What Soaking the Rich Gets: Deficits Forever
Posted in the Rochester Forum
Since: Nov 11
#1 Dec 11, 2012
Last week, the progressive think tank Center for American Progress (CAP) released their tax reform plan [pdf], supported by prominent left-wing budgeters and economists like Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. The net effect of this tax reform plan is a massive tax hike on "the rich" in order to fall far, far short of the revenue necessary to eliminate America's deficit.
The CAP plan would eliminate deductions, close loopholes raise rates, implement new taxes, increase sales taxes, create new taxes... basically every form of a tax hike you can think of, all implemented on households with income above $250,000 per year.
What this gets, according to the Center for American Progress, is a tax system that barely raises Clinton-era levels of tax revenue, while the spending side of the ledger still projects to explode. CAP's plan gets tax revenue of 20.3% of GDP, below the Clinton years' high of 20.6% of GDP, with government spending projected to be significantly higher even under the most optimistic of situations. And by the 2030s, government spending is still projected to be over 25% of GDP in the most optimistic of scenarios.(You do not want to know what the pessimistic scenarios are. Something along the lines of an apocalypse.)
This is an unsustainable situation. It's government spending, not tax revenues, that needs the most attention. Even with very few policy changes, total tax revenues will rebound to above historical averages by the end of the decade. You can't soak-the-rich all the way to deficit reduction.
More honest progressives know that if they truly want to tax their way to a balanced budget, they need to tax the middle class and the poor. David Callahan writes that CAP's major mistake is exempting the non-rich from tax hikes, and that CAP "simply doesn't face up to revenue realities."
Obama is so RETARDED.
Since: Nov 11
#2 Dec 11, 2012
Reminder: Americans Overwhelmingly Support Federal Spending Cuts
But by all means, let's keep obsessing over tax increases on rich people, which would take care of roughly eight percent of this year's federal deficit -- at best. Let's take a peek at the data itself, then discover how Politico chose to boil it down into a narrative-driving headline:
Since: Jan 11
#3 Dec 11, 2012
But, but.... uh... If I just borrow more money at higher and higher interest rates and spend more money on stuff I don't really need then it will all be ok, right? Maybe we can just print more money? Hyper-inflation is good, right? Perhaps all the British wealthy folks that moved out of Britain due to high taxes will stay here with U.S. wealthy and allow themselves to be taxed to death and won't move to some other country together. Goodbye jobs and tax base.
Add your comments below
|Susan B. Anthony on 10.00 bill||48 min||hung row||5|
|Remembering Officer Daryl Pierson||1 hr||Marnie||5|
|25% of RCSD students missed first day||2 hr||Marnie||4|
|Police: cars damaged during driving stunt||2 hr||RacistFireCrotchB...||1|
|blue lives matter!!!!||3 hr||Hands Up Oooops||10|
|Rochester pair charged with possessing stolen p...||3 hr||Forrest||5|
|McDonald's is messing with MY McMuffin||3 hr||hung row||5|
Find what you want!
Search Rochester Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC