The best one yet!
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Progun

Elk Grove, CA

#1 Aug 4, 2014
Nancy Pelosi says Hamas is a "humanitarian effort"... Good lord when will you left wing idiots wake up!? I love that she said that though. Just proves that the left are completely out of touch with reality. It is kind of like believing that Oslama, I mean Obama was actually born in America. Not!
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#2 Aug 4, 2014
Progun wrote:
Nancy Pelosi says Hamas is a "humanitarian effort"... Good lord when will you left wing idiots wake up!? I love that she said that though. Just proves that the left are completely out of touch with reality. It is kind of like believing that Oslama, I mean Obama was actually born in America. Not!
>
>
A better question would have been when will all you conservative idiots wake up up and realize that FOX is more commonly known as FAUX because it slants and distorts the news, just to dupe all you gullible T baggers?

The whole thing was taken out of context just to fool uninformed T baggers. Nancy Pelosi never said that "Hamas is a humanitarian organization," but if you can prove otherwise please do so.

You better watch the 3rd video on the attached website, the CNN interview of Pelosi by Candy Crawley.

http://www.jta.org/2014/07/31/news-opinion/po...

BTW, the ridiculous notion that President OBAMA was not born in the United States is so ridiculous and passé that not even a clown like Trump believes in it anymore.

But you are right though, your post is "the best one yet," the best proof that T baggers spread nothing but lies and total disinformation ...
tBaggers Masters of dumb

Hesperia, CA

#3 Aug 4, 2014
Progun wrote:
Nancy Pelosi says Hamas is a "humanitarian effort"... Good lord when will you left wing idiots wake up!? I love that she said that though. Just proves that the left are completely out of touch with reality. It is kind of like believing that Oslama, I mean Obama was actually born in America. Not!
" The BEST One Yet"?

Come on, you Tea Baggers have topped this One MANY MANY Times! After all You Tea Bagger Republicans are the Masers of STUPID!

For this to be the "...Best One Yet" you dumbies need to string several unrelated out of context statements together to make a really silly non existent point. Have you lost your Tea Bagger Partisan idiot MOJO?
Grapevine

Paradise, CA

#4 Aug 4, 2014
Pelosi says that Hamas initiated the conflict, that Israel has a right to respond, that the United States should assist it in its response, and that Hamas uses civilians as human shields.
The right is wrong

Lincoln, CA

#5 Aug 4, 2014
Progun wrote:
Nancy Pelosi says Hamas is a "humanitarian effort"... Good lord when will you left wing idiots wake up!? I love that she said that though. Just proves that the left are completely out of touch with reality. It is kind of like believing that Oslama, I mean Obama was actually born in America. Not!
For Gawds sake moron, where do you come up with your bull shit? You're an insult to everyone with a brain who visits this forum.
Progun

Chico, CA

#6 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
A better question would have been when will all you conservative idiots wake up up and realize that FOX is more commonly known as FAUX because it slants and distorts the news, just to dupe all you gullible T baggers?
The whole thing was taken out of context just to fool uninformed T baggers. Nancy Pelosi never said that "Hamas is a humanitarian organization," but if you can prove otherwise please do so.
You better watch the 3rd video on the attached website, the CNN interview of Pelosi by Candy Crawley.
http://www.jta.org/2014/07/31/news-opinion/po...
BTW, the ridiculous notion that President OBAMA was not born in the United States is so ridiculous and passé that not even a clown like Trump believes in it anymore.
But you are right though, your post is "the best one yet," the best proof that T baggers spread nothing but lies and total disinformation ...
Its not my job to source it, look it up for yourself, retard. As far as Fox news goes... The number one rated Fox News, that Fox News? Lol! Nice try. Has MSNBC reached 1000 viewers yet? Maybe if MSNBC fired the bulldike, the race baiting Sharpton and the other morons they say are anchors they might break 500 viewers!!! Lol!
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#7 Aug 5, 2014
Progun wrote:
<quoted text>Its not my job to source it, look it up for yourself, retard. As far as Fox news goes... The number one rated Fox News, that Fox News? Lol! Nice try. Has MSNBC reached 1000 viewers yet? Maybe if MSNBC fired the bulldike, the race baiting Sharpton and the other morons they say are anchors they might break 500 viewers!!! Lol!
>
>
I did look it up myself, that's why I said you posted ridiculous lies.

The only reason FAUX is rated number one is because it is the only network the uninformed T bagging conservative masses listen to.

Liberals obtain their news from a wide variety of different sources rather than being lied to by one network which is owned by foreigners at that!
The right is wrong

Sacramento, CA

#8 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
I did look it up myself, that's why I said you posted ridiculous lies.
The only reason FAUX is rated number one is because it is the only network the uninformed T bagging conservative masses listen to.
Liberals obtain their news from a wide variety of different sources rather than being lied to by one network which is owned by foreigners at that!
On the money as usual Gramps. More people watch all other sources combined than people who watch faux. It's really simple math. Add up all the people watching stations other than faux and compare that to the total number of people watching faux.
News

Paradise, CA

#9 Aug 5, 2014
Herman and Chomsky (1988) proposed a propaganda model hypothesizing systematic biases of U.S. media from structural economic causes. They hypothesize media ownership by corporations, funding from advertising, the use of official sources, efforts to discredit independent media ("flak"), and "anti-communist" ideology as the filters that bias news in favor of U.S. corporate interests.

Many of the positions in the preceding study are supported by a 2002 study by Jim A. Kuypers: Press Bias and Politics: How the Media Frame Controversial Issues. In this study of 116 mainstream US papers (including The New York Times, the Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, and the San Francisco Chronicle), Kuypers found that the mainstream print press in America operate within a narrow range of liberal beliefs. Those who expressed points of view further to the left were generally ignored, whereas those who expressed moderate or conservative points of view were often actively denigrated or labeled as holding a minority point of view. In short, if a political leader, regardless of party, spoke within the press-supported range of acceptable discourse, he or she would receive positive press coverage. If a politician, again regardless of party, were to speak outside of this range, he or she would receive negative press or be ignored. Kuypers also found that the liberal points of view expressed in editorial and opinion pages were found in hard news coverage of the same issues. Although focusing primarily on the issues of race and homosexuality, Kuypers found that the press injected opinion into its news coverage of other issues such as welfare reform, environmental protection, and gun control; in all cases favoring a liberal point of view
Glo Bull Warming LOL

Penn Valley, CA

#10 Aug 5, 2014
The right is wrong wrote:
<quoted text>
On the money as usual Gramps. More people watch all other sources combined than people who watch faux. It's really simple math. Add up all the people watching stations other than faux and compare that to the total number of people watching faux.
You are such a pathetic POS lying dirt bag!!!

On Monday, Variety reported that Fox News had once again dominated all comers I the annual ratings, not merely blowing out CNN, MSNBC and HLN, but drawing more viewers than the combined averages of the three other networks. Fox News averaged 1.774 million viewers in primetime; the other three averaged a combined 1.626 million viewers in primetime.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...

Up yours, you oblamer blithering idiot stooge!
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#11 Aug 5, 2014
Glo Bull Warming LOL wrote:
<quoted text>
You are such a pathetic POS lying dirt bag!!!
On Monday, Variety reported that Fox News had once again dominated all comers I the annual ratings, not merely blowing out CNN, MSNBC and HLN, but drawing more viewers than the combined averages of the three other networks. Fox News averaged 1.774 million viewers in primetime; the other three averaged a combined 1.626 million viewers in primetime.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
Up yours, you oblamer blithering idiot stooge!
>
>
What exactly don't you understand about the fact that uninformed Tbagging dupes only watch FOX because FAUX tells them whatever they want to hear, whereas liberals spread their viewership at least over half a dozen networks?

Go pound sand up yours, you gullible Tbagging dumb cluck!!!
The right is wrong

Sacramento, CA

#12 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
What exactly don't you understand about the fact that uninformed Tbagging dupes only watch FOX because FAUX tells them whatever they want to hear, whereas liberals spread their viewership at least over half a dozen networks?
Go pound sand up yours, you gullible Tbagging dumb cluck!!!
As usual Gramps, you see through the bull -shit the right posts. Notice how glowing -bullshit won't post the rest of the ratings? There are hundreds of other cable channels yet the righties wont post those ratings. Just like everything they do, they cherry -pick and won't tell the rest of the story.

Hell, the Disney Channel has millions of viewers.
The right is wrong

Sacramento, CA

#13 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
What exactly don't you understand about the fact that uninformed Tbagging dupes only watch FOX because FAUX tells them whatever they want to hear, whereas liberals spread their viewership at least over half a dozen networks?
Go pound sand up yours, you gullible Tbagging dumb cluck!!!
Hey Gramps, I just went surfing and found that when you add in all the other channels that faux supporters ignore like Univision you can easily see that overall, faux isn't no. 1.
The right is wrong

Sacramento, CA

#14 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
What exactly don't you understand about the fact that uninformed Tbagging dupes only watch FOX because FAUX tells them whatever they want to hear, whereas liberals spread their viewership at least over half a dozen networks?
Go pound sand up yours, you gullible Tbagging dumb cluck!!!
Here's an interesting link! It kind of blows glowing -bullshit right of the water.

http://www.marketingcharts.com/television/us-...
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#15 Aug 5, 2014
The right is wrong wrote:
<quoted text>
As usual Gramps, you see through the bull -shit the right posts. Notice how glowing -bullshit won't post the rest of the ratings? There are hundreds of other cable channels yet the righties wont post those ratings. Just like everything they do, they cherry -pick and won't tell the rest of the story.
Hell, the Disney Channel has millions of viewers.
>
>
You must be an expert rifleman because you keep on hitting the bullseye in as far as the the modus operandi of the righties goes.

Whenever they can't rewrite history they cherry pick and if they can't cherry pick they attempt to rewrite history.
The right is wrong

Lincoln, CA

#16 Aug 5, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
You must be an expert rifleman because you keep on hitting the bullseye in as far as the the modus operandi of the righties goes.
Whenever they can't rewrite history they cherry pick and if they can't cherry pick they attempt to rewrite history.
Thanks Gramps. Another little tid -bit I picked up while surfing is that blacks watch more t.v. than whites so if the skewed data the tea -baggers post is correct, it's mostly blacks that watch faux.

Speaking of shooting, we got drawn for X6A. and my son wants to get D3-5 for our second tags. I'd like to get B1-6 for our second tags cause I like that Hayfork area. Can't wait!
Concerned Hunter

Wichita Falls, TX

#17 Aug 5, 2014
Hey right is wrong...

Be sure to let us all know EXACTLY WHEN and WHERE you are going to be out in the wilderness "hunting"...

It would be a REAL SHAME if a "Great White Bwana" Game Hunter like YOU would go missing from some "unfortunate accident" in a desolate, inaccessible wilderness area...

You know...those woods are a BIG PLACE..!

And it might not be easy to find a body (or two) who go missing from some "unfortunate accident"...!

So please... practice GOOD HUNTER SAFETY and be sure to let us know EXACTLY... WHEN and WHERE you are going to be alone in the woods...

PLEASE...!!!
Progun

Elk Grove, CA

#18 Aug 6, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
I did look it up myself, that's why I said you posted ridiculous lies.
The only reason FAUX is rated number one is because it is the only network the uninformed T bagging conservative masses listen to.
Liberals obtain their news from a wide variety of different sources rather than being lied to by one network which is owned by foreigners at that!
So in other words, you have nothing.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#19 Aug 6, 2014
Progun wrote:
<quoted text>So in other words, you have nothing.
>
>
I posted a link with the interview and yes, you have nothing, but that don't stop you from rabble rousing.

Typical T bagging conservative tactic.
The right is wrong

Sacramento, CA

#20 Aug 6, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
I posted a link with the interview and yes, you have nothing, but that don't stop you from rabble rousing.
Typical T bagging conservative tactic.
He doesn't care about facts. The whole thing behind him and glowing bull shit is whatever they can imagine.

As usual, he's got nothing except his imagination. Have you noticed the growing trend from the right? They post bull and when they're called on it they say "google it" yet when we post information and back it up with a link to a source the righties ignore the facts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richvale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Free The Nipple 1 hr ER Tech 2
The Clinton Crime Family at Work - Pay For Play 3 hr GRANDPA NICOLAI 7
Hillary Plays NAZI Card - Looses Argument 3 hr GRANDPA NICOLAI 5
Bob Has A New Hero 11 hr --Crack Rabbit-- 2
KKK has given $20K to Clinton campaign- 11 hr --Crack Rabbit-- 2
News Victims of apparent triple homicide identified (Jul '08) Sat Itzmealwayz 52
US Army Says Hillary Disgrunted or Careless Aug 26 Gossip 2

Richvale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richvale Mortgages