Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>So, explain history, gay racist boy.
38 states now have constitutional bans on gay marriage: no vote will ever change that.
44 states have state definitions of marriage has man and woman. Three states are about to lose the fight to change.
You have 6 states, so that places you on the wrong side of history.
By the way, the polls had you winning Prop 8 in 2008, BUT YOU LOST.
Blacks can get married to whomever they want in ALL 50 states, so suck on it, gay racist.
Funny thing, racist gay boy, interracial marriage means white and Asians can not marry, since they are a different race, Caucasian and Mongloid.

No, the polls had us losing on Prop 8 in 2008 and we lost.

[Green Fairy]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Not the same, either start an initiative to remove marriage from straights or STFU.
No, you are equal to pedophiles, bestiality and polygamist and that is not separate but the same.
You sound like you are 12, why don't you come back when you arguments grow up.

would definite happy with civil unions under the federal law as long as it also applies to straight people as well as gays,and leaves marriage as a religious symbolic ceremony but you just want own marriage because you want to like you're"better" then everyone

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>She paid attention...she is gay so she is a liar...the terms chicken and chicken hawk came from gays, because they support pedophilia and they started NAMBLA and NAWGLA.

NAMBLA has less than a thousand members worldwide. There are more men locked up in the state of Rhode Island for banging little girls under 12. I don't even know what NAWGLA is. But you sure do.

[Green Fairy]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, and you are a pedophile. You are saying that you should be allowed to satisfy a 12 or 13 year old, when they are aroused and you are attracted.
Puberty does not mean sex, pedofreak. Some children have their periods at 10 or sperm at 10, so is that how you justify your pedophilia.
Also, freak, sexual abuse of children can cause early arousal and body reactions, and that is abnormal.
The reason that you gay freaks are dangerous is because you think that if you see a 10 year old child, with a mature body, you think that your arousal means that it is okay and their desire is consent to you.

Sound like you're the pedophile.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>She paid attention...she is gay so she is a liar...the terms chicken and chicken hawk came from gays, because they support pedophilia and they started NAMBLA and NAWGLA.

All you have to do if you want to see the percentage of gays who mo1est is go to a $ex offender registry like the one for the State of Texas that lists the age and gender of each mo1ester's victim(s). You can enter even a gay-friendly zip code and pull a random sample and you'll see that well over 90% are men mo1esting little girls ONLY. 2 to 3% are women molesters. 2 to 3% are men who molested both genders. 2 to 3% are men who molested males only.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, and you are a pedophile. You are saying that you should be allowed to satisfy a 12 or 13 year old, when they are aroused and you are attracted.

Wrong. I was addressing the fact that he said that somehow it's wrong for a 15 year old to be with a 15 year old. I fully support the fact that adults should not be with children sexually.

In 1900 you know what the age of consent was in many states? TEN YEARS OLD ("A Guide to America's $ex Laws - Silbaugh/Posner") Know why? Because 'good Christian legislators' were making the laws using a bible that doesn't say one word about adults having $ex with children even though it thinks to mention bestia1ity. Was god more concerned with the welfare of animals than children? Evidently so. And that's why it's frightening that the Christians want to regain control of things. We'll be back to adults marrying children because it was 'biblical'.

It's modern psychology, which you all hate, that began doing studies and collecting evidence that children as old as 17 can be harmed by $exual relationships with adults. This is the same modern psychology that says homosexuality is normal and healthy. The testimony of these psychologists has been used to RAISE the age of consent in every state in the US.

So let's look to modern psychology and actual facts to make our laws instead of your bronze age middle eastern desert tribe that didn't understand a thing about human sexuality.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, and you are a pedophile. You are saying that you should be allowed to satisfy a 12 or 13 year old, when they are aroused and you are attracted.
Puberty does not mean sex, pedofreak. Some children have their periods at 10 or sperm at 10, so is that how you justify your pedophilia.
Also, freak, sexual abuse of children can cause early arousal and body reactions, and that is abnormal.
The reason that you gay freaks are dangerous is because you think that if you see a 10 year old child, with a mature body, you think that your arousal means that it is okay and their desire is consent to you.

I'm the pedophile and you've seen 10 year olds with mature bodies? I've never seen a 10 year old with a mature body. Get help before you hurt someone's child.

[NorCal Native]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Not the same, either start an initiative to remove marriage from straights or STFU.
No, you are equal to pedophiles, bestiality and polygamist and that is not separate but the same.
You sound like you are 12, why don't you come back when you arguments grow up.

Why don't you STFU you lying lil putz of a troll!!!

I see you do nothing more than continue to make asinine statement with no real evidence to back you up......but we that from trolls like you!!!

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, and you are a pedophile. You are saying that you should be allowed to satisfy a 12 or 13 year old, when they are aroused and you are attracted.
Puberty does not mean sex, pedofreak. Some children have their periods at 10 or sperm at 10, so is that how you justify your pedophilia.
Also, freak, sexual abuse of children can cause early arousal and body reactions, and that is abnormal.
The reason that you gay freaks are dangerous is because you think that if you see a 10 year old child, with a mature body, you think that your arousal means that it is okay and their desire is consent to you.

Oh and you're not just saying that you've seen 10 year olds with mature bodies, you're basically saying you've experience arousal looking at 10 year olds who have what you perceived as a mature body. PLEASE GET HELP.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Nope, only gays are pedophiles and that is why you defend gay pedophiles. At what age did you decide to be a gay pedophiles?

Wrong. All you have to do if you want to see the percentage of gays who mo1est is go to a $ex offender registry like the one for the State of Texas that lists the age and gender of each mo1ester's victim(s). You can enter even a gay-friendly zip code and pull a random sample and you'll see that well over 90% are men mo1esting little girls ONLY. 2 to 3% are women molesters. 2 to 3% are men who molested both genders. 2 to 3% are men who molested males only.

Nice try, but lies don't work when there are real world examples that ANYONE can go look at.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Hey gay freak, you really should have stayed awake back when your 8th grade civics class taught you that state constitutional amendments on traditional marriage do not violate federal constitutional, since it is the federal government that has declared that behavior and sexual orientation is not a protected class or suspect class.

Since they supposedly teach that in 8th grade civics, it should be pretty easy to post a source on it, right???

[Gay Pride]

The only unconstitutional amendment is in California, the other 30 states have no gay judges to overturn the ban, sorrrrry!

We need more gay judges, specially an insider in the US Supreme Court! Recall Judge Walker from retirement and he will do the job.

[Cheyenne277]

Here Is One wrote:

<quoted text>
If what you are saying is true then I could call you a friend.
Here ya go........
It is just one link but search and you will find thousands.....
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/03...
The gay community rallied behind these two and many like the rose ho said that it was no big deal and if the parents did not want their chidden to see gay sex they should just cover their children's eyes......

That's the best you can find, and it doesn't even mention children? How about I start posting all the news stories of heterosexuals who have murdered their own children...

[Cheyenne277]

Gay Pride wrote:

The only unconstitutional amendment is in California, the other 30 states have no gay judges to overturn the ban, sorrrrry!
We need more gay judges, specially an insider in the US Supreme Court! Recall Judge Walker from retirement and he will do the job.

What are you talking about?

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Oh gay boy, shut up.
NAMBLA is the IGLA, change the name but do the same.
70,000 gay pedophile ring was busted, 231 gays arrested and 184 children rescued. All 70,000 were NAMBLA and NAWGLA supporters.
Wow, idiot, you don't know what NAWGLA, NAMBLA or the IGLA are?
You probably think that the Matthew Shepard murder was a hate crime, when it was gay on gay, McKinney-gay killing his gay lover Matthew Shepard.

Totally made up. Of course if it's not you can post a source, right?

[RiccardoFire]

Wat the Tyler wrote:

<quoted text>
59% of blacks support marriage equality for gay couples. You failed. Black people don't care what a bunch of pastors have to say.
<quoted text>
So when did you CHOOSE to be straight?

People don't have to decide to be straight, you are born that way, it's the natural. It's the normal. You would vote for Hitler if he came out and favored gay marriage, you make me sick.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Nope, you said that you want to be with 12 or 13 year old children, because you think they should be satisfied.
If it is okay for a 15 year old to have sex, then it is okay for them to have sex with a 51 year old.

Nope, never said the first sentence. I invite you to tell me what post I stated that in. They're numbered so that should be easy. As for the second sentence, that's pedophile reasoning and you need to be locked up.

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Then, you better get to posting since it was your crowd who posted that the Constitution and equal rights were taught in 8th grade. So, get to posting.

Oh right. There's no Constitution or guarantee of equal rights unless I post it? You're an idiot.

Why don't you just admit what you said was totally made up. Troll.

[RnL2008]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

<quoted text>Actually, it is 38 states with constitutional bans and not even a gay judge can change that.

Actually that's a lie and there has been enough links to back that up......at the moment only 30 states have an actual Constitutional Amendment.....not 38, or 44 or any other number you decide to pull outta your stinking azz!!!

[Cheyenne277]

Silent Assassinat wrote:

Now, stop your lying, it is the IGLA, LGBT, ACLU, APA, and NAMBLA who are trying to lower the age of consent to 12. The APA says that children do not show signs of being harmed when they have sex with adults.

That's a total lie, but once again, post ANY source on that.