First Prev
of 10
Next Last
Awful Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#1 Jan 31, 2013
THIS is the truth! The time to take action is NOW!
Smart Liberal

Saint Paul, MN

#2 Jan 31, 2013
I agree.
Awful Truth

Grantsburg, WI

#3 Jan 31, 2013
The Low Integrity Poster of many names says,

"THIS is the truth! The time to take action is NOW!"

And then .....

The Low Integrity Poster of many names says,

"I agree."

Lemmme say.........Bahayahhaayhahaahh hhh!
Fred

Minneapolis, MN

#4 Jan 31, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
The Low Integrity Poster of many names says,
"THIS is the truth! The time to take action is NOW!"
And then .....
The Low Integrity Poster of many names says,
"I agree."
Lemmme say.........Bahayahhaayhahaahh hhh!
Says the low integrity poster of many names.
Miss Piggy

Minneapolis, MN

#5 Jan 31, 2013
Why don't they ever mention that the person who shot her was a known violent mental-case who was judged incompetent to stand trial? He should have been locked up before the shootings, for the safety of others.

“The one and only Smart Liberal”

Since: Aug 12

Former MN Tax Payer

#6 Jan 31, 2013
Fred wrote:
<quoted text>Says the low integrity poster of many names.
If you only had a brain.
Awful Truth

Grantsburg, WI

#7 Jan 31, 2013
Fred wrote:
<quoted text>Says the low integrity poster of many names.
Pee Wee Herman Demokrat,

Your 5th name this AM?

Lemme quote your Party's Mascot "I know you are, but what am I!"

Bahayahahyahahah!

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#8 Jan 31, 2013
Miss Piggy wrote:
Why don't they ever mention that the person who shot her was a known violent mental-case who was judged incompetent to stand trial? He should have been locked up before the shootings, for the safety of others.
Which would pretty much eliminate his access to guns. I believe this applies to most, if not all of the recent mass killers. All had a history of mental illness and most if not all of them were using some kind of psychiatric drugs. Limiting the number of rounds in their magazines or the cosmetic enhancements of their guns would not have prevented them from taking lives.
Miss Piggy

Minneapolis, MN

#9 Jan 31, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
<quoted text>
Which would pretty much eliminate his access to guns. I believe this applies to most, if not all of the recent mass killers. All had a history of mental illness and most if not all of them were using some kind of psychiatric drugs. Limiting the number of rounds in their magazines or the cosmetic enhancements of their guns would not have prevented them from taking lives.
Exactly!
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#10 Jan 31, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
<quoted text>
Which would pretty much eliminate his access to guns. I believe this applies to most, if not all of the recent mass killers. All had a history of mental illness and most if not all of them were using some kind of psychiatric drugs. Limiting the number of rounds in their magazines or the cosmetic enhancements of their guns would not have prevented them from taking lives.
I like teabagger talk... I believe... most, if not all ???

"Man", that's so weak !! LMAOROTFU~!

Try Breivik, cantgetitup...

Since: Sep 11

Rogers, MN

#11 Jan 31, 2013
Kind of proves my point, don't you think? It's not the guns or magazines or cosmetic parts, it's the deranged people.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_B...

Breivik was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia,[22] and a second evaluation was commissioned following widespread criticism of the first report.[23] The second psychiatric evaluation was published one week before the trial, concluding that Breivik was not psychotic during the attacks nor during the evaluation;[24] he was diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Sound like anyone who has posted slewpidly on this thread recently?
Amused Slew

Seattle, WA

#12 Jan 31, 2013
Breivik was not psychotic during the attacks nor during the evaluation..

Yeah, but you don't want to see your problems, cantgetitup.

LMAOROTFU~!
Awful Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#13 Jan 31, 2013
Miss Piggy wrote:
Why don't they ever mention that the person who shot her was a known violent mental-case who was judged incompetent to stand trial? He should have been locked up before the shootings, for the safety of others.
Why do you tell half truths?

The shooter was eventually judged compentent to stand trial. He pleaded guilty to 19 counts, and in November 2012 was sentenced to life in prison.
Miss Piggy

Minneapolis, MN

#14 Jan 31, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you tell half truths?
The shooter was eventually judged compentent to stand trial. He pleaded guilty to 19 counts, and in November 2012 was sentenced to life in prison.
What's your point, name jacking Slewzer Troll?
Are you saying the cold blooded murderer should NOT have been locked up BEFORE killing innocent people, even though he showed all the signs of a violent mental case?
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#15 Jan 31, 2013
cantmakeitup wrote:
Kind of proves my point, don't you think? It's not the guns or magazines or cosmetic parts, it's the deranged people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anders_Behring_B...
Breivik was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia,[22] and a second evaluation was commissioned following widespread criticism of the first report.[23] The second psychiatric evaluation was published one week before the trial, concluding that Breivik was not psychotic during the attacks nor during the evaluation;[24] he was diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Sound like anyone who has posted slewpidly on this thread recently?
You are typing to a Sociopath with Homicidal Tendencies.

I do not keep calling the Psychotic names.....

I keep WARNING Topix that they need to be responsible and remove her from here and report her BEFORE she goes "Breivik"!

Slewsie has no Politics. She cannot develop a thought that goes beyond her "emotion of the moment". This is why I seldom use "Demokrat" when addressing her.

She simply sees those to the Right of Karl Marx like she sees the source of her Emotional Retardation, Uncle Daddy!

The Big Kids are a threat to her existence.
She fears losing the Government Checks that sustain her.

In other words, YOU represent an Existential Threat to her! The wiser, smarter and more common sense a Poster shows, the more she "Feels" threatened.
Awful Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#16 Jan 31, 2013
Sure, in retrospect it is easy to say that he should have been locked up.

But it isn't against the law to be mentally ill in the United States, and proving that a person is a danger to him-or-herself is not as easy as it sounds. What is sane to one person isn't to another. Some people call anyone different than themselves mentally ill.

Incidentally, the "Miss Piggy" name is registered to a person that posts in the Ohio forums. That makes you a namejacker by your own definition, doesn't it?
Awful Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#17 Jan 31, 2013
Consistent wrote:
<quoted text>
You are typing to a Sociopath with Homicidal Tendencies.
I do not keep calling the Psychotic names.....
I keep WARNING Topix that they need to be responsible and remove her from here and report her BEFORE she goes "Breivik"!
Slewsie has no Politics. She cannot develop a thought that goes beyond her "emotion of the moment". This is why I seldom use "Demokrat" when addressing her.
She simply sees those to the Right of Karl Marx like she sees the source of her Emotional Retardation, Uncle Daddy!
The Big Kids are a threat to her existence.
She fears losing the Government Checks that sustain her.
In other words, YOU represent an Existential Threat to her! The wiser, smarter and more common sense a Poster shows, the more she "Feels" threatened.
That's a bit ironic coming from someone that lives off his government pension, isn't it?
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#18 Jan 31, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a bit ironic coming from someone that lives off his government pension, isn't it?
Ironic is a Tard that has embraced the illusion he created in a Moment of Psychosis who continues to try to use the lie as a Tool to Impact me in a negative way.

IF I were receiving a Government Pension, it would be because I would be one of the few that Earned it vs a Dependent like you that "Feels" entitled to it!
Consistent

Grantsburg, WI

#19 Jan 31, 2013
Awful Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a bit ironic coming from someone that lives off his government pension, isn't it?
By the way, you have no clue about "Irony".....as you Act the Retard, and attempt to redirect the brilliant points made in my rant with the Strawman YOU created about me, along with your Co-Dependent on the Topix Site, Ms Slewsie..
Awful Truth

Saint Paul, MN

#20 Jan 31, 2013
I see. So you are entitled to your government check each month but others aren't.

Glad we got that cleared up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 10
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Robbinsdale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Twin Cities: lowest metro unemployment rate in US 3 hr Bill 22
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 4 hr VN Vet 32,991
New York physician tests positive for Ebola 10 hr cantmakeitup 4
Nina Pham 'cured of Ebola' and set to meet Obama 10 hr Tang Wong Chew 5
Autopsy reports on Ferguson Shooting 10 hr cantmakeitup 13
He fled, fired -- and died (Feb '07) 11 hr Gonar 163
Denver Somali Girls Try to Join ISIS 14 hr cantmakeitup 5
Robbinsdale Dating
Find my Match

Robbinsdale Jobs

Robbinsdale People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Robbinsdale News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Robbinsdale

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]