Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17903 Jul 11, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>If it is accurate then I am confident that the mainstream media will pick up on it, I will take is more serious then.
The problem with that is that the main stream media wouldn't report it. They are back in Protect Mode.
Surely you have determined THAT.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17904 Jul 11, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
I knew you were wasting your time. I admire your tenacity, as well. The libs simply don't want to hear it. It wouldn't matter if the "truth-o-meter of the universe" were to tell them they made a mistake by voting for and continuously supporting Obama, they would look wide eyed, blink occasionally, march to the beat and repeat over and over: "I am right. Those who don't agree with me are wrong and full of hate".
I thought only drunks thought it isn't them, that only the rest of the world was marching out of step.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17905 Jul 11, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
They can't, they (liberals) don't get the fact that obamacare a tax that will gouge the middle and lower classes the most.
If youíre a company making billions in profits, youíre exempt from Obamacare next year. But if youíre a 28-year-old struggling to pay off your student loans, youíre not.
If youíre a big bank or financial company, you donít have to comply with Obamcare, But if youíre a single parent trying to make ends meet, you do.
Yep. I've said before that the rich WON'T cover the cost because they have the money to circumvent and the poor CAN'T cover the cost because they have no money. I asked whom that left to pick up the cost. Guess what? Not ONE lib responded. The answer is obvious, but they don't want to hear it. They think we are making it up.
OMTE

Ford City, PA

#17906 Jul 11, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Came across this article again. The unions are threatening the democrats in the midterm if they don't give them "special" dispensation on Obamacare. Uh-oh. Sooooorrrrryyyyy. Union thugs will follow the same rules as everyone else. You thugs were lied to for your money and your votes. Gullible. HOT diggity dog!!!!!
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/300881...
I don't know alot about Obamacare as I stated, but you seem really passionate about warning people of the adverse effects of this unrepealable law. It has got me curious. Can you explain to me in simple terms, the high and lows of this health care reform law, and how it will affect the different age groups and classes? I personally think the idea of Obamacare is for people to have insurance, so they can go to the doctor and prevent major health problems. This over the long term would eventually make for a healthier public. Now, indigent people just hurt and wait till they can't stand it no more and go to the E.R. with no means to pay, and the government and hospitals foot the bill for their care. Don't they? In return the hospitals charge paying patients $40 for aspirin. I know to start off there is going to be an increase in healthcare insurance premiums, but eventually if the public becomes healthier, by getting preventable care, then these major health issues should decline. Ya think? In time premiums should stable out and after that decline, and if these hospitals aren't left holding the bag, then prices of treatment should decline as well. Like I said I don't have that much interest in this issue, because there are far more pressing issues at hand. Issues that could be the end of this great nation and could make or break Obamacare. Until these issues are resolved with our government. Obamacare will be low on my list of worries. I'm just curious as to if you can explain to me why I should hate Obamacare in your own words.:)

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17907 Jul 11, 2013
It is obvious that Obamas news media is trying to divide the races with the Zimmerman case. Of course it was to Obamas advantage before the election.
Now they are trying to divide Hispanics into races. They used the term "White Hispanic" to describe Zimmerman. I guess that means there are also black Hispanics.
The truth is they thought Zimmerman was white to start with and even said he was a member of the Tea Party. Oops, it was the wrong Zimmerman. Oh well, lets just make it up to serve our purposes. So we will say he is white even though he is Hispanic. Soon pictures were posted of Zimmerman and everyone thought , this guy isn't white as he looks Hispanic. So that is how George Zimmerman became a "White Hispanic".

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#17908 Jul 11, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know alot about Obamacare as I stated, but you seem really passionate about warning people of the adverse effects of this unrepealable law. It has got me curious. Can you explain to me in simple terms, the high and lows of this health care reform law, and how it will affect the different age groups and classes? I personally think the idea of Obamacare is for people to have insurance, so they can go to the doctor and prevent major health problems. This over the long term would eventually make for a healthier public. Now, indigent people just hurt and wait till they can't stand it no more and go to the E.R. with no means to pay, and the government and hospitals foot the bill for their care. Don't they? In return the hospitals charge paying patients $40 for aspirin. I know to start off there is going to be an increase in healthcare insurance premiums, but eventually if the public becomes healthier, by getting preventable care, then these major health issues should decline. Ya think? In time premiums should stable out and after that decline, and if these hospitals aren't left holding the bag, then prices of treatment should decline as well. Like I said I don't have that much interest in this issue, because there are far more pressing issues at hand. Issues that could be the end of this great nation and could make or break Obamacare. Until these issues are resolved with our government. Obamacare will be low on my list of worries. I'm just curious as to if you can explain to me why I should hate Obamacare in your own words.:)
Great post.

It always comes back to the same simple facts.

If you carry insurance or pay taxes you currently pay for those who don't.

Nobody, even our Right Wing friends can dispute that.

Whether that's good or bad doesn't matter - it just is.

ObamaCare will, to greater or lessor extent, cause uninsured people to become insured.

Even out Right Wing friends don't dispute that - they only argue about it's imperfections.

So.....

Anyone who believes uninsured people should become insured people, whether by perfect or imperfect legislation, support ObamaCare.

Anyone who doesn't believe uninsured people should become insured people are against ObamaCare.

How simple can this be ?
jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#17909 Jul 11, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with that is that the main stream media wouldn't report it. They are back in Protect Mode.
Surely you have determined THAT.
WOW! That means the good old days of Woodward & Bernstein and the Washington Post are gone too, huh. When did this happen. Obama is more powerful and tyrannical than Nixon was. Gimme a break!
Informed Opinion

North Fort Myers, FL

#17910 Jul 11, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>He shall forever more be known as "ignored opinion".
Please,

My black lab recently ignored the CSPAN shows explaining the efficacy of surgical implantation of stents vis a vis other methodologies utilized to address arterial cardiac insufficiency.

That doesn't mean the information presented isn't accurate - that just means some information requires a level of intellectual
sophistication not available to all potential audiences.

But, here's the good news - my black lab enjoys many of yours and Syn's posts - he says their a little immature for his taste - but hey.. don't feel offended - he's a really smart dog.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#17911 Jul 11, 2013
General Robert E Lee wrote:
<quoted text>
I ask the leftists such questions all the time, they never answer though. They just bob and weave, shuck and jive, deflect, deny, and when all else fails, attack.
+1

Hence, the clueless and uneducated moniker...

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#17912 Jul 11, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>If it is accurate then I am confident that the mainstream media will pick up on it, I will take is more serious then.
If this poster thinks someone from the MSM will report negatively on something that impacts the current administration, well...
Who

Broken Arrow, OK

#17913 Jul 11, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post.
It always comes back to the same simple facts.
If you carry insurance or pay taxes you currently pay for those who don't.
Nobody, even our Right Wing friends can dispute that.
Whether that's good or bad doesn't matter - it just is.
ObamaCare will, to greater or lessor extent, cause uninsured people to become insured.
Even out Right Wing friends don't dispute that - they only argue about it's imperfections.
So.....
Anyone who believes uninsured people should become insured people, whether by perfect or imperfect legislation, support ObamaCare.
Anyone who doesn't believe uninsured people should become insured people are against ObamaCare.
How simple can this be ?

Not as simple as you make it and not so simple even you can understand.

Fact is even Obama doesn't understand it, those who are trying to administer it don't understand it, the insurance companies don't understand it, and the public in general don't understand it.

All your post regarding Obamacare shows you don't know what it's going to cost, how it's going to affect those without insurance, how it's going to affect those with insurance, how it's going to affect tax revenue, and how it's going to affect the federal and State budgets.

In fact, you are like Pelosi WHO said "we don't know what's in it but we/re going to pass it."
And now that it has passed they still don't know what's in it, how to implement it, what the affect on the budget will be and how much taxes will need to be RAISED to fully implement it.

You believe your taxes will go down if those lazy sorry people buy Obamacare. You believe it is going to reduce medical care when those lazy sorry people buy Obamacare. You believe people will become healthier when those lazy sorry people buy Obamacare.

A lot of those lazy sorry people will not pay the high premiums and a lot of those lazy sorry people don't have the extra money to pay the premiums.

The pie in the sky called Obamacare is just a mirage, full of dung just waiting to drop on the American people.


jeb stuart

Cordele, GA

#17914 Jul 11, 2013
Bill in Dville wrote:
<quoted text>
If this poster thinks someone from the MSM will report negatively on something that impacts the current administration, well...
liberal press, liberal president, liberal senate. Now, if just get the wackos off the Supreme Court and get control of the House of Reps- then things will start to get better!

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17915 Jul 11, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>Well dammit now, I just hadn't thought about that! I guess that means we will have to rely on you wackos for all our information in the future, huh.
Yes. You left wing looneys don't offer up any reliable information.:)
Who

Broken Arrow, OK

#17916 Jul 11, 2013
"In response to a request from House Budget Committee Ranking Republican Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the Congressional Budget Office [CBO] confirmed that President Obamaís massive health care law will increase prescription drug prices. The CBO confirms the range of onerous restrictions and requirements will drive health care costs up, at odds with the claims made by its proponents. CBOís letter specifies that manufacturers will have an incentive to raise drug prices and that, as a result, health care costs will increase for some seniors and for those who are uninsured."

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17917 Jul 11, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know alot about Obamacare as I stated, but you seem really passionate about warning people of the adverse effects of this unrepealable law. It has got me curious. Can you explain to me in simple terms, the high and lows of this health care reform law, and how it will affect the different age groups and classes? I personally think the idea of Obamacare is for people to have insurance, so they can go to the doctor and prevent major health problems. This over the long term would eventually make for a healthier public. Now, indigent people just hurt and wait till they can't stand it no more and go to the E.R. with no means to pay, and the government and hospitals foot the bill for their care. Don't they? In return the hospitals charge paying patients $40 for aspirin. I know to start off there is going to be an increase in healthcare insurance premiums, but eventually if the public becomes healthier, by getting preventable care, then these major health issues should decline. Ya think? In time premiums should stable out and after that decline, and if these hospitals aren't left holding the bag, then prices of treatment should decline as well. Like I said I don't have that much interest in this issue, because there are far more pressing issues at hand. Issues that could be the end of this great nation and could make or break Obamacare. Until these issues are resolved with our government. Obamacare will be low on my list of worries. I'm just curious as to if you can explain to me why I should hate Obamacare in your own words.:)
lol Good try, OMTE. I, along with the other conservatives, have posted simple to understand articles and have tried to explain in simple terms what the pitfalls are. You have had access to that information. I can tell by the tone of your post that you aren't open to anything except that Obamacare is going to save the day. There ARE other pressing issues, however, Obamacare is just as important as the other issues, in my opinion. Actually, you can click on the link about Obamacare that I posted an hour or so ago and that will give you SOME information. I'm curious. How did you feel about this law being FORCED on us in the first place. No one (including CONGRESS) had read it. It was supposed to be published online for a lengthy amount of time(BEFORE it was passed) so that the American public could read it and become familiar with it. It WASN'T. That was another of Obama's blantant lies. He KNEW what would happen to it. It was pushed through rather clandestinely mainly because Obama wants to go down in history as being the Father of our socialized medicine. THAT is ALL he cares about. This law was forced on us and it will affect each and every one of us. I think everyone will agree that we needed healthcare reform, but this law is a DOG. As time passes, more and more people(some Dems included) are getting concerned. A majority of the American public DID NOT want it and now that number is larger. We don't have a choice now.
Who

Broken Arrow, OK

#17918 Jul 11, 2013
"How Much Does ObamaCare Cost The Average American?

The cost of ObamaCare plans depend on a number of factors including: the market your purchasing insurance in, your health status, the quality of the plan and your income, to name a few. Plans range from bare-bones "Bronze" plans to high-end "Platinum" plans. "Bronze" plans for individuals are expected to cost between $4,500 and $5,800 a year in 2016. But if you make less than 4 times the Federal poverty line ($11,170 in 2012), youíll pay less by virtue of receiving tax credits. Someone making up to 133% of the FPL will get credits so that his net payment will be only 2% of income, while those making 300% to 400% of FPL will pay 9.5% of FPL.

Please note that while ObamaCare regulates insurance companies, you will still be purchasing private insurance (unless you choose to pay the penalty or are covered under Medicaid/Medicare)."


FPL = FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL.

This from the mouth of the obamacare site.

"Subsidies for out-of-pocket costs, if you buy in your state's online marketplace Up to $28,763 for singles and Up to $58,564 family of 4."

$28K and $58K for subsidies??? Where is the hell is that money coming from???

http://obamacarefacts.com/costof-obamacare.ph...

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#17919 Jul 11, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I don't know alot about Obamacare as I stated, but you seem really passionate about warning people of the adverse effects of this unrepealable law. It has got me curious. Can you explain to me in simple terms, the high and lows of this health care reform law, and how it will affect the different age groups and classes? I personally think the idea of Obamacare is for people to have insurance, so they can go to the doctor and prevent major health problems. This over the long term would eventually make for a healthier public. Now, indigent people just hurt and wait till they can't stand it no more and go to the E.R. with no means to pay, and the government and hospitals foot the bill for their care. Don't they? In return the hospitals charge paying patients $40 for aspirin. I know to start off there is going to be an increase in healthcare insurance premiums, but eventually if the public becomes healthier, by getting preventable care, then these major health issues should decline. Ya think? In time premiums should stable out and after that decline, and if these hospitals aren't left holding the bag, then prices of treatment should decline as well. Like I said I don't have that much interest in this issue, because there are far more pressing issues at hand. Issues that could be the end of this great nation and could make or break Obamacare. Until these issues are resolved with our government. Obamacare will be low on my list of worries. I'm just curious as to if you can explain to me why I should hate Obamacare in your own words.:)
u don't know a lot about a lot of things.

Since: Jul 12

Douglasville, GA

#17920 Jul 11, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! That means the good old days of Woodward & Bernstein and the Washington Post are gone too, huh. When did this happen. Obama is more powerful and tyrannical than Nixon was. Gimme a break!
Obama makes Nixon look like Shirley Temple.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17921 Jul 11, 2013
Informed Opinion wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post.
It always comes back to the same simple facts.
If you carry insurance or pay taxes you currently pay for those who don't.
Nobody, even our Right Wing friends can dispute that.
Whether that's good or bad doesn't matter - it just is.
ObamaCare will, to greater or lessor extent, cause uninsured people to become insured.
Even out Right Wing friends don't dispute that - they only argue about it's imperfections.
So.....
Anyone who believes uninsured people should become insured people, whether by perfect or imperfect legislation, support ObamaCare.
Anyone who doesn't believe uninsured people should become insured people are against ObamaCare.
How simple can this be ?
I DID read this because I knew you would defend that dog of a law. The FOP must be the ONLY union that is still supporting Obama in regard to Obamacare. Ah, I digress.
Obamacare is NOT FUNDED. If the young and healthy decide they STILL don't want to become insured, they won't. They can pay a penality or just slip through the cracks. The poor will most likely get some type of voucher because they will STILL BE POOR and won't be able to pay for insurance. The rich won't care. They'll pay for THEIRS or figure out some loophole because they know how to do that. Okay. SOMEONE has to pay for Obamacare. Hmmmm.......wonder who? Do you honestly need help with that answer? As far as those with pre-existing conditions being able to get insurance, perhaps. It won't be an OPEN DOOR to everyone with pre-existing conditions. Again, THAT healthcare will be expensive. Hmmmmm.....wonder who will be picking up THAT tab? The rich won't. The poor can't. Ummmm.....let's see. Who will pay for THAT? Care to guess?
You looney libs have NO CLUE about this debacle.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#17922 Jul 11, 2013
jeb stuart wrote:
<quoted text>WOW! That means the good old days of Woodward & Bernstein and the Washington Post are gone too, huh. When did this happen. Obama is more powerful and tyrannical than Nixon was. Gimme a break!
So, you are saying that the main stream media ISN'T left wing bias???????? Seriously?
It's really a waste of time to try and get you libs to hear anything other than the Koolaid rhetoric. Never seen anything like it. Hope I never will again.

As far as your reference to the Nixon era....this is a whole different ballgame than those days. This media built Obama up to be something that he obviously isn't and they intend to protect their "baby". You give ME a break.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Richmond Hill Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
ALS run from GA to South Carolina entered into ... Mar 21 St Patty 2
Poll Is it bad my gf has slept with 80-90 men before... (Sep '13) Mar 21 St Patty 44
Savannah Creates a Monster - Privileged White T... Mar 21 Butter Milk 2
Help Savannah be healthier and happier! Mar 20 Canyon Ranch Inst... 1
Teen Challenge Exposed! (Jul '07) Mar 14 15 years sober 153
News TRAILER: First look at Savannah-filmed slave dr... (Apr '16) Apr '16 al3abmix 1
WaterWays Township vs Dunham Marsh vs River Oaks (Nov '15) Apr '16 Wallace 3

Richmond Hill Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Richmond Hill Mortgages