The Obama Recession
Posted in the Rochester Forum
Since: Nov 11
#1 Nov 17, 2012
Full time work is about to get scarcer. The reason? By hiring part-time workers who put in less than 30 hours per week, employers can avoid a mandate dictated by the new health reform law: either provide expensive health insurance or pay a fine equal to $2,000 per worker. Avoiding the mandate becomes even more attractive for low-wage employees, since they can get highly subsidized insurance in the newly created health insurance exchanges. According to the Wall Street Journal:
• Darden Restaurants [parent of Red Lobster and Olive Garden] was among the first companies to say it was changing hiring in response to the health-care law.
• Pillar Hotels & Resorts this summer began to focus more on hiring part-time workers among its 5,500 employees, after the Supreme Court upheld the health-care overhaul.
• CKE Restaurants Inc., parent of the Carl’s Jr. and Hardee’s burger chains, began two months ago to hire part-time workers to replace full-time employees who left.
• Home retailer Anna’s Linens Inc. is considering cutting hours for some full-time employees to avoid the insurance mandate if the healthcare law isn’t repealed.
• In a July survey, 32% of retail and hospitality company respondents told [Mercer] that they were likely to reduce the number of employees working 30 hours a week or more.
Clearly the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) is a major factor holding back economic recovery. But it’s not alone. Other public policies enacted during the Obama administration’s first four years have been affecting the supply side of the market.
As I wrote previously, another problem is that we are paying people not to work.
A new book by University of Chicago economist Casey Mulligan estimates that about half the precipitous 2007-2011 decline in the labor-force-participation rate and in hours worked can be blamed on easier eligibility rules for unemployment insurance, food stamps and housing aid.
As Steve Moore writes in a review of Mulligan’s book:
Since: Nov 11
#2 Nov 17, 2012
The annual value in average benefits for not working rose to $14,000 per recipient in 2011 — the high was $16,000 in 2009 — up from $10,000 in 2007. Such increases were inversely related to changes in average hours worked. On average, Americans worked a stunning 120 fewer hours in 2009 than in 2007 — the largest contraction in work effort of any recession since the Depression. Since 2009, work hours and labor-force participation have remained at record lows even though the recession officially ended in June 2009.
Another frequently heard explanation for the slow recovery is the Keynesian idea that there has been a lack of consumer spending — which caused businesses to cut production and lay off workers. Yet:
Mulligan shows that, during the worst of the 2008-09 troubles, most sectors “outside of hard-hit construction and manufacturing…increased their use of production inputs other than labor hours.”…”Businesses perceive labor to be more expensive than it was before the recession began,” Mulligan writes. The reason for the added cost was that easier requirements for benefits — even as the government was pumping “stimulus” money into the economy — unwittingly reduced the supply of workers.
Elections have consequences.
Add your comments below
|My dad's birthday is saturday!||46 min||IescapedNY||20|
|Trump Lashes Out at Dems||51 min||IescapedNY||2|
|Rochester a Sanctuary City?||1 hr||Ha ha is unemployed||5|
|One Year Later... Trump Shutdown Begins||2 hr||IescapedNY||12|
|Amazon Announces Top 20 Cities - No Rochester||19 hr||IescapedNY||11|
|Jerry this is your last warning||19 hr||IescapedNY||3|
|Anyone find Trumps comments about "black" count...||19 hr||IescapedNY||24|
Find what you want!
Search Rochester Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC