Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#213757 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
I'm wondering where your concern for the integrity and effectiveness of our military comes in?
Well ahead of your concern for truthfulness and integrity. It's so far ahead in fact, you couldn't see it even if it were on a linear line.

Smile jackass.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213758 Sep 1, 2013
Speak Italian like a Brooklynite.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#213759 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
They aren't required to. No one that gets married is required to equate to your fairytales. Sucks to be you. Your distinctions are irrelevant to the state and to overwhelming majority of citizens.
KiMare wrote:
Oh please, enlighten me about the real world.
That would be like attempting to explain photosynthesis to a 6 month old. There's no point.
KiMare wrote:
How does a ss couple 'hit all of those'?????
Snicker.
Why does a ss couple have to?????? Oh, that's right, they don't.
Snicker.

Up your meds kuntmare.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#213760 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
She brings a whole new meaning to a blonde lesbian...
Sowing discord on a Sunday. Your god hates you.

Smile kuntmare!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#213761 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I certainly didn't see a smirk, it looked to me like sh/tty brains falling out a plundered sphincter...

Surely you have seen a lot of plundered sphincters. In fact, I bet you have a whole web site devoted to them on your "favorites" list.

Sicko.
Mikey

Long Beach, CA

#213762 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
I would never want to do that, please show me the 'bigoted twirl'.
I can't wait...
LOL all of it moron. Mars and Venus? Mary please. Marriage is no longer 'only' between 2 genders and what about 'poly'? Going to set off your little friend Frankie on that one. You disgusting troll, it is you that's in denial. Your going to tell me that those 15 minute Las Vegas marriages are strength and nurture delicately balanced? what a crock of sh*t and twirl. Sounds like you're the one with a stretched sphincter because the unstoppable bullsh*t is falling out all over you. POS

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#213763 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
What a lovely sentiment. It's also an incredible load of crap.

It states no verifiable facts, only saccharine feelings.

--"A miraculous union of two genders"--Obviously a union can involve two men or two women. The statistics I found indicate that there are about 770,000 same-sex couples in the U.S.
Also, there's nothing miraculous about the union of two genders. Billions of people do it each year. A miracle is a rare event. It is "a perceptible interruption of the laws of nature."
So, if you want to split hairs, same-sex relationships are much more rare than opposite-sex relationships. One could argue that same-sex relationships are more of a miracle than opposite-sex relationships.

--"A unions so profound it is described as the union of Mars and Venus."--Venus is the Roman goddess of love. Mars is the Roman god of war. Sounds like a hellish relationship to me.
In Roman mythology, Venus and Mars do not marry. In fact, Venus is married to Vulcan. But Venus and Mars have an affair. They end up having a child.
Is this how you see opposite-sex relationships? Kind of scary...

--"It reunites humanity to the roots of life, while at the very same time hosting the best and natural birth place of future human life."--No one denies that opposite-sex activity results in offspring. Without sexual activity between opposite-sex people none of us would be here.
But you wrongly equate marriage and childbirth.
And while there is a relationship between the two, neither is dependent on the other to exist.
Take for example an unmarried couple (maybe even a one-night-stand) in which a child is conceived. This looks nothing like your lofty description of marriage. Nor does a loving marriage in which the couple decides to not have children.

--"It is the blend of masculinity and femininity." Again, it might be masculine and feminine. But it could just as well be masculine and masculine or feminine and feminine.
And remember, homosexual relationships are much more rare than heterosexual relationships--meaning that they are likely more miraculous and unique than heterosexual relationships.

--"The wisdom of logic and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one."--Now this is just a bunch of sexist bullshit.

--"A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders."--whatever... see above...

--"A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions."--First off, a same-sex couple doesn't have to equate to anything. Secondly, you throw out a bunch of "rules" that only you think people should abide by. But you forget, Kim; you're not the "marriage god". You don't get to impose your beliefs or standards on anyone but you and your wife (God love her soul). Thirdly, you continue to make this into some kind of a competition--claiming that heterosexual marriages are MORE real, MORE loving, MORE unique, MORE, MORE, MORE... And that's just a bunch of childish bullshit. Heterosexual marriages are different than homosexual marriages only because of the gender composition. Both can and do have families. Both are based on love. This isn't a race, Kim. Only YOU have made it into one. It makes you pathetic and small.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213764 Sep 1, 2013
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL all of it moron. Mars and Venus? Mary please. Marriage is no longer 'only' between 2 genders and what about 'poly'? Going to set off your little friend Frankie on that one. You disgusting troll, it is you that's in denial. Your going to tell me that those 15 minute Las Vegas marriages are strength and nurture delicately balanced? what a crock of sh*t and twirl. Sounds like you're the one with a stretched sphincter because the unstoppable bullsh*t is falling out all over you. POS
Little? I'm 6 foot tall 225 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal!

And yes, what about poly and incest? The pink elephants in the rainbow room.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213765 Sep 1, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
What a lovely sentiment. It's also an incredible load of crap.
It states no verifiable facts, only saccharine feelings.
--"A miraculous union of two genders"--Obviously a union can involve two men or two women. The statistics I found indicate that there are about 770,000 same-sex couples in the U.S.
Also, there's nothing miraculous about the union of two genders. Billions of people do it each year. A miracle is a rare event. It is "a perceptible interruption of the laws of nature."
So, if you want to split hairs, same-sex relationships are much more rare than opposite-sex relationships. One could argue that same-sex relationships are more of a miracle than opposite-sex relationships.
--"A unions so profound it is described as the union of Mars and Venus."--Venus is the Roman goddess of love. Mars is the Roman god of war. Sounds like a hellish relationship to me.
In Roman mythology, Venus and Mars do not marry. In fact, Venus is married to Vulcan. But Venus and Mars have an affair. They end up having a child.
Is this how you see opposite-sex relationships? Kind of scary...
--"It reunites humanity to the roots of life, while at the very same time hosting the best and natural birth place of future human life."--No one denies that opposite-sex activity results in offspring. Without sexual activity between opposite-sex people none of us would be here.
But you wrongly equate marriage and childbirth.
And while there is a relationship between the two, neither is dependent on the other to exist.
Take for example an unmarried couple (maybe even a one-night-stand) in which a child is conceived. This looks nothing like your lofty description of marriage. Nor does a loving marriage in which the couple decides to not have children.
--"It is the blend of masculinity and femininity." Again, it might be masculine and feminine. But it could just as well be masculine and masculine or feminine and feminine.
And remember, homosexual relationships are much more rare than heterosexual relationships--meaning that they are likely more miraculous and unique than heterosexual relationships.
--"The wisdom of logic and intuition united. Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced. Protection and nurture combined as one."--Now this is just a bunch of sexist bullshit.
--"A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders."--whatever... see above...
--"A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions."--First off, a same-sex couple doesn't have to equate to anything. Secondly, you throw out a bunch of "rules" that only you think people should abide by. But you forget, Kim; you're not the "marriage god". You don't get to impose your beliefs or standards on anyone but you and your wife (God love her soul). Thirdly, you continue to make this into some kind of a competition--claiming that heterosexual marriages are MORE real, MORE loving, MORE unique, MORE, MORE, MORE... And that's just a bunch of childish bullshit. Heterosexual marriages are different than homosexual marriages only because of the gender composition. Both can and do have families. Both are based on love. This isn't a race, Kim. Only YOU have made it into one. It makes you pathetic and small.
Too wordy.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#213766 Sep 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Too wordy.
yes, it seems you need pity, concise soundbytes to parrot...thinking may certainly not be your forte, huh?(silent 'e' please on the forte, we are not talking italian music terms here...)

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213767 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
I would never want to do that, please show me the 'bigoted twirl'.
I can't wait...
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>perhaps the fact that the words you stole from someone else without credit were absolutely false because of the bigoted incorrect statement at the end...
let me guess, that was the only part that was yours? seems when you try to use your own words all that comes out is bullshit...
Can't back up the claim of bigoted twirl?

Nor will you be able to back up the assertion that I 'stole' the words.

Please, provide proof.

Smile.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#213768 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
Oh please, enlighten me about the real world.
How does a ss couple 'hit all of those'?????
Snicker.
Only when you can show that it is legally mandated that YOUR personal description of marriage MUST include all of YOUR factors, then we can talk.

But you know as well as I do that no such set of laws exists.

As has been pointed out to you repeatedly, you narcissistic turd, you don't get to set the standard for marriage for the rest of humanity.

Does it ever occur to you the hubris it takes for one person to attempt to define marriage for every couple on the planet? No one else in this discussion has ever tried to mandate that certain factors MUST be in place before a couple can take their relationship to the next level of marriage. Only someone with SERIOUS pathology would attempt to do this. Not even our government is this intrusive. I don't even think most ministers insist that a couple meet such strict guidelines before they agree to marry them.

You are unique. And not in a good way...

You need to seriously take a look at yourself and try to determine exactly what it is that makes you believe that you know what is best for everyone else.

But here's the bottom line (and I know how much you like bottoms)... You are one person out of billions of people on the planet. You are rude, obnoxious, and opinionated. You WISH you had the power to enforce your standards on everyone else, but you don't. All you get to do is sit around and watch the world change. There is nothing you can do to stop it. The momentum is in our favor. And all of your poems, canned comments, smirking, etc. can't do anything to stop it.

Sucks to be you...

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213769 Sep 1, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
They aren't required to. No one that gets married is required to equate to your fairytales. Sucks to be you. Your distinctions are irrelevant to the state and to overwhelming majority of citizens.
<quoted text>
That would be like attempting to explain photosynthesis to a 6 month old. There's no point.
<quoted text>
Why does a ss couple have to?????? Oh, that's right, they don't.
Snicker.
Up your meds kuntmare.
Honey, calm down.

No one said anything about a 'requirement'

I simply noted irrefutable distinctions between marriage and ss couples such as your partner and you.

All you have is gay twirl and ad homoan attacks.

Yes?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#213770 Sep 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Too wordy.
Does being confined to a wheelchair make you incapable of reading? Maybe your brain is located somewhere in the vicinity of your ass. Maybe when you lost your ability to walk, you also lost your ability to concentrate.

It's the only explanation I can come up with.

Well, the other explanation is that you're just a dick. That's another possibility.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213771 Sep 1, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yes, it seems you need pity, concise soundbytes to parrot...thinking may certainly not be your forte, huh?(silent 'e' please on the forte, we are not talking italian music terms here...)
It seems I need pity eh?

Oh the irony.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#213772 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
I would never want to do that, please show me the 'bigoted twirl'.
I can't wait...
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL all of it moron. Mars and Venus? Mary please. Marriage is no longer 'only' between 2 genders and what about 'poly'? Going to set off your little friend Frankie on that one. You disgusting troll, it is you that's in denial. Your going to tell me that those 15 minute Las Vegas marriages are strength and nurture delicately balanced? what a crock of sh*t and twirl. Sounds like you're the one with a stretched sphincter because the unstoppable bullsh*t is falling out all over you. POS
Mikey honey,

If you are going to validate your assertion, you can't shift the issue to another person's points, or point out the exceptions.

I pointed out the time-honored essence of marriage, fulfilled by the vast majority of couples who make the vow. It also exposes the absolute inability of ss couples to equate.

Clearly may be able to mount an a//, but you certainly can't kick this old a//.

Smirk.

Since: Mar 11

St. Croix valley

#213773 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
I would never want to do that, please show me the 'bigoted twirl'.
I can't wait...
<quoted text>
Can't back up the claim of bigoted twirl?
Nor will you be able to back up the assertion that I 'stole' the words.
Please, provide proof.
Smile.
so you admit to creating a post that was totally false...again?

maybe you were not thinking clearly trying to find some bit of proof from your previous bullshit post...

still nothing on that front yet, just your prejudice and bigotry to show the world? so sad, so ugly of a human...
Mikey

Long Beach, CA

#213774 Sep 1, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
In the end,
Marriage is a miraculous union of two genders,
a union so profound,
it is described as the union of Mars and Venus.
It reunites humanity to the roots of life,
while at the very same time
hosting the best and natural
birth place of future human life.
It is the blend of masculinity and femininity.
The wisdom of logic and intuition united.
Strength and delicacy perfectly balanced.
Protection and nurture combined as one.
A complimentary merging that multiplies the unbiased blend of humanity's genders.
A ss couple cannot equate to a single one of these distinctions.
<quoted text>
I would never want to do that, please show me the 'bigoted twirl'.
I can't wait...
<quoted text>
Can't back up the claim of bigoted twirl?
Nor will you be able to back up the assertion that I 'stole' the words.
Please, provide proof.
Smile.
I already did asstroll, can't even remember who you're posting to. Maybe you should go do some sphincter exercises to tighten up that new one I just gave you.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213775 Sep 1, 2013
woodtick57 wrote:
<quoted text>yes, it seems you need pity, concise soundbytes to parrot...thinking may certainly not be your forte, huh?(silent 'e' please on the forte, we are not talking italian music terms here...)
Are you still working on providing that post where you "proved me wrong"? Or are you just hoping I forget that it doesn't exist and that you lied? Let me know, m'kay?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#213776 Sep 1, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Does being confined to a wheelchair make you incapable of reading? Maybe your brain is located somewhere in the vicinity of your ass. Maybe when you lost your ability to walk, you also lost your ability to concentrate.
It's the only explanation I can come up with.
Well, the other explanation is that you're just a dick. That's another possibility.
I read well. Your post was too long and boring to bother with. It was truly too wordy. You could have said the same thing with 1/3 the words.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rowland Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Manuel Lozano Lee Baca? 3 hr Allegations 1
News More than 1,000 backpacks, school supplies give... (Aug '10) 6 hr heaven 15
News Man wounded in Hacienda Heights shooting (Jun '12) 15 hr HHxP13 29
News South El Monte mayor admits to 7-year bribery s... Fri concerned res 1
#Crack Wives Splatter Fri Martin Gallagher ... 2
News A girl waves a Mexican flag during rallies in L... (Mar '06) Fri Hanson Bologna 4,511
News Cynthia Kurtz: Taxes, negativity driving busine... (Oct '10) Fri Rat Chainy 3

Rowland Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rowland Heights Mortgages