Where can someone report such activity when the people in charge
are also the criminals, thus some lighthearted conversation on the topic seems justified.
I have picked up on the clues also. This same person always jumps to the defense of the RPD and calls everyone who states the obvious weaknesses in the department as 'trash','criminals' or 'wellie's', etc. Easier to deflect that look inward I suppose.
To the poster referring to themself as "Criminal", please note that I am a clinical psychologist, and you are unfortunately leaving clues everywhere. For one example, you felt the need to say "I could never do it", which indicates to me that the opposite is most likely true. That, or you are personally close to one, or are doing the bidding of one. I could extensively analyze your posts and others, but time constraints govern all of us, so some quick examples will need to suffice. I also notice your propensity to refer to those that disagree with the methodology of the police as "lawbreakers" and "trash", and indicate that they MUST have broken the law in order to disagree with your stance. Is disagreeing possible without being a criminal? Certainly. A mere child of four would not fall prey to that ploy, although this trick seems common in this thread. Is it possible you are engaging in a defense mechanism referred to in pop psychoanalytical circles as projecting? Is it possible you feel some of these posters may have a point regarding police conduct, but the overarching superego portion of your psyche will not allow the surpressed beliefs to reach the surface, ie, your conscious mind?
I read these posts with a different eye than most, and the value of these chance things that are being inadvertently blurted out is very helpful.
I thank you for your time, and I wish to see this discussion carried to a satisfactory conclusion, albeit without the animosity that so often marrs logical discussion.