Boy, you really are desperate for a comeback when this is the best you can come with. I guess all the writers and speechwriters need to never again use a guote because they like the phraseology or the flow of the words. You have now determined that when one uses a quote, one is always referring back to the original speech or document as the basis of your rebuttal.<quoted text>
I guess you were just responding to something that was really unbearably insulting.
It is interesting how it continues to be those on the Left who keep bringing up Jesus, not those of us on the Right - we just respond.
I invite you to find any post of mine that mentioned religion that was not a response to something insulting you on the Left brought up.
New International Version (NIV)
True and False Disciples
21 “Not everyone who says to me,‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me on that day,‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23 Then I will tell them plainly,‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
So in an earlier post, when I said "Lay on, MacDuff" I was actually referring to Shakespeare's Richard III as the basis for my position.
Or if someone says "Say it ain't so,...", they are really using the trial of Shoeless Joe Jackson as the basis for their position.
Or when I tell you that my response to any of your posts is "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn." I am actually using "Gone with the Wind" as the basis for my rebuttal.
Yeah, right. Try again, Sherlock. And I am not using all of Sir Arthur Conan Doyles' Holmes stories as the basis for my rebuttal there, either.