Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17022 Jul 2, 2013
mysteryperson wrote:
An eye opener...What about this information Obama lovers and liberals
These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!
Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000,which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for a 40-hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.
Furthermore:
There are actually two messages here. The first is very
interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.
A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very
interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International
Health Organization.
Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years
after diagnosis:
U.S. 65%
England 46%
Canada 42%
Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received
treatment within six months:
U.S. 93%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it
within six months:
U.S. 90%
England 15%
Canada 43%
Percentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within
one month:
U.S. 77%
England 40%
Canada 43%
Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million
people:
U.S. 71
England 14
Canada 18
Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are
in "excellent health":
U.S. 12%
England 2%
Canada 6%
And now for the last statistic:
National Health Insurance?
U.S. NO
England YES
Canada YES
Check this last set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked
in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
Here are the percentages.
T. Roosevelt. 38%
Taft. 40%
Wilson . 52%
Harding. 49%
Coolidge. 48%
Hoover. 42%
F. Roosevelt. 50%
Truman. 50%
Eisenhower. 57%
Kennedy. 30%
Johnson. 47%
Nixon. 53%
Ford. 42%
Carter. 32%
Reagan.56%
GH Bush. 51%
Clinton . 39%
GW Bush. 55%
Obama. 8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:
only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the
last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big
corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one
with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk
about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has
never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff
and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia,
government and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."
They should have been in an employment line.
Pass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media
IN GOD WE TRUST
+1 Great post!
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#17023 Jul 2, 2013
mysteryperson wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
An eye opener...What about this information Obama lovers and liberals

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.
oooops, pants still on fire...

http://www.politifact.com/georgia/statements/...

...The writer, Michael Cembalest, examined the histories of nine Cabinet positions for the comparison. The departments they headed were Agriculture, Commerce, Energy, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Labor, State, Transportation and Treasury:

...Chu headed the electronics research lab at AT&T Bell Laboratories; Donovan served as managing director of Prudential Mortgage Capital Co.; and Salazar has been a partner in his family's farm, and he owned and operated a Dairy Queen and radio stations in his home state of Colorado.

Three other Obama appointees had legal experience in the private sector: Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner worked for Kissinger Associates, a consulting firm that advises international corporations on political and economic conditions overseas.

Cembalest said that he did discount the corporate experience of Clinton, Vilsack and Locke. Cembalest acknowledged fault in missing Salazar's business background, saying he would have given him a full point if he had it to do over again. Cembalest said Chu and Donovan did not represent the kind of private-sector business experience he was looking for when doing his study. Cembalest said he did not mean for his research to be used for political ends.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#17024 Jul 2, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I skim their posts hoping that they announce that they have contracted AIDS and are dying, but that's just me. I hope they all give each other AIDS and die, but again that's just me.
Yep, the (lack of) class continuously shows itself...
OMTE

Atlanta, GA

#17025 Jul 2, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, the (lack of) class continuously shows itself...
I'm glad you liked it you queer lovin fat POS. I don't have class. I have SWAG. Nerd.
guest

Warrenton, VA

#17027 Jul 2, 2013
More pants on fire (And there's more if one cares to look) the mail keeps on going :
http://www.politifact.com/texas/statements/20...
danger zone

Oxford, GA

#17028 Jul 2, 2013
My guess is they don't count all the dead people collecting benefits. Just a bit of info they'd rather not throw out there. And, this is just Massachusetts. Oh well.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/29/ma...
danger zone

Oxford, GA

#17029 Jul 2, 2013
Did they mention the welfare benefits going to US prisoners? No? I didn't think so... And this is just New Jersey.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/...
danger zone

Oxford, GA

#17030 Jul 2, 2013
Individual cases of welfare fraud are too numerous to mention... 1000 & 1000s totaling billions. Oh, but let's make it all about ridiculing a "chain letter". Can the dumbocrats get any dumber??
Scott

Braselton, GA

#17031 Jul 2, 2013
A young man walked into the local welfare office to pick up his check. He marched up to the counter and said, "Hi . You know, I just HATE drawing welfare. I'd really rather have a job. I don't like taking advantage of the system, getting something for nothing."

The social worker behind the counter said, "Your timing is excellent.

We just got a job opening from a very wealthy old man who wants a Chauffeur and bodyguard for his beautiful daughter . "

"You'll have to drive around in his 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL, and he will supply all of your clothes . "

"Because of the long hours, meals will be provided . You'll also be expected to escort the daughter on her overseas holiday trips . "

"This is rather awkward to say but you will also have, as part of your job, the assignment to satisfy her sexual urges as the daughter is in her mid-20's and has a rather strong sex drive . "

The guy, just plain wide-eyed, said, "You're bullshittin' me!"

The social worker said, "Yeah, but ... You started it . "
guest

United States

#17032 Jul 2, 2013
danger zone wrote:
Individual cases of welfare fraud are too numerous to mention... 1000 & 1000s totaling billions. Oh, but let's make it all about ridiculing a "chain letter". Can the dumbocrats get any dumber??
That's just silly DZ. Nobody was making anything "all about" anything. The poster linked some specific sites that have been proven to contain distorted information. That information came from specific RWW chain emails. There are lots of them. The ridicule was specific about specific chain emails. Now if the links that you posted are accurate then why certainly there ought to be a stop put to fraud. You have engaged, to a small degree, it the type of distortion that I have been referring to when you say "...all about..." . It just isn't true.
guest

United States

#17033 Jul 2, 2013
Scott wrote:
A young man walked into the local welfare office to pick up his check. He marched up to the counter and said, "Hi . You know, I just HATE drawing welfare. I'd really rather have a job. I don't like taking advantage of the system, getting something for nothing."
The social worker behind the counter said, "Your timing is excellent.
We just got a job opening from a very wealthy old man who wants a Chauffeur and bodyguard for his beautiful daughter . "
"You'll have to drive around in his 2013 Mercedes-Benz CL, and he will supply all of your clothes . "
"Because of the long hours, meals will be provided . You'll also be expected to escort the daughter on her overseas holiday trips . "
"This is rather awkward to say but you will also have, as part of your job, the assignment to satisfy her sexual urges as the daughter is in her mid-20's and has a rather strong sex drive . "
The guy, just plain wide-eyed, said, "You're bullshittin' me!"
The social worker said, "Yeah, but ... You started it . "
Now that's funny.
Oh my

Blairsville, GA

#17034 Jul 2, 2013
danger zone wrote:
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blairsville-g...
Individual cases of welfare fraud are too numerous to mention... 1000 & 1000s totaling billions. Oh, but let's make it all about ridiculing a "chain letter". Can the dumbocrats get any dumber??
By all means shed light on the fraud, and when your state legislators want to slash the administrative budget (systems development, manpower for case work) for these types of departments shed light on that too, cause it's admin that oversees this stuff.

Oh the terrible ridicule to point out the misinformation, the lies, to think that sock puppet may never post again.
danger zone

Grayson, GA

#17035 Jul 2, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just silly DZ. Nobody was making anything "all about" anything. The poster linked some specific sites that have been proven to contain distorted information. That information came from specific RWW chain emails. There are lots of them. The ridicule was specific about specific chain emails. Now if the links that you posted are accurate then why certainly there ought to be a stop put to fraud. You have engaged, to a small degree, it the type of distortion that I have been referring to when you say "...all about..." . It just isn't true.
No, you reign above ALL who post here with your twisting & spinning- distortions. Don't EVEN try that. The point is, welfare recipients out number employed Americans. Only the LIVING can be honest wage earners. The living, dead, prisoners & your cat can draw welfare. And you don't see a problem? Okay, done here, you just answered the question, DUMBOCRATS grow dumber as each day passes. Moving along..... I hate bickering with fools.
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17036 Jul 2, 2013
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
Goodgodamighty, you are some piece of work, I give up. Trying to have a discussion with you is like trying to have a discussion with a chimpanzee.
Do try to find "…..provide security…..in the United States" anywhere in the original news release, that ought to occupy you for the next few months.

Ok dumba-in my post you responded too, I said "provision of security at mass events."
Now you being a bright boy, why don't you just tell us what that statement means?

and get Oh my to help you out since he doen't seem to know what it means also.

Who

Jefferson, GA

#17037 Jul 2, 2013
Oh my wrote:
<quoted text>
Check your closet and under your bed
the Disaster Boogeyman is waiting
to connect those dots.
For sure you can't connect them.

“Registered Conservative”

Since: Jul 11

Draketown, GA

#17038 Jul 2, 2013
Radical liberal unionists suffer from a number of maladies and delusions, but several are painfully obvious. First, not only are they incapable of taking care of themselves, they cannot comprehend why they should be FORCED to take care of themselves. They are terrified of everything that is not pre-processed, homogenized and approved by an official governmental entity or "union".
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17039 Jul 2, 2013
How can one a-hole do this.

"White House delays employer mandate requirement until 2015."
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17040 Jul 2, 2013
Individuals still required to comply.
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17041 Jul 2, 2013
UnitedHealth to exit individual insurance market in California.
Who

Jefferson, GA

#17042 Jul 2, 2013
Aetna will exit California's individual health insurance market.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rincon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
dead beet shit head cops in port wentworth GA (Jul '08) Mar 20 Taft Turner 81
Live Bait Vending Machine Mar 6 Fighingintheham 1
News Court date set for Rincon chief's traffic charges (May '15) Feb '17 Who_ peepers 2
News City of Pooler launches new cell phone app Feb '17 vondes 1
Thinking of Moving to Port Wentworth (Jan '09) Feb '17 South girl 26
Support tour local teamster Feb '17 Supportyourlocalt... 1
Beware of Pedophiles wearing robes (Mar '16) Jan '17 Sarah 4

Rincon Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rincon Mortgages