Why don't liberals repeal 2nd Amendment?

Why don't liberals repeal 2nd Amendment?

Posted in the Rolla Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#1 Jan 16, 2013
Because they would fail. So instead they attempt to use Executive fiat to ram their bad ideas down people's throats.
xbox

Rolla, MO

#2 Jan 16, 2013
sounds like you have had a few priests ram their bad ideas down your throat too often
fay

Fairfax, VA

#3 Jan 16, 2013
You sound crazy! You ask a question and then answer it

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#5 Jan 16, 2013
fay wrote:
You sound crazy! You ask a question and then answer it
That's because I have all the answers. In fact, I'm so good, I also have the questions you don't even know to ask.
Killa the Constipated

Salem, MO

#6 Jan 16, 2013
killa_the_compassionate wrote:
Because they would fail. So instead they attempt to use Executive fiat to ram their bad ideas down people's throats.
A stupid question and answer. Liberals don't want to repeal the 2nd amendment, they want it regulated. I suppose you are in favor of pornography too.
Old time democrat

Grain Valley, MO

#7 Jan 16, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
A stupid question and answer. Liberals don't want to repeal the 2nd amendment, they want it regulated. I suppose you are in favor of pornography too.
Easy,,,,, I know it's difficult for you, but try to stay on point..,,,ur lookin a little like Xbox .
Killa the Constipated

Salem, MO

#8 Jan 16, 2013
Old time democrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy,,,,, I know it's difficult for you, but try to stay on point..,,,ur lookin a little like Xbox .
Do you support unlimited pornography?

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#9 Jan 16, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>Do you support unlimited pornography?
Subject change.
Guest

Union, MO

#10 Jan 16, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you support unlimited pornography?
As long as it's gay porn!
Obamacrat

Fairfax, VA

#11 Jan 16, 2013
Molon labe
Obamacrat

Rolla, MO

#12 Jan 17, 2013
Molon Labe is my favorite gay porn actor. I want to slobber his nobber.
Killa the Constipated

Rolla, MO

#13 Jan 17, 2013
killa_the_compassionate wrote:
<quoted text>
Subject change.
No subject change, noting that the first amendment has limits such as some pornography being banned, why is it not congruent with limitations on some firearms? Child porn harms and is illegal even though it is a restriction on freedom of speech, large capacity magazines can be limited the same way. If the 2nd amendment could not be reasonably interpreted there could be know background checks because it would violate the right of felons and the mentally I'll from having guns, they are citizens and the constitution says nothing about denying their rights.

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#14 Jan 17, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>No subject change, noting that the first amendment has limits such as some pornography being banned, why is it not congruent with limitations on some firearms? Child porn harms and is illegal even though it is a restriction on freedom of speech, large capacity magazines can be limited the same way. If the 2nd amendment could not be reasonably interpreted there could be know background checks because it would violate the right of felons and the mentally I'll from having guns, they are citizens and the constitution says nothing about denying their rights.
You are absolutely right and it is a good argument. Just because it has been done doesn't make it right though. You don't get to do wrong and then point at the wrong and say, "see... It's been done before."
Obamacrat

Jefferson City, MO

#15 Jan 17, 2013
Killa the Constipated wrote:
<quoted text>
No subject change, noting that the first amendment has limits such as some pornography being banned, why is it not congruent with limitations on some firearms? Child porn harms and is illegal even though it is a restriction on freedom of speech, large capacity magazines can be limited the same way. If the 2nd amendment could not be reasonably interpreted there could be know background checks because it would violate the right of felons and the mentally I'll from having guns, they are citizens and the constitution says nothing about denying their rights.
Not a reaonable comparison at all. There is no legal form of "child pornography"

How about we limit you to a 6 pack of beer? No one really needs a 12 pack. You'll just be that much more intoxicated when you drive.

How about limiting you to only 1 Big Mac a week? It's unhealthy ya know? More people die in a year from stokes and heart attacks that all homicide victims in the last 100 years!

Rifles of all types account for less than either knives or clubs(hammers and ball bats)

Before you doubt me, google FBI UCR or if your not smart enough follow this link fucktard!!!

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in...
Killa the Constipated

Salem, MO

#16 Jan 17, 2013
Obamacrat wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a reaonable comparison at all. There is no legal form of "child pornography"
How about we limit you to a 6 pack of beer? No one really needs a 12 pack. You'll just be that much more intoxicated when you drive.
How about limiting you to only 1 Big Mac a week? It's unhealthy ya know? More people die in a year from stokes and heart attacks that all homicide victims in the last 100 years!
Rifles of all types account for less than either knives or clubs(hammers and ball bats)
Before you doubt me, google FBI UCR or if your
not smart enough follow this link fucktard!!!
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in...
I see you are not smart enough to follow a logical comparison. You don't limit numbers of beer sold but you restrict times of sale, sale to minors etc. Some ponography is legal and protected under the first amendment, some is considered too dangerous. Sales are also restricted to certain people not minors. Gun restrictions are the same.
By the way is Fucktard a term of endearment, are you flirting?
Aladdin
#17 Jan 17, 2013
Its not Dems or Reps its both... Sandy Hook was a lie! The Globalist want our guns!! So we are disarmed for future takeover. Look at the evidence of the last tragedy an you'll see many problems with the police and news reports of what actually happened.. Like for example: they say the long rifle was used to shoot most of the victims but there is clearly video of police pulling the rifle out of the trunk of the shooters car.. Makes no sense! Wake up people!!!!
LOL

Jefferson City, MO

#18 Jan 17, 2013
Aladdin wrote:
Its not Dems or Reps its both... Sandy Hook was a lie! The Globalist want our guns!! So we are disarmed for future takeover. Look at the evidence of the last tragedy an you'll see many problems with the police and news reports of what actually happened.. Like for example: they say the long rifle was used to shoot most of the victims but there is clearly video of police pulling the rifle out of the trunk of the shooters car.. Makes no sense! Wake up people!!!!
Wack job!!!!

“I'm right”

Since: Oct 12

Rolla, MO

#19 Jan 17, 2013
Aladdin wrote:
Its not Dems or Reps its both... Sandy Hook was a lie! The Globalist want our guns!! So we are disarmed for future takeover. Look at the evidence of the last tragedy an you'll see many problems with the police and news reports of what actually happened.. Like for example: they say the long rifle was used to shoot most of the victims but there is clearly video of police pulling the rifle out of the trunk of the shooters car.. Makes no sense! Wake up people!!!!
A conspiracy that big is doomed for failure. It was real. Obama has 8 years to sit and wait for some nut to do something so he can ride in on his white horse and "fix" it while emotions run high. Obama will continue to cause and take advantage of crisis's. It will be a never ending cycle for the next 4 years.
Aladdin
#20 Jan 17, 2013
LOL wrote:
<quoted text>
Wack job!!!!
Prove me wrong then
Killa the Constipated

Salem, MO

#21 Jan 17, 2013
Aladdin wrote:
<quoted text> Prove me wrong then
How do you prove something that does not exist does not exist? There is no conspiracy so it is not possible to prove it. Prove there is no Santa Clause.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rolla Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
White Trash people in Rolla 17 hr Kev 14
The American Truth means NO MORE WAL-MARTS. 18 hr Get outta 2
I thought Facebook had the market cornered on i... 19 hr Olivia 9
Austin at FedEx 20 hr Mr T 1
Ivan Turnbull lying and panhandling Wed Magpie Ethyl 20
abusing a four year old boy Tue workwithheratcoun... 4
Mr Ed fked me Tue Mr Ed 5
Walmart Distribution Center good place to work? (Jun '12) Apr 28 Karlie 482
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rolla Mortgages