Hillary Clinton voted to invade Iraq
Posted in the Richvale Forum
#1 May 13, 2014
Oct. 11. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) casts vote to authorize use of military force in Iraq
Nov. 3. U.S. Senate approves $87 billion package for military operations and reconstruction in Iraq
and now, Clinton is flipp flopping about her documented support for Invading Iraq....and she is blaming.....wait for it, you gotta know, here it comes......W.
lol.....you simply cannot ake this stuff up
#2 May 13, 2014
Are you really that dense? The world was intentially lied to by bush, cheney, rice and the C.I.A.. Most repubicans admit they were lied to and had the truth been known they wouldn't have supported the Iraq war.
#3 May 14, 2014
Shocker!!!!! Blaming Bush? No way! Lol!!!!! How many years into the blamer's term now and you're still blaming Bush?????!!!!! Just admit it dude... You voted for Kenya, I mean Obama because you're a racist in hiding and wanted to show that you're cool for voting for a black man, regardless of him being EXTREMELY underqualified. You are a typical racist and should be ashamed of your pathetic loser ass.
#4 May 14, 2014
What did you expect from lying shleps like LOCO, PROGUN, GLOWINGBULL and the rest of the conservative ne'er-do-wells posting here???
#5 May 14, 2014
The responsibility for the deaths of over 4,400 American soldiers, the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, the waste of nearly one trillion dollars of our national treasury and the rise of terrorism and Islamist extremism that has come as a result of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq rests as much in the hands of the members in Congress who authorized the invasion as it does with the administration that requested the lawmakers' approval. Indeed, the October 2002 resolution authorizing the invasion had the support of the majority of Democratic senators, as well as the support of the Democratic Party leadership in both the House and the Senate.
Congress had many months to investigate and debate the administration's claims that Iraq was a threat as well as the likely implications of a US invasion; members of Congress also fully recognized that the resolution authorized a full-scale invasion of a sovereign nation and a subsequent military occupation for an indefinite period.
#6 May 14, 2014
They have forgotten that the "W" Bush Administration LIED to America to go into IRAQ.
But then Tea Bagger Republicans have never met a LIE they can't embrace!
#7 May 14, 2014
In typical liberal fashion, you got it partly right.....you dopey lil twit.
Top Senate Democrats had access to the same intelligence sources as Bush did (US Intelligence, British Intelligence, Israeli Intelligence, U.N. Intelligence). Charlie Wilson's War showed us that Congress sometimes is privy to even more intelligence sources than the President. That kinda blows a huge whole in the 'Bush lied' excuse. Even if Bush was somehow able to lie to all the top Democrats, how stupid does that make them look....... not getting independent verification?
ALL of the intelligence agencies (including the rest of the world) were fooled by the criminal thug Saddam...that is why there was huge DEMOCRAT support to invade Iraq, including:
Virtually ALL of the most powerful people in the Dem. Party
in fact, 60% of the senate democrats voted to invade Iraq. In total, far more than 100 democrat congressman voted to invade Iraq.
Only Ted Kennedy who was too drunk to know what was going on, voted against it.
you lil fornication face. You are far too easy to pimp slap,
#8 May 14, 2014
First off, "the rest of the world" was not fooled by Saddam Hussein and it (the world) was quite incensed when bush the W invaded Iraq.
Second, ShrubCheney had the CIA and other agencies fake the intelligence data.
Third, if senators can not even trust the President of the United States, whom can they trust?
Finally, even if bush the W did not lie,(and that is a big IF) how stupid does he look for involving the US in such an expensive war based on inaccurate data???
#9 May 14, 2014
What difference, at this point, does it make how she voted? Only a hate filled, sexist, age discriminating, prejudice against the hadicapped, racist would bring up her voting record from over 10 years ago! She has suffered a debilitating brain injury and most likely can't even remember how she voted, so just shut up and leave the poor old lady alone!
#10 May 14, 2014
All you've done is make yourself look stupid. You're telling everyone that Saddam lied to the world and said he was making weapons of mass destruction.
Your're a real idiot. The CIA and all the rest of the intelligence community are run by righties who wanted a war just as bad as bush.
#11 May 14, 2014
Yaaah but we really need to elect her because having a brain damaged old bag for president is almost as good as a Kenyan village idiots son!!
#12 May 15, 2014
Your claim is completely unsubstantiated.
Prove that the CIA intelligence community , the Brits intelligence, the U.N. intelligence, the Israeli intelligence are/were run by righties.....you cannot, but even if you could.....
Why didn't your lefty politicians demand more proof before voting to invade Iraq.
You are saying that Hillary-ous is/was incompetent.
and after the Bhengazi terror murders of 4 patriotic Americans (including a U.S. Ambassador who all worked for Clinton's state dept)......I tend to agree....she is not very bright.
after all, the libyan ambassador asked repeated for more security, and Hillary-ous just blew him off.......and now, Ambassador Stevens is dead.....and she is covering up her irresponsibility.
#13 May 15, 2014
You are correct again, and LOCO is talking out hisass as always.
Those of us who were awake while history was being made remember that Cheney intimidated the CIA…
We also remember how covert CIA agent Valery Plame was outed by the bush/cheney administration because her husband Ambassador Joseph C Wilson proved that bush the W's administration was lying about Saddam Hussein purchasing fissionable uranium from Nigeria…
#14 May 15, 2014
The Five Things Hillary is Known for are Bad Things
1. Benghazi: Clinton has failed to offer an explanation for why the diplomatic post wasn’t well defended. And she hasn’t fully explained what she did the night of the attack.
2. The Russia Reset: The button was incorrectly translated, to start with. And pushing it seems to have bounced us back into the Cold War.
3. Monica Lewinsky: Sure, she was the woman wronged. But she has also allowed herself to ride to power of the coattails of one of the most degenerate men to serve as president. So she partially owns that legacy too. And voters will be reminded that Bill, even if he’s just surfing porn in the Green Room, will be back in the White House with her.
4. Hillarycare: There is, of course, no Hillarycare. It became Obamacare. It was her biggest political assignment, and she blew it. That Obama succeeded where she failed will remind voters that with Hillary, they’re settling for an also-ran. The woman Obama beat. Second best.
5. Boko Haram: Despite urging from serious people within the Obama’s own administration, Hillary’s State Department failed to label Boko Haram a terrorist outfit. There were real reasons for this based in policy, but we may never know the extent to which the political exigency of minimizing the existence of terrorists as Obama sought reelection was the true driving factor. No matter, the decision looks bad today and is irrevocably associated with Hillary.
#15 May 15, 2014
State Department spokeswoman can't name Hillary Clinton's diplomatic achievements ... and neither can Hillary Clinton!
Young Hillary Clinton Supporters Struggle to Name Her Accomplishments
The problem is obvious......she did nothing even remarkable.
In fact, the murderous Bhengazi terror attack on her watch is a glaring problem for her......and the Russian "reset" has been revealed as a teenage gurlish stunt and a remarkable failure.
#16 May 15, 2014
The world community is of a unanimous opinion. Hillary and Obama are complete amateurs!!! What a ridiculous way to run a country!!!
#17 May 16, 2014
Aaahhh yes, very true... "Butt" they are very professional criminals!!!
#18 May 16, 2014
Where are/were the weapons of mass destruction?
bush and company lied and the ramifications will reverberate for decades . Be it national debt or problems related to the V.A. bush caused problems that just keep on giving.
Add your comments below
|Ill-egals Usling A Lot of CA Water||4 min||The right is wrong||40|
|Climate Change Denial||10 min||The right is wrong||154|
|Why do conservatards post lies then post links ...||19 min||Leftist our moron...||12|
|dr. oz, the phony conservatard capitalist.||2 hr||The right is wrong||1|
|Willits bipass collapse: enviro-sabotage?||6 hr||Here Is One||183|
|can methhead back up his claim?||6 hr||Here Is One||24|
|Was/is Mexitrol a figment of our imaginations ?||8 hr||The right is wrong||1|
Find what you want!
Search Richvale Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC