Right wing talk -show talking head shows his ignorance
Posted in the Richvale Forum
#1 Apr 9, 2014
Today, a radical right -wing talking head (Tom Sullivan - Tom Sullivan Radio Show - FOX News Radio) exhibited his ignorance on nation media. He carried on about how the BLM was trying to take away a Nevada Ranchers land.
Bull shit, the land in question belongs to EVERYONE in this country and not to the rancher in question. Sullivan claimed that the government enacted "grazing laws" in the 90's. Bull shit! I worked for the U.S. Forest Service in the late 60's and at different times in the 70's. I worked for the Resource Forester and several of my responsibilities were based on "grazing rights" (established law)
The rancher in Nevada ran his cattle on thousands of acres that weren't his. That's called trespass.
And speaking of trespass, I can't count the times I've been on a mining claim or grazing allotment and been told by individuals that I'm trespassing. I've got maps of every piece of Federal property here in Caulifornia so for some stupid person to try to tell me I'm trespassing when I'm not, well, what would you expect from repubicans..
And yes, I have close family and friends who are in the cattle business.
#2 Apr 10, 2014
Environmentalists are praising the government’s forceful actions, which are being taken to protect the “desert tortoise.”
Carol Bundy said five officials took Dave and “threw him on the ground.”
“One put his knee on his head, the other put his boot on his head and pushed him into the gravel,” she said.“He’s got quite a bruised head. Just bruised him up pretty good.”
#3 Apr 10, 2014
Got any proof of that?
#4 Apr 11, 2014
. The Review Journal reported that the BLM and the National Park Service have banned grazing in the area in an effort to protect the desert tortoise an endangered species. Twenty years ago Bundy rejected the government’s land-use restrictions intended to protect the tortoise.
#6 Apr 11, 2014
I just read over 100 posts at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/w...
A lot of good information there though I suggest a person do a little follow -up before said information is taken as/for fact.
My ake is that mr. bundy is a thief.
#7 Apr 13, 2014
And we are just supposed to believe everything you just said because, well because you said so? Bull shit! Sorry bud, Democrats aren't exactly known for being "ttruthful". Look at Obama and his "birth certificate"... An obvious lie. Give it up bud, I will continue to own you and prove you to be another Obamabot lemming. Game over. Lol ;)
#8 Apr 14, 2014
It's game over for you bud!
Anyone who who still believes President OBAMA was not born in the United States has got less than zero credibility and is obviously owned by his masters.
#9 Apr 14, 2014
Ahhhhhhhhhh, prove anything I posted is not trutful or you're a liar.
#10 Apr 14, 2014
The cowardly little chickenshit with a small dick and a big gun said he will shoot you in the face in another thread, that is a typical conservative response one can expect from some of these mentally unstable conservative radicals.
#11 Apr 14, 2014
Yeah I know. He gets like that when he gets pimp -slapped around. I'm used to freaks like him talking crap when they're proven to be wrong.
The land never was bundies and never will be.
Talking head tom sullivan on kfbk, biased and unfair said there needs to be a special investigation because someone is related to someone who worked for someone who knew someone they were related to.. I'd only agree to that if someone investigated dickwad chaney and his direct connection to halliburton
#13 Apr 14, 2014
Obama Gives Halliburton $568 Million Contract
Just to show how completely stupid you are SFB, AKA riw
#14 Apr 15, 2014
You stupid moron! To change the contract during a war that bush started and couldn’t finish could have made it that much more costly (lives & money) for us and our allies.
Gawd you’re stupid!
And the military people who did that “no –bid” contract are repubicans! The military leadership is hard right! The CIA from top to bottom is hard right! The FBI from top to bottom is hard right!
If repubicans in congress didn’t want the contract, and they’re the ones who appropriate money, not the president, congress could have nixed to deal
Gawd you’re stupid!
#15 Apr 15, 2014
I knew that you would come up some completely stupid and limpdick excuse too try to cover for oblamers "no bid contract" for Halliburton!
ROTFLMAO at you, you pathetic lemming, oblamer suckass!
You dickheads blow my mind the way that you will not admit just one fault in the biggest POS to have ever sat in the oval office! Hell... this POS is way worse than carter!
Even Putin knows it, and you don't??? That says a whole lot about you lemming morons.
LMAO at you!
#16 Apr 15, 2014
ALLEGATIONS SURFACE THAT SENATOR HARRY REID (D-NV) IS BEHIND THE BLM LAND GRAB OF BUNDY RANCH TO HELP CHINESE COMPANY
The Bureau of Land Management, whose director was Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) former senior adviser, has purged documents from its web site stating that the agency wants Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle off of the land his family has worked for over 140 years in order to make way for solar panel power stations.
Deleted from BLM.gov but reposted for posterity by the Free Republic, the BLM document entitled “Cattle Trespass Impacts” directly states that Bundy’s cattle “impacts” solar development, more specifically the construction of “utility-scale solar power generation facilities” on “public lands.”
“Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle,” the document states.
Another BLM report entitled Regional Mitigation Strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone (BLM Technical Note 444) reveals that Bundy’s land in question is within the “Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone and surrounding area” which is part of a broad U.S. Department of Energy program for “Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States” on land “managed” by BLM.
#17 Apr 15, 2014
Wow, here come the conspiracy freaks. It’s proven that bundy trespass issue was adjudicated in several courts of law at different times and the ruling was that bundy is a thief and where do you morons go from here.
Until you can come up with any “facts” that prove your assertions correct, everything you post is suspect.
#18 Apr 15, 2014
The rancher hasn't paid grazing fees since 1992. The majority of other ranchers pay these grazing fees.
Bundy is doing very well financially, but he refuses to pay the grazing fees to the government-- to US.
He's an illegal WELFARE QUEEN. He's sponging from us, the taxpayers who own this land. I can only guess that the reason righties support this thief is because he wears a cowboy hat.
#19 Apr 15, 2014
This wasn't a sudden development. The government has been in court with Bundy for years. He wouldn't pay the fees, and he wouldn't remove his cattle. This is NOT his land, it's ours.
Right-wing militia groups and Tbagger groups have rallied to Bundy's defense, bringing semi-automatic weapons. They wanted to start a "range war", and that's why the BLM backed down. The BLM is the adult in this conflict.
Supporting this thief is just ridiculous. It's unfair to the many other ranchers who DO pay their grazing fees.
Bundy says that he abides by Nevada laws but doesn't believe that the US government even exists. No wonder why Progun and right-wing extremists on these blogs (every one of them) love ole Bundy.
You guys are still fighting the Civil War.
BTW, about Bundy saying that he's ok with Nevada law but not with U.S. law-- the Nevada constitution expressly recognizes U.S. law.
Article 1, Section 2, "The Paramount Allegiance of every citizen is due to the Federal Government in the exercise of all its Constitutional powers as the same have been or may be defined by the Supreme Court of the United States...whensoever any portion of the States, or people thereof attempt to secede from the Federal Union, or forcibly resist the Execution of its laws, the Federal Government may, by warrant of the Constitution, employ armed force in compelling obedience to its Authority.
#20 Apr 15, 2014
Hey extreme hypocrit!
How come you do not say the same thing about illegal aliens, who are here bleeding us dry??????????
Is it because they vote demorat??????????
How about you just STFU with your hypocritical stupidity!
#21 Apr 15, 2014
What are you frothing about now? Oh, Halliburton in Iraq. Four years ago, as we were preparing to withdraw from Iraq, Halliburton did get a no-bid contract to continue.
The decision to stay with Halliburton was made by the generals in Iraq. They saw a huge cost and huge disruption to get rid of Halliburton and start with a new company.
As much as I dislike Halliburton, it makes sense.
Oh, and globull, who put Halliburton into Iraq at the beginning, also with a no-bid contract? Why, Cheney did that, he put in his own company. Did you froth at the mouth when that happened?
#22 Apr 15, 2014
War brings business to Feinstein spouse
Blum’s firms win multimillion-dollar defense contracts in Iraq, Afghanistan
When it comes to scoring mega-military-related contracts, Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s multimillionaire husband, Richard Blum, is right in the thick of things.
First up: a contract announced last week between the Army and URS Corp., the San Francisco planning and engineering company that specializes in defense work — and that happens to be partly owned by Blum’s investment firm.
The contract — which could grow to $600 million — is to help with troop mobilization, weapons systems training and anti-terrorism methods.
That’s on top of a $3.1 billion Army contract that URS snared back in February for weapons systems and homeland defense.
Next up: Perini Corp., which qualified earlier this month for as much as $100 million of defense work in Iraq and elsewhere. The Massachusetts-based company is already busy building barracks and other facilities for the new Afghan army — a separate contract worth $28 million.
And I'm sure that O-BLAMER! knows nothing about this???
Add your comments below
|DERELECTION of DUTY||1 hr||Both Sides Now||10|
|YE SHALL KNOW THEM by THEIR DEEDS||3 hr||First Amendment||8|
|Clinton - Spots on Dress - Impeachment. Trump -...||3 hr||First Amendment||5|
|Why do the Republicans use RACIAL SLURS?||3 hr||First Amendment||2|
|TRUMP Exposes the TRUE Republican Evangelical "...||3 hr||Trump Family Values||1|
|EvangeliCONS Agree: "Trump IS the Second Coming...||4 hr||Panties 4 Trump||3|
|Conservaturds; Robert Mueller IS a Registered R...||4 hr||Perv Trump||1|
Find what you want!
Search Richvale Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC