You dishonesty is exposed;Marriage is a fundamental right of the individual, as affirmed 14 times by the Supreme Court. This applies only to humans, not to trees.
Everyone qualifies for fundamental rights by virtue of being alive, though a fundamental right may be denied or delayed, but only if the government can demonstrate a compelling and legitimate government interest for doing so.
Procreation ability, intent, or even desire has never been a requirement for marriage, yet is often offered as an excuse to deny equality, ignoring that gay people do raise children both biologically related or adopted. Denial of equal treatment provides nothing to opposite sex couples, while harming same sex couples needlessly. For these reasons the procreation excuse is irrational.
Prejudice and tradition also fail to qualify as legitimate governmental interests sufficient for denial of equal treatment as required by the 5th and 14th amendments.
“These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
SCOTUS affirmed marriage BECAUSE of procreation.
Why is that deception necessary for your argument.
I never said marriage applies to trees. I used the procreation of trees or the lack thereof as an analogy to the procreation or lack thereof with humans.
You know that, but again used deceitful gay twirl to avoid dealing with reality.
Why is that necessary for a legitimate position?
Honest minds want to know. Is that too much for you???