GARY FOSTER JR. The most hated man in Richmond.

[Lucky]

If I were him I would so be ashamed to show my face in public.Oh wait its be posted in mug shots many time so obviously he doesnt care. Hope he rots in hell.

[people]

it was just a cat

[Curious]

But but but....... Cats respond like those puff balls when hit with 162 grains of copper traveling almost 4000 feet per second.

Sorry.. wandered off there a minute. Where were we??? A cat, yes, a cat.... Just kill it and toss in the trash.

[uhhuh]

people wrote:

it was just a cat

a kitten that got 5 thousand dollars raised for it . I'm glad the kitten got surgery

[sallystruthers]

That 5000 dollars could have fed 7500 starving kids in Africa. The cat could have fed two more.

[EVERYONE]

I hope he gets the MAX when he goes to court!

[Archie]

sallystruthers wrote:

That 5000 dollars could have fed 7500 starving kids in Africa. The cat could have fed two more.

Cat in the Kettle at the Peking Moon,
Little boy blue, and the man in the moon ...

[Jon B]

It was a cat. Get over it! More resouses should be used in abused kids not animals. I hope he takes it to trial because you people have left plenty of loop holes in his case for a mistrial.

[fyi]

Actually the most hated man in Richmond is Jermaine Carter who is facing alot of charges right now but tried to get out of them by snitching! And i think what kind of info he had was much worse then what happened to some cat!

[Raptureme]

Let me get this straight...

Kill a cat with a golf club....charged with felony looking at possible prison time

Reach inside the womb of a human and kill an innocent child and get paid to do so

[Clearly]

Raptureme wrote:

Let me get this straight...
Kill a cat with a golf club....charged with felony looking at possible prison time
Reach inside the womb of a human and kill an innocent child and get paid to do so

And there you have the Democratic party.

[gator]

He didn't kill the cat. He beat it. There are laws against that.

As for the reach inside the womb of a human remark.
OMG.

Your logic on this matter, and how you can tie one to the other, is really amazing.

[Raptureme]

gator wrote:

He didn't kill the cat. He beat it. There are laws against that.
As for the reach inside the womb of a human remark.
OMG.
Your logic on this matter, and how you can tie one to the other, is really amazing.

Thought he killed the cat...my bad

[hm]

gator wrote:

He didn't kill the cat. He beat it. There are laws against that.

As for the reach inside the womb of a human remark.
OMG.

Your logic on this matter, and how you can tie one to the other, is really amazing.

Well said

[Concerned]

You know both dogs and cats are Gods creatures, I'm sure he never intended for them to be abused. Like wise children shouldn't be either.
Things will never change unless he start getting harsher punishment for these sorry ABUSERS.
We are the VOICE for children and animals.

[tgifootballseaso n]

Concerned wrote:

You know both dogs and cats are Gods creatures, I'm sure he never intended for them to be abused. Like wise children shouldn't be either.
Things will never change unless he start getting harsher punishment for these sorry ABUSERS.
We are the VOICE for children and animals.

Bless the beasts and the children...in this world, they have no choice - they have no voice.

[please]

Is his mother the late Frances Foster?

[Poster]

The sad fact is this is a true story. Yep, someone actually spent 5000 dollars on a cat! Talk about ignorant people.

The solution would have been to snap its neck and be done with it. To charge someone with a crime, for killing a cat, makes our entire court system look like fools.

We have robberies and murders, and druggies, and drunks, and our court system is concentrating on some loser that whacked a cat??? Has the system lost its mind???

Its a cat people...... A useless cat. A target for any farmer in the county.

The $5000 dollars should have been spent having your heads examined you dumbasses.

[true story]

Poster wrote:

The sad fact is this is a true story. Yep, someone actually spent 5000 dollars on a cat! Talk about ignorant people.

The solution would have been to snap its neck and be done with it. To charge someone with a crime, for killing a cat, makes our entire court system look like fools.

We have robberies and murders, and druggies, and drunks, and our court system is concentrating on some loser that whacked a cat??? Has the system lost its mind???

Its a cat people...... A useless cat. A target for any farmer in the county.

The $5000 dollars should have been spent having your heads examined you dumbasses.

I would much rather spend money on an animal than someone with a piss poor attitude like you!

[Whatever]

Poster wrote:

The sad fact is this is a true story. Yep, someone actually spent 5000 dollars on a cat! Talk about ignorant people.
The solution would have been to snap its neck and be done with it. To charge someone with a crime, for killing a cat, makes our entire court system look like fools.
We have robberies and murders, and druggies, and drunks, and our court system is concentrating on some loser that whacked a cat??? Has the system lost its mind???
Its a cat people...... A useless cat. A target for any farmer in the county.
The $5000 dollars should have been spent having your heads examined you dumbasses.

Dear Poster:

Maybe you need a drink.

Sincerely,

Whatever