Bible study rules for public schools proposed

Feb 10, 2010 Full story: The Courier-Journal 133,213

FRANKFORT, Ky. - The state would create rules for teaching about the Bible in public high schools under a bill filed Monday by three Democratic senators.

Full Story

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104331 May 21, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I just don't agree that it is most, but I acknowledge there are many. No one in my family needed anything other than someone to deliver the child.
I do not see the assistance you speak of as playing God. Just as I don't see someone taking medicine to help their body stay healthy as playing God. You mentioned the cord. That doesn't seem any different to me than someone having bypass surgery, a stint, or a heart transplant. To me it isn't playing God.
The single biggest advance in medicine has been sanitation. Simple hand washing has saved countless lives in child birthing - yet it was God who created the germs. How many centuries has God been punishing the innocent for not inventing the microscope sooner? Religious logic is anti logic.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104332 May 21, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
They stated an INCORRECT percentile.
I do NOT believe in MISrepresenting actual FACT.
It needed edited-for the sake of TRUTH in facts.
Absolutely NO argument to it.
Just FACT.
Condoms and spermacides ONLY rank in prevention, at about 75/76 percent efficiancy.
And the Planned Parenthood ought to know-they've sure been around helping to enlighten people about such for a LONG, LONG time.
This message has been a public service announcement brought to others courtesy of believers in personal responsibility and Planned Parenthood @
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topic...
###
Perhaps Planned parenthood . org needs to UPDATE THER FREAKIN FACTS! idiot

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104334 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree , most Doc's are pure pr$cks!
I've heard it's because many have a God complex. LOL!

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#104335 May 21, 2013
do whut wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess this is where we part and travel different paths. I don't believe in fate. I believe in doing everything possible to preserve life. I also believe that medication is necessary for many to have a good quality of life.
I would much rather be the one that pulls a thorn of of a lion's paw than the one that says tough crap and moves on.
Then you do not believe in any divine plan either, because the two are the same thing, only one makes the assertion that there is something setting it all up.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#104336 May 21, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
I've heard it's because many have a God complex. LOL!
This is sadly true, it's when it becomes a complex that it becomes dangerous to the patient. Enjoying the fact that you get to play god by saving lives is fine, but when you think you are actually a god, you tend to act more like the mythical gods of the culture you belong, and the Abrahamic one is a monster.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104337 May 21, 2013
Here's another one updated... few months ago
So true

United States

#104338 May 21, 2013
Hope everyone is safe , thru all these storms.. Feel so bad for all of those who have lost so much. :(.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104339 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
using condoms are 90 to 95% effective when used with other agents as spermacide or birth control. This is fact! I cannot answer for those people who are not smart enough to read directions for use of how to apply poperly , or are not informed on the risks/benefits factor.

damn Dr. Clark says 99% effective, I was wrong! I wasn't agreeing with you proven science. I still stand on , and completely agree with my stats! Not Yours. Simply because I stated using a condom ALONG WITH spermacides AND birth control makes that % of effectivness CORRECT!

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104340 May 21, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
Well known available FACTS(for those that can read anyway)-even 35 years ago!!!
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topic...
Apparently you don't read as well as you think you do:

"Each year, 2 out of 100 women whose partners use condoms will become pregnant if they always use condoms correctly."

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topic...

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104341 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps Planned parenthood . org needs to UPDATE THER FREAKIN FACTS! idiot
Planned Parenthood placed condoms (male condoms) in the 15-24% ineffective grouping because, according to their stats, if used incorrectly condoms are only 82% effective. If used correctly they are 98% effective.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104342 May 21, 2013
Thank you SS and Kitten, was trying to explain it to them but didn't do so well in my presentation.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104343 May 21, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
They stated an INCORRECT percentile.
I do NOT believe in MISrepresenting actual FACT.
Your posts suggest otherwise.
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
It needed edited-for the sake of TRUTH in facts.
Absolutely NO argument to it.
Just FACT.
Condoms and spermacides ONLY rank in prevention, at about 75/76 percent efficiancy.
Not according to the link you provided. If you click on the male condom graphic you'll get the rest of the info (which you obviously didn't take the time to read).

Condoms are ~82% effective if used incorrectly. I'll say that again so maybe you can understand what Planned Parenthood is telling you:
Male condoms are approximately 82% effective if they are not always used correctly.

If always used correctly they are approximately 98% effective.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#104344 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Thank you SS and Kitten, was trying to explain it to them but didn't do so well in my presentation.
At first I was o.O

Then I was O.o

Then I went >.<

Now I'm all ^_^

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104345 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
Thank you SS and Kitten, was trying to explain it to them but didn't do so well in my presentation.
Nah, your presentation was fine, the problem is they typically don't care much for actual facts. Facts and data just get in the way of their proselytizing.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104346 May 21, 2013
Ok on one hand you can't claim there is no God , then when it suits your argument claim there is a God.
Yes and Amen wrote:
<quoted text>Hahahaha...
You said "Clueless"....
We know God is real, and you call us Clueless???
ChromiuMan wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, I submit exhibit A.
ChromiuMan I am just wanting to understand your stance on this.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104347 May 21, 2013
O wait... was reading that post wrong Crom, my apologies. I see what you were doing now.
stuck in a lodi

Elkhorn City, KY

#104348 May 21, 2013
ProvenScience wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of the RECENT web page from the PPH comparison site, do you NOT comprehend.
Please keep your IGNORANCE away from kids, unless you would also like to promote how to responsibly take a birth control pill each day, or use an IUD, or keep current with Norplant or something sismilar.
We are trying to promote personal responsibility of no excuses for BOTH genders, which that means FEMALES as well--NOT the ignorant, dark age "it awrl duh male fault, cuz it easier to just steek it to duh males".
Once again-(Notice the VERY current year as well)
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topic...
2013 Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc.
1-800-230-PLAN
###
You know I'm pretty damn ignorant on alot of things, sometimes I have to read one's post couple or three times to get the jest of that person's views. I don't pretend to know everything, but I strive to learn something everyday! But when it comes to Proper use of Condoms and the stats of safe sex..That's pretty much a NO Brainer for me! I'm sure all men can relate: Nobody likes taking a shower with a raincoat on! But b4 I subject myself to an STD, I will "suit up" so to speak!

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104349 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
O wait... was reading that post wrong Crom, my apologies. I see what you were doing now.
Crom? I haven't read any R. E. Howard in decades.

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#104350 May 21, 2013
ChromiuMan wrote:
<quoted text>
Crom? I haven't read any R. E. Howard in decades.

“See how you are?”

Since: Jul 12

Earth

#104351 May 21, 2013
stuck in a lodi wrote:
<quoted text>
You know I'm pretty damn ignorant on alot of things, sometimes I have to read one's post couple or three times to get the jest of that person's views. I don't pretend to know everything, but I strive to learn something everyday!
The gist of peoples' own views are often more comical than others' jests about them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richmond Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Song Title Game (Aug '09) 3 min Jennifer Renee 30,707
Police car chase in Richmond? 9 min Local Resident 1,085
ssi disability fraud in colonels cab company 47 min Local 4
Trees that need cut 1 hr rhinestone 7
Word Association (Jul '10) 1 hr Jennifer Renee 20,347
Add a Word, Drop a Word (Sep '11) 1 hr Jennifer Renee 18,572
Any Cute Lonely Female English Teachers or Libr... 3 hr Edward Hieronymus 835
Richmond Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Richmond People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots