New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

Thanks to ALL of the countries who helped the U.S. victims after hurricane "Sandy."
It is highly appropriate that we send THANKS to all of the countries to which we have given our help to over the years, by them returning our favors after "Sandy" ravaged our East Coast, leaving dead, homelessness, and pure disaster in its wake, by them sending the victims monetary and physical help.

this was a storm that affected several states of the u.s. not the entire nation itself....the u.s. can take care of a few of it's own people.
the only people who appear to be suffering are the people who were underinsuranced or not insured at all.
most others received federal assistance from fema, etc...

there will always be the have's and have nots....some will lose alot after this storm, and some will make out like bandits.
go figure....

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>It is better for you to remain silent and thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt.

"You want to see idiots, catch your reflection in a window. "
Ha ha ha yes cause I'M the one trying to justify why Jesus giving things away for free is ok, yet the government giving things away for free isn't...

Do you know what a parable is? Every time you open your mouth, STUPID comes out.

Do you know what LIVING by a parable means?

I think it's hilarious. All you conservatives way is god and jesus everywhere, yet you wouldn't take two seconds to actually SEE what is being said in that bible you wave at gay people.

Insult me all you want, you still haven't answered two keys questions I've asked in regulars to your logic.

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>It is better for you to remain silent and thought a fool, than to speak out and remove all doubt.

"You want to see idiots, catch your reflection in a window. "
Ha ha ha yes cause I'M the one trying to justify why Jesus giving things away for free is ok, yet the government giving things away for free isn't...

Do you know what a parable is? Every time you open your mouth, STUPID comes out.

More stupid then assuming other countries should have helped us for Sandy? Then getting mad because they didn't? Is that what you consider smart? Ha ha

Unrelyable wrote:

<quoted text>
More stupid then assuming other countries should have helped us for Sandy? Then getting mad because they didn't? Is that what you consider smart? Ha ha

Who's Mad? We have obama for president, what is there to worry about. We are the most generous nation on earth, it is the principle of reciprocity at point, even if just nominal.

Mexican Mitt Romney wrote:

<quoted text>
If you insist on letting e-mails (especially from AIPAC) and blogs be your only source of education and information, we will never win another election silly gringo...
Ireland has sent $322,000. Taiwan donated $300,000. The Philippines made a donation of $250,000.
http://news.yahoo.com/private-donations-hurri...

I have many sources, some for entertainment, like abc cnn cbc nbc, others for facts WSJ, IBD, BBC NPR, NWTF. The donations you listed are fine but merely nominal, and hardly reciprocal to this great nations' generosity, and I don't expect it, the point is Foreign aid should be based on the present, not on historical perspective. It should start at zero and be commensurate with our selfish interests period, like everyone else.

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>
I have many sources, some for entertainment, like abc cnn cbc nbc, others for facts WSJ, IBD, BBC NPR, NWTF.

If that was truly the case you would not have copied and pasted that nonsense without fact checking it first.

T

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>he donations you listed are fine but merely nominal, and hardly reciprocal to this great nations' generosity, and I don't expect it, the point is Foreign aid should be based on the present, not on historical perspective. It should start at zero and be commensurate with our selfish interests period, like everyone else.

While I agree with you on some points, we are one the richest nation on earth so our donations will most always be greater than other nations. Foreign aid accounts for about 1 percent of the U.S. budget. The bloated defense budget that Eisenhower warned us about is 20 times greater than that.

Mexican Mitt Romney wrote:

<quoted text>
If that was truly the case you would not have copied and pasted that nonsense without fact checking it first.
T<quoted text>
While I agree with you on some points, we are one the richest nation on earth so our donations will most always be greater than other nations. Foreign aid accounts for about 1 percent of the U.S. budget. The bloated defense budget that Eisenhower warned us about is 20 times greater than that.

It is not the amount of foreign aid, it is that in many cases it is given unconditionally, like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases.

The Administration could have searched for wasteful spending to alleviate across the board cuts, but they chose instead to inflict targeted high profile cutbacks, like "White House tours", I mean really, there are no frauds committed in Medicare and Medicaid? We are talking about Billions and Billions of fraud and duplication of programs. Bloated military costs do have at least a deterrent quality concerning our enemies, fraud does not.

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>It is not the amount of foreign aid, it is that in many cases it is given unconditionally, like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases.

The Administration could have searched for wasteful spending to alleviate across the board cuts, but they chose instead to inflict targeted high profile cutbacks, like "White House tours", I mean really, there are no frauds committed in Medicare and Medicaid? We are talking about Billions and Billions of fraud and duplication of programs. Bloated military costs do have at least a deterrent quality concerning our enemies, fraud does not.

"like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases."

Only a conservative would say the loving nurture of a mother can be irresponsible...

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>It is not the amount of foreign aid, it is that in many cases it is given unconditionally, like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases.

The Administration could have searched for wasteful spending to alleviate across the board cuts, but they chose instead to inflict targeted high profile cutbacks, like "White House tours", I mean really, there are no frauds committed in Medicare and Medicaid? We are talking about Billions and Billions of fraud and duplication of programs. Bloated military costs do have at least a deterrent quality concerning our enemies, fraud does not.

Ha ha ha ha so FIRST you claimed there wasn't any aid given to us during sandy from other countries. Then, when someone shows you how untrue that statement is, you switched your point to "It is not the amount of foreign aid"

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

So rather then admit you actually didn't have any information on a topic you felt compelled to speak about, you, in turn, tried to play it of as if you actually KNEW countries gave us aid, but switched your view to "it doesn't matter how much that have?"

So, you either lied about knowing countries have aid, of you're lying now, switching your talking point... Either way, you haven't a first clue about anything you're discussing...

But please, in typical conservative fashion, rather then admit you just don't know, keep pretending you do... It's entertaining!

Unrelyable wrote:

<quoted text>
"like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases."
Only a conservative would say the loving nurture of a mother can be irresponsible...

If you want an example of how a mothers love can be irresponsible look into the attachment parenting movement.

Unrelyable wrote:

<quoted text>
"like a parents' love for their child, and that can be irresponsible in both cases."
Only a conservative would say the loving nurture of a mother can be irresponsible...

loving nurture, no I said unconditional love, and of course you don't know the difference, because you are a laughable idiot, or a lying skunk that changes words to fit their fallacious narrative, a tactic of the left, which is it skunky?

Once a dingleberry always a dingleberry.

Remiesong wrote:

Once a dingleberry always a dingleberry.

Brilliant prose, how do you do it?

Hingle McCringleberry wrote:

<quoted text>
You have the sense of humor of a toad that has been run over several times, helping those in need is admirable, creating a generational dependence rather than opportunity is the doing of democrats, whose only intention was to create a voting block ad infinitum of dependents to be exploited. Shameful.

I'd like to give you your forty acres and a mule and take back all the tools of opportunity you have no doubt whelched from the taxpayers of this great country. You should feel proud of your uppity attitude and your misguided efforts to malign those less fortunate and those who try to help them. Dingleberry!!!!

test

Tap...tap...tap
Is this on?
I know you're out there; I can here you breathing.
A monkey, a prostitute, and a rabbi go into a bar.....

Good Reason lets Party for G Bush

higurs wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =xTqulSeEbEYXX
Good Reason lets Party for G Bush

Dingleberrys brother.

Rodney wrote:

Tap...tap...tap
Is this on?
I know you're out there; I can here you breathing.
A monkey, a prostitute, and a rabbi go into a bar.....

The bartender looks up at them and says; Is this some kind of joke?

Remiesong wrote:

<quoted text> I'd like to give you your forty acres and a mule and take back all the tools of opportunity you have no doubt whelched from the taxpayers of this great country. You should feel proud of your uppity attitude and your misguided efforts to malign those less fortunate and those who try to help them. Dingleberry!!!!

"If I had had a son, he would have looked like Barack Obama".......Trayvon Martin