Where is the proof that the amount of CO2 that we have put in the atmosphere over the last 100 years has caused any warming.<quoted text>
There is plenty of proof for AGW. The definition of a fool is someone who looks only in the rear view mirror while driving forward...
Don't forget comrade you produce more CO2 than most humans,
You make it sound like the CO2 that humans produce is worse than naturally occurring CO2. Which brings up another question. We, humans, are natural to this planet therefore anything that we do, like a buffalo grazing on the plains and emitting CO2 through it's flatulence, is natural since we are natural beings then it follows that all our CO2 production is natural.
"Strictly from a chemical point of view, one CO2 molecule is the same as the next. There is no difference between manmade and natural CO2 molecules, none at all. The trees in the forests and the algae in the water use them all for the same purpose and in the same way to build up biomass—in plain English, to grow. The plants in the farmers’ fields rely on it as much as the fish feeding on the smaller prey in the water which feeds on algae. Take away that vital nutrient and the whole food chain is in peril; especially the top tier, that‘s us humans.
The difference between manmade (“bad”) and natural (“good”) CO2 is not a chemical one. It only exists in the minds of politicians, bureaucrats and scientists who understand the principle of a dollar sign in front of a number.
Natural CO2 comes without any such sign and, therefore, is of no consequence. Obviously, that’s prevents it from being manipulated or taxed – a fact which makes it then “bad.”
In contrast, manmade CO2 is highly $$$-laden and therefore now “good.”
And that, dear readers, is the only difference between “good” and “bad” CO2!"