Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,852)

Showing posts 157,021 - 157,040 of200,214
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179992
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie RIzzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Get a sense of humor frikkin jerk.
Oh I see making off color remaks about a persons sexuality,whom you have never met is funny . Do you also enjoy sticking a firecracker up a frogs ass and the lighting the fuse funny? Tell me Frankie what else do you consider funny?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179993
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Do you want 5 wives, OK by me. Do you want to marry your sister, OK by me.
Yet you keep posting on the thread, why is that? BTW did you notice your vote total? Puppy went up HUH?
No as I've told you many times I don't want five wives, I want to discuss the concept as it applies to marriage rights.

You want to discuss same sex marriage. Does that mean you want to marry a man?

Stop being so stupid. You're just angry because I hurt your feelings, I understand. But try and get over it for your own sake fruitcake.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179994
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow you really are a piece of work. Prior to the repeal DADT men and women homosexuals served in the military. Women have been subject to sexual harassment in the military for quite some time. It just did not happen. Or are you implying that Gay men are the reason?
Of course it existed before.

Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.

The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.

Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...

Smile.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179995
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA

The topic is marriage, not ad hominem insults.

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Reply
Jazybird will never understand what you are saying, don't bother trying. He's "stuck on stupid"!

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA

No, I was in the Navy. That jackass Big D was a coastie. That's the only thing he's got going for him.

Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Great argument fruitcake! Even dopier ad homonym than Mona Lott. But that's all you've got, so you go with it, I understand.

Hey Frankie, can you just see the Hypocracy, in your posts?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179996
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Gay historians? Do you always look at persons sexuality prior to judging thier work?
I wonder if Madame Curie would have been a homosexual, would her work discovering radioactive substances of radium and polonium been discredited by science?
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.

Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...

Smile.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179997
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Clueless.
I never saw the movie, must have been one of your favorites, you must know every line.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179998
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it existed before.
Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.
The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.
Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...
Smile.
If you check the sources, you will find most are rooted in a Homophobic historian who has been discredited by his peers and even other heterosexuals.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179999
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
Humm, if a heterosexual then does reaserach on hetersexuals, its a clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180000
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course it existed before.
Did you read the word 'epidemic' in the HP article. How intelligent is it to INCREASE the risk of heterosexual and ADD homosexual.
The powerful influence of mating behavior, or defective mating behavior in the case of homosexuals is exactly why historically the military has avoided such situations.
Clearly, more than your sexuality is broken...
Smile.
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you check the sources, you will find most are rooted in a Homophobic historian who has been discredited by his peers and even other heterosexuals.
Did you deliberately confuse issues?

I understand why, you are losing your ass.

Smirk.
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180001
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
......
Did you deliberately confuse issues?
I understand why, you are losing your ass.
Smirk.
After reading many of your posts, I have not seen a single logical argument against extending the same protections to gay couples that are extended to married straight couples.

Do you have any?

Remember, the key word is logical.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180002
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Humm, if a heterosexual then does reaserach on hetersexuals, its a clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
I didn't base the criticism on my opinion or the orientation.

In the case of Boswell, other historians discredited his work, which exposed his gay bias.

In the case of lesbian family studies, again, the methodology was extremely unscientific. So much so that even an article in Slate magazine noted the poor quality. In the most notable case, the lesbian researchers made the claim that lesbian couples made better parents than natural parents. It is why I require any family studies to include the methodology.

The question I never get answered is this; Why is this deception necessary for a legitimate cause??? Or, why is the denial of basic anatomy, evolution and scientific facts necessary to justify a legitimate cause???

Maybe you have a real answer?

Smile.
Changes

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180003
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Looks as if you all better enjoy it.
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180004
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all, only when it is related to research related to their own orientation. A clear conflict of interest that has proven to be biased.
Another example would be two lesbian researchers doing research on lesbian family studies. We all know where that led...
Smile.
As long as a study and it's results was thoroughly peer-reviewed, why would it matter who conducted the study?

When studying what criteria is used in a study, and examining the final outcome, it's not hard to figure out if that study was correct or not.

That's why there IS a peer-review process.

For instance the Regnerus study failed on many points. Can you show where the study you mention failed?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180005
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

7

Time wrote:
<quoted text>
As long as a study and it's results was thoroughly peer-reviewed, why would it matter who conducted the study?
When studying what criteria is used in a study, and examining the final outcome, it's not hard to figure out if that study was correct or not.
That's why there IS a peer-review process.
For instance the Regnerus study failed on many points. Can you show where the study you mention failed?
The Regnerus study was challenged and found to be the largest, most scientific study to date.

The study I noted was disqualified by peer review, not just for a small and selective study group with no comparisons, but with extremely dubious information collecting methods.

Here is a challenge; Find me a study that lists it's study methods and challenges the Regnerus findings.

Smile.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180006
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Hardly equal to urinals and tampon dispensers... By the way, have you ever seen one used in the men's room (for babies).
Basically, you are defending brainless equality. Think about it...
Smile.
He's rushing to the defense of his hero the great Rose_NoHo!

Even if she says something very stupid, JizzyBird will defend it. Being that he is so stupid himself.
Time

Broad Run, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180007
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The Regnerus study was challenged and found to be the largest, most scientific study to date.
T.......
I don't think you actually read the "challenges".

Again, opinion is not the same as fact, and smiling in condescension doesn't make it look any better.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180008
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Can you say Unisex bathrooms? Its my guess that you would not use one. A woman might discover your umm, shortcomings?
Happens to you, eh?
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180009
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Oh I see making off color remaks about a persons sexuality,whom you have never met is funny . Do you also enjoy sticking a firecracker up a frogs ass and the lighting the fuse funny? Tell me Frankie what else do you consider funny?
Does anyone know a good siding contractor? By good, I mean good skills, not a good ass!

The last thing I want is some guy like Jizzybird58 coming over my house and flashing me hairy sweaty man-butt!
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180010
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
The topic is marriage, not ad hominem insults.
Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Reply
Jazybird will never understand what you are saying, don't bother trying. He's "stuck on stupid"!
Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
No, I was in the Navy. That jackass Big D was a coastie. That's the only thing he's got going for him.
Frankie RIzzo
Union City, CA
Great argument fruitcake! Even dopier ad homonym than Mona Lott. But that's all you've got, so you go with it, I understand.
Hey Frankie, can you just see the Hypocracy, in your posts?
You see, Fruitcake, every time I try and discuss marriage, iceholes like you get upset and start with the dumb ad hominem.

So I join in! What else can I do when I'm being shouted down with stupidity by stupid people? Drop down to your level. It's the only thing you understand.
Frankie RIzzo

Union City, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180011
Feb 16, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you check the sources, you will find most are rooted in a Homophobic historian who has been discredited by his peers and even other heterosexuals.
Weak.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 157,021 - 157,040 of200,214
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

5 Users are viewing the Redwood City Forum right now

Search the Redwood City Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 34 min RiccardoFire 7,816
CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10) 3 hr Oldies news stand 4,852
CA Jury reaches verdict in Oakland BART shooting t... (Jul '10) 6 hr Oldies news stand 2,223
Girl Scouts Find Baby Bobcat in Need of Medical... 12 hr smeer 1
Another Mountain Lion Spotted Near San Mateo 15 hr Netlord 1
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 21 hr This topics peaked 15,911
sex Thu Smeer 1
•••
•••

Redwood City News Video

•••
•••

Redwood City Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Redwood City People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Redwood City News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Redwood City
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••