Adams / Cunningham / Child Abusers
Posted in the Rockport Forum
#1 Jul 15, 2013
Judge William held contrary to all law that it is frivolous to believe a child
There was nothing about this particular child that made him unbelievable.
The judge never heard this child directly but attacked the child's mother and her lawyer without ever hearing from the child so he cannot claim he magically perceived lack of credibility.
There is no doubt the child made the statements in that he made the statements multiple times to multiple people in several instances recorded on videotape including an interview by a psychologist.
The judge made a ruling not founded in law anywhere to cover up the child abuse at issue.
The only explanation other than sick perversion is that one of the child abusers was his personal lawyer who he was working with on his personal child custody matter (according to his own admission). In other words, conflict of interest.
When Tom Cunningham and the Judicial Conduct Commission cover up this kind of child abuse, they become party to the abuse. They are also party to the obstruction of justice and corruption involved.
Add your comments below
|Loser in Taft||4 hr||Grossed out||1|
|has anyone attend junior/high school 1979 here (Feb '15)||Jun 25||A Rare Breed||3|
|The Wharf||Jun 24||Sailor-stuck-inTX||3|
|Who Knows her? (Mar '13)||Jun 21||citizen of Taft||22|
|Navy guy, I think||Jun 15||SoTXgal3||3|
|What is the Fulton-Rockport High School like? (Apr '13)||Jun 14||Longmire||5|
|Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10)||Jun 13||robert||994|
Find what you want!
Search Rockport Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC