Why don't liberals repeal 2nd Amendment?
Sandy

Union, MO

#22 Jan 17, 2013
Aladdin family reunion.

http://youtu.be/Y54rcz_L5Q4
Obamacrat

United States

#23 Jan 17, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you are not smart enough to follow a logical comparison. You don't limit numbers of beer sold but you restrict times of sale, sale to minors etc. Some ponography is legal and protected under the first amendment, some is considered too dangerous. Sales are also restricted to certain people not minors. Gun restrictions are the same.
By the way is Fucktard a term of endearment, are you flirting?
While I realize you have never read the US Constitution, but I have.

No where does it say, "the right to keep and bear child porn, shall not be infringed". Nor does it say that "your right to purchase beer at 3:00 am shall not be infringed"

I realize you pole smokers think all guys are like you, contain your perverted urges or go get your fix at the rest area?
Killa the Constipated

Salem, MO

#24 Jan 17, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
While I realize you have never read the US Constitution, but I have.
No where does it say, "the right to keep and bear child porn, shall not be infringed". Nor does it say that "your right to purchase beer at 3:00 am shall not be infringed"
I realize you pole smokers think all guys are like you, contain your perverted urges or go get your fix at the rest area?
The 1st amendment, you know the one that comes first, it's about free speech. Does Killa tutor you? If you had to pass a literacy test to buy a gun you would be out of luck. How do you type when you can't read?
Obamacrat

United States

#25 Jan 17, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
The 1st amendment, you know the one that comes first, it's about free speech. Does Killa tutor you? If you had to pass a literacy test to buy a gun you would be out of luck. How do you type when you can't read?
Again.....I know you saw something about free speech on cartoons or msnbc, how about you show me where it says your right to "keep and bear child porn shall not be infringed"? Don't mind me if I don't wait.....

Arms are specifically mentioned in the 2nd Amendment for a reason. I realize it doesn't meet your agenda.....sorry about that
MOGunny

Belton, MO

#26 Jan 17, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
No subject change, noting that the first amendment has limits such as some pornography being banned, why is it not congruent with limitations on some firearms? Child porn harms and is illegal even though it is a restriction on freedom of speech, large capacity magazines can be limited the same way. If the 2nd amendment could not be reasonably interpreted there could be know background checks because it would violate the right of felons and the mentally I'll from having guns, they are citizens and the constitution says nothing about denying their rights.
No one has to be harmed for me to exercise my second amendment rights. The gun manufacturer is not harmed. Neither is my children, spouse, joe whoope t do off the street, or you either for that matter.

You just defeat your own arguement. Child pornography harms the child therefore denying their most basic rights and needs, and protections.
Obamacrat

Jefferson City, MO

#27 Jan 17, 2013
MOGunny wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has to be harmed for me to exercise my second amendment rights. The gun manufacturer is not harmed. Neither is my children, spouse, joe whoope t do off the street, or you either for that matter.
You just defeat your own arguement. Child pornography harms the child therefore denying their most basic rights and needs, and protections.
Great point Gunny

I'm sure the mental constipation has him bound up right now. As soon as MSNBC and CNN tells him what opinion he should have, he'll have a dull witted reply
BarbarasBush

Rolla, MO

#28 Jan 17, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
While I realize you have never read the US Constitution, but I have.
No where does it say, "the right to keep and bear child porn, shall not be infringed". Nor does it say that "your right to purchase beer at 3:00 am shall not be infringed"
I realize you pole smokers think all guys are like you, contain your perverted urges or go get your fix at the rest area?
where does it say your right to keep and bear rocket-propelled grenades and 100 shot magazines shall not be infringed?
idk

United States

#29 Jan 17, 2013
BarbarasBush wrote:
<quoted text>
where does it say your right to keep and bear rocket-propelled grenades and 100 shot magazines shall not be infringed?
the magazine is part of the gun tard you must be a nut job that wants guns taken away let me tell you you will be one of the first to die when our leader decides to enslave us
Obamacrat

Chesapeake, OH

#30 Jan 18, 2013
BarbarasBush wrote:
<quoted text>
where does it say your right to keep and bear rocket-propelled grenades and 100 shot magazines shall not be infringed?
Are they ARMS? If the answer is yes, then the are illegally being infringed.

Is this that complicated for you to understand? The mere fact that we as a society have allowed our government to violate the Constitution does not make it legal.

If you look historically, private citizens could in fact own all types of arms until the early 1900's. The very same ARMS the government possessed.

What part of "shall NOT be infringed" do you not understand?

With the correct license and fees there is very little a citizen cannot own. It's a tragedy we have allowed our rights be decimated
BarbarasBush

Rolla, MO

#31 Jan 18, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they ARMS? If the answer is yes, then the are illegally being infringed.
Is this that complicated for you to understand? The mere fact that we as a society have allowed our government to violate the Constitution does not make it legal.
If you look historically, private citizens could in fact own all types of arms until the early 1900's. The very same ARMS the government possessed.
What part of "shall NOT be infringed" do you not understand?
With the correct license and fees there is very little a citizen cannot own. It's a tragedy we have allowed our rights be decimated
Why are you wasting time here? You should be in front of the Supreme Court with this. Chop chop, son. Go big or go home.
Obamacrat

Chesapeake, OH

#32 Jan 18, 2013
BarbarasBush wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you wasting time here? You should be in front of the Supreme Court with this. Chop chop, son. Go big or go home.
Well if the Supreme Court wasn't stacked full of liberal pieces of crap there would be no need to go in front, but since it is it would be a waste of time.

Alas, times are a changing!! Enjoy your liberal "save everyone" ideology while it lasts.
GeorgeGooberBush

Rolla, MO

#33 Jan 18, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Well if the Supreme Court wasn't stacked full of liberal pieces of crap there would be no need to go in front, but since it is it would be a waste of time.
Alas, times are a changing!! Enjoy your liberal "save everyone" ideology while it lasts.
Yep that librul Uncle Tom Clarence shoulda hadda hi tech lynching before now.

And that Scalia is the most librul on guns since librul Teflon Ron put him in there.
Sandy Hook

Union, MO

#34 Jan 18, 2013
GeorgeGooberBush wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep that librul Uncle Tom Clarence shoulda hadda hi tech lynching before now.
And that Scalia is the most librul on guns since librul Teflon Ron put him in there.
Looks like someone should stop spending money on 100 round clips and invest in spell check or at least a dictionary.DUH!
scolda

Rolla, MO

#35 Jan 18, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Are they ARMS? If the answer is yes, then the are illegally being infringed.
Is this that complicated for you to understand? The mere fact that we as a society have allowed our government to violate the Constitution does not make it legal.
If you look historically, private citizens could in fact own all types of arms until the early 1900's. The very same ARMS the government possessed.
What part of "shall NOT be infringed" do you not understand?
With the correct license and fees there is very little a citizen cannot own. It's a tragedy we have allowed our rights be decimated
Shuks. Now you just done bein embarrasin yerself.
laffer

Rolla, MO

#36 Jan 19, 2013
The overblown gun-control controversy is a perfect example of sheer delusion without a shred of proof the President is overstepping his Constitutional authority.

It is bad enough that functionally ignorant citizens are crying tyranny at the PresidentÂ’s gun control measures earlier in the week, but when Republican legislators co-opt the lies, it exposes that they either know what the PresidentÂ’s executive orders entail and are lying to incite gun owners, or are relating what they think the orders are revealing their delusion-based bias.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#37 Jan 19, 2013
Aladdin wrote:
Its not Dems or Reps its both... Sandy Hook was a lie! The Globalist want our guns!! So we are disarmed for future takeover. Look at the evidence of the last tragedy an you'll see many problems with the police and news reports of what actually happened.. Like for example: they say the long rifle was used to shoot most of the victims but there is clearly video of police pulling the rifle out of the trunk of the shooters car.. Makes no sense! Wake up people!!!!
I've got a solution for your paranoid disrespect for these dead children and their parents, go to Sandy Hook and talked to those parents and the first responders and see what reception you get.

Hint, make sure your health and life insurance premiums are paid in advance!
Cohen
#38 Jan 19, 2013
Saying that Obama or any President for that matter would try and become a dictator would be a direct INSULT to are men and woman in the armed forces. If something like that ever happened do you think all of our military would would just stand aside and let it happen? Or that they would be the ones joining in on the tyranny? They would be the first line of defense against an armed force trying to take over and we would be the last... I have faith that if it was actually thought of and tried that our branches of the military would not engage American citizens and fight back against people trying to overthrow democracy. I also believe they would win with much ease.
agree

United States

#39 Jan 19, 2013
Guest wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as it's gay porn!
Sick

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#40 Jan 19, 2013
Cohen wrote:
Saying that Obama or any President for that matter would try and become a dictator would be a direct INSULT to are men and woman in the armed forces. If something like that ever happened do you think all of our military would would just stand aside and let it happen? Or that they would be the ones joining in on the tyranny? They would be the first line of defense against an armed force trying to take over and we would be the last... I have faith that if it was actually thought of and tried that our branches of the military would not engage American citizens and fight back against people trying to overthrow democracy. I also believe they would win with much ease.
It depends on many factors. You are right that some would stand up. But some would not.
Franklin

Rolla, MO

#41 Jan 20, 2013
Killa, congrats! This post is 39 responses to your answering of your own question. As much as I hate to say it, you are correct. Not only could they not repeal the Second Amendment, but you will be pleased to watch Obama lose much of his acquired political capital from this last election. Meanwhile we have urgent needs to balance a budget and pay down our debt.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rolla Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
lost love 1 hr honestasyouweretome 65
Melissa as Andrew's new Benz? 3 hr Jrl 28
wh*res in Rolla 3 hr Mr Ed 12
Mr Ed 3 hr Mr Ed 12
Me Ed is Ryan Kallman 3 hr Mr Ed 43
Mr ed speaks 3 hr Mr Ed 78
Money People Owe 6 hr Collections 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rolla Mortgages