"Global warmist" experts stuck in pol...
Local

Lucerne, CA

#21 Jan 7, 2014
another thought.
Perhaps the global warmists fanatics who stupidly/arrogantly sailed their big strong icebreaker ship into the polar region during winter were climatologists. Had they been meteorologists, they may have known that it is winter time and it gets very cold in the polar regions during winter..........or, they could have consulted ANY ten year old who would have certainly warned them about the dangers of winter in the polar regions.
and to think that these dopey so called weather cimate experts are affecting our world economic/political stability.
lololol
you cannot make this stuff up.
Local

Lucerne, CA

#22 Jan 7, 2014
In addition to millions of dollars spent on the expedition,......millions of dollars have been spent on an international rescue mission, which has affected the scientific programs of a number of countries and there are calls for the expedition to foot the bill for the rescue.
Prof. Chris Turney is a global warming activist and should be held accountable as the leader of this ill fated, ill advised junkett to the polar region.........during winter.....your tax dollars at work.

http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2014/01/02/pro...
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#23 Jan 7, 2014
Local wrote:
For anyone with a brain. There is very little difference between "weather" and "climate"........exc ept....the measure of time.
Anyone with a brain could easily research the difference between weather and climate, so that counts you out.

Sure, it's a matter of time-- short-term trends versus the much longer view.

But there isn't "very little difference" between the two. The difference can be huge. For example, although parts of the US are now experiencing very cold weather due to the extremely unusual pouring of freezing Arctic air into the Eastern US-- the last decade is overall the warmest we've seen since measurements began.

And 2013 was the seventh warmest year ever.
Local wrote:
Global warming fanatics try to make it sound much more complicated in order to cover up how badly their weather/climate predictions have been.
The 'fanatics' are the mesmerized ditto-heads who believe every bit of nonsense that Breitbart, Watts, Fox, and Limbaugh can feed them. People who respect science and scientists are the mainstream of sensible people.

Global warming is complicated, and your simpleton mind cannot grasp it. You'd rather make science into a political argument, which is so much easier for you.
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#24 Jan 7, 2014
Climate scientists HAVE predicted that we're going to experience more EXTREME and unusual weather, due to the overall warming of our planet.

They've forecast more high temperatures of our land, atmosphere and oceans, and this has become our reality. They've forecast more droughts, flooding, hurricanes and cyclones, and we've seen these happen. They have NOT counted out times of extremely cold weather.

The so-called Polar Vortex is the name for the very cold air now flowing into the US. This is another extreme event, which climate scientists are now studying.
Tea Party Solution

Chico, CA

#25 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
Since there is no scientific evidence to back the AGW theory I knew you would be at a loss for an answer.
You say that 'there is no scientific evidence'? C'mon, Sam, that's beyond ridiculous.

This debate should be about what to do about it. That would be refreshing.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#26 Jan 7, 2014
^
^
Post # 20 is hilarious…

weather is a temporary and localized atmospheric disturbance lasting from a few days to several weeks, occasionally setting daily highs and lows….

Whereas climate extends for hundreds, thousands or even millions of years and it is the overall temperature TREND and not the daily high and low variations that point to global warming.

I know that's a difficult concept for illiterate t baggers to understand, but nevertheless...

The following link is for those who are still confused as to the difference between weather and climate.

http://www.eo.ucar.edu/basics/
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#27 Jan 7, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone with a brain could easily research the difference between weather and climate, so that counts you out.
Sure, it's a matter of time-- short-term trends versus the much longer view.
But there isn't "very little difference" between the two. The difference can be huge. For example, although parts of the US are now experiencing very cold weather due to the extremely unusual pouring of freezing Arctic air into the Eastern US-- the last decade is overall the warmest we've seen since measurements began.
And 2013 was the seventh warmest year ever.
<quoted text>
The 'fanatics' are the mesmerized ditto-heads who believe every bit of nonsense that Breitbart, Watts, Fox, and Limbaugh can feed them. People who respect science and scientists are the mainstream of sensible people.
Global warming is complicated, and your simpleton mind cannot grasp it. You'd rather make science into a political argument, which is so much easier for you.
>
>
Sorry about my post # 25 SOLUTION, I did not see this post of yours and didn't know that you already tried to straighten LOCO out…

I suppose that TOPIX buffers the posts in a holding area for a certain length of time or something.
Tea Party Solution

South San Francisco, CA

#28 Jan 7, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
Sorry about my post # 25 SOLUTION, I did not see this post of yours and didn't know that you already tried to straighten LOCO out…
I suppose that TOPIX buffers the posts in a holding area for a certain length of time or something.
Don't let it happen again punk or I'll come over and do # 2 in your closet!!
Local

Lucerne, CA

#29 Jan 7, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone with a brain could easily research the difference between weather and climate, so that counts you out.
Sure, it's a matter of time-- short-term trends versus the much longer view.
But there isn't "very little difference" between the two. The difference can be huge. For example, although parts of the US are now experiencing very cold weather due to the extremely unusual pouring of freezing Arctic air into the Eastern US-- the last decade is overall the warmest we've seen since measurements began.
And 2013 was the seventh warmest year ever.
<quoted text>
The 'fanatics' are the mesmerized ditto-heads who believe every bit of nonsense that Breitbart, Watts, Fox, and Limbaugh can feed them. People who respect science and scientists are the mainstream of sensible people.
Global warming is complicated, and your simpleton mind cannot grasp it. You'd rather make science into a political argument, which is so much easier for you.
You Always make things difficult for average folks to understand.

When we talk about climate, we talk about changes in long-term averages of daily weather.
Even a moron like you knows what weather is.
Climate is the composite or generally prevailing weather condition over time.

We could describe a climate in the span of a day, or a week, or century or over thousands of years.....but it is just a compilation of various weather data over the specified time.

If you have a problem with any of the last few statements, take it up with NASA, and the websters dictionary.



There now lil teepee, isn't that simple?

Does making it more complicated make you feel important?
btw, you should contact your bretheren global warmists experts stuck in the ice and inform them about the polar climate this time of year. The weather can be treacherous.

bwwwwwahahahahahaha

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#30 Jan 7, 2014
Tea Party Solution wrote:
Climate scientists HAVE predicted that we're going to experience more EXTREME and unusual weather, due to the overall warming of our planet.
So are you telling that there has NEVER been this type of weather, or colder, in North America before? Has there never been tropical temperatures in North America before?
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#32 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
So are you telling that there has NEVER been this type of weather, or colder, in North America before? Has there never been tropical temperatures in North America before?
>
>
No one is saying that there has never been this type of weather, nor changes in our climate, in fact there have been many changes in the Earth's climate over the eons, but scientists can tell us pretty accurately what the drivers* behind those changes were.

Recently, the emissions of human activity prove to be the main drivers behind the Earth's temperature rise.

* drivers= factors that influence climatic change or

http://www.climatekelpie.com.au/understand-cl...

and

http://www.eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html
Local

Lucerne, CA

#33 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
So are you telling that there has NEVER been this type of weather, or colder, in North America before? Has there never been tropical temperatures in North America before?
You have to give them a bit of credit Sam. While most man made global warming fanatics are milling about in dark spaces with their tails between their legs, teepee/the ole pos continue to speak boldly about their beloved man made global warming theory.........even when the real weather data is making them look foolish, and the SS MMGW is stuck/covered in ice.

lmao

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#34 Jan 7, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>
>
>
No one is saying that there has never been this type of weather, nor changes in our climate, in fact there have been many changes in the Earth's climate over the eons, but scientists can tell us pretty accurately what the drivers* behind those changes were.
Recently, the emissions of human activity prove to be the main drivers behind the Earth's temperature rise.
* drivers= factors that influence climatic change or
http://www.climatekelpie.com.au/understand-cl...
and
http://www.eo.ucar.edu/basics/cc_1.html
No. You AGW freaks are always on about "unprecedented", etc., making wild claims about that which you know nothing about. Climate science can no more predict the future than could Nostradamus. There is no proof that CO2 has caused any warming nor that it will cause the unprecedented warming that you all are predicting. You lie.

Here is the real reason for global warming. All naturally occurring events.

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#35 Jan 7, 2014
Local wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to give them a bit of credit Sam. While most man made global warming fanatics are milling about in dark spaces with their tails between their legs, teepee/the ole pos continue to speak boldly about their beloved man made global warming theory.........even when the real weather data is making them look foolish, and the SS MMGW is stuck/covered in ice.
lmao
Well, they are consistent. Consistently wrong. Only a fool would keep believing the same garbage fed to them by their handlers when the facts show them to be wrong.
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#36 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, they are consistent. Consistently wrong. Only a fool would keep believing the same garbage fed to them by their handlers when the facts show them to be wrong.
>
>
Are you finality admitting that you are a fool for believing all the garbage your handlers have been spoon feeding you all these years..???
GRANDPA NICOLAI

Chico, CA

#37 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
No. You AGW freaks are always on about "unprecedented", etc., making wild claims about that which you know nothing about. Climate science can no more predict the future than could Nostradamus. There is no proof that CO2 has caused any warming nor that it will cause the unprecedented warming that you all are predicting. You lie.
Here is the real reason for global warming. All naturally occurring events.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =tNoRkxCBi6QXX
>
>
Right!

In your universe the t baggers know so much more about everything than all the scientists and intellectuals combined.

That is why all you right wing nuts are always disputing the findings of world renowned scientists who deal daily with things most of you could not even pronounce let alone know the meaning of.

Humanity has dumped over a billion years worth of CO2 (a greenhouse gas) into the atmosphere in a mere 100 years, acidifying the oceans, melting glaciers, rising the sea levels, raising the ocean's temperature, on and on, and fools still want proof…

Educate yourselves and you will see the proof.

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#38 Jan 7, 2014
GRANDPA NICOLAI wrote:
<quoted text>

Humanity has dumped over a billion years worth of CO2 (a greenhouse gas) into the atmosphere in a mere 100 years, acidifying the oceans, melting glaciers, rising the sea levels, raising the ocean's temperature, on and on, and fools still want proof…
Educate yourselves and you will see the proof.
A billion years worth? How did you come up with this number?
Where is the proof that man made CO2 is causing the warming that ended over a decade ago?
Local

Lucerne, CA

#39 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
A billion years worth? How did you come up with this number?
Where is the proof that man made CO2 is causing the warming that ended over a decade ago?
He pulled those numbers out of his posterior......like most non scientist MMGW beleivers, they read their dailykos nonsense and then they make the remainder up as they go along.
It is my sincere hope that he bought a non refundable springtime cruise ticket through the Northwest passage.

“Government IS the problem.”

Since: Jan 08

Chico, CA

#40 Jan 7, 2014
Local wrote:
<quoted text>
He pulled those numbers out of his posterior......like most non scientist MMGW beleivers, they read their dailykos nonsense and then they make the remainder up as they go along.
It is my sincere hope that he bought a non refundable springtime cruise ticket through the Northwest passage.
Yes, and then they are bold enough to say that any non AGW alarmist scientists like Richard Lindzen, Fred Singer or John Christie don't know what they are talking about or that they are paid off by "Big Oil".

Local

Lucerne, CA

#41 Jan 7, 2014
Sam Lowree wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and then they are bold enough to say that any non AGW alarmist scientists like Richard Lindzen, Fred Singer or John Christie don't know what they are talking about or that they are paid off by "Big Oil".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-sHg3ZztDAwXX
The truth is....the folks you mention dare to disagree with the liberal mob of scientists who grab government research funding.
The same type of scientific mob that, at one time, declared the world to be flat. These "experts" were the favorites of Kings and queens.(they got oodles grant funding as well)... and....they had the arrogance/audacity to proclaim that the earth was the center of the universe....and everything else rotated around the earth. They were the preeminent scientific mob of their time.......of course, we now know that they were very wrong in their assumptions/theory.......in fact, they simply didn't have enough information to have a chance to be correct....they had a slight clue, but that was about it........and yet, tons of gold were spent on exploratory expeditions based upon their scientific opinion.
Hmmm, at least they were smart enough to stay away from the polar regions during the winter.

lmao

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richvale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Muslims Are Proof That Pigs And Camels Reproduced 4 hr democrats are cri... 4
USA Today OPPOSES Trump 4 hr democrats are cri... 5
Democratic Group Registering Dead Voters 5 hr democrats are cri... 1
Hillary Clinton Pardon 5 hr Clinton Crime Family 1
WHERE are the CONSERVATIVES 13 hr GRANDPA NICOLAI 6
News Hate crimes against blacks, Latinos, transgende... 17 hr TerriB1 1
News Drought years tough on Sac Valley rice growers (Jan '16) Jan '16 Telly savalas 1

Richvale Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richvale Mortgages