Comments
3,041 - 3,060 of 6,590 Comments Last updated Sunday Jul 6
Olive

Herrin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3290
Oct 7, 2012
 
Romney flip-flops on his 47% statement. Did you really expect anything else? Now he is saying he is wrong but he is lying through his teeth. What a loser.
Shitt Rmoney wrote:
Shitt Romney said he was "completely wrong" when he argued that nearly half of Americans were "victims" and dependent on government.

The admission came Thursday as the GOP presidential candidate sought to clarify his controversial "47%" comments.

"Clearly in a campaign with hundreds if not thousands of speeches and question-and-answer sessions, now and then you're going to say something that doesn't come out right," Romney said on Fox News. "In this case, I said something that's just completely wrong."

Last month, secretly recorded video of Romney at a May fundraiser showed the Republican candidate saying 47% of Americans will vote for President Barack Obama "no matter what."

"There are 47% who are with him, who are dependent on government, who believe that, that they are victims, who believe that government has the responsibility to care for them. Who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing."

Romney ads: U.S. can't afford four more years of Obama

The non-partisan Tax Policy Center estimates that for tax year 2011, 46% of households will end up owing nothing in federal income taxes. But if payroll taxes are counted, the number of non-payer households drops precipitously - to an estimated 18% in 2011.

Adding to his argument about entitlement, Romney said his "job is not to worry about those people."

"I'll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives," he added.

"What I have to do is convince the 5 percent to 10 percent in the center that are independents, that are thoughtful."

After the videos, which were posted on the progressive news website Mother Jones, caught fire, Romney called a last-minute press conference with pool reporters while he was in California at the time.

The former Massachusetts governor acknowledged the comments were "off the cuff" and "not elegantly stated," but he defended the main point of the message, saying he was criticizing the increasing size of government and entitlement programs.

"We have a very different approach – the president and I – between a government-dominated society and a society driven by free people pursuing their dreams," Romney said.

The following day, Romney still stuck by his comments and elaborated on the logistical reasoning behind his remarks.

With Ryan by his side, Romney rallies Virginians in debate victory lap

"We were of course talking about a campaign and how he is going to get close to half the vote," Romney said. "I'm going to get half the vote, I hope, I want to get 50.1% or more. Frankly we have two very different views about America."

In the first presidential debate Wednesday, Obama surprised political observers by not going after Romney on the comments, as he has on the campaign trail in the last two weeks.

On Fox News Thursday night, Romney was asked what he would have said if the president had brought up the controversial statements–which is when the GOP nominee went as far as to say he was "wrong."

He then argued that, if elected, he would represent all Americans, not just half.

"I absolutely believe, however, that my life has shown that I care about 100% and that's been demonstrated throughout my life. And this whole campaign is about the 100%. When I become president, it will be helping the 100%."
beware

Chicago Heights, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3291
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

Im watching the replay on line of obama getting his little butt kicked! I can't believe that he is such a coward! Can't even look at Romney as he was being critiqued! What was he writing down? Obama never even had any come backs! Weak, the whole time! Mitt dominates the whole time!
Olive

Herrin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3292
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NEWS FLASH: UNEMPLOYMENT STILL UNDER 8%. NATION REJOICES EXCEPT FOR BUTTHURT REPUBLICANS.
paul

Hinckley, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3293
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Olive wrote:
NEWS FLASH: UNEMPLOYMENT STILL UNDER 8%. NATION REJOICES EXCEPT FOR BUTTHURT REPUBLICANS.
NEWS FLASH.......
Real unemployment is well over 11%.
A disgrace by any standard.

Wait till after the election and the figures are adjusted upward yet again.

Your boy is a one man wrecking crew supported by the media who will still not ask this mistake any questions that might befuddle him.

He is the worst thing that has ever happened to this country.
Popeye

Manhattan, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3294
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Olive wrote:
NEWS FLASH: UNEMPLOYMENT STILL UNDER 8%. NATION REJOICES EXCEPT FOR BUTTHURT REPUBLICANS.
Where in the hell did you get unemployment under 8%??

You can always tell when a Democrat is lying, they are speaking.
The Emperor

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3295
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Popeye wrote:
<quoted text> Where in the hell did you get unemployment under 8%??
You can always tell when a Democrat is lying, they are speaking.
Good

Goooooooooooooooood

Let the butthur flow though you
UninformedOhio Republican

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3296
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Popeye wrote:
<quoted text> Where in the hell did you get unemployment under 8%??
It's simple mathematics. 7.8% < 8.0%

Got it?

No?

Okay, here you go...

If the values in question are elements of an ordered set, such as the integers or the real numbers, they can be compared in size.

The notation a < b means that a is less than b.
The notation a > b means that a is greater than b.

In either case, a is not equal to b. These relations are known as strict inequalities. The notation a < b may also be read as "a is strictly less than b".

So this is what it has come to with republicans? Just straight out denial.

Instead of just bashing the factual numbers, now they just put their hands over their eyes and ears and pretend it didn't happen.
paul

Hinckley, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3297
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

UninformedOhio Republican wrote:
<quoted text>
It's simple mathematics. 7.8% < 8.0%
Got it?
No?
Okay, here you go...
If the values in question are elements of an ordered set, such as the integers or the real numbers, they can be compared in size.
The notation a < b means that a is less than b.
The notation a > b means that a is greater than b.
In either case, a is not equal to b. These relations are known as strict inequalities. The notation a < b may also be read as "a is strictly less than b".
So this is what it has come to with republicans? Just straight out denial.
Instead of just bashing the factual numbers, now they just put their hands over their eyes and ears and pretend it didn't happen.
Dumbass.
beware

Chicago Heights, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3298
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

UninformedOhio Republican wrote:
<quoted text>
It's simple mathematics. 7.8% < 8.0%
Got it?
No?
Okay, here you go...
If the values in question are elements of an ordered set, such as the integers or the real numbers, they can be compared in size.
The notation a < b means that a is less than b.
The notation a > b means that a is greater than b.
In either case, a is not equal to b. These relations are known as strict inequalities. The notation a < b may also be read as "a is strictly less than b".
So this is what it has come to with republicans? Just straight out denial.
Instead of just bashing the factual numbers, now they just put their hands over their eyes and ears and pretend it didn't happen.
60% of these so called jobs were temporary, part time with no benefits. They were low waged and last less than 90 days. The real factual unemployment number u6 is about 15%. There were only 114000 jobs added in a month for a population of 310million. This is a laughable number. GDP is less than 1.5. That is terrible and this is the worst recovery since the end of WW2. These are facts that matter.
Liberal BS

Lake Villa, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3299
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

UninformedOhio Republican wrote:
<quoted text>It's simple mathematics. 7.8% < 8.0%

Got it?

No?

Okay, here you go...

If the values in question are elements of an ordered set, such as the integers or the real numbers, they can be compared in size.

The notation a < b means that a is less than b.
The notation a > b means that a is greater than b.

In either case, a is not equal to b. These relations are known as strict inequalities. The notation a < b may also be read as "a is strictly less than b".

So this is what it has come to with republicans? Just straight out denial.

Instead of just bashing the factual numbers, now they just put their hands over their eyes and ears and pretend it didn't happen.
Underemployment 14.2%. Unchanged from August
Liberal BS

Lake Villa, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3300
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Olive wrote:
NEWS FLASH: UNEMPLOYMENT STILL UNDER 8%. NATION REJOICES EXCEPT FOR BUTTHURT REPUBLICANS.
25 million unemployed. 14.2% underemployed trying to support families on part time hours. And the "rejoicing" is where?
remembering Bush

Waterloo, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3301
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

If you want to piss off the pubs...just mention Cheney/ Bush. Base your facts on his 8 years. That just kills'em. They can't face the facts of just why we are in a failng economy. How's that Irag war thing going. Thousands of soldiers killed, billions spent. Don't mention that stuff. It infuriates them as they have no defense. No one could direct a recovery in 4 years, but their hero romney will. I mean, they got put out of office for a reason didn't they. It's called inept leadership, but they want to lead again. I sure hope not.lol
Olive

Herrin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3302
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

remembering Bush wrote:
If you want to piss off the pubs...just mention Cheney/ Bush. Base your facts on his 8 years. That just kills'em. They can't face the facts of just why we are in a failng economy. How's that Irag war thing going. Thousands of soldiers killed, billions spent. Don't mention that stuff. It infuriates them as they have no defense. No one could direct a recovery in 4 years, but their hero romney will. I mean, they got put out of office for a reason didn't they. It's called inept leadership, but they want to lead again. I sure hope not.lol
If Bush would have killed Osama bi Laden they would have carved his face on Mount Rushmore. When Obama killed Osama bin Laden they were concerned about bin Laden's rights. Talk about hypocritical douche bags!
Liberal BS

Lake Villa, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3304
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Olive wrote:
<quoted text>If Bush would have killed Osama bi Laden they would have carved his face on Mount Rushmore. When Obama killed Osama bin Laden they were concerned about bin Laden's rights. Talk about hypocritical douche bags!
What the hell are you talking about?

And by the way, if we are choosing who will be president based on who killed bin Laden, you need to vote for a Navy Seal. Obama killed bin Laden? Which helicopter was he on?
Olive

Herrin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3305
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Liberal BS wrote:
<quoted text>
What the hell are you talking about?
And by the way, if we are choosing who will be president based on who killed bin Laden, you need to vote for a Navy Seal. Obama killed bin Laden? Which helicopter was he on?
^Sheepfucker.^
GaveUpOnSociety

Byron, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3307
Oct 7, 2012
 
who cares who is in office when they are both bought and paid for by the same bank. same corporation=same agenda
Olive

Herrin, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3308
Oct 7, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Liberal BS wrote:
<quoted text>
Great response you uncouth loser.
Wow, that really hurt coming from a sheepfucker and all.
GaveUpOnSociety

Byron, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3310
Oct 7, 2012
 
Does an internet arguement end when one member of said arguement says something so clever and witty that the other member is forced to retire? Does the "winner" feel some level of intellectual satisfaction and pride over this win? Primitive.
Good Question

Lake Villa, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3311
Oct 7, 2012
 
GaveUpOnSociety wrote:
Does an internet arguement end when one member of said arguement says something so clever and witty that the other member is forced to retire? Does the "winner" feel some level of intellectual satisfaction and pride over this win? Primitive.
I don't know. What do you think?

Seems to be a step better than people physically beating the tar out of each other. What's disturbing is that almost every one of these "threads" degenerates to the level above fairly quickly. A dozen posts or so. Nobody changes anyone's mind. It is indeed a kind of battle, but if wits, or in some cases, half wits.

Is there a solution you have to offer, or is your statement also exactly what you are ruminating over?
GaveUpOnSociety

Byron, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3312
Oct 7, 2012
 
The only solution is to get over the fact that somebody has a different belief than you. I have come to realize that opinions are usually not based on solid facts and people are ignorantly stubborn even when shown proof. The point is don't waste your time arguing online about who is right or wrong to boost your intellectual ego, if your smart then utilize it and fix the problems around you and collaborate with like-minded individuals, don't argue with those that wont be convinced anyway, its counter-productive.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Rockford Discussions

Search the Rockford Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 3 hr raphael 3,841
IL Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 5 hr Terry rigsby 48,989
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) Jul 27 newpoly 1,864
IL Who do you support for Secretary of State in Il... (Oct '10) Jul 27 Chicagobunny 526
Looking for family members Lewis C. Williams an... Jul 24 Renee 1
Hannah Montana Email!!!!!!! (Nov '07) Jul 22 Paige 1,200
Police: Suspect Tried To Strangle Woman (Mar '08) Jul 21 LMAO 164
•••
•••
•••
•••

Rockford Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Rockford People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Rockford News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Rockford
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••