You evaded your clear implosion, jackass. You clearly and repeatedly claimed that the effects of anthropogenic CO2 must be shown experimentally to have the same physical effects as other CO2. You know damn well that they have the same effect. you all so know that the former is 100X as much as the latter, yet you DISHONESTLY argued that it has yet to be demonstrated that the warming isn't being caused by the 1%. You know, the 15 that does the same thing as the 99%.<quoted text>
"Who gives a flying eff that a denier moron like yourself thinks they need to act seperately to disentangle their effects."
I think its a good idea to see experimental data before blah, blah, blah (insert variation on same old tired, totally discredited BS claim made a thousand times)
COULD YOU BE ANY MORE TRANSPARENTLY DECEPTIVE?!
I accept your concession on this argument because there is no way you can feign severe enough mental disability to continue to make it.