Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11107 May 14, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Benghazi - A CIA operation which the State Department attempted to keep covert.
The CIA, not the State Department was in charge of security - so you can't blame Hillary Clinton.
Ohhhhh - that's gotta hurt.
Now, we'll sit back and see how how you manage to blame Clinton anyway.
you just get dumber and dumber with every post.

"The Secretary of State, and by extension, the Chief of Mission (COM), are responsible for developing and implementing security policies and programs that provide for the protection of all U.S. Government personnel (including accompanying dependents) on official duty abroad."


do you understand the word "all."

do you even know who the COM was for Benghazi?

BAM!BAM!BAM!


OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11108 May 14, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
I am feeling a glimmer of hope in regard to the media. It's not too late for them to become fair and balanced. It will most certainly be new territory for them. I have mentioned before that the media has taken some severe hits in regard to their culling stories and covering for democrats, ESPECIALLY Obama. We all know why. At any rate, Benghazi,the AP invasion of privacy and the IRS biasness is too big and runs too deep for the media to take a chance on a coverup. That would basically end it for the media.
I don't see why we insist on airing our Governments dirty laundry on national television for the whole world to see. I do believe the family members desserve the right to know what happened to their loved ones in Benghazi, everything else needs to be kept private until facts are proven. Unless they want to make these finding public then these findings should be kept private indefinitely. I'm sure people are watching our news that want to hurt us. They see that we are at each others throats over an attack. An attack that was not defended properly and that's it. Now lets assume they get the idea they don't need another 9/11. All they need are small quick random attacks to cause us to devour ourselves as bored likes to say libs do when they are left alone. I believe this witch hunt makes our country look weak and divided to the world. Just a thought.
OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11109 May 14, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
So you are agreeing Obama has influenced the IRS?
I really don't know. I really think you don't either. Let me ask you this. Do you really think Obama is the first president to ever influence a branch of the government? Do you think he will be the last?
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#11110 May 14, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
<quoted text>
Americans for Prosperity were also "accused" of bankrolling Republican candidates and there is no evidence of that either. They apparently did provide some volunteers, but no money.
No time for a long post. Money trail--->>>Koch Brothers--->>>America ns for Prosperity--->>>Wake Cares-->> School Board Elections.

I agree - the tie-ins of the father are not direct evidence. HOWEVER--- Any reasonable person would HAVE to see the likelihood of a connection.

Why would they do it? I think just to see if they can. Kind of like the two rich guys in Trading Places. Sure it's speculation --we can get into more details later -- but it's pretty obvious.

Interesting side story: Two of the elected board members ended up having an affair with each other, then one of them robbed the other one.

Bored

Commerce, GA

#11111 May 14, 2013
"Hours before US Ambassador Christopher Stevens died in a terrorist attack in Libya, he sent Secretary of State Hillary Clinton a cable warning that local militias were threatening to take away security officers guarding the US diplomats.

The cable, which Stevens submitted on the morning of Sept. 11, 2012, relayed the warning that Libyan militia “would not continue to guarantee security in Benghazi, a critical function they asserted they were currently providing.” Militia leaders had previously expressed anger at US support of a certain candidate for Libyan prime minister and consequentially planned to extract their security.

Stevens’ cable reached Clinton hours before terrorists attacked the US consulate in Benghazi and killed the ambassador and three other Americans. The cable was publicly released Friday by the chairman of the US House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Darrell Issa, and includes 160 pages of documents outlining the violence surrounding Benghazi."

Response from Clinton, mum's the word.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#11112 May 14, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I'm as smart as I want to be. If being smart means being like you. Then I'd rather stupid.
'nuff said, one would think...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#11113 May 14, 2013
Okay, so if I'm tardy to the party, my apologies, but I don't remember seeing this discussed before. Does anyone else think it just a little odd that the following major news organizations have direct family ties to high level members of the Obama administration?

ABC News President Ben Sherwood's sister is Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall. She joined the Obama WH in 2009 as a Special Assistant and senior director for European affairs at the National Security Council.

CBS News President David Rhodes' brother Benjamin Rhodes has been an Obama speechwriter since 2007 and is currently the National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications. He also happens to have been directly involved in the emails going back and forth regarding the various revisions to the Benghazi talking points.

CNN Washington Deputy Bureau Chief Virginia Moseley is married to Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides.

Conflict of interest anyone?
Bored

Commerce, GA

#11114 May 14, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I really don't know. I really think you don't either. Let me ask you this. Do you really think Obama is the first president to ever influence a branch of the government? Do you think he will be the last?

You are correct in that no one knows for sure at this point in time.

Influencing a branch of government is one of the primary responsibilities of a President in order to perform his duties.

The type of influence matters. If you cant see that and understand the damage it can do to our nation if the influence is geared toward
harassing opponents or gaining special treatment for friends and family, then you are a lost cause, and if every liberal think the way you do this country is in serious peril.

I dont give a rats a** if the president is democrap or repub, breaking the law is against the law. Many get away with it, usually on a local level because folks like you think it's ok to give special treatment. Give the building project to a family member or a close friend, pay extra for the job. a little kick back here, a little kick back there. I know it happens, but when caught they should face the Judge.



Bored

Commerce, GA

#11115 May 14, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
Okay, so if I'm tardy to the party, my apologies, but I don't remember seeing this discussed before. Does anyone else think it just a little odd that the following major news organizations have direct family ties to high level members of the Obama administration?
ABC News President Ben Sherwood's sister is Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall. She joined the Obama WH in 2009 as a Special Assistant and senior director for European affairs at the National Security Council.
CBS News President David Rhodes' brother Benjamin Rhodes has been an Obama speechwriter since 2007 and is currently the National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications. He also happens to have been directly involved in the emails going back and forth regarding the various revisions to the Benghazi talking points.
CNN Washington Deputy Bureau Chief Virginia Moseley is married to Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides.
Conflict of interest anyone?

I believe I had a post about this a day or 2 ago, maybe 3.

And your post shows that liberals run the networks.


ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#11116 May 14, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
Okay, so if I'm tardy to the party, my apologies, but I don't remember seeing this discussed before. Does anyone else think it just a little odd that the following major news organizations have direct family ties to high level members of the Obama administration?
ABC News President Ben Sherwood's sister is Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall. She joined the Obama WH in 2009 as a Special Assistant and senior director for European affairs at the National Security Council.
CBS News President David Rhodes' brother Benjamin Rhodes has been an Obama speechwriter since 2007 and is currently the National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications. He also happens to have been directly involved in the emails going back and forth regarding the various revisions to the Benghazi talking points.
CNN Washington Deputy Bureau Chief Virginia Moseley is married to Deputy Secretary of State Tom Nides.
Conflict of interest anyone?
Didn't you just absolve the Koch Brothers from the actions of thier father Fred Koch who was pro segregationist and founder of the John Birch society? You said something about separating the father from the sons? All this in the context of segregationist behavior by the sons?

But now you can't do the same thing because you think it casts aspersions on Obama?

Don't you find that a wee bit hypocritical?

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11117 May 14, 2013
Aggie23 wrote:
CB
Can we PLEASE not now get into a posting war on the Koch Brothers vs George Soros? Can we just agree that you think the Koch Bros embody all that is evil and I think George Soros has ruined far more people and possibly governments than the Koch Bros ever dreamed of. Can we just leave it at that?
But, but, but THEN you wouldn't be distracted from what is going on right now!!!!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11118 May 14, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
One extremely small sliver of information:
Koch Brothers campaign to reintroduce segregation into the Wake County school system.
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2011/01/will-wa...
What type of link is that????(As if I didn't already know.) Nope! Not acceptable.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#11119 May 14, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe I had a post about this a day or 2 ago, maybe 3.
And your post shows that liberals run the networks.
Ah, I tend to skim a lot on weekends.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11120 May 14, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll make you a deal. If you do some deep, honest research regarding the Koch Bros - I'll do the same on Soros.
Then sometime in a few days I'll post the most honestly disturbing thing I could find on Soros, and you do the same on the Koch Brothers.
What difference does this make? You are OBSESSED with the Koch Brothers. Get over it. Get passed it. You libs have rotten evil people, too. You seem to think that if you are a loonie liberal socialist commie, that makes you a paragon of virtue. What a laugh. All you are doing is trying to distract us from the corruption that is going on right now. It's not going to happen. Koch Brothers are over. Move on.
ChicknButt

Douglasville, GA

#11121 May 14, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
What type of link is that????(As if I didn't already know.) Nope! Not acceptable.
Well, the post wasn't directed at you, it was specifically at Aggie. But since your nosy nose is here -

NOT ACCEPTABLE! to your NOT ACCEPTABLE!

You've got to say why it's not acceptable. I know you RWW love your baseless accusations, but if you wanna play that game you gotta back up your talk.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11122 May 14, 2013
Apparently wrote:
<quoted text>
Ran across Informed opinion on youtube recently, thought the rest of you may like to see him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
This is superb. Yep! Nailed IO plus ALL the other LLSC's, on this forum.
guest

United States

#11123 May 14, 2013
ChicknButt wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't you just absolve the Koch Brothers from the actions of thier father Fred Koch who was pro segregationist and founder of the John Birch society? You said something about separating the father from the sons? All this in the context of segregationist behavior by the sons?
But now you can't do the same thing because you think it casts aspersions on Obama?
Don't you find that a wee bit hypocritical?
I don't see how ya'll have the patience for this nonsense. These fundamentalists are completely bat shit crazy. It's the fringe of the fringe here in Ga. One can only assume that some knuckle draggers down in South Alabama could be further tripped out in their over zealous dogma. It's beyond laughable. I tell folks I know around the country about it and it's like I'm talking about some science fiction horror story. They refuse to believe that there still exists, in 2013, that kind of backward mentality. goodgodamighty

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#11124 May 14, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>You are no better than him you ignorant right wing militant. I know Bill ironic and hypocritical. I never said I was smart or a good christian.
OMTE, what's the problem? That is EXACTLY what you libs say. The only thing I questioned was the line about Ron Paul.
OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11125 May 14, 2013
Bored wrote:
<quoted text>
You are correct in that no one knows for sure at this point in time.
Influencing a branch of government is one of the primary responsibilities of a President in order to perform his duties.
The type of influence matters. If you cant see that and understand the damage it can do to our nation if the influence is geared toward
harassing opponents or gaining special treatment for friends and family, then you are a lost cause, and if every liberal think the way you do this country is in serious peril.
I dont give a rats a** if the president is democrap or repub, breaking the law is against the law. Many get away with it, usually on a local level because folks like you think it's ok to give special treatment. Give the building project to a family member or a close friend, pay extra for the job. a little kick back here, a little kick back there. I know it happens, but when caught they should face the Judge.
I'm saying it's common place. I know this is hard for you to understand, but there are parts of the Obama administration that work independently on behalf Obama. Obama has the duty to fire them if they make a mistake on his behalf. He usually doesn't have to. They have the grace to resign. You want us to quit bringing up Romney, but ya'll are still wondering and making excuses why you lost. Let's move on. There was no conspiracy. You lost.
OMTE

New Bethlehem, PA

#11126 May 14, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
'nuff said, one would think...
Agreed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Rincon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
dead beet shit head cops in port wentworth GA (Jul '08) Nov '16 corruptpw 79
Buddy Carter on Trump Oct '16 Nathanael Greene 3
Immigration What Are They Thinking (Jan '16) Oct '16 Astonished 18
Best internet provider out by Griffin Lake Oct '16 KNSTIER 1
Looking for Fun? Sep '16 Carl 3
Review: Meadowbrook Truck Sales (Jan '15) Sep '16 Bobcat 3
pooler (Apr '15) Aug '16 I know you pooler 3

Rincon Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Rincon Mortgages