Be fair

Farmington, MI

#21 Jun 29, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
Something about creepy gay guys that lurk around children
Of course you are insinuating in your above sentence that you consider Charles a creppy gay guy who lurks around children! Don't lie you friggin fart.

Without any substansial concrete evidence to support your nasty, putrid claim that Charles "lurks" around children, then, what you are really trying to do is defame Charles' good character and name by sh*tting all over his reputation. F U , you, low-minded, nasty man.
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#22 Jun 29, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
<quoted text>So you are saying it is NOT creepy for gay men to lurk around children?
I am not even going to dignify that with a response, idiot.
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#23 Jun 29, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct I personally do not know Pugh this is accurate.
How dare I what?
Imply...I implied nothing, I merely made a comment about gays that lurk around children...and if you are telling me that no gays have never preyed upon children or that it is ok that they do, then I would tell you to SFTU sicko!
Bandwagon....I am commenting on a thread, get over your holier-than-thou self!
And if I didn't know any better, I would say this is actually Pugh I am speaking to!
Either way, guilty or not...way to cast yet another shadow on the shitthole that is Detroit!
A buldozer should clear out each and every city official and the subsequent people that work in those offices...too much corruption to fix, it needs to be eradicated like a cancer!
Starting with the entire city council!
Channel 2 hired Pugh's sorry self, even though his on air presences and delivery was worse than a high-school media department production.
Pugh should always and forever kiss the butt of WKBD becasue no one else would ever give him the gig he had there!
Most important, the fact is, keep in mind, you simple-minded twit, you do not know Charles Pugh, period. Therefore, since you do not know Charles, what right do you have to come on a public forum to make horrible comments about Charles Pugh's character. Why not mind your own business! Just because some mother has alleged some allegations against Mr. Pugh does not mean those allegations are true. Do you get that?! Do you understand, prick?
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#24 Jun 29, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
<quoted text>
Correct I personally do not know Pugh this is accurate.
How dare I what?
Imply...I implied nothing, I merely made a comment about gays that lurk around children...and if you are telling me that no gays have never preyed upon children or that it is ok that they do, then I would tell you to SFTU sicko!
Bandwagon....I am commenting on a thread, get over your holier-than-thou self!
And if I didn't know any better, I would say this is actually Pugh I am speaking to!
Either way, guilty or not...way to cast yet another shadow on the shitthole that is Detroit!
A buldozer should clear out each and every city official and the subsequent people that work in those offices...too much corruption to fix, it needs to be eradicated like a cancer!
Starting with the entire city council!
Channel 2 hired Pugh's sorry self, even though his on air presences and delivery was worse than a high-school media department production.
Pugh should always and forever kiss the butt of WKBD becasue no one else would ever give him the gig he had there!
For your information, I am not Charles Pugh you are writing to.

By the way, also, concerning the bandwagon statement you had made: Here it is, reread the following sentence you made s l o w l y so as not to overtax your small, little, simple mind. "Bandwagon...I am commenting on a tread, get over your holier-than-thou self!" Lol...haa! Haaaaaaaaaaaa. Oh. Dear. Lordy, Lord. Don't flatter yourself, bonehead, in view of your obnoxious, severely repugnant comments toward Charles Pugh, there is not a shread of decency, let alone holiness, in thee, bonehead! You are the kind of guy who will kick a decent man when he is down. Shame on you, sir, for your ignorance and severe stupidity. You and your drunken friends probably hang on down at your local saloon every weekend getting filthy drunk and then have the audacity to drive home drunk on top of it. You are the sicko, sir!
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#25 Jun 29, 2013
thread
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#26 Jun 29, 2013
So the poster "be fair" is a hit and run type of hide in the shadows person?

Pugh is hiding like a coward too, huh imagine that!
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#27 Jun 29, 2013
Ahhhh.... so the oh so innocent Pugh is hiding out in Seattle WA...what a piece of work!

The city gets yet another dark cloud cast over it, and Charles Pugh gets to hide out in Seattle drinking Starbucks!

Shame on you...you get what you deserve!
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#28 Jun 29, 2013
Hey the person speaking for Pugh...ever heard the saying, where there is smoke there is fire?
Something happened, not sure what, not sure how...but if it is as the news has lead people to think, then it is disgusting.

My comments about gay guys lurking around children was/is a generalized comment and in my opinion is a fair statement...to be clear I never made the accusation that Pugh himself did anything like that...BUT if it does come to light that something inappropriate happened between him and a child as the news seems to be alluding, then yes that would be despicable (and creepy)!

What is an absolute joke, is the fact you defend a guy that bales out on the city that he was elected to represent as the counsel president!

He was appropriately relieved of power and pay, when he went AWOL.
You said "You are the kind of guy who will kick a decent man when he is down."...decent??? really?
Do you know how sick people are of all the corruption and crazy activity that the Detroit city officials are involved in over the years.
And with Pugh being not present and accounted for, puts him at the top of the pile right now!

No more excuses or justifications from you...its time for Pugh to face the music like a man, like a professional, like the city elected official he is!!!

Oh and I really love the name calling...it shows your intellect and ability to debate!

And be honest about your affiliation...because its clear your not just an average citizen!
Randy

Provo, UT

#29 Jun 29, 2013
Be fair wrote:
<quoted text>
For your information, I am not Charles Pugh you are writing to.
By the way, also, concerning the bandwagon statement you had made: Here it is, reread the following sentence you made s l o w l y so as not to overtax your small, little, simple mind. "Bandwagon...I am commenting on a tread, get over your holier-than-thou self!" Lol...haa! Haaaaaaaaaaaa. Oh. Dear. Lordy, Lord. Don't flatter yourself, bonehead, in view of your obnoxious, severely repugnant comments toward Charles Pugh, there is not a shread of decency, let alone holiness, in thee, bonehead! You are the kind of guy who will kick a decent man when he is down. Shame on you, sir, for your ignorance and severe stupidity. You and your drunken friends probably hang on down at your local saloon every weekend getting filthy drunk and then have the audacity to drive home drunk on top of it. You are the sicko, sir!
If you are not Charles, then you are his cake boy.
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#30 Jun 29, 2013
Randy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you are not Charles, then you are his cake boy.
Whats funny is the simpleton equates having a discussion in a thread about a particular subject, is jumping on a bandwagon.

Someone (ie Pugh Fan) doesn't seem to understand forums and threads on the internet. The Topic is about Pugh...and not the made-up bandwagon that IQ person is spewing. lol
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#31 Jun 29, 2013
Be fair wrote:
<quoted text>
Most important, the fact is, keep in mind, you simple-minded twit, you do not know Charles Pugh, period. Therefore, since you do not know Charles, what right do you have to come on a public forum to make horrible comments about Charles Pugh's character. Why not mind your own business!
Talk about simpleton...Pugh is a public figure, yeah?
Pugh was elected by the public, yeah?
I made no such "horrible" comments about Pugh that you keep whining about.
What I have said all along is that Pugh is A.W.O.L in case you don't know what that is...google it!

Now unless you can produce a quote of something I said specifically about Pugh that is "horrible" and/or disparaging about his "character", then I suggest you shut your pie hole, because your really making a fool of yourself!
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#32 Jun 29, 2013
"The more I hear about this, the more it sounds like the mother is just money hungry and making stuff up. She went straight to a lawyer to sue. All I hear is Pugh gave the kid some money for clothes and a cell phone. Nothing illegal about that."

"This is just plain wrong. Charles Pugh is a man who deserves to be judged on fact, not the hysterical rantings of a so-called parent. This is a money grab."

Oh. Wait. I just heard on the news that the mom has just filed a criminal complaint against Pugh. Well, let us just see what happens now, okay.
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#33 Jun 30, 2013
Be fair wrote:
"The more I hear about this, the more it sounds like the mother is just money hungry and making stuff up. She went straight to a lawyer to sue. All I hear is Pugh gave the kid some money for clothes and a cell phone. Nothing illegal about that."
"This is just plain wrong. Charles Pugh is a man who deserves to be judged on fact, not the hysterical rantings of a so-called parent. This is a money grab."
Oh. Wait. I just heard on the news that the mom has just filed a criminal complaint against Pugh. Well, let us just see what happens now, okay.
Agreed, no one should play judge, jury and prosecutor without hearing all the facts!

Your rants and name calling are and were completely out of line and unwarranted AND your name you use here has proven to be a farce!
On the contrary, your use of name calling in lieu of intelligent conversation, is an indication of a lack of intelligence!
Then again your long run on paragraph already showed that.

Now back to Pugh, why would an innocent person threaten to commit suicide or harm themselves?

Why would an innocent person go into hiding?

Why would he (Pugh) call the mothers cell phone repeatedly, begging her not to "go public" with the story if he were innocent?

Where there is smoke, there is fire...and where there is no Pugh, there is clearly something fishy going on in my opinion!

“bark at the moon”

Since: Jun 13

Location hidden

#34 Jun 30, 2013
PREDICTION: Pugh will be found dead from a self inflicted gunshot.
Dude knows how cruel the media can be and will take the easy way out.
TheRealDeal

Farmington, MI

#35 Jun 30, 2013
_MoonDog_ wrote:
PREDICTION: Pugh will be found dead from a self inflicted gunshot.
Dude knows how cruel the media can be and will take the easy way out.
"cruel"?
He was in the media for a few years, he knows how it works and the more he hides the worse it looks for him.

Self inflicted is the amount of damage he is doing to his own public image!

As tragic as it would be for him to commit suicide, it would undoubtedly save the taxpayers a good deal of money AND cause this issue to go away much quicker!

I hope he doesn't weasel out this way and faces the music as he should!
wonderer

New Martinsville, WV

#36 Jun 30, 2013
Would that be Coming Out Crew, "Free, Gay and Happy?"
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#37 Jun 30, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
<quoted text>Agreed, no one should play judge, jury and prosecutor without hearing all the facts!
Your rants and name calling are and were completely out of line and unwarranted AND your name you use here has proven to be a farce!
On the contrary, your use of name calling in lieu of intelligent conversation, is an indication of a lack of intelligence!
Then again your long run on paragraph already showed that.
Now back to Pugh, why would an innocent person threaten to commit suicide or harm themselves?
Why would an innocent person go into hiding?
Why would he (Pugh) call the mothers cell phone repeatedly, begging her not to "go public" with the story if he were innocent?
Where there is smoke, there is fire...and where there is no Pugh, there is clearly something fishy going on in my opinion!
Did you not just call me a simpleton in your previous, above post? Yes! So what the heck room do you have for accusing me of name-calling when you had called me a lot of names yourself? You got some damn nerve, you dolt. For example, in your above previous post you had called me a simpleton. You, sir, are talking out of two sides of your mouth, damn hypocrite.
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#38 Jun 30, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
<quoted text>"cruel"?
He was in the media for a few years, he knows how it works and the more he hides the worse it looks for him.
Self inflicted is the amount of damage he is doing to his own public image!
As tragic as it would be for him to commit suicide, it would undoubtedly save the taxpayers a good deal of money AND cause this issue to go away much quicker!
I hope he doesn't weasel out this way and faces the music as he should!
Self-inflicted is the amount of damage you are doing to your own (anonymous bigmouth) public image!

Do you care to share with your readers your personal address so that someone in a certain camp can send you a personal piece of their mind. We will be waiting to hear from you.

In particular, since you think it would be "tragic" but ok with you,(you can't speak for each and every taxpayer, you emotional idiot) if a person you do not even know, Charles Pugh, were to commit suicide. How dare you say such an awful thing. You are a devil. In view of your above evil comment, it only seems fair that your readers have some of your own private information, such as your e-mail or, better yet, your own personal address so they can fairly criticize you directly face-to-face about your most evil, outrageous, disrestful comments, especially the comment about suicide, see above comment.

You, sir, are a bigmouth punk.

The more you hide behind your anonymous postings the more you do not care how much hurt you cause to any person. Do you know why? Because you are a punk!
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#39 Jun 30, 2013
_MoonDog_ wrote:
PREDICTION: Pugh will be found dead from a self inflicted gunshot.
Dude knows how cruel the media can be and will take the easy way out.
Sometime this summer, I predict a rotting ash tree will fall on you.
Be fair

Farmington, MI

#40 Jun 30, 2013
TheRealDeal wrote:
Hey the person speaking for Pugh...ever heard the saying, where there is smoke there is fire?
Something happened, not sure what, not sure how...but if it is as the news has lead people to think, then it is disgusting.
My comments about gay guys lurking around children was/is a generalized comment and in my opinion is a fair statement...to be clear I never made the accusation that Pugh himself did anything like that...BUT if it does come to light that something inappropriate happened between him and a child as the news seems to be alluding, then yes that would be despicable (and creepy)!
What is an absolute joke, is the fact you defend a guy that bales out on the city that he was elected to represent as the counsel president!
He was appropriately relieved of power and pay, when he went AWOL.
You said "You are the kind of guy who will kick a decent man when he is down."...decent??? really?
Do you know how sick people are of all the corruption and crazy activity that the Detroit city officials are involved in over the years.
And with Pugh being not present and accounted for, puts him at the top of the pile right now!
No more excuses or justifications from you...its time for Pugh to face the music like a man, like a professional, like the city elected official he is!!!
Oh and I really love the name calling...it shows your intellect and ability to debate!
And be honest about your affiliation...because its clear your not just an average citizen!
Why do you keep harping (no pun intended) about Pugh having to "face the music"? What the heck is wrong with you, TheRealDeal?

Here is the way I see some of this situation. First of all, Pugh has been officially relieved of his pay. Mr. Pugh had asked for a medical leave of absence and was refused a medical leave by Kevin Orr, the emergency financial manager of Detroit. When Charles was denied a medical leave absence by Mr. Kevin, Charles no longer showed up for work. So what! Charles is no longer getting paid by the city. Charles Pugh may vote on issues; however, his vote no longer is valid. Read the Detroit Free Press for more information on his vote no longer being valid. Heck, so what! Charles took off! He has not made any public statements regarding his absence. So what! A lot of people act as if Charles has made such a horrible mistake by not showing up for work. Charles Pugh no longer has any power as Council president. So he is not getting paid by the city-so he decides he won't come to work again; that sounds reasonable to me. So what! So what! So what! He is no longer going to work at the City County Building. So he is gone. Big Deal! Charles is not legally required to show up for work as a councilmember, so he took off for new adventures. So what! His life is his business. Why not mind your own business. Do you get that?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

River Rouge Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 49 min Dominican 17 21,064
We need high speed trains! 3 hr WATCHING LIVONIA 18
News Muslim man sues Little Caesars over pizza label... 11 hr As I see it 1
News Detroit teen charged in Livonia home invasion Fri Hunter 5
Review: Alexis Realty Solutions LLC (Jul '09) Fri Mica122 13
AK Steel/UAW contract Thu Iron Man 23
News CNN show tells stories of Arab, Muslim American... May 24 Mishianna 12

River Rouge Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

River Rouge Mortgages