Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#215301 Sep 8, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you should just let your imagination fly. I'm sure you can come up with a dozen scenarios.
Oh stop it! I don't even want to think about you and Gustavo doing it! Eeeww! Yuck!

It's silly how that works right? You'd think a butthole is a butthole but I gotta have a girl one if I do it at all, and you like boy ones like Gustavo's. Is he tight? YUK!YUK!YUK! That silly jarheaded jackass! I bet you don't even give him the courtesy of a reach-around.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215302 Sep 9, 2013
Huh wrote:
<quoted text>
Screw Frankie. He started this crap with his childish BS rants. He attacks people calls them names says nasty things. And when someone fights back that person is bad? SCREW YOU ALSO...
You really need to apologize to Frankie.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215303 Sep 9, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh...but of course.
LOL!!!
You might want to hone up on your skills in delivering an insult sister.
Just an FYI.
I wasn't trying to insult, just stating a fact.

Idiot.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215304 Sep 9, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
From your comments you would have us believe that anal sex is a fairly recent phenomenon; that all of a sudden people discovered an orifice for sexual pleasure that they'd never stumbled on before.
To let you know just how clever men can be with their dicks, I'll tell you a story. About 20 years ago I was working part-time as a home health care social worker. One of the people I saw was a woman who had some minor dementia. The reason she was being seen by home health care was because she had recently had a bowel resection due to cancer. She had been fitted with an colostomy bag into which her feces drained.(Sorry to be so graphic)
The nurse who was seeing her to monitor the healing of the stoma complained that this woman kept getting infections. She and this woman's doctor had tried everything to get the infection under control.
I was called in to do an evaluation. The nurse suspected that this woman's husband wasn't cleaning it properly. She wanted to know if he needed some emotional support to deal with his wife's new care needs.
I spoke to the man for quite a while. He explained that he knew exactly what to do. He was very secretive with me. He didn't like that I was asking questions. But I pushed on.
Finally, he told me what he had been doing. It seems that at some point it had occurred to him that he could use his wife's new orifice as an "entrance" for sexual intercourse. This was what was causing the infection.
She was eventually removed from the home and placed in a nursing facility.
If this half-senile coot from the hills of East TN could figure out a way to use his wife's stoma for sex, why would you think that it is unlikely that mankind didn't utilize anal sex for pleasure and birth control?
Anal sex was hardly mentioned prior to the AIDS epidemic. Oh, people snickered about it--calling it "buggery" or "corn-holing" or some other imaginative name. However, until HIV/AIDS, people simply did not talk about it.
It SEEMS recent to you. But it isn't.
Mankind is a creative lot. Necessity is the mother of invention. And I don't think that anal sex was invented only recently.
I made no such insinuation. I did say that the prevalence of porn has had a marked increase in experimentation.

Did you really just attempt to justify anal sex with an example of a demented old man taking advantage of his senile old wife?

AND causing harm in the process???

You reek of denial VV.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#215305 Sep 9, 2013
And despite all the whining and gnashing of teeth from the anti-marriage crowd, gay folks are still legally marrying in California, and will continue to do.

Some folks on these threads need a different hobby.

Why waste so much time on settled law?
Greg Kirschmann

Elmwood Park, IL

#215306 Sep 9, 2013
Quest wrote:
And despite all the whining and gnashing of teeth from the anti-marriage crowd, gay folks are still legally marrying in California, and will continue to do.
Some folks on these threads need a different hobby.
Why waste so much time on settled law?
You do have to wonder why people who consider themselves gender authorities invest so much time belittling others.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#215307 Sep 9, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course they aren't and why should I be nice? You want your privileges at my expense. Deny me the most basic of rights, make fun and call me names, belittle my marriage and reduce it to a sex act then quote God and children as an excuse. I'm not even going to mention what you do to others like me in business world. It gets really really OLD and my sex life has NOTHING to do with YOU. If it happened to you, I don't think you would be very NICE either.
First, I really don't care about your sex life. Second, what privileges are at your expense? Third, you are not denied the most basic of rights. Lastly, it doesn't justify profanity.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#215308 Sep 9, 2013
Quest wrote:
And despite all the whining and gnashing of teeth from the anti-marriage crowd, gay folks are still legally marrying in California, and will continue to do.
Some folks on these threads need a different hobby.
Why waste so much time on settled law?
1.) Gay folks can legally marry in any state in the union.
2.) There is no "anti-marriage crowd', pro marriage as in conjugal-husband and wife.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#215309 Sep 9, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
1.) Gay folks can legally marry in any state in the union.
2.) There is no "anti-marriage crowd', pro marriage as in conjugal-husband and wife.
your second point is wrong, I am pro marriage for opposite sex couples just as I am pro marriage for same sex couples.

I am pro marriage, you are anti marriage for certain cases.

There is nothing "pro" about your position

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215310 Sep 9, 2013
Greg Kirschmann wrote:
<quoted text>
You do have to wonder why people who consider themselves gender authorities invest so much time belittling others.
I wonder why a clearly distinct relationship has the audacious idiocy to try to impose itself on marriage and children. What does it say when you have to severely dumb down a relationship to equate to it?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#215311 Sep 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I made no such insinuation. I did say that the prevalence of porn has had a marked increase in experimentation.
Did you really just attempt to justify anal sex with an example of a demented old man taking advantage of his senile old wife?
AND causing harm in the process???
You reek of denial VV.
Nope... I was just pointing out mankind's ingenuity when it comes to "getting off". Like I said, men have always been looking for a place in which to stick their dicks. They have a boner, they look for a hole.

In this country, anal sex is a legal expression of sexual intercourse between heterosexual and homosexual couples.

I'll bet you've even tapped your wife a time or two.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#215312 Sep 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder why a clearly distinct relationship has the audacious idiocy to try to impose itself on marriage and children. What does it say when you have to severely dumb down a relationship to equate to it?
We have had Christians getting married for years with a distinct relationship with a fairy tale, and they impost that fairy tale relationship on their children. Many children grow up and reject the dumbing down of relationships by this fantasy.

The difference is, pro marriage people like us donít want to try and remove your rights to marry. Only the hateful, ignorant and spiteful would do that.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#215313 Sep 9, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope... I was just pointing out mankind's ingenuity when it comes to "getting off". Like I said, men have always been looking for a place in which to stick their dicks. They have a boner, they look for a hole.
In this country, anal sex is a legal expression of sexual intercourse between heterosexual and homosexual couples.
I'll bet you've even tapped your wife a time or two.
You contradict yourself and lie to cover it. Your very own example confirms it is harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.

And no, I would never think of doing that. My sphincter locks up just hearing you say such a thing.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#215314 Sep 9, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You contradict yourself and lie to cover it. Your very own example confirms it is harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
And no, I would never think of doing that. My sphincter locks up just hearing you say such a thing.
In America our Constitution gives us the right to do things that are harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. For instance there is nothing more harmful, unhealthy and demeaning than going to church and listening to the Con-artist preach from that stupid contradictory book of ignorance that you claim to trust but really don't.

If you really want gays to give up gay sex, then you need to show us you actually trust the Bible.

For instance, Mark16:17-18 says: "And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils;.... They shall take up serpents and if they drink any deadly thing it shall not hurt them."

Not many believing Christians are willing to drink poisons or handle rattlesnakes to prove the Bible's accuracy; How about you KiMerde? Want to show us that you take the Bible seriously? Please drink a quart of Draino.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#215315 Sep 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
The difference is, pro marriage people like us donít want to try and remove your rights to marry. Only the hateful, ignorant and spiteful would do that.
And there is no one more hateful, ignorant and spiteful than KiMerde.

I mean what can we expect? He is a Christ-insanity-ist after all.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#215316 Sep 9, 2013
The Book of Leviticus, for example, has more inaccurate scientific comments than any other book in the Bible, and yet our resident pew warmers ask us to trust it to tell us about homosexuality.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#215317 Sep 9, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
We have had Christians getting married for years with a distinct relationship with a fairy tale, and they impost that fairy tale relationship on their children. Many children grow up and reject the dumbing down of relationships by this fantasy.
Others embrace it. For some it provides a spiritual foundation to their marital relationship.
The difference is, pro marriage people like us donít want to try and remove your rights to marry.
Nor do the pro conjugal marriage people, yours. In fact they wish to ensure everyone has the same right to marry, enter into a legally recognized relationship of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states.
Only the hateful, ignorant and spiteful would do that.
Exactly, deny everyone THE SAME RIGHT to marry.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#215318 Sep 9, 2013
Quest wrote:
And despite all the whining and gnashing of teeth from the anti-marriage crowd, gay folks are still legally marrying in California, and will continue to do.
Some folks on these threads need a different hobby.
Why waste so much time on settled law?
You need a different hobby, try fly fishing. I love it. Very relaxing.
Where are you located? I could maybe point you towards some good places. Have fun!
Gustavo

Highland, CA

#215319 Sep 9, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
WOW! Witty.
And to the point. No other explanation needed, stupid
Gustavo

Highland, CA

#215320 Sep 9, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, not very creative are you, if that's the best you can do.
lol Another Frances. It's to the point, what more do you want. Even a simpleton like you could understand

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rowland Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Pomona approves ordinance to deal with loud, un... (Nov '09) 4 hr WordUp 32
News Club hopping: The Crazy Horse (Jul '08) 4 hr wtf 147
wmx3 5 hr Yea right 1
Pacheco Lozano made headlines again in Tribune 6 hr Long Time Resident 18
Pucker up Tuttle turd, here comes Rios! 8 hr Tuttle Congential... 24
Tuttle Mentally Disturbed, Just Look at the Lie... 8 hr Tuttle Congential... 12
Mystery Solved Tuttle Turd Dad Explained 8 hr Tuttle Congential... 11
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rowland Heights Mortgages