Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

[Bill in Dville]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
You mad? rotfl
You are one nasty critter. Gee...it must be hell to be you.

Kinda funny, how the clueless and uneducated make such claims...

Interesting that someone, who just happens to be unregistered using several names, claimed that you're using a made up name. She probably doesn't understand the irony of that, just like she doesn't understand taxes.

Can you imagine how loopy these goofs would have been if Romney had won?

[Bill in Dville]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
You mad? rotfl
You are one nasty critter. Gee...it must be hell to be you.

Oh, yeah, shame on you for hiding your location...After all, aren't we posting in a Douglasville forum? Do you think someone from Boise, Idaho would be spending a lot of time in a Douglasville forum? Someone from Florida? Only if they don't have a life, I guess...

[Synergy]

dark blue wrote:

<quoted text>
Bullshit! You hide your location and use a made up name! You pretend to be smart, the only person you impress is yourself and the other guy you pretend to be.
But you just can't hide your stupidly from the rest. Constantly telling Americans who only want fair treatment that they have wealth envy. You have NO clue what real wealth is, if you did you would not be so fast to endorse the rich 5% getting special treatment working class people just don't get.
Want another laugh, look in the mirror and open your mouth and speak what a joke.
The day you get any feelings of acceptance from anyone would be a sad day for humanity. Don't hold your breath!!
On second thought hold your breath till you turn dark blue.

Just by glancing back a couple of pages, you have posted under: "heart attack", "problems" and "dark blue". There are others. I just didn't want to waste any more time on you. Y-e-a-h. You're a REAL hero. Laughing Out Loud!

[Synergy]

Bill in Dville wrote:

<quoted text>
Kinda funny, how the clueless and uneducated make such claims...
Interesting that someone, who just happens to be unregistered using several names, claimed that you're using a made up name. She probably doesn't understand the irony of that, just like she doesn't understand taxes.
Can you imagine how loopy these goofs would have been if Romney had won?

I noticed the irony, too. She is afflicted with Opticalrectumitis. Bless her heart.

[Synergy]

Bill in Dville wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, yeah, shame on you for hiding your location...After all, aren't we posting in a Douglasville forum? Do you think someone from Boise, Idaho would be spending a lot of time in a Douglasville forum? Someone from Florida? Only if they don't have a life, I guess...

You know she will get all ticked off when she reads our posts to each other. She's definitely a person with anger issues. Oh, well. The people with the white jackets are looking for her.

[Sue]

Wwho?

[Ad exec]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
Well....

2. Fox News is still #1 in viewship.

ONLY on cable, which is a very small market, less than 3 million total for the prime time news slot. On the November 10 ratings CNN, with some 777,000 viewers, including their sister channel, both of which are right leaning, beat out FNN by some 50,000 viewers.

During prime time, CBS network, always the third place finisher, not only out-draws Fox, it out-draws all cable news channels (there are six of them) combined. Of course Fox has no network news presence the same as CBS has no presence on cable.

While Fox can and does claim it's number one, it's in a marginal (small) market and your claim it's number one is therefore, a gross misrepresentation and distortion, something Fox is noted for doing.

FWIW: Cable news total viewership declined by 15% on one measuring standard, 11% on the other, while network lost 3%, mainly to the web.

[Synergy]

Sue wrote:

Wwho?

Sybil

[snap crackle pop]

No one needs to register with topix JUST because it ticks you off Dville. Remember that. Choose your battles, you're wasting breath. I mean, how many times have you said it already? Good grief. You're the TAX man, not the TOPIX ruler. Remember that, too.

[Synergy]

Ad exec wrote:

<quoted text>
ONLY on cable, which is a very small market, less than 3 million total for the prime time news slot. On the November 10 ratings CNN, with some 777,000 viewers, including their sister channel, both of which are right leaning, beat out FNN by some 50,000 viewers.
During prime time, CBS network, always the third place finisher, not only out-draws Fox, it out-draws all cable news channels (there are six of them) combined. Of course Fox has no network news presence the same as CBS has no presence on cable.
While Fox can and does claim it's number one, it's in a marginal (small) market and your claim it's number one is therefore, a gross misrepresentation and distortion, something Fox is noted for doing.
FWIW: Cable news total viewership declined by 15% on one measuring standard, 11% on the other, while network lost 3%, mainly to the web.

Still #1. Been there for years. Why didn't you just post your link so that we can go to the site. Hmmmm....

[Informed Opinion]

Wow
You all have been busy and high spirited.

We need to have the 2013 Economic & Investment Summit. at Brasstown Valley Resort.

Synergy can fly in on one of the corporate jets - if he was good he got free use of the corporate jets as part if the golden parachute.(Relax - just kidding).

We can each get a suite and bring our wives and/or our Significant Others,(there aren't hookers at that bar).

We'll golf, have great meals, sleep in, and watch the movie "Wall Street", over and over.

Synergy and Zoltar will provide Power Point presentations.

I'll arrange a cigar maker from Tobacco Road in Miami come up to present a demonstration of hand-rolling cigars, and explain the investment opportunities to be had when Cuba opens again.

Later we'll have our cigars and fine bourbon by the roaring fire and watch NFL Replays on the sports bar TV, while we tell each other how hard we have it.

It'll be great - and best of all - think "deductibility".

Hope the wife buys my cover story. She says she's a "Trophy Wife", who was misled, and she has been a bit cranky since learning the Maserati was rented that night.

[shipit]

Fox News' secret is that the majority of their viewers are in the "65 and older" demographic.

[Ad exec]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
Still #1. Been there for years. Why didn't you just post your link so that we can go to the site. Hmmmm....

Google the damned thing yourself!

[jeb stuart]

Informed Opinion wrote:

Wow
You all have been busy and high spirited.
We need to have the 2013 Economic & Investment Summit. at Brasstown Valley Resort.
Synergy can fly in on one of the corporate jets - if he was good he got free use of the corporate jets as part if the golden parachute.(Relax - just kidding).
We can each get a suite and bring our wives and/or our Significant Others,(there aren't hookers at that bar).
We'll golf, have great meals, sleep in, and watch the movie "Wall Street", over and over.
Synergy and Zoltar will provide Power Point presentations.
I'll arrange a cigar maker from Tobacco Road in Miami come up to present a demonstration of hand-rolling cigars, and explain the investment opportunities to be had when Cuba opens again.
Later we'll have our cigars and fine bourbon by the roaring fire and watch NFL Replays on the sports bar TV, while we tell each other how hard we have it.
It'll be great - and best of all - think "deductibility".
Hope the wife buys my cover story. She says she's a "Trophy Wife", who was misled, and she has been a bit cranky since learning the Maserati was rented that night.

hey,i'm a disappointed.after all,i am the that suggested you be invited and you did'nt even mention me.maybe you hav'nt heard,i am famous all way from the mountains in north ga.down to americus,at least.oh well,with my humble background,i guess i should be grateful just to able to attend.and to be honest the real reason i wanted you invited was because i wanted someone there that could show me which one was the salad fork.

[jeb stuart]

synergy,i'd like to respond to some post(s)you made,or at least i think it was you.but i can't find them right now and am not going to spend half the day looking.please forgive and correct me if i misquote or attribute something to you that someone else said.i believe that you said that you were pro-choice and i also think i remember you saying that the republicans would not have you because you were not a homophobe.for some reason this all reminds me of something that i've observed but been unable to put into words for some time.it is about this dem.vs.rep.,right vs. left,liberal vs. conserative thing.it appears to me that some sort of phenomenon seems to take place after each election.if the republicans lose an election,then they seem to conclude that they lost because their candidate was not conserative enough and want to push their agenda further to the right.an equally disturbing phenomenon seems to occur when democrats 'win' an election,they seem to conclude that this gives them some sort of mandate to move more to the left.so the gap widens,the chasm deepens,and voters are forced to comprimise their real beliefs.just a thought.

[Synergy]

Informed Opinion wrote:

Wow
You all have been busy and high spirited.
We need to have the 2013 Economic & Investment Summit. at Brasstown Valley Resort.
Synergy can fly in on one of the corporate jets - if he was good he got free use of the corporate jets as part if the golden parachute.(Relax - just kidding).
We can each get a suite and bring our wives and/or our Significant Others,(there aren't hookers at that bar).
We'll golf, have great meals, sleep in, and watch the movie "Wall Street", over and over.
Synergy and Zoltar will provide Power Point presentations.
I'll arrange a cigar maker from Tobacco Road in Miami come up to present a demonstration of hand-rolling cigars, and explain the investment opportunities to be had when Cuba opens again.
Later we'll have our cigars and fine bourbon by the roaring fire and watch NFL Replays on the sports bar TV, while we tell each other how hard we have it.
It'll be great - and best of all - think "deductibility".
Hope the wife buys my cover story. She says she's a "Trophy Wife", who was misled, and she has been a bit cranky since learning the Maserati was rented that night.

Sounds like fun. I'll bring diamonds to hand out as door prizes.:)))(I was given a corporate jet as a gift when I retired. All are welcome aboard.)

[Synergy]

Ad exec wrote:

<quoted text>
Google the damned thing yourself!

Whatsamatter? Don't want to post that left wing propaganda site you got that junk from?.

[Synergy]

jeb stuart wrote:

synergy,i'd like to respond to some post(s)you made,or at least i think it was you.but i can't find them right now and am not going to spend half the day looking.please forgive and correct me if i misquote or attribute something to you that someone else said.i believe that you said that you were pro-choice and i also think i remember you saying that the republicans would not have you because you were not a homophobe.for some reason this all reminds me of something that i've observed but been unable to put into words for some time.it is about this dem.vs.rep.,right vs. left,liberal vs. conserative thing.it appears to me that some sort of phenomenon seems to take place after each election.if the republicans lose an election,then they seem to conclude that they lost because their candidate was not conserative enough and want to push their agenda further to the right.an equally disturbing phenomenon seems to occur when democrats 'win' an election,they seem to conclude that this gives them some sort of mandate to move more to the left.so the gap widens,the chasm deepens,and voters are forced to comprimise their real beliefs.just a thought.

I understand what you are saying. Just from observation, it seems that people lean mostly toward the middle, however, I, too, hear people complain that the republicans aren't being conservative enough. I guess maybe that is where the Tea Party comes in. I'm not sure about that. I don't know much about the Tea Party except the left hates them. Our present administration campaigned the first time on leading from the middle and that never happened. IMO, this administration is extreme left and has been from the beginning. Currently, this country is heading about as left as it can go. That's just the way it is. Obama won and those of us who don't care for his politics will just have to live with it.
I DID state that I am pro choice. Personally, I'm NOT pro abortion, but I AM pro choice. If someone wants to have an abortion, it's totally up to her.

[formerresident]

Informed Opinion wrote:

Wow
You all have been busy and high spirited.
We need to have the 2013 Economic & Investment Summit. at Brasstown Valley Resort.
Synergy can fly in on one of the corporate jets - if he was good he got free use of the corporate jets as part if the golden parachute.(Relax - just kidding).
We can each get a suite and bring our wives and/or our Significant Others,(there aren't hookers at that bar).
We'll golf, have great meals, sleep in, and watch the movie "Wall Street", over and over.
Synergy and Zoltar will provide Power Point presentations.
I'll arrange a cigar maker from Tobacco Road in Miami come up to present a demonstration of hand-rolling cigars, and explain the investment opportunities to be had when Cuba opens again.
Later we'll have our cigars and fine bourbon by the roaring fire and watch NFL Replays on the sports bar TV, while we tell each other how hard we have it.
It'll be great - and best of all - think "deductibility".
Hope the wife buys my cover story. She says she's a "Trophy Wife", who was misled, and she has been a bit cranky since learning the Maserati was rented that night.

Very good. Very good indeed:)

[Bill in Dville]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>
... I don't know much about the Tea Party except the left hates them...

Is that a good thing or a bad thing?