muslims

[Enlightened]

CB can see both sides wrote:

<quoted text>WWWHHHOOOOOPPPSSS, Lybia not Libia. Hhhhhhmmmmmmm?

Typical, if you can't fight the argument trash the syntax. Frefocus the conversation on something else. I made a mistake and didn't proof read my work. Oh well I'm not perfect like others believe them are.

[CB can see both sides]

Enlightened wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, I'm sure that has nothing to do with the two billion. Another thing I ponder - Since Egypt knew, I wonder if Lybia knew also? Likewise, since these guys invaded our Embasy, shouldn't they be turned over to us for prosecution, that is, if indeed they are truly the terrorists who did this. I note the White House hasn't called the terrorists, just radicals.

I'm not sure if the accused should be sent to America for prosecution, due to this point, would I want an American who was accused of attacking a middle east embassy here for prosecution in a middle east country for trial. Also, if the accused murders were sent to our country for trial, can you imagine how much world wide damage might be done?

I'm not sure what I would label these murderers at this point until more is known. Usually when labeled as a terrorists one is attaking another for political or religious reasons. If in fact they did attack the embassy because of a anti-religious film then yes, it might be seen as a terroristic act. If they are just anarchists who released their dissatification with their own government, then no.

[how it really is]

Enlightened wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical, if you can't fight the argument trash the syntax. Frefocus the conversation on something else. I made a mistake and didn't proof read my work. Oh well I'm not perfect like others believe them are.

If you had paid attention, you would've seen that CB made the same spelling mistake in the post above your's, so in essence, he was criticizing himself also. No need to get hateful here lol.

[ccc]

how about Quality Inn in Rolla, they took down the AMERICAN FLAG on 911 and never put it back up!!!!!

[LOL]

ccc wrote:

how about Quality Inn in Rolla, they took down the AMERICAN FLAG on 911 and never put it back up!!!!!

What a load of crap.

[CB can see both sides]

Enlightened wrote:

<quoted text>
Typical, if you can't fight the argument trash the syntax. Frefocus the conversation on something else. I made a mistake and didn't proof read my work. Oh well I'm not perfect like others believe them are.

Nope, hadn't even noticed you had misspelled Lybia, Libia, Libya or how in the hell you spell it! ha

Just saw it on the news-LIBYA!

[Andy]

Enlightened wrote:

<quoted text>
Then let's give everyone a quarter and tell them they are rich, instead of taking so much from the ones who are working for that quarter. A little calus yes, but...I believe in helping the less fortunate but not giving away my hard earned money so that the lazy can continue being lazy. I earned it, and will be happy to share SOME of it - a: if the need is really there and b: if the get off the couch and earn it. I also have a hard time
giving support to someone who spends $20 a day on smoking,$100 a month on cable TV, fills the gas tank on their Cadillac, eats out every night, and stops off at the bar every night on the was back from the unemployment office.

Never met this person, I guess you have though since you just made him up.

[Enlightened]

CB can see both sides wrote:

<quoted text>I'm not sure if the accused should be sent to America for prosecution, due to this point, would I want an American who was accused of attacking a middle east embassy here for prosecution in a middle east country for trial. Also, if the accused murders were sent to our country for trial, can you imagine how much world wide damage might be done?
I'm not sure what I would label these murderers at this point until more is known. Usually when labeled as a terrorists one is attaking another for political or religious reasons. If in fact they did attack the embassy because of a anti-religious film then yes, it might be seen as a terroristic act. If they are just anarchists who released their dissatification with their own government, then no.

Is what you're saying you're not sure we should do what is right? Come on man, OUR Embasy was invaded. Our citizens were killed. They did this because one of US exercised OUR 1st Ammendment Rights and said something they didn't like about their god. This gives them the right to riot and kill? Do you value their values more than you do ours. Instead of us trying to understand them and be so concerned about how much world wide damage would be caused, we need to stand up for what is right, what our beliefs are. Just under a year ago, those same people were dancing in the streets saying how much they appreciated us giving them freedom. This is what they feel about ours. Charlie, seeing both sides is an admirable thing, but when you do this AND subordinate our beliefs, values and rights, you thumb your nose at those who have defended them and empower those who are trying to force theirs on us.

[CB can see both sides]

Enlightened wrote:

<quoted text>
Is what you're saying you're not sure we should do what is right? Come on man, OUR Embasy was invaded. Our citizens were killed. They did this because one of US exercised OUR 1st Ammendment Rights and said something they didn't like about their god. This gives them the right to riot and kill? Do you value their values more than you do ours. Instead of us trying to understand them and be so concerned about how much world wide damage would be caused, we need to stand up for what is right, what our beliefs are. Just under a year ago, those same people were dancing in the streets saying how much they appreciated us giving them freedom. This is what they feel about ours. Charlie, seeing both sides is an admirable thing, but when you do this AND subordinate our beliefs, values and rights, you thumb your nose at those who have defended them and empower those who are trying to force theirs on us.

No, what I'm saying is those uncivillized {new to democracy} middle east countries do not understand the democracy view, as we do not understand theirs. Who are we to tell others countries how to run their countries. We do not want other countries telling us how to run ours. Those areas have been in existance far longer than America. Do I believe we have the greatest country? Yes.

They do not understand freedom of speech, this film, if in fact that is the basis for these attacks, they blame Americans because they only know their waying of governing. Their religion we do not understand, where we would not like some negative aspects of
Christianity from them, they would kill for such blaspheny. Is that action wrong? In our views yes, In theirs? No.

You say "trying to force theirs on ours", isn't that in fact what we are trying to do to them? Forcing a democracy on them? They are fed anti-American propaganda everyday from extremist. Half of a population see freedom fighters as that, the other half see those involved as terroists, or invaders.

Again, do I believe a democracy is the best way for equal rights to all concerned? Yes. Do I believe we should force democracy on others? No. Sort of defeats the premise in my opinion.

Should we have invaded a nation {Iraq} that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11? No. Was Saddam a murderer? Yes. Did we inprison Japanese for no reason, or hanged innocent people due to the color of their skin? Yes. Should we have been invaded for these deeds????