Messianic Jews say they are persecute...

Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

There are 72042 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 21, 2008, titled Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel. In it, Newsday reports that:

Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#60732 Oct 16, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
The Asuras (Adverse Beings of the Vital Plane) attack, kill and torture anyone who exposes their shortcomings and evil...
rabbee: no! i do not believe G-D, is the one with all the shortcomings. no matter how much your shortcoming proclaims otherwise.

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#60733 Oct 16, 2013
But you are bi-polar, whether you accept it or not
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
So, anyone like me who regularly experiences the higher states of consciousness-force with the concomitant adverse force attacks that periodically keep manifesting their own deleterious symptoms in the body of the yogi is bi-polar?
The only thing you regularly experience is Topix. So unless the higher states of consciousness-force is an alternative name for it, no one knows what are you talking about.

In your slang adverse force attacks means posters who opnely disagree with you.

See, now all makes sense.
Voluntarist

United States

#60734 Oct 16, 2013
Report: NBC Edits Video to Frame Veterans
Maddow selectively edits clip to demonize peaceful activism
Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
Oct. 15, 2013
MSNBC has been caught airing a deceptively edited video of a rally that took place in Washington
D.C. over the weekend, in addition to flagrantly lying to its viewers.
Raw footage of the protests outside the gates of the White House showed hyped-up riot police
striking and shoving elderly war vets.
However, in a segment produced by MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, only two-thirds of the footage was
shown, making it appear as though veterans initiated the confrontations.
Just as we witnessed during the Trayvon Martin affair, NBC has once again utilized selective editing
techniques in attempts to manipulate its target audience, omitting violence on the part of police in
order to demonize protesters who dared to defend themselves against the barrage of assaults – both
to their bodies and their liberties.
Maddow also played the rally off as a small gathering of fringe Tea Party supporters, in efforts to
dismiss legitimate protests through divide and conquer.
In reality, the demonstration, for the most part, was a non-partisan assembly of vets and
concerned citizens infuriated with the Obama administration’s spiteful decision to barricade
national war memorials.
Maddow followed through with a p
ently dishonest statement that the police featured weren’t
being paid.
In

http://www.infowars.com/report-nbc-edits-vide...
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#60735 Oct 16, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
With 30 years spent in higher education, your foundation in Math, Physics and Chem should have been strong, real strong, but the fact is that you cannot answer the most ordinary questions in any of these subjects.
(smiles)
rabbee: well first of all, your not even close to being my teacher. and what don't you understand, i don't really care that much anymore. wait until you get as old as i am, then tell me if you care anymore?
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#60736 Oct 16, 2013
STEFANO COLONNA wrote:
But you are bi-polar, whether you accept it or not
<quoted text>
The only thing you regularly experience is Topix. So unless the higher states of consciousness-force is an alternative name for it, no one knows what are you talking about.
In your slang adverse force attacks means posters who opnely disagree with you.
See, now all makes sense.
rabbee: that and his delusion, thinks this is his math class.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#60737 Oct 16, 2013
From waaaaaayyyyyyyy back on 11 Oct...
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow I have allowed you to side step the question.
The question was, cant people be moral and ethical without government?
Individuals can, groups cannot.

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#60738 Oct 16, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet he wears Jordache
Proud of my Lee jeans.$9.99 at Penny's -- on sale.

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#60739 Oct 16, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>

...Pret a porter is passe and much cheaper than haute wear...
I hate it when people misuse the French. Haute simply means "high", as in high-class. And pret-a-porter means ready-to-wear.

So, haute and pret-a-porter aren't mutually exclusive. Most haute designers have a pret-a-porter line (or several lines). Any designer who is a member of Federation Francaise de la couture (Valentino, Paco Rabanne, Chanel ...) can claim the title "haute".

What you probably meant to say is "pret-a-porter is much cheaper than bespoke". Or, ready-to-wear is cheaper than custom made. Even that isn't necessarily true. It depends on who is making the clothes. An off-the-rack suit by Valentino could easily cost more than a bespoke Saville Row suit. Price isn't necessarily a indication of quality.

Follow up point. People who constantly talk about the prices of their "haute" clothing typically don't own any haute clothing.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#60740 Oct 16, 2013
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate it when people misuse the French. Haute simply means "high", as in high-class. And pret-a-porter means ready-to-wear.
So, haute and pret-a-porter aren't mutually exclusive. Most haute designers have a pret-a-porter line (or several lines). Any designer who is a member of Federation Francaise de la couture (Valentino, Paco Rabanne, Chanel ...) can claim the title "haute".
What you probably meant to say is "pret-a-porter is much cheaper than bespoke". Or, ready-to-wear is cheaper than custom made. Even that isn't necessarily true. It depends on who is making the clothes. An off-the-rack suit by Valentino could easily cost more than a bespoke Saville Row suit. Price isn't necessarily a indication of quality.
Follow up point. People who constantly talk about the prices of their "haute" clothing typically don't own any haute clothing.
Brilliant and fabulous!

Your hired as my fashion consultant.

Even if you do wear Lees (better than Jordache)

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#60741 Oct 16, 2013
Honestly, I had no idea they still sold Jordache jeans. (they do according to google) That was a joke from my middle school years.

“No Allah: know peace”

Since: Jun 07

A sacred grove in Tujunga, CA

#60742 Oct 16, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
And it doesn't matter, the Whitehouse was out promoting free health insurance, and lets face it, those idiots on public assistance think that everything is free.
The poor have had free health care for many decades. All they need to do is walk into any emergency room at any hospital, and thy get their medical care free. The downside (for all of us) is that by doing so, they clog the emergency system with non-emergency needs - or, far worse - they wait until a minor problem really IS an emergency situation, and then their free treatment ends up costing thousands of dollars more.
Giving them a single payer plan with preventative care would be cheaper...

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#60743 Oct 16, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
Honestly, I had no idea they still sold Jordache jeans.(they do according to google) That was a joke from my middle school years.
Truth be told -- when I do wear jeans, they're Levis. There's just something about that name that appeals to me.
Voluntarist

Norway

#60744 Oct 16, 2013
Liam R wrote:
From waaaaaayyyyyyyy back on 11 Oct...
<quoted text>
Individuals can, groups cannot.
What types of groups?
Voluntarist

Norway

#60745 Oct 16, 2013
Liam R wrote:
<quoted text>
The poor have had free health care for many decades. All they need to do is walk into any emergency room at any hospital, and thy get their medical care free. The downside (for all of us) is that by doing so, they clog the emergency system with non-emergency needs - or, far worse - they wait until a minor problem really IS an emergency situation, and then their free treatment ends up costing thousands of dollars more.
Giving them a single payer plan with preventative care would be cheaper...
And would also give government too much control.
nutjobs here

Israel

#60746 Oct 16, 2013
JOEL THUMBS UP wrote:
<quoted text>
What's wrong with my assertions about Zionist control of key global institutions? I can back up my claims with proof and strong leads just as it can easily be shown that the bible preaches evil.
You claim to be able to back up what you say but never seem to actually back it up or give any real information.

First you have to define Zionism.

According to the definition of Zionism it is one who basically supports Israels right to exist. So do you include everyone who supports Israels right to exist in your global conspiracy?

Next prove that those you consider "in control" are actually Zionists and in control. You also have to show how those with totally opposite agendas are working together. What makes these people more Zionist than something else possibly political outlook.

For someone who loves to portray himself as genius you seem to be thinking too much and lost your way or just full of hate seemingly based on ignorance.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#60747 Oct 16, 2013
Dr. Paul: Not board-certified, but self-certified

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/rand_2/

Libertarian ideology rejects most of the modern regulatory systems that protect consumers, because everyone should be responsible for determining whether the hamburger contains E. coli on his own. But does that do-it-yourself dogma apply to the regulation of medicine, too? If you’re Dr. Rand Paul, practicing ophthalmologist, the answer is emphatically yes.

According to an amusing story in today’s Louisville Courier-Journal, the Kentucky Republican Senate candidate bills himself as a “board-certified” physician even though he is not actually certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology — the only recognized body that certifies doctors in his specialty......

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#60748 Oct 16, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
Dr. Paul: Not board-certified, but self-certified
http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/rand_2/
Libertarian ideology rejects most of the modern regulatory systems that protect consumers, because everyone should be responsible for determining whether the hamburger contains E. coli on his own. But does that do-it-yourself dogma apply to the regulation of medicine, too? If you’re Dr. Rand Paul, practicing ophthalmologist, the answer is emphatically yes.
According to an amusing story in today’s Louisville Courier-Journal, the Kentucky Republican Senate candidate bills himself as a “board-certified” physician even though he is not actually certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology — the only recognized body that certifies doctors in his specialty......
Just to be clear here, American Board of Ophthalmology is a private, not government organization.

The idea behind a more Libertarian government is not to eliminate government (that is anarchy). However, there are limits to what a government can and should provide to it's people. Both fiscal and moral limits. The idea behind Libertarianism is to increasingly allow the private sector to provide public services better and cheaper than can be done by the public sector.

Some people inherently don't trust private organizations to serve the public trust. But, I'd speculate an equal and growing number of people don't trust the public sector to serve the public trust as well.

I'm more than willing to discuss the pros and cons of Libertarian philosophy if we eliminate conspiracy theory and communist plots from the rhetoric (that part isn't aimed at you, Mr Bean)
Voluntarist

United States

#60749 Oct 16, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
Dr. Paul: Not board-certified, but self-certified
http://www.salon.com/2010/06/14/rand_2/
Libertarian ideology rejects most of the modern regulatory systems that protect consumers, because everyone should be responsible for determining whether the hamburger contains E. coli on his own. But does that do-it-yourself dogma apply to the regulation of medicine, too? If you’re Dr. Rand Paul, practicing ophthalmologist, the answer is emphatically yes.
According to an amusing story in today’s Louisville Courier-Journal, the Kentucky Republican Senate candidate bills himself as a “board-certified” physician even though he is not actually certified by the American Board of Ophthalmology — the only recognized body that certifies doctors in his specialty......
Your point in bringing up a 2010 article is?..

In a statement today, Paul insists that his
lack of certification form the mainstream
ABO -- and his establishment of the NBO --
is a principled stand in response to the
ABO 's "decision to grandfather in the older
ophthalmologists and not require them to
recertify ."
" I thought this was hypocritical and unjust
for the older ophthalmologists to exempt
themselves from the recertification exam."

Why start a new certifying board?
Slembarski explained that in 1992 , the
American Board of Ophthalmology -- the
established certification board -- had
instituted new rules requiring that eye
doctors re- certify every ten years. But it was
legally barred from requiring recertification
from doctors who had been certified before
'92 . In the ensuing years , that caused anger
among younger ophthalmologists, who now
were subject to a time- consuming process
that their older competitors would be
spared .
A 2004 article in an online ophthalmology
journal expresses some of these frustrations
with ABO, and notes: "[ T] here are other
organizations out there that are willing and
able to have you take a test to be board -
certified , such as the online test that is
offered by the NBO. The NBO 's test is
cheaper and far more appealing to the
younger ophthalmologists with a time-
limited certification . "

You are the biggest gay loser!

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60750 Oct 16, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>

HughBe--- I have designer suits that cost US$1000.00 or approximately and other designer clothes.

LOL.

Joel---Which designer?

Hugh---Versace Collections, as one example.

Joel---Does any self-respecting designer sell a suit as low as
$ 1000? LOL.

Hugh--- It seems that your knowledge is not based on ACTUAL experience.

Joel---Are your suits pret or haute?

Hugh--- See above
ha ha ha

You don't know the difference between pret and haute.

You have picked up a low costing pret Versace suit in a year end sale or something like that.

What you're referring to is low end pret - the pick one off the rack.

Versace haute couture costs tens of thousands of dollars and to order a haute Versace suit you'll have to fly into one of their leading salons located in Rome, Milan, or London where they create their haute stuff.

Pret is cheap but not so cheap at times and depends on the designer and the piece of clothing up for sale in their pret outlets around the world.

I am referring to haute couture and nothing else and yes the top end brands charge tens of thousands of dollars for an exclusive haute wear suit with accessories.

JOEL THUMBS UP

Since: May 13

Location hidden

#60751 Oct 16, 2013
Multiple spatio-temporal dimensions? Superstring Theory - 10 dimensions, M Theory - 11 dimensions, Bosonic String Theory - 26 dimensions, F Theory - 12 dimensions. All these are mere speculations.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richvale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Richest Counties In America. They would be Libs 14 hr Pay Taxes GayFAIRY 2
Voter Suppression in Alabama is Cause for Feder... 19 hr TURDS of TRUMP 10
Trump to be DEPOSED for Sexual Assault Civil LA... 19 hr Tank of TURDS 14
Jeremy Hoptowit Rape Case Information-Hoping fo... (Jan '09) Mon chico anonymous 14
Desperate FOX Fake News wants to make Mueller t... Mon BowlMovementsKlan 9
Trump Increasingly Unhinged Mon Dave 4
Trump is DRUGGED UP and Slurring his words! Mon ROBO SLURRING DON 1

Richvale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richvale Mortgages