"Global warmist" experts stuck in pol...
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#404 Feb 6, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I just like there to be a little proof for a scientific theory before I buy into it hook, line and sinker. Don't feel bad that you are so gullible as to believe in unproven theories like AGW.
>
>
Speaking of "line hook and sinker" you swallowed Geology professor Easterbrook global cooling theory which he arrived at by cherry picking data,distorting data and exaggerating "IPPC temperature rise by a factor of two."

It is small wonder that other members at the University geology department distanced themselves from him..

https://www.skepticalscience.com/don-easterbr...
Local

Lakeport, CA

#405 Feb 6, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
"“I am absolutely dumbfounded by the totally absurd and stupid things said every day by people who are purportedly scientists that make absolutely no sense whatsoever….
“These people are simply ignoring real-time data that has been substantiated and can be replicated and are simply making up stuff,” he told CNSNews.com . Driven by a quest for money and power, he added,“what they’re doing in the U.S. is using CO2 to impose all kinds of restrictions to push a socialist government.”
“One thing many people don’t realize is that CO2 by itself is incapable of causing significant climate change. Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 39/1,000ths of one percent. It’s nothing. Ninety-five percent of the greenhouse effect is water vapor, and water vapor is not changing.…
“No doubt CO2 has been climbing, but the total change in atmospheric composition [since 1945, when CO2 levels began to increase] is one 9/1,000ths of one percent. So how are you going to have a 10 degree climate change by changing this tiny amount? You can’t do it,” he says, which is why the trillion dollars already spent worldwide on reducing carbon dioxide has had little effect.
“The people who are climate deniers are the people who are denying global cooling," Easterbrook told CNSNews.com . "We haven’t had any global warming in 17 years, and they are denying that. And so we’re not the deniers. They’re the deniers.”
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-h...
Dr. Easterbrook has been more correct than many of his peers, but he has paid the price for going against the blob of flat earth warmies. The liberal warmie crowd shun him.......and dopes like lil teepee wonder why more scientists do not speak out?
The dopes on this site would rather listen to a guy like Dr. Turney who proudly/arrogantly led an expedition to seek out evidence of global warming and got frozen into the polar ice..........
Turney has proven himself a incompetent moron and a sham......but the liberal dopes love him.

you simply cannot make this stuff up!
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Paradise, CA

#406 Feb 6, 2014
>
>
Dear casual reader:

Only brainwashedconservatives give credence to Dr Easterbrook who lectures to fools at the Heartland Institute which is funded by the Koch brothers to undermine climate science…

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0215/Do...
Local

Lakeport, CA

#407 Feb 6, 2014
You know something is wrong when a self decribed athiest/socialist is quoting information from the "Christian Science Monitor."
lmao.......you cannt make this stuff up.

Check Dr. Easterbrook out for yourselves. He predicted a harsh cold winter in the U.S., antarctic/arctic ice mass growth, fewer tropical hurricanes, and a reversal of any short term global warming in these decades.
http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Easterbrook
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/what-c...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story...
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_fi...

enjoy your learning process.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#408 Feb 6, 2014
Local wrote:
You know something is wrong when a self decribed athiest/socialist is quoting information from the "Christian Science Monitor."
lmao.......you cannt make this stuff up.
Check Dr. Easterbrook out for yourselves. He predicted a harsh cold winter in the U.S., antarctic/arctic ice mass growth, fewer tropical hurricanes, and a reversal of any short term global warming in these decades.
http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Easterbrook
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/what-c...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story...
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_fi...
enjoy your learning process.
^
^
Dear casual reader,

You know that something is definitely wrong when a so called "conservative" dismisses the "Christian Science Monitor" and offers wikipedia as an authoritative source on Geologist cum climatologist Don Easterbrook.

Ironically, the first Wikipedia article states that Dr Easterbrook was featured in the "Glenn Beck" program and that other members of the geology department at WWU distanced themselves from him….

What more need be said…???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Easterbrook
Local

Lakeport, CA

#409 Feb 6, 2014
I am very pleased to allow casual readers to think for themselves......and let the current facts about our climate speak for themselves.....and allow them to read about the man made global warmy "experts" who were so wrong about their expert scientific calculations that they became stuck in the polar ice......in a taxpayer funded multi million dollar ice breakership.....and had to be rescued by another expensive chinese cie breaker ship that also became frozen into the polar ice and they all needed to be rescued by a dirty fossil fuel burning heliocopter!!!!
buuuuahaha
It the lefties weren't so dangerous to our society, this would be a very long and hearty.........buuuuahaha
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#410 Feb 6, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
"Easterbrook –“When we check their projections against what actually happened in that time interval, they’re not even close. They’re off by a full degree in one decade, which is huge."
Whack-a-mole time, once again.

So Easterbrook said that the IPCC projections were off by a full degree. This, from skeptical science, GRANDPA'S link:

"Over the first decade or two of the 21st Century, the IPCC projected close to 0.2°C surface warming per decade."

That's two tenths, NOT one percent.

"A Skeptical Science contributor contacted Easterbrook to inquire as to the source of his depiction of the IPCC projections. Easterbrook responded that he had obtained them from the IPCC website, but that the data must have been subsequently altered or removed, because he could no longer find it. "

Geez, he couldn't find it.

"To summarize Easterbrook's distortions of the IPCC TAR temperature projections:

•He chose a figure which represented model simulations of temperature responses only to greenhouse gas changes, which neglects for example the temperature response to the cooling effects of aerosols.



•He chose a single model run with an anomalous temperature spike in 2011.



•He only presented the data from 2000 to 2011, which concealed the fact that the temperature spike in 2011 was a short-term anomaly.



•He exaggerated his distorted IPCC temperature rise by a factor of two.

Thus Easterbrook's claim that the IPCC TAR projected a 1°C global surface warming from 2000 to 2010 was not even remotely accurate."

As GRANDPA mentioned, Easterbrook lied, distorted, and cherry-picked in order to falsely come up with his denier conclusions. He's another fraudulent spokesman for the Big Energy interests, and so the flat-earthers love him.

And we have to play whack-the-mole once again.
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#411 Feb 6, 2014
Local wrote:
<quoted text>
Dr. Easterbrook has been more correct than many of his peers, but he has paid the price for going against the blob of flat earth warmies. The liberal warmie crowd shun him.......and dopes like lil teepee wonder why more scientists do not speak out?
No, Easterbrook is a proven fraud. That's why objective scientists shun him.

And dopes like loco and Sammy love him.
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#412 Feb 6, 2014
And Sammy has still not explained why he believes that all climate scientists are pro-AGW frauds in order to keep their government funded jobs-- when more than half of our states, and half of our congress-- are anti-AGW republicans.
Local

Lakeport, CA

#413 Feb 7, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
And Sammy has still not explained why he believes that all climate scientists are pro-AGW frauds in order to keep their government funded jobs-- when more than half of our states, and half of our congress-- are anti-AGW republicans.
Don't be a dope lil teepee.
"EPA provides grants and funding to the nation's leading researchers to improve the scientific basis for decisions on national environmental issues."
The EPA is controlled by the current left wing potus. We all know that obama is a "warmy".

and, the state of Ca.(controlled by "Warmies") gives away a ton of money to scientific geniuses like Prof. Turney who led the "ship of fools" to the antarctic and got frozen into the ice while searching for the elusive "man made global warming."

I wonder if they found the ever dangerous ocean dwelling oger "Under toad" whilst making fools of themselves.
lolol
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#414 Feb 7, 2014
Local wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't be a dope lil teepee.
"EPA provides grants and funding to the nation's leading researchers to improve the scientific basis for decisions on national environmental issues."
Does the EPA run our colleges, and the scientists doing research there?

Try not to be such a simpleton, lil loco.
TWP

Wichita Falls, TX

#415 Feb 7, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
<quoted text>
Try not to be such a simpleton....
You know Tea Pee...

YOU ARE RIGHT...!!!

Because you are really, really, really, really, SMART Tea Pee...!!!

Why... all us "Fecal Face"... "Turd Eating"... "Tea Bagger"... "Conservative Idiots"... as you have called us in the past don't deserve to hear the Glorious Truth and Liberating Enlightenment that you and your BFF "GRANDPA NICOLAI" are constantly trying to shove down our throats... for our own good of course...!!!

We simply DON'T DESERVE YOU Tea Pee...!!!

Why... it would serve us all right if you just didn't even TRY and tell us all how SMART and $RICH$ and GOOD LOOKING you and "GRANDPA NICOLAI" are anymore...!

It would really, REALLY teach us all a GOOD LESSON if you and your BFF "GRANDPA NICOLAI" just never, EVER posted your Glorious Words of Wisdom EVER AGAIN on this Topix Forum...

That would REALLY show us all who the BOSS really is here...!

http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/Bob-M...

So PLEASE Tea Pee...

Teach us all a good lesson and just GO AWAY...!!!

That will REALLY show us...!!!

ROTFLMAO...!!!

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#416 Feb 7, 2014
Local wrote:
You know something is wrong when a self decribed athiest/socialist is quoting information from the "Christian Science Monitor."
lmao.......you cannt make this stuff up.
Check Dr. Easterbrook out for yourselves. He predicted a harsh cold winter in the U.S., antarctic/arctic ice mass growth, fewer tropical hurricanes, and a reversal of any short term global warming in these decades.
http://myweb.wwu.edu/dbunny/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Easterbrook
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientis...
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2010/06/04/...
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/what-c...
http://abcnews.go.com/International/story...
http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_fi...
enjoy your learning process.
Try as we might these Marxists are close minded zealots who refuse to learn.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#417 Feb 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
Try as we might these Marxists are close minded zealots who refuse to learn.
>
>

You are one to talk about "close minded zealots who refuse to learn"

SOLUTION and I thank you for the laugh SAMMY!!!!
TWP

Wichita Falls, TX

#418 Feb 7, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
SOLUTION and I thank you...!
Wow...!

You are SO lucky Road Toa d...

To have such a close partner and "soul-mate" as old "Tea Pee"...

It is really, REALLY special to see to people make that "Once In A Lifetime Connection" as you and your BFF old "Tea Pee"...

Tell us Road Toa d...

When you and your BFF "Tea Pee" are doing the old "Rumpty-Bump"...

Do you ever call him your little "Black Ghetto Boy"...?

Like you called President Obama...?

Remember... when you called President Obama - the first Black/African American President of the United States a "Boy"...?

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/chico-ca/TU96...

Well...

I guess that Democrats have been calling Black People "Boys" for a long time...

Haven't they Road Toa d...?

ROTFLMAO...!!!

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#419 Feb 7, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
You are one to talk about "close minded zealots who refuse to learn"
SOLUTION and I thank you for the laugh SAMMY!!!!
I know that you and TP are of the same mindset, closed and thick, but I didn't know that you were his spokesman.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Paradise, CA

#420 Feb 8, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
I know that you and TP are of the same mindset, closed and thick, but I didn't know that you were his spokesman.
>
>
Closed minded and thick skulled is you and your t bagging conservative cohorts, I just happened to think SOLUTION would appreciate your harebrained post where you so aptly described yourself and your cronies...

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#421 Feb 8, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
And Sammy has still not explained why he believes that all climate scientists are pro-AGW frauds in order to keep their government funded jobs-- when more than half of our states, and half of our congress-- are anti-AGW republicans.
"Science changed dramatically in the 1970s, when the reward structure in the profession began to revolve around the acquisition of massive amounts of taxpayer funding that was external to the normal budgets of the universities and federal laboratories. In climate science, this meant portraying the issue in dire terms, often in alliance with environmental advocacy organizations. Predictably, scientists (and their institutions) became addicted to the wealth, fame, and travel in the front of the airplane:

“A new and rewarding research lifestyle emerged which involved the giving of advice to all types and levels of government, the broadcasting of unchallengeable opinion to the general public, and easy justification for attendance at international conferences—this last in some luxury by normal scientific experience, and at a frequency previously unheard of.”

Every incentive reinforced this behavior, as the self-selected community of climate boffins now began to speak for both science and in the service of drastic regulatory policies. In the measured tones of the remarkably lucid and precise writer that he is, Paltridge explains how the corner got painted:

“The trap was fully sprung when many of the world’s major national academies of science (such as the Royal Society in the UK, the National Academy of Sciences in the USA and the Australian Academy of Science) persuaded themselves to issue reports giving support to the conclusions of the IPCC [the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. The reports were touted as national assessments that were supposedly independent of the IPCC and of each other, but of necessity were compiled with the assistance of, and in some cases at the behest of, many of the scientists involved in the IPCC international machinations. In effect, the academies, which are the most prestigious of the institutions of science, formally nailed their colours to the mast of the politically correct.

Since that time three or four years ago, there has been no comfortable way for the scientific community to raise the spectre of serious uncertainty about the forecasts of climatic disaster.”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmichaels/2...
Get Right or Get Left

Yuba City, CA

#422 Feb 8, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
"Science changed dramatically in the 1970s, when the reward structure in the profession began to revolve around the acquisition of massive amounts of taxpayer funding that was external to the normal budgets of the universities and federal laboratories. In climate science, this meant portraying the issue in dire terms, often in alliance with environmental advocacy organizations. Predictably, scientists (and their institutions) became addicted to the wealth, fame, and travel in the front of the airplane:
“A new and rewarding research lifestyle emerged which involved the giving of advice to all types and levels of government, the broadcasting of unchallengeable opinion to the general public, and easy justification for attendance at international conferences—this last in some luxury by normal scientific experience, and at a frequency previously unheard of.”
Every incentive reinforced this behavior, as the self-selected community of climate boffins now began to speak for both science and in the service of drastic regulatory policies. In the measured tones of the remarkably lucid and precise writer that he is, Paltridge explains how the corner got painted:
“The trap was fully sprung when many of the world’s major national academies of science (such as the Royal Society in the UK, the National Academy of Sciences in the USA and the Australian Academy of Science) persuaded themselves to issue reports giving support to the conclusions of the IPCC [the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. The reports were touted as national assessments that were supposedly independent of the IPCC and of each other, but of necessity were compiled with the assistance of, and in some cases at the behest of, many of the scientists involved in the IPCC international machinations. In effect, the academies, which are the most prestigious of the institutions of science, formally nailed their colours to the mast of the politically correct.
Since that time three or four years ago, there has been no comfortable way for the scientific community to raise the spectre of serious uncertainty about the forecasts of climatic disaster.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickmichaels/2...
And after five paragraphs of just plain and simple 'common sense'?
I bet that these GloBull warming zealot lemmings still will not get it!!!

And let's never forget about these same scientists saying in their very own words, in emails, that Glo Bull warming is a fraud!!!

Yet... with so many things proving GloBull warming as a fraud?
I bet that these Glo Bull warming zealot lemmings still will not get it!!!

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#423 Feb 8, 2014
Get Right or Get Left wrote:
<quoted text>
And after five paragraphs of just plain and simple 'common sense'?
I bet that these GloBull warming zealot lemmings still will not get it!!!
And let's never forget about these same scientists saying in their very own words, in emails, that Glo Bull warming is a fraud!!!
Yet... with so many things proving GloBull warming as a fraud?
I bet that these Glo Bull warming zealot lemmings still will not get it!!!
Yep, they all conveniently ignore climategate

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richvale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
He's baaccckkkk! 1 hr LEFTIST DIALOG 26
Here is what real scientist say about global wa... 1 hr GRANDPA NICOLAI 17
TRUMP will SINK Republicans 1 hr LEFTIST DIALOG 31
Why are all the fires getting so big? 2 hr GRANDPA NICOLAI 54
News Aryan Nations recruiting again in northern Idaho (Apr '09) 4 hr Swedenforever 460
Liberal Women who Won't be Voting for Hillary! 4 hr TWP 1
Court favors Jesus 4 hr Pastor Pete 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richvale Mortgages