Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Illinois in 2010?

[Huffington]

1. Egypt policy

The administration has been consistently one-step behind events in crafting an Egypt policy. The White House’s initial backing of President Hosni Mubarak lost any support it might have gained from the crowds in Tahrir Square. Then the United States shocked its Mideast allies by pulling support from the Egyptian leader. The United States is now faced with a hostile regime in Cairo, where a Muslim Brotherhood-headed government could hardly be bothered to act when a mob tried to overrun the U.S. embassy.

2. Iran nuclear program

During his 2008 campaign, Obama posited that the Iranian leadership was bellicose mostly in reaction to misguided policies of the Bush administration. Unlike his predecessor, he would be willing to sit down and talk with the mullahs, confident that his powers of persuasion would convince them to lay down their nuclear ambitions. Four years later, Obama seems has been more concerned about cutting back our nuclear arsenal than trying to stop Tehran.

3. Diplomatic security

How could a U.S. ambassador be at an unsecured consulate in a hostile location in the Arab world on the anniversary of September 11? Christopher Stevens’ murder by a terror mob need could have been avoided if the U.S. heeded the warnings that violence was afoot. The State Department had even issued a travel alert to Americans about going to Libya, yet the consulate had minimal security.

4. Libya explanation

Long after the entire world knew that the strike on the Libyan consulate was a terrorist attack, the Obama administration continued its laughable explanation that the assault was solely the result of a spontaneous mob enraged by an anti-Islamic film. As Sen. John McCain pointed out, protesters don’t usually bring rocket-propelled grenades to a political rally.

5. Disdain for Israel

The one ally the United States could always count on in the Middle East—Israel—has consistently gotten the shaft from the White House. Obama has shown nothing if not disdain for the Jewish state, at one point offending Israeli officials by urging a return to 1967 borders. Now Obama can’t even find time in his schedule for a face-to-face meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

6. Leading from behind in Libya

Hillary Clinton asked,“How can this happen in a country we helped to liberate?” when the U.S. ambassador was murdered. The answer goes back to the method of liberation—Obama’s sanctioning of NATO air strikes. Little regard was given to the make-up of the rebels that finally steamed-rolled to victory who are vying for power.

7. Iran protests

Before the Arab Spring, there were the Iranian protests of 2009, where any assistance from Washington, could have helped to tip the balance of power away from the hard-line Islamist leaders. Instead, Obama was still convinced of his own power to sweet-talk Ahmadinejad and he left the nascent democracy movement out to dry.

[Obama is a Menace]

Calling someone a liar is a serious accusation. This is why, aside from the unwritten contract allowing for mutual prevarication, politicians are so reluctant to do it. And not just anyone is a liar. Legend has it that our first president said, "I cannot tell a lie," but, being only human, G.W. no doubt could and certainly did, at some point. A liar, however, is someone who lives and breathes the lie; someone who specializes in the art of artifice; someone to whom lying is his first recourse, not his last. Such a man is Barack Obama.
In four years, Obama has gone from "change you can believe in" to a man you simply cannot believe. And it's not just Benghazi-gate, although that's a good place to start. With the recently revealed emails showing that the White House was told a mere two hours after the attack that it was a terrorist act, no reasonable person can still conclude that the Obama administration was honest in its aftermath. And the claim that the violence was sparked by some anti-Islamic film wasn't just a lie - it was a liar's lie.

[Repub Puke]

Do you even know how how to construct a simple sentence or paragraph. You are an obvious product of CPS.

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

CONTINUED ....
Ronnie catastrophically lowered taxes in 1981 which created debt so large that he had to RAISE taxes each of the next six years;
he repeatedly RAISED taxes on people who were making increasingly less and less in wages while giving corporate welfare away to the rich;
signed the single largest tax increase EVER into law;
he started the flood of companies leaving this country when he made it profitable to leave by giving them tax breaks on their relocation expenses and allowed them to not have to claim profits if they were held overseas;
based on the Bureau of Labor Statistics, had annual job growth of 2.1%(Democrat Johnson had 3.8%, Carter 3.1, Clinton 2.4, and Kennedy 2.3);
expanded the govt by around 90%;
effectively killed the Fairness Doctrine, choosing to stop enforcing it in 1987. When Congress voted to reinstate the doctrine with the force of law, Reagan used his veto pen in a move that would clear the way for the rise of right-wing talk radio and Roger Ailes' Fox News network.
helped to kill the electric car mandates by the state of California that effectively killed the electric car;
he reversed most the ALTERNATIVE FUELS initiative that Carter set up to ensure that we could wean off our reliance on oil;
pushed for the same free trade/"global economy" policies that are costing us millions of higher paying jobs;
cut funding for the nation's mental institutions and threw tens of thousands of the mentally ill onto the streets;
he chronically under-funded AIDS research because he prioritized kissing the religious, homophobic, conservative a*s*s of Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell;
imposed brutal trade sanctions on Nicaragua;
helped the Khmer Rouge terrorize Thailand;
funded the murderous brutal Contras;
called Ferdinand Marcos of the Philippines a "champion of freedom and democracy" while Marcos shot civilians dead in the streets, closed churches, and looted the country's treasury of billions;
he sold missiles to a present enemy in Iran via Iran/Contra and gave political, financial and military support to a future one in Saddam Hussein;
trained Osama bin Laden and his fellow muhujadeen because Ronnie never met a terrorist (who he called a "freedom fighter") that he didn't like as long as he was anti-commie;
and had arguably the most corrupt administrations EVER - with more people leaving his service under indictment, criminal investigation and under a cloud of suspicion than any other administration in history.
Yep! Other than ALL THAT ... Reagan was just GREAT wasn't he?
Reagan was a menace and the best thing that POS ever did for his country was die!
Now you see what I just did there? I just backed up my point by BURYING YOU in them.
If you have anything else to say to me ... please do!
Because I'll continue to pound you down into nothing more than ... what was the term you used?... a "stain" on the library chair you post from.

[Tom Tom]

Brady

[Mark]

Kirk

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Repub Puke wrote:

Do you even know how how to construct a simple sentence or paragraph. You are an obvious product of CPS.<quoted text>

Roland Burris/Rodger Moore/Internet Guy/Dr Phil/GOPvsUSAjr/Obama Suks/SSI/Rich Daley/Roland/KK Harvard/Grade School/Nancy Pelosi/No Mo Homo/Seymour/illiterate/Rahm/I CE/Barney Frank/Fat Pt Quinn/Straight/Dick Face Durbin/Rev Jackson/Obama/GOP VS USA/olandf/Truth/Madigan/Mayor daley/Roland/Rev Wright/Working Man/SON/Dick Face Durib/Olive Oil/Hillary/Union/Dr Philsimpson/Charlie Rangle/Pelosi/Obama is a Meanace/Bush/OMG/Idiot Joe Biden/Michelle/Illeterate/Obam a was a menace/Obama Suks/Media Matters/Huffington/Repub Puke

Way to admit defeat by dodging EVERY SINGLE ONE of my points on Reagan there!

And weren't you complaining about other people "cutting and pasting" in post #4942? Then why did you just cut and paste EVERYTHING in those last few posts DIRECTLY from the following two sources, hypocrite?

http://www.humanevents.com/2010/01/27/top-10-...

http://www.humanevents.com/2012/09/29/top-10-...

Can't you formulate your own responses? I guess you lose that when you watch Fox news eh?

I'll just re-post what I said way back in #1278 in response to your following drivel in post #1215:

"Illiteracy appears to to be your strong suite let me help over estimated is two words I could go on but it would be pointless your grammar is horrific."

Did you ever figure out that:

1) The word "overesitmated" isn't two words - that it's ONE word you illiterate jackass?

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overestimate

2) Or that it's strong SUIT ... not strong "suite" you illiterate jackass?

3) Or that your ENTIRE POST is one whole run-on sentence you illiterate jackass?

Well? Did you?

I'm still waiting for an answer here ... since April!

How much more time do you need?

I'd be REALLY embarrassed if I were you! Calling people illiterate when your post is riddled with mistakes? And then trying to call me out on a mistake that it turns out was correct ... because you have the IQ of afterbirth?

OUCH!

And since you never answered those questions there, I'll just KEEP POSTING IT to you ... over and over ... until you answer them you illiterate jackass.

Get the pattern?

[YesSir]

Mark Kirk

[truth is]

Don't be using my grandsons post name!!!!!!!!!
yes sir.

[Want]

A Republican

[MrLentz]

why shood i sooport a goverment that take my kid's to give thim to gay's now make home that legalized marege betwe same sexs that cat breed or have kid's by thim self at all , to preach ther gay ixsam to kid's that are not ther's thay steen to get , the goverment make it posable no, no i cant in good copnches knowing same sex marieger will git my son fuck in the asss by gay cuple no way . thay dont give birst thay do , rase thim past 5 year's yet that take thim do to are fucked up guverment giveng the assoh to gay and making it seem lejit no !!!!!!!!!! you abuse anuff kid's on yourt reckerd than youl change same sexd marege back to only man and a woment the breeder's the father and mother of this rase called humen the goverment gave to gay to fduch in therv saass's no !!!!!!!!!!

[MrLentz]

gay's dont breed thay shood never mary to clame kid's as family thay dont wont , if thay cant mak baby by thim self than thay shood never be give a chace to clame . in front of any child thay are menning thy shood mind a gay giting fucked in ther ass cass same sex no non no non on on o no!!!!!!!!!! no child shood ever be given thot thot to take any one is in any way roght same sex dos just that , cass saame sex can not breed on ther own . at all, and give the nex kid's aid's cass the goverment ses it's ok to fuch a child by same sex giveng the power of cholder that vare not ther's to any gay no nono nopn opn opn op non opnn no no no no no on so many ways the goverment hurt kid's every wer by same sex

[really now]

MrLentz wrote:

gay's dont breed thay shood never mary to clame kid's as family thay dont wont , if thay cant mak baby by thim self than thay shood never be give a chace to clame . in front of any child thay are menning thy shood mind a gay giting fucked in ther ass cass same sex no non no non on on o no!!!!!!!!!! no child shood ever be given thot thot to take any one is in any way roght same sex dos just that , cass saame sex can not breed on ther own . at all, and give the nex kid's aid's cass the goverment ses it's ok to fuch a child by same sex giveng the power of cholder that vare not ther's to any gay no nono nopn opn opn op non opnn no no no no no on so many ways the goverment hurt kid's every wer by same sex

I hope you don't have children. If you do god help them.

[really now]

MrLentz wrote:

gay's dont breed thay shood never mary to clame kid's as family thay dont wont , if thay cant mak baby by thim self than thay shood never be give a chace to clame . in front of any child thay are menning thy shood mind a gay giting fucked in ther ass cass same sex no non no non on on o no!!!!!!!!!! no child shood ever be given thot thot to take any one is in any way roght same sex dos just that , cass saame sex can not breed on ther own . at all, and give the nex kid's aid's cass the goverment ses it's ok to fuch a child by same sex giveng the power of cholder that vare not ther's to any gay no nono nopn opn opn op non opnn no no no no no on so many ways the goverment hurt kid's every wer by same sex

Also do you go to church? Have you heard what the priest have been doing to our children? Don't cast stones on a group, it's the person!!!!!!!!!!

[Reagan was a MENACE]

MrLentz wrote:

why shood i sooport a goverment that take my kid's to give thim to gay's now make home that legalized marege betwe same sexs that cat breed or have kid's by thim self at all , to preach ther gay ixsam to kid's that are not ther's thay steen to get , the goverment make it posable no, no i cant in good copnches knowing same sex marieger will git my son fuck in the asss by gay cuple no way . thay dont give birst thay do , rase thim past 5 year's yet that take thim do to are fucked up guverment giveng the assoh to gay and making it seem lejit no !!!!!!!!!! you abuse anuff kid's on yourt reckerd than youl change same sexd marege back to only man and a woment the breeder's the father and mother of this rase called humen the goverment gave to gay to fduch in therv saass's no !!!!!!!!!!

The above rant is the perfect example of the language skills associated with and overall education level of a Fox News watching conservative Republican.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

MrLentz wrote:

gay's dont breed thay shood never mary to clame kid's as family thay dont wont , if thay cant mak baby by thim self than thay shood never be give a chace to clame . in front of any child thay are menning thy shood mind a gay giting fucked in ther ass cass same sex no non no non on on o no!!!!!!!!!! no child shood ever be given thot thot to take any one is in any way roght same sex dos just that , cass saame sex can not breed on ther own . at all, and give the nex kid's aid's cass the goverment ses it's ok to fuch a child by same sex giveng the power of cholder that vare not ther's to any gay no nono nopn opn opn op non opnn no no no no no on so many ways the goverment hurt kid's every wer by same sex

There it is AGAIN!

[Bruser]

Reagan was a MENACE wrote:

<quoted text>
The above rant is the perfect example of the language skills associated with and overall education level of a Fox News watching conservative Republican.

Hey retarded one,this isn't English 101. True to a stupid liberal,
you attack the poster, never the substance of his post. Why? Because you have no viable answer,and know that what he is posting is true,
so instead you try to belittle the poster, and try to distract everyone from his posts.
How Liberal of you, and how childish. Funny how Obama is trying to say how Reagan he is. Go back to your knitting, and write yourself letters extolling how great you are. Oh wait, we have that idiot in the White House right now, so it is either he that is posting or his ghost writer .

[Bruser]

The Ugliness of Pro-choice Zealots by Bill O'Reilly

It is one of life's great mysteries that so many liberal people are so callous when it comes to
aborting fetuses. I mean, the Democratic convention last summer was almost a pro-abortion
pep rally, as a variety of pro-choice speakers, including the self-proclaimed "Catholic
woman" Caroline Kennedy, knelt at the altar of"reproductive rights."

Recently, another woman who calls herself a Catholic, Mary Elizabeth Williams, wrote a shocking article for Salon. Entitled "So What if Abortion Ends Life?" Williams starkly states: "I believe that life starts at conception. And it's never stopped me from being pro-choice. "
In the body of the article, Williams says this about her own pregnancies: "I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. "
And she continues, "Here's the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That's a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about ...(A) fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it
resides. She's the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always."
So now a developing fetus or viable baby ingesting in the womb is a "non-autonomous entity. " Good grief!
The measure of a decent human being is how he or she treats the defenseless. The philosophy of Williams echoes past tyranny: Might makes right! What gives Williams the right to determine that her life is better than the baby she carries?
Who appointed Williams the arbiter of who lives and who dies? Always, Williams? Abortion is acceptable always?
We are not talking about life endangerment or catastrophic damage to the mother here. No. What Williams believes, and she's not alone, is that a woman can execute her fetus simply because ''she's the boss."
You may remember the late-term abortion doctor George Tiller. For $5,000, Tiller would drill a hole into the skull of a baby anytime up until birth. Tiller had an assistant in his Kansas clinic, Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus, whose assignment
was to put on paper a reason for the late termination. Pretty much any reason would do" including "anxiety. " On May 31, 2009, Tiller was shot through the eye while attending a church service. His killer, Scott Roeder, is serving
life in prison. The murder made national headlines, and in many press dispatches, Tiller was portrayed as a martyr.
People like me who had criticized Tiller before the vicious crime, were accused by far-leflloons of encouraging the assassination.
On June 22, 2012, Neuhaus was informed that Kansas authorities had revoked her medical license. A judge ruled that she did not perform adequate mental health examinations of 11 abortion patients. The prosecution said that Neuhaus
was a "threat to any future patients she might have. "
Not to mention the babies she helped Tiller abort.
There comes a time when a human being has to either face evil or admit to allowing it. Abortion is legal in the United States, but it should not be celebrated or used as a political tool. Viable babies are human beings. if they could talk, they
would tell Williams and other pro-choice zealots that "their lives should not be marginalized by someone who thinks she's the boss." That's what the babies would say.

[Reagan was a MENACE]

Bruser wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey retarded one,this isn't English 101. True to a stupid liberal,
you attack the poster, never the substance of his post. Why? Because you have no viable answer,and know that what he is posting is true,
so instead you try to belittle the poster, and try to distract everyone from his posts.
How Liberal of you, and how childish. Funny how Obama is trying to say how Reagan he is. Go back to your knitting, and write yourself letters extolling how great you are. Oh wait, we have that idiot in the White House right now, so it is either he that is posting or his ghost writer .

AWWWW ... poor Bruser! Another tear filled rant?

Would you like some tissues for your issues?

Hold on and let me try to contain my laughter here ...

OK .. done!

No wait ... not yet ....

OK ... I think I'm finally done laughing now. Really!

Are you by chance trying to intimidate me tough guy? If you are, you're gonna have to try harder - a lot harder. You getting all cranky over there is almost as humorous as the hieroglyphics in your buddy's two posts!

But let's get something straight, right here and right now: I'll belittle anyone, anywhere, and at any time I want.

You got that?

And I'll especially do that when the moron can't spell, conjugate or define half the words he uses. When ... you know ... his remedial Republicanism is on full display for all to see.

You got that?

And here's the kicker: You won't do a DAMN thing about it!

You got that?

As for "no viable answer", I already gave one you stupid, inbred, conservative POS. Your buddy's own posts were a "distraction" from whatever the hell he was typing .... in whatever the hell language he was typing it in .... on whatever library computer he was typing it on ... since nobody could get past the first sentence.

Perhaps if you Fox News Republicans were literate enough to READ my responses you might not look like you're so "conservative" with your brain cells and IQ points you stupid inbred, conservative POS.

Is it the ratings at Fox News that are at a 12-year low ... or is it their viewership's collective IQ? I'm pretty sure yours has already fallen through the floor, is in the process of digging a hole in the basement, and is damn-near in China by now.

By the way ... are you related to the guy you're sticking up for by chance? Do you two share the same brain cell? I gotta ask because you can't even spell your own damn name right you stupid, inbred, conservative POS.

I SH*T smarter than you two!

Now go take a Midol and try not to "bruise" your vagina or break one of those freshly painted nails when you post back to me - you know, from your hidden location with all your hidden posts.

[really now]

Bruser wrote:

The Ugliness of Pro-choice Zealots by Bill O'Reilly
It is one of life's great mysteries that so many liberal people are so callous when it comes to
aborting fetuses. I mean, the Democratic convention last summer was almost a pro-abortion
pep rally, as a variety of pro-choice speakers, including the self-proclaimed "Catholic
woman" Caroline Kennedy, knelt at the altar of"reproductive rights."
"I believe that life starts at conception. And it's never stopped me from being pro-choice. "
In the body of the article, Williams says this about her own pregnancies: "I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. "
And she continues, "Here's the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That's a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about ...(A) fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it
resides. She's the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always."
So now a developing fetus or viable baby ingesting in the womb is a "non-autonomous entity. " Good grief!
The measure of a decent human being is how he or she treats the defenseless. The philosophy of Williams echoes past tyranny: Might makes right! What gives Williams the right to determine that her life is better than the baby she carries?
Who appointed Williams the arbiter of who lives and who dies? Always, Williams? Abortion is acceptable always?
We are not talking about life endangerment or catastrophic damage to the mother here. No. What Williams believes, and she's not alone, is that a woman can execute her fetus simply because ''she's the boss."
You may remember the late-term abortion doctor George Tiller. For $5,000, Tiller would drill a hole into the skull of a baby anytime up until birth. Tiller had an assistant in his Kansas clinic, Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus, whose assignment
was to put on paper a reason for the late termination. Pretty much any reason would do" including "anxiety. " On May 31, 2009, Tiller was shot through the eye while attending a church service. His killer, Scott Roeder, is serving
life in prison. The murder made national headlines, and in many press dispatches, Tiller was portrayed as a martyr.
People like me who had criticized Tiller before the vicious crime, were accused by far-leflloons of encouraging the assassination.
On June 22, 2012, Neuhaus was informed that Kansas authorities had revoked her medical license. A judge ruled that she did not perform adequate mental health examinations of 11 abortion patients. The prosecution said that Neuhaus
was a "threat to any future patients she might have. "
Not to mention the babies she helped Tiller abort.
There comes a time when a human being has to either face evil or admit to allowing it. Abortion is legal in the United States, but it should not be celebrated or used as a political tool. Viable babies are human beings. if they could talk, they
would tell Williams and other pro-choice zealots that "their lives should not be marginalized by someone who thinks she's the boss." That's what the babies would say.

Your first problem is, you listen to the no spin zone Billy boy!!! The only way he has a conversation is in a controlled environment. He won't talk in a free style debate.
2nd....I don't want you to impose your rules on me theory. What about free choice....to live with whom you want!!!!!!
If you can't care for the baby....who will???????
It's a free choice to have an abortion or not!!!!!!!!
It's a free choice to live with whom you want!!!!!!!!!!
It's a free choice to vote republican if you want!!!!!!!!
It's a free choice to go to church and sit in front of a priest that you know molested children and they did nothing about it.!!!!!!!!!
Thats what this county was founded on basic rights!!!!!!!

[really now]

Bruser wrote:

The Ugliness of Pro-choice Zealots by Bill O'Reilly
It is one of life's great mysteries that so many liberal people are so callous when it comes to
aborting fetuses. I mean, the Democratic convention last summer was almost a pro-abortion
pep rally, as a variety of pro-choice speakers, including the self-proclaimed "Catholic
woman" Caroline Kennedy, knelt at the altar of"reproductive rights."
Recently, another woman who calls herself a Catholic, Mary Elizabeth Williams, wrote a shocking article for Salon. Entitled "So What if Abortion Ends Life?" Williams starkly states: "I believe that life starts at conception. And it's never stopped me from being pro-choice. "
In the body of the article, Williams says this about her own pregnancies: "I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. "
And she continues, "Here's the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That's a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about ...(A) fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it
resides. She's the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always."
So now a developing fetus or viable baby ingesting in the womb is a "non-autonomous entity. " Good grief!
The measure of a decent human being is how he or she treats the defenseless. The philosophy of Williams echoes past tyranny: Might makes right! What gives Williams the right to determine that her life is better than the baby she carries?
Who appointed Williams the arbiter of who lives and who dies? Always, Williams? Abortion is acceptable always?
We are not talking about life endangerment or catastrophic damage to the mother here. No. What Williams believes, and she's not alone, is that a woman can execute her fetus simply because ''she's the boss."
You may remember the late-term abortion doctor George Tiller. For $5,000, Tiller would drill a hole into the skull of a baby anytime up until birth. Tiller had an assistant in his Kansas clinic, Dr. Ann Kristin Neuhaus, whose assignment
was to put on paper a reason for the late termination. Pretty much any reason would do" including "anxiety. " On May 31, 2009, Tiller was shot through the eye while attending a church service. His killer, Scott Roeder, is serving
life in prison. The murder made national headlines, and in many press dispatches, Tiller was portrayed as a martyr.
was a "threat to any future patients she might have. "
Not to mention the babies she helped Tiller abort.
There comes a time when a human being has to either face evil or admit to allowing it. Abortion is legal in the United States, but it should not be celebrated or used as a political tool. Viable babies are human beings. if they could talk, they
would tell Williams and other pro-choice zealots that "their lives should not be marginalized by someone who thinks she's the boss." That's what the babies would say.

1st off you listen to no spin billy boy..who only has a conversation in a controlled time. He won't free style debate openly.
2nd...you have this my rules only theory.
This county was founded on freedom of choice...
Choice to have an abortion or not.
Choice to live and marry who you want.
Choice to vote republican or not.
Choice to go to church and listen to a priest, you know molested a child and the church has done nothing about it.
"lot of sins coming out these days about the church" deny that!!!!
It's called freedom of choice..be careful about taking that away.
We have fought many wars and battles to save it.