#12668 Oct 13, 2012
Elvis' Beverly Hills, California estate up for sale. 1.6 acres and it's located in a locked up community.
#12669 Oct 13, 2012
43 and you are posting 24/7? No wonder you want the great Obama. Why do you post from a place you don't live close to? Would people know who you are from your name > Buttlicker? or does that explain your actions that would identify yourself? Why are you sad that you don't follow sports? what do you suffer from?
#12670 Oct 13, 2012
Heats coming back, time to start watering by night again.
#12671 Oct 13, 2012
thanks for asking.
I was inspired the poster "the last templar" ...
I thought it would be an appropriate name this fall, as you guys get taught again that your self centered agenda is WAY outside the mainstream!!
at some point there will actually be a "last teatard"
at that point?? I will be using that moniker...
as for the location??
the computer chose it....
#12672 Oct 13, 2012
I'd put a rubber tip on yours, it wouldn't look good to have another one of you's running around.
#12673 Oct 13, 2012
well lets see...
you are the one who calls himself "buttlicker"
#12674 Oct 13, 2012
It is time for romney to admit JUST how many jobs bain has been responsible for shipping overseas, or destroying through bankruptcy...
when ever a bain company came out of bankruptcy??? thousands of people were jobless??
and mitt romneys cayman island account was tens of millions of dollars fatter!!!
#12675 Oct 13, 2012
More of the same until Sunday, keep yapping.
#12676 Oct 13, 2012
what freaky coincidence!!
i went back to ayn, just the second someone complained about the rebuttlicker moniker...
it was simply a tribute to the middle ages...and the last templar!!
which is where the tea party seems to want to go politically.
so what about the other post I left you??
you never say much!!???
about the minutia of the weed issue??
what are you afraid of??
I was right about 215?? wasnt I??
dont take it too hard, I usuallly cut people slack, after I cut them down.(or debunk their arguements in your case)
#12677 Oct 13, 2012
More from you later.
#12678 Oct 14, 2012
can you envision california paying less for its criminal justice system??
proposition 36 adresses the fact that half the people in this country/state are in jail for non-violent crimes....
drug offenders in particular will be given leinience....less lives connected to them destroyed.
yes on 36.
#12679 Oct 14, 2012
U have got to be kidding. Kids are suspended in schools now for bringing marijuana in their backpacks. Legalize it and u will smell it( but not see it) in McDonald's too. So, if u don't mind sucking in pot air at every Starbuck's u go to, then make your choice. BTW if u have children, 18 yr olds can tell u they have the right to smoke it at the dining table too.
From the voice of a current public school teacher.
#12680 Oct 14, 2012
Haven't had chance to throw this topic overboard yet.
Someone get me a gaffing hook to toss the bales over board.
#12681 Oct 14, 2012
is olive really a teacher,with such poor grammar?Guess she teaches P.E.? If she would read scientific research. she would know she is sounding foolish.Can she produce any proof pot makes people dumber.I bet I can find proof teacher have made people dumber. Education was doing fine till The Federal Government got involved.
#12682 Oct 14, 2012
its hard to believe you admit being a calif public school teacher.
what a failure the calif school system is with the unions protecting ignorant terrible teachers.
there is no place for union mob bosses in our government
save the kids = ban the unions
#12683 Oct 14, 2012
Do you mix mustard and mayo with your too?
#12684 Oct 14, 2012
if you think olive gramerrella is a teacher??
you are slower than I gave you credit for.
#12685 Oct 14, 2012
this month is the 30th anniversary of the declaration of the war on drugs.
the reagan administration claimed it would cost 200 million a year....
today?? we are spending 25 billion a year on it.
altogether the amount spent on arresting, prosecuting and incarcerating drug offenders is approching 1 trillion dollars, total spent, since 1970.
that is just tax payer money fed into the system.
that doesnt include residual costs regarding the lives that were destroyed.
what it has been is a war on people
see the film "traffic"(2000)
#12686 Oct 14, 2012
Thats why you use a clip, other wise you burn your fingers.
#12687 Oct 14, 2012
According the Congressional Budget Office, the stimulus cost more than the Iraq war. The only thing it succeeded in doing was to push the country deeper into the fiscal hole, leaving us stuck with the weakest recovery since World War II. Mr. Obama promises more of the same in a second term.
It can’t work. British economist John Maynard Keynes was the father of the theory that government spending could create prosperity. Since his death in 1946, this damaging idea has resulted in the transfer of trillions of dollars of wealth away from the people who earned it and into the hands of bureaucrats. Such redistribution of income cannot result in economic growth.
Spending for the sake of spending makes no sense when it comes to a family budget, and federal budgets are no different. That extra government spending must either be financed by higher taxes or by increased debt. Higher taxes mean that taxpayers will have a lower net income, forcing them to reduce their spending. All debt has to be repaid eventually — and the most likely scenario is higher taxes will hit in the future when the debt comes due. Either way, there are no long-term gains to the economy. The only lasting result is increased debt and a larger government which weigh down the economy.
The stimulus bill, known as the American Reconstruction and Recovery Act (ARRA), provides strong evidence that Keynesian solutions are nothing more than a spending shell game. Stanford’s John Taylor, in a study published in the Journal of Economic Literature, followed the stimulus money. He found “if there had been no temporary stimulus payments to individuals or families, their total consumption would have been about the same. And if there had been no ARRA grants to states and localities, their total expenditures would have been about the same.” That is, the economy would have done at least as well had Mr. Obama’s legislation failed.
Hasn't worked because its marxism-socialism-communism-me rcantilism which loots the public and private sectors , using the public power for personal and private gain!
It always fails! Obama is a failure! The Democrat Party is a failure! And they're trying to drag the rest of us down to heII with them!
Add your comments below
|Burlingame post office sold||4 hr||Happy to have moved||1|
|CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10)||6 hr||scurall||5,066|
|CA Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10)||6 hr||ploppers||200,936|
|CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10)||Mon||GOP bull||2,265|
|Catalytic Converter Theft. Toyota Truck/SUV own... (May '07)||Mon||Jesie||950|
|Camden, TN. Topix Moderator (Aug '13)||Sep 13||ladybee||16|
|My Teen Verbally Abuses Me (Feb '09)||Sep 13||ConcernedMom||106|
Find what you want!
Search Redwood City Forum Now