Pam Mandryck being Investigated by Co...

Pam Mandryck being Investigated by County

Posted in the Rome Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Your in trouble at DDSO

Quincy, MA

#1 Jan 2, 2013
What do you know Pam?
Who would believe you after DDSO illegal voting ignored?
Gross and Deliberate Indifference!
Clean up

Quincy, MA

#2 Jan 3, 2013
Figures
lol

Rome, NY

#3 Jan 3, 2013
Oh get real, the goombas just gave her another county job!
Clean up

Quincy, MA

#4 Jan 3, 2013
Is Utica OD good enough to make it real for you?
Guessing

Rome, NY

#5 Jan 3, 2013
This has nothing to do with DDSO as some of you people hoped for. She changed her regstration but failed to step down from her position after she changed. Nothing to do with voters or elections. Maybe you should get beyond the headline before you jump to conclusions.
Getting closer everyday

Quincy, MA

#6 Jan 3, 2013
Thats what you think!
Glad you seem to be so informed to establish what is and is not part if an investigation that is 48 hours old.....
lol

Rome, NY

#7 Jan 3, 2013
Every county legislator that just recently voted to confirm and give this woman a job needs to be held accountable too! They should resign, or be voted out.
Guessing

Rome, NY

#8 Jan 3, 2013
Getting closer everyday wrote:
Thats what you think!
Glad you seem to be so informed to establish what is and is not part if an investigation that is 48 hours old.....
Yes I do consider myself informed, and apparently more informed than you. I base my information on fact not what some of you people come up with while sitting on the shitter. Try reading the article again, and stop jumping to conclusion or passing judgment on people until all the facts are known. Not everything that goes on in politics is based on grassy knoll theory. Take you own advive. The investigation is not even 48 hours old and already you want to tar and feather her. You are the one who need to get informed.
Dan

Dover, DE

#9 Jan 3, 2013
let's see. she lied about changing party;s back on 10-13-12.then she got hired to be work for the dems. she knew the RULES when she changed party's. she should be FIRED on the spot & have to return the money that was paid to he for the rest of the year!
lol

Rome, NY

#10 Jan 3, 2013
Dan wrote:
let's see. she lied about changing party;s back on 10-13-12.then she got hired to be work for the dems. she knew the RULES when she changed party's. she should be FIRED on the spot & have to return the money that was paid to he for the rest of the year!
And Piecenti should be held accountable for no veto on the legislators. Was his idea to get rid of her in the first place! Oh what, not enough $ to run the farm. Poor husband the legislator abstained. Knew his own wife was no damn DEMOCRAT!
Romes DDSO Rigged Fusco

Quincy, MA

#11 Jan 3, 2013
Watch what happens soon and inform me then!
Dan

Dover, DE

#12 Jan 3, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
And Piecenti should be held accountable for no veto on the legislators. Was his idea to get rid of her in the first place! Oh what, not enough $ to run the farm. Poor husband the legislator abstained. Knew his own wife was no damn DEMOCRAT!
her problem is she was NO Republican!she was a DEMOCRAT getting paid a a republican!
The Truth

Watertown, NY

#13 Jan 3, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
And Piecenti should be held accountable for no veto on the legislators. Was his idea to get rid of her in the first place! Oh what, not enough $ to run the farm. Poor husband the legislator abstained. Knew his own wife was no damn DEMOCRAT!
Wow you are dumb. Her husband abstained because he canot legally cast a vote. Wow you people are morons.

As for the person who said she lied. No she did not lie. She was never asked if she changed party. can't lie if not asked.
That is Politics everyday my friend.

Since: Dec 12

Rome, NY

#14 Jan 3, 2013
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow you are dumb. Her husband abstained because he canot legally cast a vote. Wow you people are morons.
As for the person who said she lied. No she did not lie. She was never asked if she changed party. can't lie if not asked.
That is Politics everyday my friend.
There is nothing illegal about her husband voting for her. He did the ethical thing by abstaining. There's a difference between illegal and unethical.
Resident

Rome, NY

#15 Jan 3, 2013
Dan wrote:
let's see. she lied about changing party;s back on 10-13-12.then she got hired to be work for the dems. she knew the RULES when she changed party's. she should be FIRED on the spot & have to return the money that was paid to he for the rest of the year!
Party changes do not go into effect until after the general election. So I don't believe it was a lie as some put it. Her appointment was not confirmed until the leg voted on it so I don't see there was any deception on her part either.
lol

Rome, NY

#16 Jan 3, 2013
Resident wrote:
<quoted text>
Party changes do not go into effect until after the general election. So I don't believe it was a lie as some put it. Her appointment was not confirmed until the leg voted on it so I don't see there was any deception on her part either.
Comment like this, could only come from a legislator! Likely Townesend.
lol

Rome, NY

#17 Jan 3, 2013
And you are sworn by oath when your appointed commissioner! She knew exactly what she was doing, and that my friends is criminal!
Rome Voter

New York, NY

#18 Jan 3, 2013
The Spin Stops Here wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing illegal about her husband voting for her. He did the ethical thing by abstaining. There's a difference between illegal and unethical.
You would know ! Everything the former administration did was UNETHICAL .
Resident

Rome, NY

#19 Jan 3, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
Comment like this, could only come from a legislator! Likely Townesend.
may my balls fall off if I was even closely related to a Townsend. I only know this because years ago, and I changed parties but it did not take effect until after the election. I don't know for sure but I imagine it would apply to anyone changing parties.

Since: Dec 12

Rome, NY

#20 Jan 3, 2013
Rome Voter wrote:
<quoted text>
You would know ! Everything the former administration did was UNETHICAL .
Normally I wouldn't respond to such nonsense, but you shouldn't make accusations that are false. I said before that I was a fusco supporter at election time. Brown had enough time, 8 years is enough for anybody. I also said that I am not a fusco supporter anymore after I have seen what he's doing to this city. So explain without spinning, how I would know anything about the former administration? Hint: I moved into this city from Utica about 10 years ago. I have to say, things weren't as bad under brown as they are under your butt-buddy fusco. I thought I saw it all when I lived in Utica, but this guy is making Utica look normal.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rome Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SCM property management 2 hr Concerned citizen 2
Rome's Next Mayor Fri No Name 234
Good Landscapers? Jul 30 Harry nootz 3
Delayed Entry program Jul 29 Sheesh 16
News Does Excessive Littering Hurt Rome's Honor Amer... Jul 29 Roman 4
Old Marcy Insane Asylum (Oct '10) Jul 29 AletaE 890
Electric wheelchair riders.. Jul 29 Next 11
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rome Mortgages