Angry and counting

[VinMan]

Lets count again. How many people revert to anger when they don't like what someone has to say? How many posters revert to profanity, or at least revert to the abbreviations to profanity when they don't like or agree with another posters comments/remarks?

The numbers are easy, just look over the posts folks! It's a no-brainier-no pun intended.

[Bayview]

Hey Vin,

Reverting to anger is not necessarily caused by someone not liking what someone has to say. Anger may be expressed becasue someone is insulting, belittling or they just don't know what the hell they are talking about. Reminds me of one of the posters in this thread.

BTW...why do you insist on antagonizing Rebecca, especially when she has your number? You are about the only one who doesn't seem to see this. and when you try to retaliate, you only prove her right in her assessment of you. Can't you see that? Guess not from threads you start like this one.

[VinMan]

I do respect your opinion bay. The way I see it; she's sent some zingers this way too. If she wants to give it, she needs to be able to take it.

I don't make the bigoted remarks she has made in the past especially those aimed at me.

I do not have to and will not defend my self to you or anyone else. I know what she is, she knows my position and i know hers. She doesn't have to read what I say but if I disagree with someone's, anyone's posts I will say so.

Aside from the last few posts she posted which I answered, none of my posts have been a direct answer to any of her posts.

Sorry If you do not like what I have to say!

Bayview wrote:

Hey Vin,
Reverting to anger is not necessarily caused by someone not liking what someone has to say. Anger may be expressed becasue someone is insulting, belittling or they just don't know what the hell they are talking about. Reminds me of one of the posters in this thread.
BTW...why do you insist on antagonizing Rebecca, especially when she has your number? You are about the only one who doesn't seem to see this. and when you try to retaliate, you only prove her right in her assessment of you. Can't you see that? Guess not from threads you start like this one.

[AunieEm2]

We're still not as bad as the Kentucky forums?

[VinMan]

Good Morning Aunnie; YOu're right about that and I love your sense of humor. Have a great day!

AunieEm2 wrote:

We're still not as bad as the Kentucky forums?

[AunieEm2]

Is this angry and counting about counting to ten before typing?

[Bayview]

VinMan wrote:

I do respect your opinion bay. The way I see it; she's sent some zingers this way too. If she wants to give it, she needs to be able to take it.
I don't make the bigoted remarks she has made in the past especially those aimed at me.
I do not have to and will not defend my self to you or anyone else. I know what she is, she knows my position and i know hers. She doesn't have to read what I say but if I disagree with someone's, anyone's posts I will say so.
Aside from the last few posts she posted which I answered, none of my posts have been a direct answer to any of her posts.
Sorry If you do not like what I have to say! <quoted text>

Vin,

It has nothing to do with whether I like or dislike what you say. I just thought you were putting yourself in a bad light by doing that, that's all.

[VinMan]

I understand that and I wasn't talking about you, I was talking about her. She wants to make those kind of remarks about me because she doesn't like what I post. She then gets personal about it. check the history, It's out there.

If you give you need to take. I don't care what she says about me, I'm just giving it back.

Politically, I disagree with who she is and what she says. Too bad if she doesn't like it. I hope that clears it up and puts an end to it.

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
Vin,
It has nothing to do with whether I like or dislike what you say. I just thought you were putting yourself in a bad light by doing that, that's all.

[marie]

Bayview wrote:

Hey Vin,
Reverting to anger is not necessarily caused by someone not liking what someone has to say. Anger may be expressed becasue someone is insulting, belittling or they just don't know what the hell they are talking about. Reminds me of one of the posters in this thread.
BTW...why do you insist on antagonizing Rebecca, especially when she has your number? You are about the only one who doesn't seem to see this. and when you try to retaliate, you only prove her right in her assessment of you. Can't you see that? Guess not from threads you start like this one.

i've been reading some of these posts and cannot figure out how you can put people down and then tell others theyre wrong.lets see now you told someone they cant write a sentence correctly,people dont know what the hell theyre talking about,someone posted a remark and you said something like you just pop in and then leave.believe it was flint everyone has an opinion whether you like it or not so dont be so harsh you were worried about not coming across as being a good guy.they can take care of themself

[Bayview]

marie wrote:

<quoted text>
i've been reading some of these posts and cannot figure out how you can put people down and then tell others theyre wrong.

Marie, just because I have put some people down in the past does not mean that I cannot comment when I see it from someone else and I disagree. Some people deserve to be put down. I didn't think that was the case here. I evaluate each situation seperately. Apparently you don't.

marie wrote:

<quoted text>
lets see now you told someone they cant write a sentence correctly,

That's right, that person can't seem to write a sentence. Check out that post again. Were those sentences? I'll be damned if they were, Marie. BTW Marie, your not too good with the sentence structure either. Being able to write properly is a big part of being able to communicate effectively. No put down; just fact.

marie wrote:

<quoted text>
people dont know what the hell theyre talking about,someone posted a remark and you said something like you just pop in and then leave.believe it was flint

Yes, Marie, it was flint. He has a habit of doing that. He pops into a thread, makes these one line flippant remarks which do not contribute in any way to the discussion and then is gone from the thread just as fast. So, what is the problem with me pointing that out?

marie wrote:

<quoted text>

[QUOTE who="marie"]<quot ed text>
everyone has an opinion whether you like it or not so dont be so harsh

Yes, Marie, you are correct. Everyone has an opinion whether I like it or not. I have an opinion that you don't seem to like, but it appears it is all right for you to be harsh on me while preaching I should not be harsh on others. Isn't that a wee bit contradictory?

marie wrote:

<quoted text>
you were worried about not coming across as being a good guy.they can take care of themself

Huh? Once again, you need to improve those communication skils, Marie. I don't understand what you are saying here.

Oh well, seems you have a problem with me, Marie, and I am sure what I have explained will in no way satisfy you. Too bad. Have a nice day, Marie.

[VinMan]

I think what marie is trying to say Bayview is that you're coming down on me for doing to others what rebecca does to me.

I hold no ill will towards you-or her. All I'm saying is one is going to dish it out, then one needs to be able to take it.

I don't curse or allude to profanity towards her or anyone else.

Posters will fall on both sides and that's fine. I don't care! Bottom line!

Have a good one bayview.

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
Marie, just because I have put some people down in the past does not mean that I cannot comment when I see it from someone else and I disagree. Some people deserve to be put down. I didn't think that was the case here. I evaluate each situation seperately. Apparently you don't.
<quoted text>
That's right, that person can't seem to write a sentence. Check out that post again. Were those sentences? I'll be damned if they were, Marie. BTW Marie, your not too good with the sentence structure either. Being able to write properly is a big part of being able to communicate effectively. No put down; just fact.
<quoted text>
Yes, Marie, it was flint. He has a habit of doing that. He pops into a thread, makes these one line flippant remarks which do not contribute in any way to the discussion and then is gone from the thread just as fast. So, what is the problem with me pointing that out?
<quoted text>
Yes, Marie, you are correct. Everyone has an opinion whether I like it or not. I have an opinion that you don't seem to like, but it appears it is all right for you to be harsh on me while preaching I should not be harsh on others. Isn't that a wee bit contradictory?
<quoted text>
Huh? Once again, you need to improve those communication skils, Marie. I don't understand what you are saying here.
Oh well, seems you have a problem with me, Marie, and I am sure what I have explained will in no way satisfy you. Too bad. Have a nice day, Marie.

[VinMan]

I don't put people down. I point out what they say. If they think I'm putting them down they are mistaken. You on the other hand admit to putting people down! I do't make this stuff up.

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
Marie, just because I have put some people down in the past does not mean that I cannot comment when I see it from someone else and I disagree. Some people deserve to be put down. I didn't think that was the case here. I evaluate each situation seperately. Apparently you don't.
<quoted text>
That's right, that person can't seem to write a sentence. Check out that post again. Were those sentences? I'll be damned if they were, Marie. BTW Marie, your not too good with the sentence structure either. Being able to write properly is a big part of being able to communicate effectively. No put down; just fact.
<quoted text>
Yes, Marie, it was flint. He has a habit of doing that. He pops into a thread, makes these one line flippant remarks which do not contribute in any way to the discussion and then is gone from the thread just as fast. So, what is the problem with me pointing that out?
<quoted text>
Yes, Marie, you are correct. Everyone has an opinion whether I like it or not. I have an opinion that you don't seem to like, but it appears it is all right for you to be harsh on me while preaching I should not be harsh on others. Isn't that a wee bit contradictory?
<quoted text>
Huh? Once again, you need to improve those communication skils, Marie. I don't understand what you are saying here.
Oh well, seems you have a problem with me, Marie, and I am sure what I have explained will in no way satisfy you. Too bad. Have a nice day, Marie.

[Bayview]

VinMan wrote:

I think what marie is trying to say Bayview is that you're coming down on me for doing to others what rebecca does to me.
I hold no ill will towards you-or her. All I'm saying is one is going to dish it out, then one needs to be able to take it.
I don't curse or allude to profanity towards her or anyone else.
Posters will fall on both sides and that's fine. I don't care! Bottom line!
Have a good one bayview.<quoted text>

Didn't think of it that way, Vin

i've been reading some of these posts and cannot figure out how you can put people down and then tell others theyre wrong.

She was addressing me...and, I was telling you I thought you were wrong at the time.

Oh, it doesn't matter all that much. Marie is just a blip on the screen. I don't remember seeing her in here before. She probably won't be back.

[Bayview]

VinMan wrote:

I don't put people down. I point out what they say. If they think I'm putting them down they are mistaken. You on the other hand admit to putting people down! I do't make this stuff up.<quoted text>

I make no bones about it. I do put certain people down when I feel they deserve it....and, whether you realize it or want to admit it, you were putting Rebacca down...granted, she has done that to you before as well...but you did get your digs in there Vin...and, that is putting someone down.

[marie]

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't think of it that way, Vin
<quoted text>
She was addressing me...and, I was telling you I thought you were wrong at the time.
Oh, it doesn't matter all that much. Marie is just a blip on the screen. I don't remember seeing her in here before. She probably won't be back.

Marie is not a blip on the screen

[AunieEm2]

The people the people the people!

[Bayview]

marie wrote:

<quoted text>
Marie is not a blip on the screen

Then, my apologies, I think.

[VinMan]

My digs consist of answering to the foul mouth she has regaring what I say. Or as in most cases, just a plain disagreement to her political and lifestyle positions. You and may differ on what it's called, that's fine.

You admittedly point out that your are guilty of what you accuse me of; Are you saying that your antagonize other posters? Just not her?

In any event I still believe that people who can throw it must learn to catch it as well.

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
I make no bones about it. I do put certain people down when I feel they deserve it....and, whether you realize it or want to admit it, you were putting Rebacca down...granted, she has done that to you before as well...but you did get your digs in there Vin...and, that is putting someone down.

[VinMan]

I agree, it really doesn't matter and who cares anyway? right?

Have a good one

Bayview wrote:

<quoted text>
Didn't think of it that way, Vin
<quoted text>
She was addressing me...and, I was telling you I thought you were wrong at the time.
Oh, it doesn't matter all that much. Marie is just a blip on the screen. I don't remember seeing her in here before. She probably won't be back.

[Bayview]

VinMan wrote:

My digs consist of answering to the foul mouth she has regaring what I say. Or as in most cases, just a plain disagreement to her political and lifestyle positions. You and may differ on what it's called, that's fine.
You admittedly point out that your are guilty of what you accuse me of; Are you saying that your antagonize other posters? Just not her?
In any event I still believe that people who can throw it must learn to catch it as well. <quoted text>

I agree. I will throw it, take it and throw it back.

The reason I orginally commented to you was because it seemed like you were coming out of left field to me. I guess I have missed it, but I never remember her attacking you without provocation.