorney then said that meant he said no.
Is that how she handles her clients, putting words in their mouth they didn't say?
In a Freudian slip, the article author says twice that the council voted to "recluse" itself, when he probably meant "recuse".
But the council does regularly make decisions in hiding (the back room) and probably does want to hide out now that residents will learn of the council voting to spend over $200,000 per employee to remodel and expand city hall, instead of providing basic services of fire, police, and road repair.
#2 Sep 20, 2013
Since the Council regularly violates the Brown Act and now wants to "recluse" themselves, does that mean they are "brown recluses"?
Add your comments below
|UCLA FOOTBALL NOTEBOOK: Neuheisel says Prince w... (Sep '10)||26 min||Anthony Ramon||35,094|
|Attention BP staff workers council people verba...||44 min||Na NA||13|
|Crime and Public Safety, January 13 (Jan '10)||11 hr||Mr Smith||18|
|LMSA Soccer (Feb '10)||13 hr||lmsa||10,262|
|Two critically injured during San Dimas house p... (Jul '09)||Mon||DontactPrivileged||23|
|Where is LMP (Mar '08)||Dec 10||Fake 1 percenters||87|
|why is VLM so disrespected by everyone (Jul '08)||Dec 10||Stupidmf||121|
Find what you want!
Search Rowland Heights Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC