Missouri's Prop C: Voters Set to Challenge Health Reform

[Obozo Struttn Dicktater]

mEAT me in st louie wrote:

<quoted text>
the next DicEATer is Large"Loser"Language

http://dancingczars.files.wordpress.com/2012/...

[john]

r u kidding

[Really]

Whatever

[Matters]

This is important

[wexgex]

youtube.com/watch... …
Get a Grip on Reality it needs reform

[Brenda Toombs]

vote no. we live n america we r posed to be free here. not live in a communoist world w one dictator.

[Iran]

Iran to pee

[YEP]

This state is going to vote for this health care because they have so many on welfare and like the government hand out. Working people will pay for this thru the nose. the freeloaders will have a free ride. Just wait until the next government move is to cut their welfare and it is coming. Lets see how many want more government control than. You better wake up and vote against this bill it is just more government contrlo of our lives. They are not giving anything away.

[Milw TaXpayer]

So......how did the vote in Missouri go?????

[Seymour]

If you think about it, that is if you pay any kind of taxes, you are paying for it anyway.

[Hoemann]

I don't think we ever got to vote on this issue yet.

[jnixonthecrook]

With so much corruption in this state, who would really care about healthcare. When there state government corruption like this.
Here are the case files of MO DSS Family Support , Child Support enforcement workers that have the authority to issue garnishments per a judge's decision and enforce them to employers but what happens when these state employees, have garnishments against them and MO DSS does nothing to enforce the judge's ruling against their workers.
12SL-AC08463 - QUICKCLICK LOANS LLC V EDITH DAVIS
This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Sort Date Entries: Descending Ascending Display Options:
12/17/2012 Garnishment Returned Served
E DOCUMENT - Document ID - 12-GARN-82287; Served To - MISSOURI CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION; Server - SO ST LOUIS CITY-ST LOUIS; Served Date - 12-DEC-12; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Sheriff Department; Reason Description - Served
10/16/2012 Judgment Transcribed
E-DOCUMENT
Req for Transcript Judgment
10/10/2012 Execution/Garnishment Issued
This is garnishment 12-GARN-82287 for EDITH DAVIS; returnable date: 08-JAN-2013; Garnishee: MISSOURI CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION
08/29/2012 Judgment Entered
AFFIDAVIT FILED.
Default Judgment
Associated Entries: 07/27/2012 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Associated Entries: 07/30/2012 - Hearing Scheduled
Scheduled For: 08/29/2012; 9:00 AM ; SANDRA FARRAGUT-HEMPHILL; St Louis County
08/21/2012 Summons Personally Served
Document ID - 12-AASM-7691; Served To - DAVIS, EDITH; Server - ; Served Date - 16-AUG-12; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Served
07/30/2012 Pluries Summons Issued
Document ID: 12-AASM-7691, for DAVIS, EDITH;
Hearing Scheduled
Associated Entries: 08/29/2012 - Default Judgment
Scheduled For: 08/29/2012; 9:00 AM ; SANDRA FARRAGUT-HEMPHILL; St Louis County
07/27/2012 Request for Alias Summons
Filed By: GARY R UNDERWOOD
Summ Req-Assc Pers Serv
Request for Appointment of Special Process Server Filed and Appointed as Requested.
Filed By: GARY R UNDERWOOD
Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Hearing Continued From: 08/01/2012; 9:00 AM Hearing
07/23/2012 Summons Withdrawn
Document ID - 12-AASM-6173; Served To - DAVIS, EDITH; Server - ; Served Date - 23-JUL-12; Served Time - 09:11:36; Service Type - Special Process Server; Reason Description - Recalled for Re-Issuance
07/09/2012 Hearing Scheduled
Associated Entries: 07/27/2012 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Scheduled For: 08/01/2012; 9:00 AM ; SANDRA FARRAGUT-HEMPHILL; St Louis County
07/06/2012 Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Hearing Continued From: 07/11/2012; 9:00 AM Hearing
06/14/2012 Pluries Summons Issued
Document ID: 12-AASM-6173, for DAVIS, EDITH.
06/08/2012 Hearing Scheduled
Associated Entries: 07/06/2012 - Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Scheduled For: 07/11/2012; 9:00 AM ; SANDRA FARRAGUT-HEMPHILL; St Louis County
Hearing Continued/Rescheduled
Hearing Continued From: 06/06/2012; 9:00 AM Hearing
05/31/2012 Summ Req-Assc Pers Serv
Request for Appointment of Special Process Server Filed and Appointed as Requested.
Memorandum Filed
PLURIES REQUEST
05/25/2012 Summons Withdrawn

[jnixonthecrook]

part 2

12SL-AC08463 - QUICKCLICK LOANS LLC V EDITH DAVIS
This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Judgment
Date: 10/16/2012 Description: Judgment Transcribed Against: DAVIS, EDITH
Amount of Judgment:$2,039.47 Date of Satisfaction: not yet on file
Text: E-DOCUMENT
Next Judgment
Date: 08/29/2012 Description: Judgment Entered Against: DAVIS, EDITH
Amount of Judgment:$2,039.47 Date of Satisfaction: not yet on file
Text: AFFIDAVIT FILED.

12SL-AC08463- QUICKCLICK LOANS LLC V EDITH DAVIS
This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Garnishment/Execution Number: 12-GARN-82287
Garnishment/Execution Issue Date: 10/10/2012 Location of Judgment or Decree: St Louis County
Debtor: EDITH DAVIS County Directed to: The City of St. Louis
Garnishee: MISSOURI CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION Requester: QUICKCLICK LOANS LLC
Requested Return Date: 01/08/2013 Interrogatories Filed:
Exemption Filed:

Reason for Hold: Date Placed on Hold:
Reason Taken off Hold: Date Taken off Hold:
Reason Released: Date Released:

Pay Out Date:

Total Due:$2,502.19 Balance Due:$2,502.19
12SL-AC41099 - MILLS PROPERTIES INC V GENINE BYRD

This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Sort Date Entries: Descending Ascending Display Options:

02/19/2013 Garnishment Returned Non-Est
E DOCUMENT Document ID - 13-EXEC-428; Served To - BYRD, GENINE; Server - EVICTIONS, SHERIFF; Served Date - 19-FEB-13; Served Time - 00:00:00; Service Type - Execution 3; Reason Description - Canceled by Atty/Pltf; Service Text - ACTION STOPPED - WHITL

02/04/2013 Execution/Garnishment Issued
E DOCUMENT This is garnishment 13-EXEC-428 for GENINE BYRD; POSSESSION OF PREMISES@ 3726 CAMBRIDGE AVE APT #2 MAPLEWOOD MO 63143; returnable date: 06-MAR-2013

01/08/2013 Judgment Entered
E-DOCUMENT POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES AT 3726 CAMBRIDGE AVE.,#2 MAPLWOOD, MO 63143. SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER FEES TAXED AS COURT COST IN THE AMOUNT OF $ 35.00.
Consent Judgment
Associated Entries: 11/30/2012 - Hearing Scheduled
Scheduled For: 01/08/2013; 9:00 AM ; BRENDA STITH LOFTIN; St Louis County

11/30/2012 Summons Issued-Associate
Document ID: 12-SMLT-9892, for BYRD, GENINE.
Summ Req-Assc Pers Serv
Request for Appointment of Special Process Server Filed.
Hearing Scheduled
Associated Entries: 01/08/2013 - Consent Judgment
Scheduled For: 01/08/2013; 9:00 AM ; BRENDA STITH LOFTIN; St Louis County

11/27/2012 Judge Assigned
33T
Confid Filing Info Sheet Filed
Pet Filed in Associate Ct

12SL-AC41099- MILLS PROPERTIES INC V GENINE BYRD
This information is provided as a service and is not considered an official court record.
Garnishment/Execution Number: 13-EXEC-428
Garnishment/Execution Issue Date: 02/04/2013 Location of Judgment or Decree: St Louis County
Debtor: GENINE BYRD County Directed to: St. Louis County
Garnishee: Requester: MILLS PROPERTIES INC
Requested Return Date: 03/06/2013 Interrogatories Filed:
Exemption Filed:

Reason for Hold: Date Placed on Hold:
Reason Taken off Hold: Date Taken off Hold:
Reason Released: Date Released:

Pay Out Date:

Total Due:$4,065.00 Balance Due:$4,065.00
Receipt/Payout Information

[Brittney]

Very scary.

[Guest]

Pee on you leg

[Buck]

Vote for

[DanFromSmithvill e]

Now this thread does seem dead.

[DanFromSmithvill e]

Who considers the recent health care reform to be a positive step in the right direction?

[Stand Your Ground]

So far I'm not very confident. My husbands company he works for offers insurance to all full time employees (over 120 employees only 5 part time college students). Im worried , heres an example of why, because the company pays in $1100 for employee/spouse and children (medical only), we pay the rest. In 2012 we paid $300/month, as of June 1st our insurance will be 585/month and company will remain to pay the $1100. Insurance companies blame the rate hike on new health care that will be taken effect soon. My husband makes a good salary but half of the employees only make $15-19/hour..that's a large salary cut for a lot of people. The insurance plan also went from bad to worse. Supposedly our plan and premium is #3 out of the best 10 of Missouri companies insurance plans?? So far I see the middle class may suffer the most. There are just so many unknowns with the new health care laws.

[Sandy NT]

DanFromSmithville wrote:

Who considers the recent health care reform to be a positive step in the right direction?

I don't see anything positive about it. It seems like the new rate hikes are not balancing out with any improvements.